Thursday, July 10, 2025
Home Blog Page 168

Movie Review (LFF): ‘Herself’ is an Emotional Drama Strengthened by Stellar Performances


Director: Phyllida Lloyd
Writer: Malcolm Campbell, Clare Dunne
Stars: Clare Dunne, Harriet Walter, Conleth Hill

Synopsis: Young mother Sandra escapes her abusive husband and fights back against a broken housing system. She sets out to build her own home and in the process rebuilds her life and rediscovers herself.

[/info]

Irish cinema has grown from strength to strength over the last few years, and the wealth of talented filmmakers and actors coming from the country is making it hard to ignore. In the last few years, films such as Brooklyn, Sing Street, and Once have captured the hearts and imagination of audiences all over the world, with the latter even winning the Academy Award for Best Original Song. With Herself comes another Irish drama that is filled with a lot of heart as well as a wealth of fantastic performances.

The story centers around Sandra (Claire Dunne) who flees from her abusive husband Gary (Ian Lloyd Anderson) and seeks to find a better and safer life for her two daughters. Frustrated by the housing system, she comes up with the idea of building her own home, seeking out a blueprint, a list of materials, and a budget of €35,000. Along this difficult journey, Sandra receives help from many, including Peggy (Harriet Walter), a woman who her mother used to clean for and offers to use the space in her garden to build the house, and Aido (Conleth Hill) who she first meets standing up for her at a DIY shop.

The strongest aspect of Herself is the fantastic ensemble performances and the relationships that Sandra has with them. Irish stage actor Dunne is undeniably excellent in the leading role, who shows the vulnerability of Sandra while also showing her tough, never-say-die attitude. It’s a performance reminiscent of Brie Larson’s Oscar-winning role in Room in the way she portrays multiple layers on the back of an abusive relationship. Hill is unrecognizable from his days as Lord Varys in Game of Thrones and is a welcome breath of fresh air to the film after an uncomfortable start. Walter is no doubt the MVP however, a tough no-nonsense thinker who protects and comforts Sandra throughout the film in a way we wish we could as the audience. Her calm and graceful performance carries the film through its darkest moments and will be marked down as another stellar performance from a veteran of the screen.

Phyllida Lloyd’s direction is assured and confident, handling the film’s most delicate moments with enough care to allow us as the audience to become invested. The first few minutes are extremely tough to sit through, but understandably important to give insight into Sandra’s abusive past and to demonstrate the difficulties she’s been through. These moments crop up throughout the film and often lead to jarring changes of tone, especially when reliving past experiences.

There’s also a feeling of heightened reality throughout, which can distract from the gritty realism of some of the film’s emotional scenes involving Sandra not wanting to send her daughters back to Gary to visit. How quickly and efficiently the house comes together feels rushed, especially given the lack of experience of some involved.

The screenplay is another of the film’s strongest aspects, with the screenplay from Malcolm Campbell and leading lady Claire Dunne filled with engaging dialogue and intriguing plot points. It’s clear watching with the knowledge that Dunne co-wrote the script just how much she gets the character of Sandra, from her mannerisms to the way she interacts with particular characters. Much like Lloyd’s direction, the script is delicate and handles a tough subject matter extremely well, even if the tone from scene to scene feels uneven. It also struggles to demonstrate the passing of time occasionally, however, it’s easy to become swept into the emotion of particular scenes that this isn’t much of an issue.

The film’s soundtrack is great by itself but sometimes feels out of place and a distraction considering the tone of the rest of the film. While The Killers’ Run for Cover works very well, there are other instances of pop songs playing over particular action sequences that don’t quite fit.

The ending catches you off-guard, a bittersweet conclusion that is both satisfying and unsatisfying depending on which story thread you find yourself most invested in. The most important point though is that all loose ends are tied up, whether it be through what is seen on screen or what is explained through dialogue.

Overall, despite an occasionally uneven tone and distracting soundtrack, Herself works because of the strength of its ensemble and the heart it carries. Dunne will no doubt be offered future leading roles and is certainly an actress to keep an eye on, while Walter is worthy of citations come awards season, even if it’s some of the smaller ceremonies. Herself has a lot of heart and when focused on a character who’s been through so much but refuses to lie down and give up, it’s hard not to admire. Another solid selection by the London Film Festival and will help bring eyes to a potential new star.

Grade: B

Poll: What is the best performance of the 21st century NOT nominated for an Oscar?

After choosing to review Lars Von Trier’s Dancer in the Dark on Episode 399, in honor of its 20th anniversary, it got us thinking about Björk’s Cannes-winning performance and how it got no recognition by the Academy. And unfortunately, she is far from alone. Since the year 2000 there have been hundreds of acting snubs at the Oscars, in both the leading and supporting categories, and we thought this would be the perfect opportunity to highlight not just the best snubs, but some of the best performances of the century period. Get ready for a doozy of a poll, as there was no holding back.

With that out of the way, what is the best performance of the 21st century NOT nominated for an Oscar?


Op-ed: Ain’t Baseball Great?

“You can’t sit on a lead and run a few plays into the line and just kill the clock. You’ve got to throw the ball over the damn plate and give the other man his chance. That’s why baseball is the greatest game of them all.” – Earl Weaver

I love football. No, you didn’t read the title wrong–this is an article about baseball films. No–I’m not trying to be cute and yell “touchdown!” when someone hits a homerun–so hear me out, because I promise I’m going somewhere with this. I am a huge Baltimore Ravens fan and have been extremely loyal to them for 20 years. I have season tickets and almost never miss attending a home game (only two in those 20 seasons). I was willing to spend whatever money I needed to so I could be at Super Bowl XLVII, and I did it–I was there when the confetti fell. I love football, and the Super Bowl was an amazing, once in a lifetime experience that I would not trade for the world. I will never forget it. That being said: I would sell my soul for a Baltimore Orioles World Series Championship in my lifetime. Baseball is my first love.

Like most American children, I grew up on baseball. Before the now popular sports like soccer and lacrosse took off, every American child was signed up for tee-ball every spring. That is when and how I fell in love with the sport. Of course, I transitioned to competitive fastpitch softball when my tee-ball days expired, but it all started with baseball. Every spring I look forward to Opening Day at Camden Yards, the best ballpark in baseball (this is not up for discussion). I get strange looks from most people when I say that I actually love to watch baseball, as most people find it boring. My most controversial sports opinions are that I do not think curling is a sport* and I believe playoff baseball is the most exciting round of playoff games. As the strangest year in sports (and the world?) somehow continues, I got to thinking about how much I love October baseball, but how weird this year has felt not being able to attend any game or event in person. This led me to reflect and rely on my favorite baseball films to get me excited.
*Curling is literally a coffee pot being thrown down an ice rink with brooms.

My top 5 baseball films and why:

5. The One About Being a Fan – Fever Pitch (2005)

Would I be an Orioles fan if I didn’t loathe the Boston Red Sox? While I’m at it–the Yankees suck, too. I think we can all agree on that. Is it possible to hate the Red Sox and love Fever Pitch? Absolutely. What makes this baseball film so great is that is centers around Ben (Jimmy Fallon) who is not just a Red Sox fan–but the definition of a fanatic. His life centers around the Boston Red Sox. He ranks the Red Sox more important than sex and breathing. There is a moment when Ben has an epiphany that perfectly sums up what life is like being a dedicated, loyal fan of any sport. Even if and when your team loses, they still somehow never let you down and that is what keeps people coming back. They are consistent: every season they are here and if a game gets canceled they make it up to you, Ben says, like a real family. That is what it’s like to be committed to your team even though losing seasons, hardships, and curses. Plus, I think Jimmy Fallon and Drew Barrymore have incredible chemistry overall throughout this narrative, and the craziness of the Red Sox actually defeating the “Curse of the Bambino” to close out the film will give you chills, even if you loathe the Red Sox as I do.

4. The One About Being the Underdogs – Major League (1989)

Most underdog stories in sports are tearjerkers, right? A heartfelt story with a character that faces adversity and then triumphs in an emotional way. That is definitely the opposite of what Major League is, and that is why I love it. This is not meant to be an inspiring, uplifting, emotional story. This is about the gritty washed up “has been and a couple of never will be’s” given an unexpected chance and barely scraping by, yet still coming out on top. The characters are gritty misfits and oddballs and yet still loveable. They are not only underdogs because they are not the best team on paper–but even their owner wants them to fail. She desires their failure so she can move the team out of its current home city, Cleveland, and to Miami instead. When this is discovered, it is what ends up rallying the team to come together and prove everyone wrong, especially their owner. The best part is the end of the film because it stays true to the gritty persona it has created over the course of the narrative. This game is a big game, an important one–but it’s not the World Series. They win, but not with a big, show-stopping walk-off homerun. No, the has-been catcher with bad knees legs out a bunt to score the winning run. It’s not pretty, but it works. Just like the characters and the story. Plus, there are many funny, memorable moments that just heightens the viewing experience.

3. The One about Childhood Nostalgia – The Sandlot (1993)

Every 4th of July just before the fireworks begin I say, “time for the only night game of the year!” to see if anyone knows what I am referencing. The real ones know. Of course, The Sandlot is the one that pulls at my childhood heartstrings. Remember the days when you would meet up with your friends and play outside until the sun went down and you only went home because you were hungry? I miss those days. This film is so great because this kid, who had no friends and no connections, made a life because of baseball, neighborhood backyard baseball at that. The entirety of the film just undeniably feels like summer. Yes, the premise of the narrative is silly–but that is what it is like to be a kid. The end-all-be-all was losing the one baseball in possession and then wanting to fit in so badly and save the day that you go a get your dad’s baseball signed by the most famous player of all time and then you lose that, too? Absolutely devastating and funny. When the narrative comes full circle, Benny “The Jet” Rodriguez making it as a professional ballplayer, and Scotty Smalls following him as an announcer it just warms my heart. It captures the full circle of falling in love with a sport as a child and it carrying you through your whole adult life.

2. The One about the Game – Moneyball (2011)

How can you not be romantic about baseball? Some teams make it about the players in contrast to making it about the game. The star athletes with well-known names are what draws crowds, fans, and put butts in seats, and the front office knows that. But what else puts butts in seats? Wins. It doesn’t matter who is hitting the ball and scoring the runs, as long as they’re doing it. That is where the value is even if it isn’t sexy. Moneyball displays this perfectly through the mastery of dialogue by an Aaron Sorkin script, and the profile of a man who truly loves the game. This story is about how this man, Billy Beane, portrayed by Brad Pitt in his most underrated roles, went against the odds and looked completely at the statistics and numbers. His obsession and superstitions are relatable and empathetic. The story becomes emotional although it is cold in many ways. The growth of friendship between Billy Beane and Peter (Jonah Hill) and their belief in the approach of creating a winning team is contagious–the audience believes in it, too. So when it happens and there is success, it is our win too.

1. The Best of All – A League of Their Own (1992)

The one about women playing baseball. Call me biased, however, I truly believe this is the definitive baseball film–the best of them all. A perfect combination of the all aforementioned qualities that make the other baseball films great, this has it all and more. This film is based on a true story with a rich history of the sport included, too. During the war, a lot of professional baseball players were pulled away from the sport, and the All-American Girls Professional Baseball League (AAGPBL) was created. Obviously, I resonated with this story so strongly because I know what it is like to be a woman athlete. I understand that women in sports are treated completely differently than men in sports, both amateur and professional.

I know this film by heart, front, and back, and I actually apologize to everyone I watch it with because I cannot help but recite so many lines as they are delivered. The most famous line, of course, is the one most people know delivered by none other than America’s film dad, Tom Hanks: “There’s no crying in baseball!” The beauty of A League of Their Own is the story-telling and direction by Penny Marshall. The film’s pace, starting in the future and telling the narrative through a flashback allows the audience to see the entirety of the experience, ending with the real-world reveal and induction of the AAGPBL into the Baseball Hall of Fame. Women playing softball, being recruited to play in this newly created baseball league. Action montages, hitting streaks, slumps, errors, getting traded to other teams. Women expected to be feminine and athletic, women struggling with love and loss of their partners at war, sibling and team rivalry, an emotional underdog triumph–this film really does have it all.

There are many films about baseball that deserve to be on a list for a good reason, but this list is mine. Honorable mentions go to Major League II (1994), 42 (2013), Rookie of the Year (1993), Hardball (2001), and The Rookie (2002). I could go on and on, like many other fans of the game and films. They say you never really get over your first love, and I am so glad baseball is mine.

Criterion Crunch Time: ‘Only Angels Have Wings’

Welcome to a new month of Criterion Crunch Time. It’s time to find four more movies leaving the Criterion Channel. One of the great things about this service is finally checking out those movies on your List of Shame. We’ve all got them, and many times they are much older films. This is not the place to get into the battle of streaming services, but let’s just say that Criterion Channel is one of the very few places you can stream movies made before 1980. And we are certainly starting this month well before the ’80s! Now on to one of the films on my personal list of shame, Only Angels Have Wings from way back in 1939.

Only Angels Have Wings, from widely acclaimed director Howard Hawks (Bringing Up Baby, Rio Bravo, and many others) focuses on the adventures of a mail freight company in a remote South American location. We are ushered here by the introduction of Bonnie Lee (Jean Arthur) being followed for her beauty off of a literal banana boat by pilots Joe (Noah Beery, Jr.) and Les (Allyn Joslyn). After some unfortunate mild racism (“I’m so grateful to hear something that doesn’t sound like pig Latin.”), we are treated to wonderfully balanced flirtation between the three and good-natured competition for her attention between Joe and Les. This is no easy task and shows the masterful direction from Hawks, as well as some underrated acting, particularly from Arthur. The character of Bonnie is actually a quite difficult one to play. She has to be bubbly and charming, open to flirtation without seeming like a sexpot, and moving forward in the film; be able to show true emotional range due to sudden loss. Arthur manages to cover all of this in the first half-hour, and even improves from there.

Only Angels Have Wings also expertly sets up high stakes, all while surrounded by the fun flirtation of the introduction. We quickly learn that these men often fly in conditions no sane pilot would because they would lose their contract if they did not. This directly leads to the death of Joe, who desperately wants to land, in order to take Bonnie Lee out for a nice steak dinner. It is heart-wrenching to hear the hope in his voice over the radio over finally making that landing, only to see him crash through trees next to the fogged over runway. Seeing the terror on Bonnie’s face as a counterpoint to the stone faces of the men on the ground is particularly affecting, and a shocking change in tone from everything leading up to that moment

Many older films fail for modern viewers because we may be spoiled when it comes to action and cinematography. But Only Angels Have Wings is a true exception here. The work of cinematographer Joseph Walker was honored with an Academy Award nomination and it is clear why even now. The numerous crash sequences are incredibly harrowing, regardless of when it was filmed. Although experienced viewers may be able to see exactly how he is pulling these tricks, the combination of his work and the tremendous performances absolutely are impactful and meaningful. Plus, the death of Joe in the first act sets up the idea that we have no idea who will survive as the runtime pushes on.

But we have gone far enough here without mentioning two of the more important actors in this film. Just before Joe’s death, we are introduced to Geoff (Cary Grant). Grant feels like a bit of a precursor to Bogart in Casablanca in this role, but with that quintessential Grant flair. Geoff runs the outpost and is gruff, to the point, and seemingly damaged beyond repair by the love of his life leaving him. As his relationship with Bonnie Lee changes from contentious (he refuses to mourn for Joe) to friendly and finally to out and out romantic, there is an utterly fantastic scene between the two wherein she digs for information about the infamous Judy. Although Geoff tries to avoid her questions by continuing to ask “who” whenever she gets a bit too close to the truth, Bonnie and the audience find out that she left him because his job is just too dangerous. This, of course, leads him to take on more and more dangerous jobs. This, other than Cary Grant being Cary Grant, is what ultimately makes him a likable character. Yes, he willingly sends young men to their possible deaths in the fog. But when things get too dangerous, he is the one that goes up himself.  But this began with talking about Judy, a character who I never thought would make an appearance. She is a powerful character even with her just being spoken about in hushed tones. But when she does finally appear, things certainly pick up emotionally.

Now, sometimes it feels as if we don’t have this much anymore (probably because the studio system is gone, for now), but old Hollywood was fantastic at making honest to god movie stars. When Rita Hayworth (in her first meaningful role, no less) steps onto the screen, that my friends is a movie star. It is not just her looks, and she is absolutely stunning. It is her presence, and also her willingness to play a surprising range in a limited amount of time on screen. A scene with an inebriated Judy slowly dealing with her relationship with Geoff immediately makes her a real person, and not just the woman who hurt one of the protagonists. Judy returns at just about the worst time for our lead romance, not only complicating things between them, but also bringing along her new flyboy husband, Bat MacPherson, who just happens to have done something terrible that makes him hated in the entire industry. If there is a weakness in the film, it is trying to imagine Bat and Judy together, especially in comparison to Cary Grant.

It should also be mentioned that Bat, hated for bailing out to save his own life while his mechanic died, has his own journey that is surprisingly effective. Having this arc also enables Geoff to move on from Judy and to focus on Bonnie. It is also admirable that Geoff never becomes a matinee idol type. Even when he is admitting his feelings for Bonnie, he uses a gambit that she only sees after he is out the door on another dangerous mission. The script, penned by Jules Furthman, allows him to both be in love and stay true to his independence and his own personal image of himself as a bit of a scoundrel. That moment when Bonnie realizes what he has done just endears her (and us!) to him even more.

As I look back on why I love Only Angels Have Wings, the word that keeps popping up is balance. Bonnie Lee’s romance and grief, Geoff’s gruff nature and charm, Bat MacPherson’s amazingly complete character arc, and even Judy’s attraction for flyboys and desperation to be safe. All of these precarious balancing acts work just about perfectly, and so does the movie. Only Angels Have Wings is also precarious, an action film, filled with romance. This split genre has been attempted numerous times and usually fails. Even the best seem, well, out of balance. In this film, the action is high wire and keeps you on the edge of your seat, but the romance keeps you wanting all of these men to arrive home safe, even when they can’t admit to themselves that they want it too.

Join us next week as we watch Albert Brooks’s Mother, one of his many movies leaving Criterion Channel at the end of this month.

List: Top 3 Aaron Sorkin Exchanges

This week on Episode 398 of the InSession Film Podcast, inspired by our review of The Trial of the Chicago 7, we discussed our Top 3 Aaron Sorkin exchanges in film. Sorkin holds a rare status in Hollywood in that his scripts often trump the director. It’s not always the case, but often his films are labeled as “Aaron Sorkin films” even if he didn’t direct them. His writing is so well crafted and historically resonate that it’s almost become legendary at this point. And much of it boils down to verbal exchanges between characters and the riveting drama that Sorkin brings to the page. That was the focus of our Top 3 this week and boy did it make for a challenging topic given the great dialogue he’s written over the last three decades. That said, here are our lists:

(Note: Please keep in mind that we each had different criteria for our selections)

JD

1) Opening Scene with Erica and Mark – The Social Network
2) John Scully Confronts Steve Jobs – Steve Jobs
3) Bench Scene with Molly and Larry – My Girl

Brendan

1) Opening Scene with Erica and Mark – The Social Network
2) Kafee and Jessep Lunch Scene – A Few Good Men
3) Congressman Wilson First Meets Gust Avrakotos – Charlie Wilson’s War

Rory

1) Opening Scene with Erica and Mark – The Social Network
2) Eduardo Confronts Mark at Facebook Offices – The Social Network
3) Kafee and Jessep “Crystal Clear” Moment – A Few Good Men

Honorable Mentions (Combined)

Steve and Daughter – Steve Jobs
Steve and Wozniak – Steve Jobs
Steve and Joanna Office Conversations – Steve Jobs
Opening Sequence – Steve Jobs
Pretty All of Philip Seymour Hoffman – Charlie Wilson’s War
Do I Have Your Full Attention – The Social Network
The Winklevii – The Social Network
Let Me Check Your Math – The Social Network
The Internet’s Not Written In Pencil – The Social Network
Winklevoss Twins and Larry Summers – The Social Network
Or, pretty much the whole script – The Social Network
Commander, Leave So We Can Talk Behind Your Back Moment – A Few Good Men
Don’t Ever Question My Orders – A Few Good Men
Good Call, Sam – A Few Good Men
This is What a Courtroom Looks Like – A Few Good Men
You Can’t Handle the Truth – A Few Good Men

Hopefully you guys enjoyed our lists and if you agree or disagree with us, let us know in the comment section below. A topic like this is cumbersome given the vast amount of great exchanges in Sorkin’s scripts and the lack of time to revisit all of them. However, the best will always stand out and we did our best to lay those out. However, that doesn’t mean your list will look like ours. So, what would be your Top 3? Leave a comment in the comment section or email us at [email protected].

For the entire podcast, click here or listen below.

For more lists done by the InSession Film crew and other guests, be sure see our Top 3 Movie Lists page.

The Video Nasty: A British Form Of Censorship

In the United States, the old Hays Code ended and the MPAA was born, giving out its ratings to indicate the type of content a film has and whether it’s acceptable for people under 17 to see. With the UK, they never had an exact rating system, but never had a system that prohibited certain films from getting released. No law was made to regulate movies and their content until the 1980s and concern for a certain film was not brought to the public’s attention until the 1970s. Slasher films became controversial for its graphic violence and, in an era now dominant by the conservatism of Margaret Thatcher, conservative pressure groups such as the National Viewers’ and Listeners’ Association (NVLA) pushed Parliament to amend obscenity laws to movies also.

The term “video nasty” came from controversial activist Mary Whitehouse, who led the NVLA and for years crusaded against TV shows that were showing subjects that were inappropriate to the general public. Her complaint was that the exposure of such films to children led to copycat behavior and the rise in violent crime. Successfully, public debate over the ‘nasties’ led to a bill called the Video Recordings Act of 1984. Here, the newly-named British Board of Film Classification had the job of certifying all cinema and video releases. While the effect was the keep such videos away from children’s hands, it ended up being sought out more by the public. It was illegal to have unclassified videos or give children movies that were under the minimum age as labeled.

A list of films was published and labeled under three different categories. First, there were the “prosecuted films,” where 39 films successfully banned by the original Obscene Publications Act; the majority of them were later re-cut and approved for release. These films could not be sold unless approved by the Board. Second, there was a list of films that were not banned or was failed to get banned per court, thus allowing the movie to be released with a warning label regarding explicit content. The third group were not obscene, but could still be seized by police and destroyed. It’s kind of like a misdemeanor to have this film or really there was no prosecution.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HUDTPw-eSVs

A number of notable works fell into these three categories, but almost all were these hardcore slasher films with grotesque violence that would fall under the NC-17 rating here. The notorious horror films Cannibal Holocaust, which faced legal matters in various countries due to its content (such as rumors the cast were actually killed), I Spit On Your Grave, and The Last House On The Left fell under the first category. The Boogeyman, The Evil Dead, and Possession fell under the second category. The last category featured Dawn of the Dead, Foxy Brown, Friday The 13th, Scanners, and The Texas Chainsaw Massacre. Although they were released prior to the new system, Straw Dogs and The Exorcist were initially subjected to scrutiny but was not listed among the three categories.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=teANBA860Ck

If you read this and were confused, so was I and others who felt that this went against free speech and complained that the new law was trying to regulate their private lives. Mary Whitehouse and her supporters would point to events such as the Hungerford Massacre, where a man went on a killing spree possibly influenced by the Rambo series, as legitimate to have such regulation. Some saw the classification of one group of films over another as a farce and too wrapped up in social conservatism that Thatcherism promoted. But by the late 1990s, the censorship was being relaxed after people got their heads out of their asses (and the Labour party was swept to power) and a number of films were finally released or re-rated.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ls4qGRneHZs

Today, the Video Recordings Act is still in law after being slightly amended, but it’s something you don’t hear anymore. The term “video nasty” is such an outdated complaint and far removed from the moral panic brought on by Mary Whitehouse (who died in 2001) and her group. But it was also such a British move to employ under the government of the 1980s. The 2010 documentary Video Nasties: Moral Panic, Censorship & Videotape was released covering the era, and its sequel, Draconian Days, was released in 2014. For now, both documentaries can be found here on YouTube. It is worth watching and learning how the British handled their business with the most shocking of movies made from everywhere and the ridiculousness of it by today’s standards.

Follow me on Twitter: @brian_cine (Cine-A-Man)

Podcast: The Trial of the Chicago 7 / Top 3 Aaron Sorkin Exchanges – Episode 398

This week’s episode is brought to you by Audible. Sign up today and get a free audiobook!

This week on the InSession Film Podcast, our very own Rory Doherty joins us to discuss Aaron Sorkin’s latest directorial effort in The Trial of the Chicago 7! We also talk about our Top 3 Sorkin exchanges in film as the banter between characters in his scripts are legendary by this point. JD and Brendan also offer up their thoughts on the Netflix documentary, The Social Dilemma.

Huge thanks to Rory for joining us this week on the show. He was a great guest and we loved talking Sorkin with him. You will also want to stay tuned for our first break segment as we make a big announcement regarding Episode 400.

On that note, check out this week’s show and let us know what you think in the comment section. Thanks for listening and for supporting the InSession Film Podcast!

– Movie Review: The Trial of the Chicago 7 (7:16)
Director: Aaron Sorkin
Writer: Aaron Sorkin
Stars: Eddie Redmayne, Mark Rylance, Sacha Baron Cohen

– Notes / The Social Dilemma / True History of the Kelly Gang / Stuntwomen: The Untold Hollywood Story (1:01:29)
This week for our discussion segment, as mentioned above, we announce our plans for Episode 400 as its quickly approaching. It’s going to be fun and hopefully seamless technically. We’ve never attempted what we are going to do, so fingers crossed it goes off without any issues. Either way, though, we are excited for it. Both JD and Brendan give their thoughts on the rather horrifying documentary The Social Dilemma, while JD also gives his thoughts on True History of the Kelly Gang and Stuntwomen: The Untold Hollywood Story.

[divider]

RELATED: Listen to Episode 387 of the InSession Film Podcast where we discussed Kelly Reichardt’s First Cow!

[divider]

Top 3 Aaron Sorkin Exchanges (1:32:18)
Aaron Sorkin holds a rare status in Hollywood in that his scripts often trump the director. It’s not always the case, but often his films are labeled as “Aaron Sorkin films” even if he didn’t direct them. His writing is so well crafted and historically resonate that it’s almost become legendary at this point. And much of it boils down to verbal exchanges between characters and the riveting drama that Sorkin brings to the page. That was the focus of our Top 3 this week and boy did it make for a challenging topic given the great dialogue he’s written over the last three decades. With that said, what would be your Top 3?

Show Sponsor: First Time Watchers Podcast

– Music

Blessed Be The Young Children – Flood
I Put a Spell on You – Jalacy “Screamin’ Jay” Hawkins
Revenge – Daniel Pemberton
The Return of the Eagle – Atli Örvarsson

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
InSession Film Podcast – Episode 398

[divider]

Next week on the show:

Main Review: Dancer in the Dark
Top 3: TBD

[divider]

Help Support The InSession Film Podcast

If you want to help support us, there are several ways you can help us and we’d absolutely appreciate it. Every penny goes directly back into supporting the show and we are truly honored and grateful. Thanks for your support and for listening to the InSession Film Podcast!

VISIT OUR DONATE PAGE HERE

Movie Review (LFF): ‘The Painter and The Thief’ is an Extraordinary Exploration of Obsession and Friendship


Director: Benjamin Ree

Synopsis: Czech artist Barbora Kysilkova develops an unlikely friendship with the man who stole two of her paintings.

[/info]

For a documentary feature to capture the imagination of audiences, it requires a story so bizarre that it’s hard to comprehend that it really did happen. This is exactly the best way to describe Benjamin Ree’s The Painter and The Thief, a brilliant and beautiful film that explores themes of obsession, change, and forgiveness while somehow covering every major perspective of those involved.

The documentary centers around two very different but complex personalities, one in the form of Czech artist Barbora Kysilkova and the other Norwegian criminal Karl Bertil-Nordland. After relocating to Norway, Kysilkova has some of her most valuable paintings stolen, with CCTV footage capturing the events. In an unlikely turn of events, she’s able to contact one of the thieves – Nordland – and from here a fascinating and unlikely friendship forms. The two begin to regularly meet up and Kysilkova even makes several incredible paintings of Nordland, as her fascination with him becomes a borderline obsession.

It’s jam-packed with twists and turns, so much so you’d be forgiven for thinking this wasn’t a documentary at all. It’s extremely engaging and unpredictable, with the events surrounding the two at the center of this story seems too unbelievable to be true. But that’s the beauty of the documentary – it is a true story, it is real, and the way director Benjamin Ree captures every heartfelt moment is extraordinary.

When thinking of the year’s best endings, The Painter and The Thief will be near the top of every list. It’s one final, beautiful twist that turns the documentary on its head and allows you to view particular characters – particularly Kysilkova – in a different light, especially her relationship with Nordland.

By far, the film’s strongest aspect is the fascinating characters, not just Nordland and Kysilkova, but the others involved in their life too. Early on in the documentary, we see the relationship between Nordland and his then-girlfriend, which culminates in a tragic, unexpected twist that changes his life forever. But this event is integral to furthering the relationship between Kysilkova and Nordland, especially in how the former ensures to be the most supportive person in his life.

The other fascinating relationship shown on screen is between Kysilkova and her partner Øystein, who finds himself frustrated and concerned about the growing bond between his partner and the man who turned her life upside down. Øystein knows his partner and her extremely tough past better than anybody and knows of the dangers when she becomes too close to the wrong people. Even though we as the viewer can see that Nordland is becoming a changed man, to Øystein he’s a criminal that his partner has become obsessed about, so it’s understandable and easy to sympathize with his feelings throughout.

While the film moves relatively seamlessly between characters, there are a couple of early clunky moments when particular moments are relived through both perspectives. The documentary works at its strongest when we see the moments between the two characters happen almost simultaneously, rather than exploring one POV at a time. This only happens early on – perhaps to help establish the characters and their background – so it’s not a big enough flaw to detract from the overall high quality of the documentary.

Norwegian filmmaker Benjamin Ree is emerging as one of the best International documentary creators around. He previously made the 2016 documentary Magnus, exploring the life of chess champion (and fantasy football cult hero) Magnus Carlsen, which played at a handful of film festivals around the world. With The Painter and The Thief, Ree’s reputation within the industry is sure to rocket sky-high. With Neon at the helm (who last year were behind Parasite’s Oscar success), there’s no denying its awards chances, especially in the documentary and International film categories. It would be a surprise not to see Ree at next year’s Academy Awards in some form, and this will surely be a critical darling in those aforementioned categories.

Praise must also be given to the score from Uno Helmersson which is terrific throughout without ever overbearing the dialogue and story on screen, while Robert Stengård’s editing is essential in creating such a seamless piece that allows the twists and turns to occur naturally and without force.

It’s already had previous success this year in January when picking up the prize for World Cinema Documentary Special Jury Award for Creative Storytelling at Sundance, and it will be no surprise if it also wins similar acclaim at this year’s London Film Festival.

Overall, The Painter and The Thief is a masterful exploration of obsession, the ability to forgive, and the journey it takes for somebody to turn their life around. It’s a satisfying story full of twists and features one of the most memorable closing shots of the last few years. Expect this to be a title that is mentioned frequently throughout awards season, and is surely a must-watch for anybody who is fascinated by extraordinary true stories.

Grade: A-

[divider]

 

Shorts Review (Fantastic Fest): ‘Fantastic Shorts’ Nails the Fantastic Feeling

We are trapped. In the year 2020, or when we assume that we would have 20/20 vision on things, we are forced to march through life blindfolded as COVID-19 dismantles and shreds pursuits and to-dos. If you’ve been an outdoors soul, hopefully you’ve been learning to love indoors. If you’ve been pro-indoors, may the walls haven’t wised up and caved in. Any semblance of normalcy is catnip, and that is what this year’s Fantastic Fest is by keeping its lights on — by going all-virtual. Thank the organizers for that sliver of freedom, or the reminder that freedom is around the bend.

That might also be the theme of the seven shorts in Fantastic Shorts, one of this year’s FF’s four shorts blocks. We’ll leave the programmers to answer this, though. Compiled into a two-hour showcase, all the titles impress in the technical department — even for purely comical purposes — and some among them also feature narratives that elevate them further. In this feature-barren and premiere-light rendition of FF, Fantastic Shorts is a genuine blessing. Or simply a new experience that (at last) has your attention. Either way: entrapment, meets freedom.

[divider]

As the opening short, Blocks, directed and written by Bridget Moloney, suggests, our lead Ashleigh (Claire Coffee) has always been the wife to her husband Eric (Mark Webber) and the mother to her kids Wren and Gus (Phoebe Sinclair and George Sinclair). No power plays or burdens here — just responsibilities — but all the same she can’t reserve some hours of the day for herself. One morning, Ashleigh’s body, as if saying “enough is enough,” has her coughing up LEGO blocks, an act that initially evokes the bizarre but ultimately assembles into a considerate message. Composer Ariel Marx aligns her notes with that progress, starting out all Twilight Zone-esque but gradually rounds it out with relatability. Much of the short’s effectiveness also relies on Coffee’s performance; the expressiveness there is the best anchor that Moloney possesses. [B+]

 

I Love Your Guts, directed and written by David Janove, moves the setting away from the home to a burger joint, but it’s the late-night shift (with a dangerous drunk on the way) and one of our leads is in an unrequited-love situation. Kristina (Allie McCarthy) adores her colleague Jacqui (Danielle Kay) — a lot — and still keeps that adoration to herself. In a way, the fries are fine as is, and it is akin to spraying the double-edged ketchup on top she is to declare her love. McCarthy and Kay boast the charm and cadence that make them cousins of Booksmart’s Kaitlyn Dever and Beanie Feldstein, or at the least regular contacts. Although the editing from Cara Bomar and Jordan Towles slightly falters during the action-heavy climax — it seems to be a beat behind the action — it’s a negligible flaw. A testament to the strength in the serves of our leads and d.p. Aser Santos Jr. (who stretches the confining kitchen with a couple of commendable long takes). [B]

 

The notion of restriction becomes most extreme in Solution for Sadness (orig. Solució per a la tristeza) as it centers on a gorilla mask that, upon wearing, will hide teary eyes and downward brows and the like — for good. Tuixén (Tuixén Benet, who also directed and co-wrote the short with Marc Martínez Jordán) learns about it first-hand after admitting to the universe — through narration to viewers — that she’d get the gold “if crying was an Olympic sport,” and her search for the mask’s origins will have her face a secret society plus an inconvenient truth (that 2020 has been showing us every month since March). It’s tough to assess the acting since key players all wear masks, but Benet has translated her performance into other components of the short, chiefly its deceptively comedic plot. Even with the reliance on exposition and technicals befitting a made-over-the-weekend production, this short is no student film. It only behaves like one, and it actually has something to say — or a gift to give — at the close. A surprisingly introspective trip, this one, as a journey out of a dark place tends to be. [B]

 

As if an amalgam of past shorts, thematically, Jack and Jo Don’t Want to Die has Jack (Justin Kirk, effectively deadpan) looking to commit suicide on his last shift; just one bullet will launch both the pain of the routine and an unreturned love out of his system. Jo (Olivia Edward) also has life issues of her own, which are revealed to us when Jack gets her out of a suspension chamber. Yes, you read that right —  this short, directed and written by Kantu Lentz, is of the low-key sci-fi type and stylistically the most cinematic. But it’s not just all polish here, which allows its “Coens meets Niccol” aesthetics to shine, as Jack and Jo also has a beating heart. Look to its title, then watch the entire thing. Reconnecting with the world won’t be easy, but at the same time it isn’t as difficult as one would think— especially when you hold on long enough for a common spark, however minor, to come along. [B+]

 

Still, for some cultures, the wait will be longer — if not more of a dream. “They are hunting. Fix your scarf,” whispered a woman to our lead Shima (Mohadeseh Kharaman), starting off director-writer Farbod Ardebili’s Forbidden to See Us Scream in Tehran with palpable tension. “They” is a reference to the morality police, which to be specific are old men in plainclothes. As long as Shima is “law-abiding,” she doesn’t have to tell the world that she is — are you sitting down? — the frontwoman of a death metal band. Ardebili’s short walks on a beautiful foundation, a spin on the need to express oneself in a culture where expression is limited. That is why whenever Shima raises her voice, either to protect her deaf-mute sister Sherin (Sarina Amiri) or to put to bed a wild plan to go viral (and have a future) by drummer Farzad (Babak Kamangir), Kharaman’s performance will stir your soul. Despite the suspenseful beginning, the short doesn’t aim to be harrowing. Instead, it’s full of hope, but it understands that at times hope can be in the background or reserved for one character. A short film with layers. Sorry, let’s do this right: A SHORT FILM WITH LAYERS! WOW! [A]

 

Not one to dial back the distress, though, is Please Hold from K.D. Dávila. The U.S. in this production is a dystopia realized as all you have to do for a police drone to swoop down and arrest you is to walk to work while munching on a banana. This is what happened to young Mateo Tores (Erick Lopez). As to what his charges are? Who knows — there’s no one in the prison to listen to your queries except for the constant muzak and a most-irksome virtual public defender. In visualizing the story Dávila co-wrote with Levin Meneske, Dávila makes a short that is as darkly funny as it is scarily feasible, rightfully critical and, above all that, full of compassion. Lopez stops short of completing his character’s emotional shifts in the short’s final minutes — or that Dávila misses the chance to insert some potentially lasting close-ups — but the careful cinematography and audio do more than enough to compensate. And much like Forbidden…, the short looks at “freedom” through lens tinted in shades of gray, which is both more realistic and in line with the narrative (of a system with the heartlessness so normalized it now has no shame being a governmental moneymaker). [A-]

 

Not only does (You’ll Make It In) Florida, directed, written, edited and scored by Phil Chernyak, give the shorts program’s possible motif of “freedom is possible” the most vivid treatment, it also replaces Florida’s reputation as the producer of weird news to a desirable change of scenery. While browsing through a magazine, exhausted teacher Pam (Emily Cass McDonnell, channeling SNL’s Debbie Downer) comes across an ad highlighting how much sunshine the Sunshine State has, which promptly comes alive as a retro ride with a cheery Guide (Danny Burstein, relishing in hamming things up). With neon fonts, projected backgrounds, foggy lighting, miniatures and more, this short is first and foremost a technical showcase — and a smooth swing from life drama to motivational musical! — despite having a meaningful plot. This is the weakest title out of the seven in Fantastic Shorts, but a downright perfect closer: It allows most of us to temporarily escape our homes and reminds us that the Grand Gift called traveling is waiting for us after all this madness. [B-]

Movie Review: ‘The Boys in the Band” Still Rings True in 2020


Director: Joe Mantello
Writer: Mart Crowley, Ned Martel
Stars: Jim Parsons, Zachary Quinto, Matt Bomer, Andrew Rannells, Charlie Carver

Synopsis: A group of gay friends reunites to celebrate one of their birthdays at an apartment on the Upper East Side of Manhattan. When the host’s potentially closeted college roommate shows up uninvited, the evening is thrown into turmoil. [/info]

A group of men gathers together in a New York apartment to celebrate the birthday of a friend. Mayhem ensues. Over the course of the party, these friends will relive past love, regret, and come to terms with their inner demons. The Boys in the Band, directed by Joe Mantello, is now available on Netflix. It is the film version of the revival of the play by the same name, written by Mart Crowley. The revival took place on Broadway on the 50th anniversary of its original premiere in 2018. The cast of the 2018 production is reviving the roles for this film: Jim Parsons, Zachary Quinto, Andrew Rannells, and Brian Hutchison.

The setting is announced in the immediate opening of the film: New York City, 1968. The opening credits immediately establish the style and personality of each character by giving quick clips of each character at work, walking around the city, and living life. We are introduced to Michael (Parsons), and learn that he is getting ready to host a birthday party for his friend Harold (Quinto). But this party won’t go quite as planned. Michael’s guests are all gay, and his party preparations are disrupted by his college roommate, Harold, who calls to let Michael know he is in New York City, and desperate to talk to him. We see Michael panic because unlike the party guests he is expecting, Harold is straight, with a wife and two daughters in Washington DC. Harold will continue to disrupt the evening, bringing with him a sense of doom every time he appears onscreen. The party begins with laughter and dancing and ends with most characters ending up with a better look at who they are once their deeply rooted fear, anger, and bitterness are exposed.

I admit I went into this film with a total bias. I have seen the original William Friedkin film from 1970. I own a copy of the original play and have read it several times. This play was very important when it came out because it reflects where gay culture was in 1968. It showed mainstream audiences a look at the life of men who lived their lives very much in secret. It showed the stereotypical flamboyant gay man with the character of Emory (played in this version by Robin de Jesus). It portrays a couple, one of whom is still technically married with two children. These men appear to understand who they are, and how they want to live their lives. In 2020, is it still relevant? Gays are allowed to get married now, able to serve in the military and adopt children. This updated version has come out the same year the Supreme Court decided that gays can no longer lose their jobs based on their sexuality. Even as I write this, there is an open position on the SCOTUS that might go to an extremely conservative judge. Despite gains made by the LGBT community, we still live in a country where people often have to hide who they are in order to live in peace.

This movie completely lived up to my high expectations. It was stylish, with great costumes, catchy music, and phenomenal acting. The supporting cast is excellent, from Andrew Rannells and Tuk Watkins playing a couple that is so relatable to so many of us, to Quinto, who shines as a self-conscious and embittered man, who is so terrified of his appearance he always shows up late to any occasion. Brian Hutchison is excellent as the tormented, possibly in-the-closet Alan. You see his internal conflicts playing across his face throughout the entire film. It is Parsons, as Michael, however, who is the true standout. He is another character who is uncomfortable in his own skin, with bitter memories and unsure of his place in the world. His seething anger towards Alan is clear from the moment they first speak on the phone. Alan is different from his other friends. You see the anguish on Michael’s face when Alan calls him at the start of the film, and that clearly, there is a history between these two men. When Michael does finally explode, it is well expected. We, the audience, have been watching the pressure build throughout the course of the film.

Please watch The Boys in the Band on Netflix. Although it takes place in 1968 and might appear dated at times (some of the verbal expressions, the fashion, etc) it still is truly relevant today. Not simply because of the theme of homosexuality, but a reminder to us all of what life is like when you are really never comfortable in your place in the world, let alone in your own skin.

Overall Grade: A

[divider]

 

Movie Review (NYFF): ‘The Woman Who Ran’ is an Appreciation of the Peacefulness in Female Interactions


Director: Hong Sangsoo
Writer: Hong Sangsoo
Stars: Kim Minhee, Seo Younghwa, Song Seonmi, Kim Saebyuk, Lee Eunmi, Kwon Haehyo, Shin Seokho, Ha Seongguk

Synopsis: While her husband is on a business trip, Gamhee meets three of her friends. She visits the first two at their homes, and she runs into the third by chance at a movie theater. While they have a friendly conversation, as always, several currents flow independently above and below the surface of the sea.

[/info]

There is something thoroughly enjoyable about the women-led film The Woman Who Ran. It may be its peaceful interactions between all the women in the movie – regardless of the context of their encounters. Or the evident disregard that the director/writer/editor/composer of the movie, Hong Sangsoo, has for the few men that appear on screen – who always appear with their backs to the camera. Or even the fact that the film is one of those where “nothing really happens”, but the smoothness in its content and its serenity provide a simple narrative one can easily relate to. These characteristics make The Woman Who Ran a distinguished entry in the selection of this year’s NYFF.

The secret weapon of the story is that it lingers in your mind once the credits stop rolling. The mere tranquility of the scenes and the tenderness of the women prove an ideal antidote to the craziness of these days. The movie follows Gamhee (director’s muse Kim Minhee) as she visits a couple of girlfriends for casual dinners, taking advantage of her free weekend while her husband is away on a business trip.

Soon it is evident that Hong Sangsoo is interested in portraying the normal state – a constant feature in his filmography – of the women’s existence through invigorating conversations, personal confessions, and overdue apologies. Everyone is comfortable with one another, just enjoying the company and exchanging ideas, and even when the situations become difficult, there is a palpable tenderness and maturity in the dialogues.

These gatherings take place in apartments, hallways, coffee shops, and movie theatres, showing the ordinary and calm state of the city of Seoul. Gamhee’s first visit is Youngsoon (Seo Younghwa) a recent divorcée that is adjusting to her new liberty and who shares an apartment with Youngji (Lee Eunmi).

The conversation between these friends soon diverts to recurring topics in the movie: the peculiarities of marriage and the toxicity of men. For example, Gamhee repeatedly explains that this is the first time she and her husband are apart after five years of marriage. Gamhee tells this piece of trivia to everyone she meets – who have incredulous reactions – working as the main piece of evidence in the theory that no matter the company, conversations tend to become repetitive and circular.

In addition, a little story narrated by Youngji sets the gender perspective: she tells them about a rooster that keeps biting the chickens’ necks only to show off and prove his strength. This results in the chickens having no fur in the back of their necks. Whether through this story or the few times they appear in the film, men are the source of discomfort and confrontation, although they are always deliciously dismissed by the women in the story.

Garmhee later visits Suyoung (Song Seonmi), a free-spirited woman who is focused on saving money, teaching Pilates, and exploring her new neighborhood. Her modern view on life and her keenness to explore an artistic way of life brings a completely different style and conversation from the one we witnessed before.

Lastly, Garmhee has a surprise encounter with an old acquaintance that wronged her in the past. Through this unexpected interaction – maybe the most interesting of them all – we get to learn more about our protagonist through past heartbreak and present contentedness. Woojin (Kim Saebyuk) is the most tragic character of them, having to deal with an obnoxious and self-centered husband that she now sees as shallow and off-putting. Precisely this chance meeting is the one that works as the perfect moment of catharsis for Garmhee, proving that losing may be the best victory when assessed from a distance.

The Woman Who Ran is a pleasurable glimpse into the life of a normal woman in Korea. Hong Sangsoo provides a sensible story about women where peace and equilibrium are the rules, but that is constantly interrupted by the appearance of unwanted men. The movie is simple and nondramatic, but this does not mean that the story is not complex or surrounded by tough issues. It is just that in this world of women, everything is treated with care and sensibility.

Grade: A

[divider]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pyfor89dB-w

 

 

Movie Review (LFF): ‘Mogul Mowgli’ is a Complex, Emotionally Compelling Passion Project


Director: Bassam Tariq
Writer: Bassam Tariq, Riz Ahmed
Stars: Riz Ahmed, Alyy Khan, Sudha Bhuchar, Nabhaan Rizwan

Synopsis: On the brink of his first international tour, Zed, a British Pakistani rapper, decides to fly home to the UK to visit the family he has not seen in two years. While trying to reconnect with his parents, he is suddenly struck down by an autoimmune disease.

[/info]

Passion projects are usually hit and miss, but with Riz Ahmed’s latest film, Mogul Mowgli, I can’t remember when I last saw a project made with this much passion.

Ahmed co-penned the screenplay with director Bassam Tariq about a British-Pakistani rapper named Zed (Ahmed), who’s about to make it big before he’s forced to return home to the family and culture that he’s been quietly ostracizing for several years. It’s then that his health takes a drastic turn, and he’s diagnosed with a chronic muscle-related autoimmune condition. Opting for an experimental, chemo-like treatment in the hopes of making his upcoming tour, Zed fights to regain his strength while fighting a looming crisis of identity and has to confront how he’s been trying to remove himself from his family’s life. Identity and disability come crashing together for Zed in a movie rich with pain, shame, and transgenerational trauma.

Ahmed’s performance is potentially his best yet. During the opening moments, after we filter through the noise of a moving train and unfocused falling ash, a memory that holds significance that neither Zed nor the audience fully understands, he is seen backstage of a gig, performing his rap in a quiet, breathless voice. He then explodes onto the stage, accompanied by the beats of his music and the screams of an enraptured crowd. This characterizes Ahmed’s performance in the film – being able to maneuver with ease between the smaller, more vulnerable moments driven by an internal intensity, and when the script calls for him to be more expressive and commanding. When he raps in bed while waiting for sleep, it’s with the same edge in his voice that you heard when he was shouting into a microphone. This is how he most genuinely and honestly communicates. 

Because this is so well established, it feels all the more debilitating when Zed’s ability to perform is stripped away from him. Zed’s illness is captured with uncomfortable, intrusive shots of Ahmed, whose physicality communicates the struggles Zed is having to assert control over his own body. When Zed attempts to relearn how to walk, Tariq cuts to his unsure feet, making clumsy steps. These insert shots feel disconnected from the rest of his body, further insisting on Zed’s disorientation and lack of bodily autonomy. 

More than just losing control over his body, Zed’s mind starts unwinding as well. He finds himself lost in hallucinations, parties getting disorderly, the crowd of a rap battle turning against him, even imagining the displacement of Pakistanis that his family went through decades before he was born. In all three cases, Zed feels lost and powerless, and we clearly understand his fear of being overwhelmed. It’s an effective collaboration between Ahmed and Bassam; not only does their script clearly dramatize the internal struggles of Zed’s illness, but they creatively find ways to make the audience feel his panic and pain.

More than just being a physical ailment, Zed’s illness mirrors his own crisis of identity. It’s clear that Zed wants to separate himself from his Pakistani roots, and returning home is deeply uncomfortable for him. When he returns to his parent’s house, you get the feeling that looking through old family photos is less nostalgic and more of a chore. In addition, he is repeatedly confronted with his severance from his culture and religion, further alienating him in his own home environment. As a doctor tells Zed about his condition, “Your body can’t recognize itself, so it’s attacking itself.” His inability, or refusal, to engage with his cultural history is bit by bit destroying him. His illness as a metaphor is not particularly subtle, but it is effective, making his condition feel even more personally damaging.

For these reasons, Mogul Mowgli can be a trying watch. Scenes drag you down to Zed’s emotional and physical rock bottom, and it can be exhausting watching all the possible escapes from Zed’s hell be snuffed out one by one. Outside of Zed’s journey, we get a little glimpse of other characters or storylines, and therefore there are few distractions from his torment. It’s a film with a singular focus, but it goes about it in an inventive way, and it’s obvious to see why Ahmed invested so much effort into this worthy project.

Grade: B+

[divider]

 

Movie Review (NYFF): ‘Red, White and Blue’ is an Unsatisfying, Incomplete Character Study


Director: Steve McQueen
Writer: Steve McQueen, Courttia Newland,
Stars: John Boyega, Steve Toussaint, Tyrone Huntley, Nathan Vidal, Jaden Oshenye, Antonia Thomas, Callum Callaghan, Assad Zaman

Synopsis: Part of Steve McQueen’s “Small Axe”, an anthology of decades-spanning films that presents various lives in London’s West Indian community. Red, White, and Blue tells the true story of Leroy Logan, a young forensic scientist with a yearning to do more than his solitary laboratory work. Soon, he applies to become a police officer.

[/info]

Steve McQueen has presented two films that have conveyed the complexity of being a Black person in the United Kingdom during the 1960s – 1980s. These movies have proven to be realistic and eye-opening. However, once we get to Red, White and Blue, his final film selected for the New York Film Festival, the feeling of mastery is subdued by the results.

Red, White and Blue presents the real story of Leroy Logan, brought to life by a fierce and determined John Boyega that reminds us of a young Denzel Washington. Logan is a forensic scientist that is getting tired of being in the shadows and in isolation because of his work in a laboratory. He and his sister were brought up by a strict father (Steve Toussaint) who always demanded excellence and pride.

Precisely the relationship between father and son is the one that suffers the most once Leroy starts his career as a policeman, a decision that overlaps with an altercation between his father and the local police. While one chooses to join the ranks of the “enemy”, the other is determined to get his day on court and face the men that did him wrong. Unfortunately, once we start focusing more on Leroy’s career, we get less time with his father and with his mission to find any resemblance of justice.

However, Leroy’s intentions are in the right place. He says that he wants to change the organization from within, take out the rubbish, and serve the community as best as possible. These objectives, as wonderful as they sound, prove to be extremely ambitious for Leroy to conquer and for the movie to show. Alas, we only focus on him for several months, and his mission, if successful, would take years.

As with the previous Small Axe movies – Mangrove and Lovers Rock –  Red, White and Blue cannot escape a critical eye that takes into consideration today’s events regarding the Black Lives Matter movement and the police brutality against Black people. As such, the story of a man that decides to become a policeman to make improvements from within feels a little too enthusiastic and naïve for the 1980s and today.

Although based on true events, the story does not convey a feeling of success and change. Instead, it shows the complex relationship between Leroy and the police department. We never get to see the way he changes the organization; we only see the emotional turmoil he goes through and several instances of discrimination and racism. The movie covers a noticeably short span of time; maybe a miniseries about the character would have been a better idea.

The idealistic message of Leroy starts to get messy and unfocused in 78 minutes that feel insufficient. Sometimes the movie even makes us wonder who is using who. Is he changing the organization or is he being used by it because of his good disposition? It only seems that he is helping to improve the image of a racist and malign institution.

I am uncertain what the message of the story is supposed to be. Even the real Leroy confirmed in 2013 that the police force was still institutionally racist, after thirty years as a police officer. Consequently, the movie does not work as a success story, but instead it is an effective reminder of the blatant racism that exists in institutions that shape the lives of people. It also allows us to admire the decisions of Leroy and to appreciate his commitment to his community. That is all.

The technical parts of the movie are extraordinary. The production design by Helen Scott and the costume design by Sinéad Kidao are effective and an enjoyable link to the past. The soundtrack, which contains its healthy dose of Al Green, is maybe the secret weapon of the movie, even though it is restrained in the second part of the film.

Red, White and Blue feels like unfinished business. As if McQueen and his co-writer, Courttia Newland, were preparing themselves for the next stage of the story where Leroy Logan fulfills his professional and moral objectives. Unfortunately, we do not get to see this. We only see the racism within the police department, the rejection by the local community, and the ideals that exist in his head but never come to fruition. Thus, the movie feels incomplete and rudely interrupted showing a story of conflict and excruciating idealism, only digestible because of John Boyega’s commitment to his character.

Grade: B-

[divider]

 

Podcast: The Social Network/ On the Rocks – Extra Film

On this week’s Extra Film, Ryan and Jay continue their David Fincher Movie Series with The Social Network, and then they review the latest from Sofia Coppola, On the Rocks.

Following their discussion The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, the Extra Film boys head into one of the most popular films they’ve ever reviewed on the show, The Social Network. Marred as one of the best films of the 2010s, The Social Network has an all-time script from Sorkin and top-notch direction from Fincher. Match it with a stellar cast, the film has defined a generation and the social media company they’ve grown up with. In what might be their best episode of the Fincher series yet, the dive deep into The Social Network, and leave no stone unturned.

After that, the boys turn to Sofia Coppola’s On the Rocks. Known as one of the most unique directors working today, this is the first time the guys have been able to explore a film from Coppola. Her reteaming with actor Bill Murray, plus setting the film in New York City, makes for her most personal film since Lost in Translation. Without getting into spoilers, Ryan and Jay really do their best to let you know just how much they loved this film and wish Coppola will do more efforts like this going forward.

Thanks for listening!

– Movie Review: The Social Network (3:50)
Director: David Fincher
Screenplay: Aaron Sorkin
Stars: Jesse Eisenberg, Andrew Garfield, Justin Timberlake, Armie Hammer, Rooney Mara

– Movie Review: On the Rocks (1:06:32)
Directors: Sofia Coppola
Screenplay: Sofia Coppola
Stars: Bill Murray, Rashida Jones, Marlon Wayans

– Music

Trent Reznor, Atticus Ross – Hand Covers Bruise
Phoenix – Identical
The Return of the Eagle – Atli Örvarsson

We try to make this the best movie podcast we possibly can and we hope you enjoy them. Subscribe today on iTunes, Spotify or Stitcher, and please leave us a review on iTunes. You can also find us on Soundcloud, PlayerFM, and TuneIn Radio as well. We really appreciate all your support of the InSession Film Podcast.

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
The Social Network/ On the Rocks – Extra Film

Mobile App

To hear this Extra Film episode and everything else we do, download our apps on the Amazon Market for Android and the Podcast Box app on IOS devices. The mobile app covers all of our main shows, bonus podcast’s and everything else relating to the InSession Film Podcast. Thanks for your wonderful support and for listening to our show. It means the world to us!

Movie Review: ‘Dick Johnson Is Dead’ Gorgeously Examines Grief and Mortality


Director: Kirsten Johnson

Synopsis: As her father nears the end of his life, filmmaker Kirsten Johnson stages his death in inventive and comical ways to help them both face the inevitable.

[/info]

Kirsten Johnson is a long-time cinematographer who’s known for her work Citizenfour, The Invisible War, and 1971 among others, but she really stepped onto the scene in 2016 with her documentary Cameraperson. It didn’t win Oscars (of course the Documentary Branch didn’t even nominate it), but it was hailed as one of the best films of that year, let alone being one of the very best docs to come out in 2016. Well, four years later and Johnson is back with her latest film in Dick Johnson Is Dead.

Johnson’s latest feature examines her father, Dick Johnson, who begins to suffer from dementia and to cope the both of them create a series of staged sequenced that elegantly portrays the end of Mr. Johnson’s life. There are accidents. Falls. Car crashes. Construction workers with deadly shrapnel. A patient of his that turns on him in the office and stabs him. At one point, Dick even finds himself in a heaven-like state with confetti and party decor all around him as he celebrates the transition from life to death. The intuitiveness of Dick Johnson Is Dead as it mocks up these varying scenarios is not only engaging but oddly funny in its self-awareness that Dick’s death is approaching.

However, it’s not all roses and awkward laughter regarding that irony. While inventive and bitingly clever, at its core, Dick Johnson Is Dead is strikingly poignant as Kirsten lovingly witnesses her father’s deterioration. Things may seem normal at first, but it’s not before long where we see the humanity of these individuals pour out of them. In one sequence, Dick realizes that he can no longer work. He has to sell his beloved car and move to New York to live with Kirsten. We see him lock the door to his office for the last time. He has the epiphany that he can’t keep his car. When those things finally hit him, it’s devastating. There are moments Dick has at his home that remind him of his late wife, who tragically died some years before because of Alzheimer’s, adding further pathos to the film.

What makes Dick Johnson Is Dead even more nuanced in all of that, though, is the sleight of hand it takes near the end where grief and celebration collide. It’s not easy to grapple with your own mortality, but it’s even more challenging when it’s your father and it’s happening right in front of your eyes every day. The emotional weight of that could be cumbersome, but Kirsten also realizes that her father isn’t defined by this one moment either. In what is arguably the best scene of the year, without spoilers, the final sequence involves a massive collision of death and life, fiction and non-fiction, and it’s utterly breathtaking. It’s the thesis of film and the irony that comes with it, coming to terms with the reality that death is inevitable. And it’s sad. It’s painful. But it also reminds us of what’s great in life and why family means so much to us.

You couple that with Kirsten Johnson’s direction and vision for the film, and it renders Dick Johnson Is Dead one of the best films of 2020. It’s available on Netflix and I cannot recommend it enough.

Grade: A

[divider]

 

Movie Review: ‘Enola Holmes’ is a Charming Surprise from Netflix


Director: Harry Bradbeer
Writer: Jack Thorne (screenplay by), Nancy Springer (based upon the book)
Stars: Millie Bobby Brown, Henry Cavill, Sam Claflin, Louis Partridge

Synopsis: When Enola Holmes-Sherlock’s teen sister-discovers her mother missing, she sets off to find her, becoming a super-sleuth in her own right as she outwits her famous brother and unravels a dangerous conspiracy around a mysterious young Lord.

[/info]

Netflix original movies can be hit or miss. They’ve never had trouble releasing film after film to keep new content coming for their subscribers. Their latest film, Enola Holmes, is one of the most charming and easily enjoyable films they have produced. In this “based on a book” flick, Enola Holmes (sister of the infamous Sherlock) finds mysteries of her own to solve. Millie Bobby Brown easily carries the film and stands out in a cast with Henry Cavil, Sam Claflin, and Helena Bonham Carter. 

Enola Holmes tells the story of Sherlock and Mycroft’s little sister as she searches for her missing mother while accidentally getting tangled into a dangerous mystery involving a young marquess and his family. She has to solve her case while learning to survive alone in the big city and avoiding her brother’s attempts to turn her into a proper lady. Enola is an independent, intelligent, and free-thinking teenager who has no interest in finishing school or becoming a housewife. Her adventures around London with the Viscount Tewksbury, Marquess of Basilwether, or Tewksbury for short, are based on the novel “The Case of the Missing Marquess” by Nancy Springer. There are a total of six books in the series if this film leaves you wanting to solve more mysteries with Enola Holmes.

This movie is best described as “charming”. It’s a pleasure to watch and is exactly the kind of escapism everyone needs right now. Millie Bobby Brown is an excellent narrator, breaking the fourth wall many times to keep viewers informed, she’s funny and charismatic and proves she is every bit as capable of handling a starring role as anyone else in Hollywood. I genuinely can’t wait to see what else she does. Henry Cavil -who’s best known for his role as Superman in multiple DCEU films- plays a pretty good young Sherlock without pulling attention or making the movie about Sherlock instead of his sister. If there are future Enola Holmes films, I would love to see him return a well. Another highlight of the film is the fight scenes between Millie Bobby Brown and Burn Gorman. They are more entertaining and brutal than what I was expecting from a PG-13 movie about a teenage girl. Another highlight of the film is a scene that takes place in a special tea shop involving Susan Wokoma and Henry Cavill. Wokoma’s character, Edith, doesn’t have much screen time in the movie, but she’s fantastic and leaves viewers wanting to see more from Edith in future films.

As far as criticism of the film, there isn’t a lot to say. Fans of the original Sherlock books may not like how Mycroft is portrayed, he’s easily one of the most dislikable characters in the movie- despite Sam Claflin looking fabulous with a ginormous mustache. Other than a dislikable Mycroft, the film is wonderful and I have no complaints.

Enola Holmes is a fun, charming, action-adventure flick. Millie Bobby Brown is a star that will inspire viewers to either check out her filmography or convince them to read the books the movie is based on. If Netflix decides to do sequels I will happily watch all of them. Enola Holmes is streaming on Netflix worldwide, so if you have access to Netflix consider giving it a watch.

Grade: A

[divider]

 

Second Chances: Moulin Rouge!

Where and when we watch movies are crucial to how much we enjoy them. By rewatching a film, our opinion on it can drastically change. We can appreciate things we never saw before, feel like we’re watching an entirely new film, or our estimations can plummet, and we question why we ever liked it in the first place.

In this column, I’m going to be revisiting some of my least favorite movies. I want to work out what I disliked about it in the first place, and whether I find those aspects still troubling. I want to reflect on what about me has changed since my last watch, and whether or not I appreciate it more. I want to give a fair and balanced assessment to films I could very easily, completely write off and never think about again because every film deserves a second chance.

When I first saw Moulin Rouge! (2001), huddled around a TV on my first night in a new flat, our group was onto our third or fourth bottle of wine, and we were experiencing a giggly mass-hysteria. On reflection, it seems the exact right way to watch a Baz Luhrmann film.

When wannabe-Bohemian writer Christian (Ewan McGregor) moves to Paris, he falls madly in love with dazzling courtesan Satine (Nicole Kidman), the lead dancer at the titular exuberant cabaret venue. But alas! Satine is promised to a controlling Duke (Richard Roxburgh), and her relationship with Christian must remain secret if they ever want to seize that elusive happiness. Also, Satine has tuberculosis, just in case you thought there wasn’t enough melodrama to go around.

I love a good musical. I was even a passionate defender of Tom Hooper’s Les Miserables (2012) until I saw any other production of it (seriously, Tom, my high school did Les Mis better than you). From West Side Story (1961) to Hairspray (2007), I genuinely believe you can heighten the drama and fun of old stories by working in a series of musical numbers. On paper, I was primed to love Moulin Rouge. A great cast helmed by the king of excessive production design, a series of anachronistic modern hits laced through a century-old story, I was already on board. 

Unfortunately, Luhrmann’s off-the-wall, whiplash-inducing, half-opera, half-Bollywood jukebox musical fell flat for me. I found it irritating, indulgent, and tedious. I wasn’t convinced that dropping countless modern music references into a period film was as smart as Luhrmann thought. In my university days, I was surrounded by musical theatre fanatics. Their repeated insistence on playing and performing the ‘Elephant Love Medley’ at parties had given me the wild idea that the movie was any good. I have since learned not to trust their taste.

And so, without wine, I sat down to give the most Luhrmann film Luhrmann has ever Luhrmann-ed another go. How did it fare on a rewatch? Was I swept away by the glittering technicolor? Did the songs finally make my heart swell? Did I like it any better?

Yes. Technically, yes, I did. Would I say it’s a good film? Probably not. But we’re making baby steps.

There is a staggeringly small amount of story in this film. I find the portrayal of Bohemian life pretty irritating at the best of times, but at least most films have something concrete to say about the ideology. Moulin Rouge chooses to merely pay lip-service to the revolutionary themes at its core, a superficial backdrop to hang behind the film’s main concern – the romance. But even the romance feels insignificant. Barely any work has gone into fleshing out the characters, giving them layered backstories or substantial motivations. Luhrmann wanted to engender great swellings of feeling in the audience, rollicking from obvious melodrama to broad comedy and pockmarking the narrative with recognizable songs. Rarely, however, do the emotions he so obviously wants you to experience ever feel earned. Instead, Moulin Rouge feels like a slideshow of sentimentality, coated with saccharine set dressing and blunt musical cues.

The first half of Moulin Rouge is excessively annoying. The characters are grating, the dutch angles give you a headache, and the humor is – well, broad would be an understatement. Here’s the thing, though, even if a film’s humor is really broad, you still need a deft comedic director to pull it off. A scene where Christian hides behind Satine’s negligee to avoid being spotted by the Duke is painfully awkward, with not a single actor giving any sign that they’re comfortable with the material. 

When we got to the ‘Elephant Love Medley’ I had heard countless times over belted by tipsy musical theatre kids, I was once again disappointed. Satine and Christian sing snippets from famous love songs, quoting The Beatles, David Bowie, and Whitney Huston, to name just a few. But that’s all they’re doing – quoting other songs. This is the moment when we’re meant to be convinced of the authenticity of these two characters’ connection, where we’re meant to be bowled over by the conviction of their passion, and instead, we hear samples from Luhrmann’s ‘All-Time Greatest Love Songs’ mixtape. Christian and Satine are feigning to make a connection with other people’s words, and it just feels artificial when it should be original. There’s no intimacy or genuine feeling. The audience recognizing songs is made a priority overwriting the characters.

The low point of the film comes when our love interests, their rag-tag Bohemian friends, and the cabaret ringmaster Harold Zidler (Jim Broadbent) spontaneously pitch a theatre show to the Duke for reasons I’m genuinely unclear about right now. They perform a clumsy dance and shout clunky lyrics overtop Classical music for what seems like nine hours, and the whole thing reeks of being underwritten and overplayed. 

But here lies the fundamental problem with critiquing Moulin Rouge. Musical numbers and dialogue may be ridiculous and annoying, but it is undeniably admirable that everyone approaches the nonsense with complete dedication. There’s no question that everyone is on board for the silliness, and no-one ever displays any sign that they’re even the least bit ashamed of it. You may find the film embarrassing, but the actors are never embarrassed themselves. Even the Pitch sequence, in all its cringiness, is fuelled by a bare-faced commitment to stupidity that at least manages to hold onto a bit of integrity.

The inspiration for the film came from Luhrmann sitting in on a Bollywood feature when researching A Midsummer Night’s Dream in the 90s. He was transfixed by “how their coolness had been ripped aside and how they were united in this singular sharing of the story.” He started thinking, “Could we do that in the West? Could we ever get past that cerebral cool and perceived cool?” In this aspect, Moulin Rouge is a success. It’s not a ‘cool’ movie; it’s sheer madcap insanity, excessive in a way that some modern audiences find grating. But if it works for you, if you love how modern songs are twisted into a period setting, if the lights and colors and costumes thrill you, then I can’t deny this film has something really special at the heart of it. 

Personally, the most significant change between my watches (apart from levels of alcohol consumption) was that the first time I saw Moulin Rouge, for wine-related reasons, I must have stopped paying attention to the final act. Because of my rewatch, I noticed that the last third of this film is fantastic. From the moment that a tango cover of The Police’s Roxanne rings through the air accompanied by powerful strings and a gravelly-voiced Argentine (Jacek Koman), I was hit by the full force of the bristling melodrama. There were suddenly emotional stakes! Our characters were being deceitful, envious, passionate. The operatic qualities were being dialed up, and I found myself enjoying everything that proceeded, leading to an emotionally explosive and gripping finale. The excess in the last act felt less congratulatory and more melancholic. Against my better judgment, I was finding it a lot more compelling. 

You can’t argue that Moulin Rouge is stupid. You can’t protest that it’s ridiculous, contrived, overly flashy, and melodramatic, with paper-thin characters and a plagiarized plot. You can’t make these arguments, not because they’re untrue (they’re very true), but because Lehrmann and everyone involved knows these flaws exist, and they wear them with pride. The film is unassailable and impenetrable; it is triumphantly indignant and courageously simplistic. It is dedicated to a singular cause – fun. It didn’t entirely work for me, but I’m not going to deny I had fun along the way. Moulin Rouge is equal parts confounding and exhilarating, but I was left feeling more satisfied than my previous watch, and I’m glad I gave it another go.

Chasing the Gold: Best Sound Analysis (2021 Oscars)

This may be one of the most interesting years for the Best Sound category at the Academy Awards. For one, this is the first year since 1962 that only one award is given out to Sound, blending both the Sound Editing and Sound Mixing awards. Secondly, with the sort of year that this has been, it is going to be very hard to predict this category until closer to the awards. Not only are we uncertain if certain films will release in time to qualify for this year’s awards, but the typical genre films that are usually locks for this category aren’t the films being talked about for Oscar potential. We don’t have a war film like Dunkirk or 1917. We don’t have a space movie like Interstellar or Ad Astra. We don’t have a car film like Ford v. Ferrari or Baby Driver. We are even struggling with musicals now that West Side Story has been postponed to December 2021. However, I think I have managed to come up with five films that, if released and pushed right, could make the list for Best Sound at the 2021 Academy Awards.

Da 5 Bloods

As I highlighted in the opening of this piece, the Academy loves to choose a war film to win the Sound categories. It’s hard to argue against the technical skill it takes to create the gun effects and get the balance right between blasts and dialogue. That is why I could see a situation (if Netflix campaigns it right) where Spike Lee’s Da 5 Bloods makes it into the nomination list. If we are going to have a war film make the list, it surely has to be this one.

No Time to Die

If this film does end up releasing in November as planned, this is the safest bet for the Best Sound win. Not only has the previous Bond films, Spectre and Skyfall, both won for Sound Editing of their respective years (even if Skyfall was a tie with Zero Dark Thirty), but there is no other film of that style that is releasing this year. Guns, technology, cars, it has everything a Best Sound win needs to have in the mix.

Dune

Regardless of the quality of the film, the script, or the performances, the trailer alone was enough to convince several people that Villeneuve’s Dune is a technical player in many categories. Best Visual Effects, Best Costume Design, Best Production Design, it’s leading them all. Therefore, it shouldn’t be much of a surprise that it has a real shot at also landing the Best Sound award in such a year that is unpredictable. Of course, this is all dependent on if the film does release in December or is pushed back to later on in 2021. With a big-budget film like this, they need to release it when it can be profitable.

Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom

Whilst this is sight-unseen, and also sadly timed due to the passing of Chadwick Boseman, I could see Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom being a surprise contender in numerous categories, but particularly Best Sound. Not only is this film going to get a big push in categories such as Best Supporting Actor, but this is a film about music. With both musicals slated for this year (In The Heights and West Side Story) pushed back, it gives this film breathing space and also a chance to get into this category.

Mank

When it comes to the technical prospects for Mank, it is certainly going to help that it is a film about making films. Whilst it will not be the most show-stopping of the lot, there are several aspects that could help get Mank the nomination. For example, it is worth noticing that this is a film directed by David Fincher. When a Fincher movie gets a lot of nominations (such as The Curious Case of Benjamin Button and The Social Network), he usually gets his films in for Best Sound Mixing. This is also a weaker year for the category, so it may be easier than ever for a film like Mank to score this nomination.

So much can and will change between now and February 2021, when the eligibility period ends for this year’s Academy Awards. Some of these films may not get released in time, or another film may come out and surprise. One thing is for sure though, I will be utterly surprised and shocked if Tenet makes it into the line-up.

My Best Sound nominees (as of September 30th, 2020):

  1. No Time to Die
  2. Dune
  3. Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom
  4. Da 5 Bloods
  5. Mank

Top Ten: Deborah Kerr Essentials

The wonderful Kristin Battestella wrote a fantastic article on Gregory Peck a few weeks ago that laid out why she loves him and which performances of his she thinks you should check out. I don’t share her fascination with Peck but her article did inspire me to think about performers I love and Deborah Kerr immediately came to mind. The Scottish beauty had a long and consistent career that allowed her to appear in independent films in Britain before becoming a full-fledged superstar in America in the 1950s. Despite regularly playing posh ladies there was something very down to earth and natural about Kerr and that made her more enigmatic and exciting than some of her contemporaries. Sadly some people imagine her as the sort of bland leading lady who relied on her glamor and her looks to get by rather than appreciating her talent and the interesting choices she made. I wanted to highlight some of her most under-appreciated pieces of work with this article in the hope that it will encourage people to see her as the unique presence she was rather than being the disposable love interest in Quo Vadis (1951).

File:Jc portia brutus.png - Wikimedia Commons

10. Julius Caesar

This is a fairly stolid adaptation of William Shakespeare’s famous play but when James Mason starts talking in that mellifluous voice of his it is hard to look away. I will do away with a plot description because I assume you will already know what happens in this age-old story. Kerr has a pretty small role and doesn’t appear on screen for a very long time but she does leave a strong impression. In an eye-catching white dress, she introduces Portia as a beautiful young woman who has been robbed of all power in a society full of misogynists. Those incredible green eyes of hers bored into my soul and the anger she seemed to feel was visceral. She puts it all out there in her one big scene and proves that she was superior to Greer Garson who fails to draw your interest in a larger role. Kerr was actually brought to Hollywood to be a star in the Garson mold but she broke away from the bland prestige pictures that were thrown at her in the early 1950s and put together a filmography full of hidden gems. Dreary Garson can’t hold a candle to her.

The Arrangement | Movies ala Mark

9. The Arrangement

This trashy melodrama was lambasted upon release in 1969 as director Elia Kazan adapted his own novel and was criticized for coming across as a navel-gazing jerk. To be fair the film is pretty sympathetic to asshole Eddie Anderson, Kirk Douglas, who hates his wife Florence, Deborah Kerr, for seemingly no reason while carrying on an affair with the much younger Gwen, Faye Dunaway. Kerr is pushed into the background and plays a character who is meant to be annoying and unsympathetic but any reasonable person sides with her as they watch this film and Kerr finds a way to avoid engaging in cheap theatrics. She provides a nice counterbalance to the icy, sleek Dunaway who glides through every scene as she finds a way to explore her character’s deep insecurities. When her husband attacks her with criticisms about how empty she is we sense her bewilderment and we see the way this woman has compartmentalized her life. She has such distaste for her husband that she doesn’t even bother to talk back to him and note his hypocrisy in hating her for not being somebody with a strong moral center. Her natural beauty is also on display and I began to resent the fact that she wasn’t given better roles later in her career. She looked better than most actresses half her age and still possessed forceful charisma but because of sexism, she was forced to play wives who were meant to be mean and unattractive rather than getting leading roles.

Separate Tables (1958) Deborah Kerr, | Deborah kerr, Old movies, Movie  scenes

8. Separate Tables

This is one of those films that has not aged well as the screenwriters made some troubling changes when transferring Terrence Rattigan’s highly respected plays onto the screen. The film follows sexual harasser Major Pollock, David Niven, as he tries to fight back against the tyrannical Mrs. Railton-Bell, Gladys Cooper, who wants to kick him out of the boarding house they stay at by socially pressuring others into persecuting him. Railton-Bell’s daughter Sybil, Deborah Kerr, is completely controlled by her overbearing mother but loves Pollock from afar and longs for him despite his issues. The film also tacks on Burt Lancaster and Rita Hayworth as two glamorous Americans involved in a fun subplot about a divorced couple reconciling that unfortunately involves domestic abuse. If you can get past the fact that the film essentially condones physical abuse within a relationship and sexual harassment you will get to enjoy some great performances. I don’t think Kerr is at her best in this film as she is largely sidelined in favor of the more showy Hayworth but she does have a few stunning scenes. When she’s around Niven she finds a variety of ways to respond to him which is more difficult than people think it is as it would have been easy for her to switch off when he goes off on one of his monologues but she finds ways to ground these scenes as well as drawing attention to her character’s responses. These little touches make the film worth watching and with an exquisite Wendy Hiller on screen for a few highly memorable scenes it is hard not to be riveted.

Deborah Kerr in “Heaven Knows, Mr. Allison” (1957, John Huston) /  Cinematography by Oswald Morris | Deborah kerr, Allison, Girls on film

7. Heaven Knows, Mr. Allison

This 1957 feature is the poor man’s version of The African Queen (1951) as John Huston blatantly took most of the tropes from that classic romantic comedy and cobbled them together for this misshapen oddity which never quite comes together. It tells the story of a virtuous nun, Sister Angela, Deborah Kerr, and a rakish Marine, Allison, Robert Mitchum, who grow close when they both find themselves on a desert island in the middle of World War II. He falls in love with her but she rejects him and they end up parting after some Marines find them on the island. In some ways, the film is hurt by the conservative mores of the day as most modern audience members would want the nun to throw caution to the wind and have an affair with bad boy Mitchum. In 1957 audience members would have protested against something like this happening in a mainstream film so we get a bizarre story in which tension between the two characters never really develops. Fortunately, Kerr is on hand to singlehandedly rescue this misguided film as she brings quiet grace and dignity to a part that could have been boring. She has terrific chemistry with Mitchum, who was a lifelong friend, and the easy conversations they have early on in the film are a joy to watch. It is rare to see such natural acting and Kerr makes diffidence exciting as her character brushes up against some troubling emotions. She is held back by a story that doesn’t let her do much but in many ways, this film serves as a testament to her abilities as she does more with her role than any other actress could have.

Givenchy-Jean-Seberg-Deborah-Kerr-Bonjour-Tristesse | Bonjour tristesse

6. Bonjour Tristesse

This Otto Preminger flick is best remembered as a vehicle for Jean Seberg who would become iconic with her role in Jean-Luc Godard’s Breathless (1960) but Kerr steals the show as a fairly tragic character. Kerr plays Anne, a sophisticated older woman who gets involved with an abrasive playboy who lets his manipulative daughter Cecile, Jean Seberg, drive them apart. Yet again Kerr was stuck playing a woman of a certain age even though she still seemed sprightly and energetic rather than being the spinster that other characters claim she is. She makes for a sympathetic tragic heroine and you want to beat everybody else over the head for not appreciating her maturity and intelligence. The film does highlight Kerr’s greatest asset as she made acting like an adult sexy and appealing in the 1950s. This was special because so many leading ladies from this era were asked to act like little girls and when they were paired with older leading men it always felt creepy because there was such a power imbalance between the characters they played. With Kerr, you always felt like she was on equal footing with her leading men because she never played dumb and refused to be awed in the face of respected actors like Burt Lancaster and Cary Grant. Watch Bonjour Tristesse and marvel at her strength and confidence. She was a rare creature and we should have had more actresses like Kerr rather than being subjected to the Leslie Carons and Audrey Hepburns of the world.

The Sundowners (1960) - Rotten Tomatoes

5. The Sundowners

I like this quirky Australian family film a little bit less than everybody else but I will admit that it does have its charms in between the unnecessarily long shots of koala bears and sheep. It concerns drover Paddy Carmody, Robert Mitchum, who forces his family to move around the country frequently because of his non-committal ways. His wife Ida, Deborah Kerr, loves him but she wants to live a more stable life and is upset when her husband loses all of their money and prevents them from buying a farm they could have lived on permanently. Kerr and Mitchum were paired for the second time here and their chemistry was as strong as ever as they make a very convincing married couple. One delightful scene depicts the two of them sharing an intimate moment and Kerr mixes feminine pride with bashfulness when she says “Glad to know you appreciate me” as she washes her face after a long day of work. When Mitchum counters with “You come on over here. I’ll appreciate you” we see a thrilled look on Kerr’s face as she prepares to lie down with her beloved husband and perhaps have sex with him. She also brings an unexpected earthiness to the part and successfully adopts an Australian accent which only makes poor Mitchum look worse as his voice is suspended somewhere between American, Irish and Australian. This serves as an effective rebuke to critics of Kerr who claim that she was only capable of playing ladylike, aristocratic types.

A Valentine's Day Tribute to Truly Romantic Movies: An Affair to Remember |  by Laurie Levy | Medium

4. An Affair to Remember

This might be Kerr’s best-known role and some fans might shout at me for not placing it first but I like her other work a little bit more. We all know the story and most classic film fans have already seen Love Affair (1939) and Sleepless in Seattle (1993) but it’s basically about singer Terry McKay, Deborah Kerr, falling in love with playboy Nickie Ferrante, Cary Grant. The two agree to meet one another atop the Empire State Building in six months’ time when they end their affair but she is hit by a car and ends up paralyzed so she can’t meet him at the agreed time but the two see one another again and eventually get together. I must admit that I am not a big fan of the film as a whole as I have never really warmed to Grant and he isn’t the sort of man I fantasize about so the central romance doesn’t work for me. Kerr is utterly brilliant however and she is the reason that I keep watching it. She was such a great fit for this sort of melodrama as this was clearly a film made for adults and it is not afraid to deal with serious, weighty themes while still being a glossy piece of mainstream entertainment. Kerr finds a way to plumb the depths of her character’s psyche by displaying the anguish she feels over having such a frivolous affair but she is also every inch the glamorous leading lady as she wears incredible gowns with aplomb. I gasp at all the right moments and smile when she looks up at Grant with stars in her eyes but I am also floored by the dramatic scenes where she completely lets go of her composure.

THE INNOCENTS 1961 | Deborah kerr, Best actress, British films

3. The Innocents

This is a film that everybody seems to like. Even those who dislike Kerr’s work in the 1950s or horror movies are united in their love for this disturbing Henry James adaptation. It is all about governess Miss Giddens, Deborah Kerr, as she comes to believe that ghosts are haunting the house of her employers. This is a grand showcase for Kerr’s talents and she takes advantage of the fact that the script allows her to widen those legendary eyes. She captures mania mixed with emotional repression far better than Nicole Kidman would in The Others (2001) and the image of her with her lips slightly parted and her eyes darting back and forth will be burned into my brain forever. This is one of those films where I feel like I don’t have to encourage people to see it because they will have already watched it. I’m so happy that this fairly strange picture has been so widely embraced and it is heartening to realize that audiences do gravitate towards artistically ambitious fare sometimes.

The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp - Showroom Workstation - Sheffield

2. The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp

Kerr is tasked with playing multiple roles here and does so very well as she plays all three women that soldier Clive Wynne-Candy falls in love with throughout his life. She is totally believable as somebody radiant enough to leave a person gobsmacked and the audience is bewitched by her in all three of her incarnations. She was very young when she made this film and she does seem gawkier than she would in later roles. This only endears her to us more as we can see her trying to figure out who she is and there are times when she does look uncomfortable in her own skin. She portrays the uncertainty of youth wonderfully but never loses the rosy tint in her cheeks that lets us know she is a lot of fun to spend time with. This was what made Kerr such a beloved figure in Hollywood social circles as she was a great raconteur and never seemed to take herself too seriously. A more precious, overly serious young actress would have given a stiff, overly mannered performance in the role Kerr was handed but she works wonders with it.

1. Black Narcissus

Was it ever going to be anything else? Kerr’s portrayal of the sexually frustrated Sister Clodagh, Deborah Kerr, who grapples with her desire while establishing a school and a hospital in the Himalayas is legendary. She captures the confusion and mania that a whole generation of women had to go through when they were told that feeling sexual desire was not right. She tries to deny herself the pleasures that she needs but it will not be denied and it comes out in emotional stress. As she sublimates her desires Kerr becomes an even more physical performer as she almost seems like she is in a German Expressionist film. She never reached these heights again but that is understandable because her work in this film stands as one of the great achievements in the history of film acting. Kathleen Byron is also fantastic but Kerr’s subtlety means that she is allowed to go wild and become unrestrained in the second act. The yin and yang that they form is central to the film’s success and they each need to be doing very specific things for the other’s performance to be effective.

I am sure I will receive some criticism for not including films like The Chalk Garden (1964) and The Gypsy Moths (1969) on this list but I hope you have enjoyed this ranking. Please comment below if you agree or disagree with my choices.

Chasing the Gold: Best Production Design Analysis (2020)

The production design race for gold at the 93rd Academy Awards is quite the race, and from this early look at the possible contenders, we can sense a tough competition coming ahead.

In recent years the production design category has been more of the same, and with everything going out of ordinary this year, at least we can expect this category to stick to its roots. This category has never been about subtlety or delicacy; it usually includes more extravagant and excessive nominees.

With that in mind, we can kind of divide the early contenders into four different groups:

  • Period films: it’s no secret that the Academy loves a proper period production design just as much as they love a conventional period costume design, and it seems like 2020 has this group covered with films like Mank, The Trial of the Chicago 7, Ammonite, News of the World, The Personal History of David Copperfield, Rebecca, Judas And the Black Messiah, Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom, and Emma all scheduled to come out this year. For now, it looks like Mank leads the race in this group with The Personal History of David Copperfield, Ammonite, and News of the World just trailing behind. We’ll have a better idea of the competition intensity when these films come out since Emma is the only film that had the chance to open widely before the pandemic hit.
  • Big productions: this group has also been an Academy favorite over the past few years and will likely continue to show up in this year’s race. It includes films like Dune, Tenet, Mulan, Da 5 Bloods, Wonder Woman 1984, No Time to Die, and Death on the Nile. From only its first trailer, Dune appears to be another masterful work from Patrice Vermette and will likely earn him his third nomination. Tenet and Mulan are currently competing in this year’s version of Box Office, and the competition might extend to Oscar’s night if both of them can secure a nomination for production design. Da 5 Bloods might have a shot in the race if some of the other contenders seriously underperform while No Time to Die, Wonder Woman 1984, and Death on the Nile are looking more likely contenders as we come closer to their release date.
  • Likely upsets: In a normal Oscar’s year, these films wouldn’t be considered as possible contenders, but if you haven’t noticed, we aren’t in a normal Oscar’s year. So here are the films that could get the nomination ticket to enter this year Oscar’s race: One Night in Miami, Hillbilly Elegy, The Father, and I’m Thinking of Ending Things. All of these films have a chance to get the nomination, albeit a small one but a chance nonetheless. Regina King’s One Night in Miami leads in this section until we see what Ron Howard’s Hillbilly Elegy has to say since not even photos have been seen from the film. 

So, here are the early predictions for production design:

  1. Mank: Production Design by Donald Graham Burt and Set Decoration by Jan Pascale.
  2. Dune: Production Design by Patrice Vermette and Set Decoration by Richard Roberts and Zsuzsanna Sipos.
  3. The Personal History of David Copperfield: Production Design by Cristina Casali and Set Decoration by Charlotte Dirickx.
  4. Ammonite: Production Design by Sarah Finlay and Set Decoration by Sophie Hervieu.
  5. News of the World: Production Design by David Crank and Set Decoration by Elizabeth Keenan.
  6. Mulan: Production Design by Grant Major and Set Decoration by Anne Kuljian.
  7. The Trial of the Chicago 7: Production Design by Shane Valentino and Set Decoration by Andrew Baseman.
  8. One Night in Miami: Production Design by Page Buckner and Set Decoration by Janessa Hitsman.
  9. Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom: Production Design by Mark Ricker and Set Decoration by Karen O’Hara and Diana Stoughton.
  10. Rebecca: Production Design by Sarah Greenwood and Set Decoration by Katie Spencer.