Home Blog Page 307

List: Top 3 Movie Bankers

This week on Episode 191 of the InSession Film Podcast, we discussed Gavin O’Connor’s new film, The Accountant. Now, for clarity, we understand that accounting isn’t the same thing as banking. However, both deal with finances and math and “bankers” gave us a little bit more flexibility with this week’s list. At any rate, this was a challenging topic, but there have been some iconic bankers / accountants that have graced movie screens over the decades and hopefully our lists are reflective of that fact.

On that note, which movie bankers would make your list? Here are the one’s that made ours:

*Keep in mind we have different criteria for our lists as well*

JD

1) Andy Dufresne – The Shawshank Redemption
2) Itzhak Stern – Schindler’s List
3) Jared Vennett – The Big Short

Brendan

1) Andy Dufresne – The Shawshank Redemption
2) Harold Crick – Stranger Than Fiction
3) Jonathan Mardukas – Midnight Run

Honorable Mentions (Combined)

George Bailey – It’s a Wonderful Life
Bank Manager – The Dark Knight
Griphook – Harry Potter
David Ershon – The Other Guys
Louis Tully – Ghostbusters
Jordan Belfort – The Wolf of Wall Street
Gordon Gekko – Wall Street

Hopefully you guys enjoyed our lists and if you agree or disagree with us, let us know in the comment section below. Despite this being a challenging topic, there are obviously some other great options out there depending on your criteria. That being said, what would be your Top 3? Leave a comment in the comment section or email us at [email protected].

For the entire podcast, click here or listen below.

For more lists done by the InSession Film crew and other guests, be sure see our Top 3 Movie Lists page.

Podcast: The Accountant, Top 3 Movie Bankers, The Goblet of Fire – Episode 191

This podcast is brought to you by KNFilters.com!

This week on the InSession Film Podcast, we discuss Gavin O’Connor’s new film, The Accountant, starring the great Ben Affleck. We also dive into our Top 3 movie bankers and we continue our Harry Potter Movie Series with Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire.

This week was a blast discussing Affleck, O’Connor and the hilarity that took place in The Accountant. JD seriously wants Affleck nominated at this year’s Golden Globes. Also, it’s hard to believe that we are half way done with our Harry Potter series. Boy, does time fly when you’re having fun and this series has been incredible. No guest this week but this hostful episode will hopefully satisfy nonetheless.

On that note, check out the show and let us know what you think in the comment section. Thanks for listening and thanks for supporting the InSession Film Podcast!

– The Accountant Movie Review (8:24)
Grades
JD: B+
Brendan: A-

– Top 3 Movie Bankers (40:18)
For clarity, we understand that accounting isn’t the same thing as banking. However, both deal with finances and math and “bankers” gave us a little bit more flexibility with this week’s list. At any rate, this was a challenging topic, but there have been some iconic bankers / accountants that have graced movie screens over the decades and hopefully our lists are reflective of that fact. On that note, what would be your top 3?

Top 3 Sponsor: First Time Watchers Podcast

[divider]

RELATED: Listen to Episode 190 of the InSession Film Podcast where we discussed The Birth of a Nation!

[divider]

– Harry Potter Movie Series: Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (1:13:16)
Grades
JD: B+
Brendan: C+

– Music

To Leave Something Behind – Sean Rowe
Shawshank Prison – Thomas Newman
The Story Continues – Patrick Doyle
The Return of the Eagle – Atli Örvarsson

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Stitcher
InSession Film Podcast – Episode 191

[divider]

Next week on the show:

Main Review: Jack Reacher: Never Go Back
Top 3: TBD
Harry Potter Movie Series: Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix

jack-reacher-never-go-back

[divider]

Help Support The InSession Film Podcast

If you want to help support us, there are several ways you can help us and we’d absolutely appreciate it. Every penny goes directly back into supporting the show and we are truly honored and grateful. Thanks for your support and for listening to the InSession Film Podcast!

VISIT OUR DONATE PAGE HERE

Podcast: 13th, Tale of Tales – Extra Film

This week on the InSession Film Podcast: Extra Film segment, we discuss Ava DuVernay’s powerful new documentary 13th as well as Matteo Gorrone’s new film, Tale of Tales!

Regardless of its form, 13th is simply one of the best and most important films you’ll see this year. It is required viewing that will hopefully bring clarity to one of the more divisive topics currently in our mainstream. Despite your politics, as a film, it’s a moving experience that we can’t recommend enough.

On that note, have fun listening to this week’s Extra Film segment and let us know what you think in the comment section below. Hope you enjoy and thanks for listening!

– 13th Movie Review (5:27)
Grades
Brendan: A
JD: A

– Tale of Tales Movie Review (37:22)
Grades
Brendan: F
JD: F

– Music

The Birth of a Nation – DC The Midi Alien, Reks
Lust, Caution – Alexandre Desplat
The Return of the Eagle – Atli Örvarsson

We try to make this the best movie podcast we possibly can and we hope you enjoy them. Subscribe today on iTunes and Stitcher and please leave us a review on iTunes. You can also find us on Soundcloud, PlayerFM and TuneIn Radio as well. We really appreciate all your support of the InSession Film Podcast.

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Stitcher
13th, Tale of Tales – Extra Film

[divider]

Mobile App

To hear this Extra Film episode and everything else we do, download our apps on the Amazon Market for Android and the Podcast Box app on IOS devices. The mobile app covers all of our main shows, bonus podcast’s and everything else relating to the InSession Film Podcast. Thanks for your wonderful support and listening to our show. It means the world to us!

[divider]

Help Support The InSession Film Podcast

If you want to help support us, we would greatly appreciate it! For more info, CLICK HERE.

Featured: Anticipating The Accountant

0

This weekend on Episode 191, we will be discussing Gavin O’Connor’s new film, The Accountant. Now, there’s many reasons to be excited for this film on paper. For one, it stars Ben Affleck. Yeah, yeah, I know that is a turnoff for some people but he’s not a bad actor. Since he’s started directing especially, his acting has improved significantly, making him a serviceable and entertaining watch each time he’s on screen. And based off of the trailer for this film, that trend doesn’t seem to be stopping. The Accountant also stars Anna Kendrick. Enough said, am I right? Additionally, we’ll see the likes of J.K. Simmons, John Lithgow and Jon Bernthal. Yeah, I’d say the cast for this film is quite excellent.

However, more than that, Gavin O’Connor is the big reason I’m personally anticipating The Accountant. He may not be a household name but he’s an underrated director that knows how to build drama. Everyone knows my thoughts on Warrior, which is one of the most underrated films of all-time, but his skills are evident in Miracle as well. And I’d argue Jane Got a Gun too. Jane was a messy film, but given that film’s production hell, it could have turned out a lot worse. Still, O’Connor saved that film as much as he could. I’m not saying he is one of the best directors working today or that his resume is the best thing since sliced bread, but I do think he’s a great director with huge potential. And that is enough to get me pumped for his films.

On top of all of that, the story sounds somewhat riveting as well. As a simple crime-drama, this looks to satisfy your basic movie needs here. What about you though, are you excited for The Accountant this weekend?

Movie Review: The Birth of a Nation is flawed, but powerful


Director: Nate Parker
Writers: Nate Parker
Stars: Nate Parker, Armie Hammer, Penelope Ann Miller, Aja Naomi King, Esther Scott, Jackie Earle Haley

Synopsis: A story set on the offshore drilling rig Deepwater Horizon, which exploded during April 2010 and created the worst oil spill in U.S. history.

[/info]

In 1999, Nate Parker and Jean McGianni Celestin were accused of raping a fellow college student who was intoxicated and unconscious at the time. Did the victim give her consent to engage in thus activities? Parker was taken to court and ultimately was found not guilty. Celestin was convicted of sexual assault and received a six-month to a one-year sentence in 2001. The conviction was overturned in 2005. The victim committed suicide in 2012. A tragic ending to an ongoing problem we have in this country; sexual assault and the damaging effects it has on the victims. Everyone is entitled to their opinion on the situation, but ultimately Parker was found not guilty in our justice system. Our justice system certainly is flawed, but nevertheless, he was found not guilty. Why bring all this up?

The Birth of a Nation, for the first time, opens the curtain into the life of Nat Turner and the slave rebellion that to this day is probably the most influential acts of resistance against slavery. Nate Parker pulled the trifecta for this film and we should not diminish the movie based on the supposed actions of the director. Social media has been very critical of Parker with many people boycotting the film, based on how he is handling the rape charge. Fox has stood by Parker in all this, and I (James Shaw) also stand by this movie. The Birth of a Nation may not be as impactful as 12 years a Slave, but this is an important film to see during these troubling times as race relations are at its all-time lowest. The Birth of a Nation is not 100% accurate; most historical films are not and those that disagree with Parker are quick to point this out and belittle his film. Accurate or not, every moviegoer is going to be moved by this movie.

Parker should not have starred in the film since he wrote and directed it, but I can see why he would want to star in it as well given the name recognition he would receive for himself. Parker does an excellent job of portraying the complexity of Turner’s life. Turner stands out for his intelligence as a slave, which in turn renders mercy of the white man. This leads to sermons from Turner, which are both horrifying and emotionally very stirring. As a black man in America, a few of those moments viscerally hit close to home. The same fear these characters were experiencing in 1831; I can relate to in 2016.

One interesting omission from this film was a rape scene that, apparently, would have made the film more powerful. Perhaps that omission came before the news of Parker’s allegations, but I think it was cut because of the fear of a potential backlash. The Birth of a Nation is Nat Turner’s story, not Nate Parker’s, so I think omitting this scene was wrong. I am not promoting rape but this type of stuff happened, and it’s supposed to make us uncomfortable, just like the beatings and murders were.

The Birth of a Nation is flawed, but it is a film that everyone needs to see. I hope that you can leave Parker’s personal life out of this film. This experience is about the legacy of Nat Turner and the importance of his rebellion.

Overall Grade: B

[divider]
Hear our podcast review on Episode 190:

[divider]

Poll: WARRIOR – great sports film or the greatest sports film?

This is maybe my favorite poll we’ve ever done. This weekend on Episode 191, we’ll be discussing Gavin O’Connor’s new film, The Accountant. That name should be familiar as O’Connor directed the most underrated film of all-time in Warrior. It’s an incredible film and we felt like using it for our poll this week. I’ve been home sick all week, so maybe it’s the medicine, but this felt like a fun question to ask.

Vote now!


List: Top 3 Controversial Films

This week on Episode 190 of the InSession Film Podcast, we discussed Nate Parker’s directorial debut, The Birth of a Nation. One of the sad things about this new version of The Birth of a Nation, is the controversy surrounding Parker himself. As noted earlier this week, this film was set up to be one of the most influential films to come out this fall. However, Parker’s controversy has stifled that conversation mightily, which is very understandable given what Parker has been accused of. For a lot of audiences, it will be hard to separate the man from the art. Using that as our inspiration this week, we decided to discuss our favorite controversial films. Whether it be about the subject matter, how the film was made or whatever the case may be, there are a lot of great films out there that have polarized audiences over the years.

On that note, which controversial films would make your list? Here are the one’s that made ours:

*Keep in mind we have different criteria for our lists as well*

JD

1) The Passion of the Christ
2) Do the Right Thing
3) Bonnie & Clyde

Brendan

1) The Exorcist
2) Requiem for a Dream
3) A Clockwork Orange

Kristen

1) Showgirls
2) Freaks
3) Straw Dogs

Honorable Mentions (Combined)

The Wild Bunch, Dogma, JFK, The Last Temptation of Christ, The Birth of a Nation (2016), United 93, Song of the South, Psycho, Salò, or the 120 Days of Sodom, Rosemary’s Baby, Antichrist, Silence of the Lambs, Midnight Cowboy, I Spit on Your Grave

Hopefully you guys enjoyed our lists and if you agree or disagree with us, let us know in the comment section below. Clearly there are many other films that could contend for this list, depending on your criteria. That being said, what would be your Top 3? Leave a comment in the comment section or email us at [email protected].

For the entire podcast, click here or listen below.

For more lists done by the InSession Film crew and other guests, be sure see our Top 3 Movie Lists page.

Podcast: The Birth of a Nation, Top 3 Controversial Films, The Prisoner of Azkaban – Episode 190

This podcast is brought to you by Audible.com. Get your free audio book and 30-day free trial today!

This week on the InSession Film Podcast, film critic Kristen Lopez joins us to discuss Nate Parker’s directorial debut, The Birth of a Nation. Inspired by the conversation around that film, we also discuss our Top 3 Controversial Films and we continue our Harry Potter Movie Series with Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban!

Big thanks to Kristen for joining us this week, who was great and had a lot of passionate things to say on this week’s episode. She’s a very busy woman these days but we are grateful she made time for us. Just a heads up, we had a very interesting debate on The Birth of a Nation. If you have any thoughts, please hit us up on social media, we’d love to continue the conversation.

On that note, check out the show and let us know what you think in the comment section. Thanks for listening and thanks for supporting the InSession Film Podcast!

– The Birth of a Nation Movie Review (7:02)
Grades
JD: B+
Brendan: B-
Kristen: C

– Top 3 Controversial Films (47:25)
One of the sad things about The Birth of a Nation, is the controversy surrounding Nate Parker himself. As noted earlier this week, this film was set up to be one of the most influential films to come out this fall. However, Parker’s controversy has stifled that conversation mightily, which is very understandable given what Parker has been accused of. For a lot of audiences, it will be hard to separate the man from the art. Using that as our inspiration this week, we decided to discuss our favorite controversial films. Whether it be about the subject matter, how the film was made or whatever the case may be, there are a lot of great films out there that have polarized audiences over the years. On that note, what would be your top 3?

Top 3 Sponsor: First Time Watchers Podcast

[divider]

RELATED: Listen to Episode 189 of the InSession Film Podcast where we discussed Deepwater Horizon!

[divider]

– Harry Potter Movie Series: Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (1:29:33)
Grades
JD: A
Brendan: A
Kristen: A-

– Music

On My Own – Lecrae, Leon Bridges
Passion of the Christ – John Depney
A Window to the Past – John Williams
The Return of the Eagle – Atli Örvarsson

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Stitcher
InSession Film Podcast – Episode 190

[divider]

Next week on the show:

Main Review: The Accountant
Top 3: TBD
Harry Potter Movie Series: Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire

the-accountant

[divider]

Help Support The InSession Film Podcast

If you want to help support us, there are several ways you can help us and we’d absolutely appreciate it. Every penny goes directly back into supporting the show and we are truly honored and grateful. Thanks for your support and for listening to the InSession Film Podcast!

VISIT OUR DONATE PAGE HERE

Podcast: The Wailing, Queen of Katwe – Extra Film

This week on the InSession Film Podcast: Extra Film segment, we discuss the Korean horror film The Wailing and Disney’s latest “inspired by a true story” sports film, Queen of Katwe.

We apologize to those hardy defenders of The Wailing, because as you’ll see below, this film for us wasn’t the grand master stroke of cinema many claimed it to be. It’s a good film but we had some rather significant issues with the film that we hope comes through in our discussion. If you’re a huge lover of the film, we hope this isn’t a deal breaker.

On that note, have fun listening to this week’s Extra Film segment and let us know what you think in the comment section below. Hope you enjoy and thanks for listening!

– The Wailing Movie Review (6:08)
Grades
Brendan: B
JD: B

– Queen of Katwe Movie Review (36:45)
Grades
Brendan: B
JD: B

– Music

If I Ever Had A Heart – Emily Wells
Mbilo Mbilo – Eddie Kenzo
The Return of the Eagle – Atli Örvarsson

We try to make this the best movie podcast we possibly can and we hope you enjoy them. Subscribe today on iTunes and Stitcher and please leave us a review on iTunes. You can also find us on Soundcloud, PlayerFM and TuneIn Radio as well. We really appreciate all your support of the InSession Film Podcast.

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Stitcher
The Wailing, Queen of Katwe – Extra Film

[divider]

Mobile App

To hear this Extra Film episode and everything else we do, download our apps on the Amazon Market for Android and the Podcast Box app on IOS devices. The mobile app covers all of our main shows, bonus podcast’s and everything else relating to the InSession Film Podcast. Thanks for your wonderful support and listening to our show. It means the world to us!

[divider]

Help Support The InSession Film Podcast

If you want to help support us, we would greatly appreciate it! For more info, CLICK HERE.

Featured: Anticipating Birth of a Nation

2

In some ways it’s hard believe that The Birth of a Nation is finally coming to theaters. Nate Parker’s directorial debut film made waves way back in January at this year’s Sundance Film Festival and we’ve been itching to see it ever since. The film was also highlighted because its praise came at the height of the #OscarsSoWhite controversy regarding the Oscars. It seemed early on that The Academy would have at least one film they could hold in their back pocket to help cover some ground when it comes to the lack of diversity in their nominations. However, The Birth of a Nation has somewhat fizzled out a little bit due to a few different factors. For one, as the film has seen more film festivals, critics have been a little harder on the film in their reviews. The more and more reviews that come out, it appears that Parker’s direction is reflective of a first-timer at the helm. Secondly, and speaking of Parker, his rape allegations have sparked further controversy. This may or may not hurt the film at the box office, however it will have significant awards ramifications. This is just my opinion, but I’m not certain that The Academy will be eager to vote for The Birth of a Nation given the discussion around Parker’s scandal. That said, if the film is good enough on its own, I would hope that would be enough for voters, but history has proven otherwise.

It’s been rather heartbreaking to see how things have developed for The Birth of a Nation. Given our current cultural landscape, this film could have reverberated in some really powerful ways. The film itself still may offer some relevant conversation, but I’m curious as to how much of it will be stifled due to its external mayhem. Even if the film is flawed, as it appears to be, I would hope people could look past Parker’s personal life and receive the film for what is. I don’t expect The Birth of a Nation to be on the same level as 12 Years a Slave, but our social landscape right now is ripe for this material.

Looking at the film on its own, it sounds great on paper. The story of Nat Turner is inspiring and tragic all at the same time. The film also stars Parker, as well as Jackie Earle Haley, Armie Hammer, Dwight Henry (who was amazing in Beasts of the Southern Wild), Aunjanue Ellis (who is underrated as an actress), Esther Scott and many more. Everything about this film looks great fundamentally. The big question is whether or not Parker is effective as a director. Can he take such rich material, with a robust cast, and do something resonate with it? We’ll find out the answer to that this weekend.

No matter how this film turns out, one thing is for certain. The Birth of a Nation has arguably the best movie poster I’ve seen all year. In fact, I’d go as far as to say it is the best I’ve seen, personally. Wow.

birth-of-a-nation

Are you excited for The Birth of a Nation this weekend?

[divider]

Here’s what else you can expect at the box office this weekend:

The Girl on the Train

Middle School: The Worst Years of My Life
The Greasy Strangler (limited)
Blue Jay (limited)
Voyage of Time (limited)

Poll: What is the best movie about, or featuring, slavery?

This weekend on Episode 190, we will be discussing Nate Parker’s Birth of A Nation, which retells the story of Nat Turner who orchestrated an uprising in the 1830’s. Despite the external controversy surrounding Parker, the film itself looks like a gripping experience that will parallel a lot of our current cultural debates. The topic of slavery is an uncomfortable subject for some audiences, but it’s an important part of U.S. history that’s worth exploring on the big screen. 12 Years A Slave was a great film that won Best Picture at the Oscars for a reason. There have been many great films over the years depicting slavery, and it was our inspiration for our poll this week.

What is the best movie about, or featuring, slavery? Vote now!


Movie Review: Deepwater Horizon is a thrill ride of a disaster film


Director: Peter Berg
Writers: Matthew Michael Carnahan, Matthew Sand
Stars: Mark Wahlberg, Kurt Russell, Gina Rodriguez, John Malkovich

Synopsis: A story set on the offshore drilling rig Deepwater Horizon, which exploded during April 2010 and created the worst oil spill in U.S. history.

[/info]

Disaster films always guarantee a jolly fun viewing. Whether they are poorly made because of the acting or because the set up just isn’t believable, disaster films are still enjoyable despite these flaws. However, we do get some disaster films that do happen to dazzle due to interesting film making styles and decent acting. And this summer’s Deepwater Horizon utilizes this plethora of tools to make for a thoroughly enjoyable disaster movie.

Mike Williams (Mark Wahlberg) is a lead technician on the oil rig Deepwater Horizon. A company that is in charge of oil rigs known simply as BP, arrives on the oil rig to run through some rudimentary tests on the rig. But, the company decides not to run any tests due to budgeting issues, the man in charge Jimmy Harrell (Kurt Russell) is hesitant to drill without any of the tests having being ran. After a bit of persuading from the heads of the company, the rig team decides to run some simple tests and then begin drilling. The tests pass and the crew begins drilling. During drilling pressure inside of the drill begins to build and build until an insanely terrifying explosion that emits the Deepwater Horizon in flames.

The film’s visual style and visual abrasiveness is incredibly enjoyable. When we as an audience watch a disaster film, the one thing we truly hope for is that the visual effects are not poorly done. Deepwater Horizon utilizes our technological advancements from the most recent years to explode, combust, and even dazzle the audience through it’s intensity. That being said the film is intense, insanely intense. We do begin slow, and the slowness burns through the first half an hour of the movie, but once the initial explosion of oil onto the rig occurs, it is not stop action and intensity right up until about the last ten minutes. The intensity however does not distract from the overall enjoyment of the movie.

Another highlight is the acting. Personally, anytime Kurt Russell is on screen I get thoroughly excited. He manages to bring so much excitement and charisma to the screen, especially in his older appearances like The Thing and Escape from New York. Russell has managed to keep this charisma frequent and applicable throughout his older years. The movie does not exactly bring any high caliber acting, nothing on a best actor level work. However, the acting does help bring the realism to the scenario of the film, it manages to add a whole other element of enjoyment and a sense of “being there” as I like to put it.

One thing we have started to look for more in films is how well special effects are put together. Whether it be practical effect extravaganza like in George Miller’s Mad Max, or insane over the top computer generated effects like in the Marvel movies, we as audiences have become more aware of this and begin to judge them like we do at the other aspects in film. And the special effects in Deepwater Horizon manage to pass for quite the excelling job. The film appears as if it mixes both practical effects and CGI. The actors also do an excellent job at selling their reaction on the ferocity of the explosions. Recently, we’ve been seeing a lot of poorly done CGI with a copious number of low budget films trying to increase their production value with CGI, but Deepwater Horizon masters their use of CGI to create an even larger impact.

Deepwater Horizon is a fun, thrill ride of a disaster film. With the action and thrills soaring the movie to new heights, carried miraculously by the well done performances and solid screenplay, Peter Berg and Mark Wahlberg deliver another box office hit once again.

Overall Grade: B-

[divider]
Hear our podcast review on Episode 189:

[divider]

Featured: The Legacy of the Fantastic Four

The Fantastic Four first debuted over fifty years ago in 1961. Created by Stan Lee and Jack Kirby, the duo wanted to do something different with the super-hero genre. They did things uncommon at the time, such as making the team a family, having one of the characters (The Thing) have unattractive powers, they were celebrities and in their first several appearances they didn’t have any sort of costume. The series would go onto be hugely popular, kick-starting what is now the Marvel universe. The adventures of Mr. Fantastic, the Invisible Woman, The Human Torch and The Thing, would continue under dozens of writers and artists over the years and the team would evolve and become more successful.

Stan and Jack’s work on the series is still considered one of the best today and is as one of the longest uninterrupted runs in all of comics. For over one-hundred issues they produced the book monthly, adding characters till popular today such as Dr. Doom, the Black Panther, Galactus, the Skrulls, the Silver Surfer and countless others. The heart of the Fantastic Four franchise has always been discovery and family. The team aren’t likely to proactively fight crime and instead combat situations arise as they explore new locations, worlds and ideas. The group’s membership has changed from time to time, but has focused mostly on the main four, with the children of Mr. Fantastic and the Invisible Woman becoming main characters.

Like any popular super hero franchise, it’s going to spawn adaptions. The first Fantastic Four animated series debuted in the 1960s produced by the Hanna-Barbera company. Another show would follow in the seventies (notoriously lacking the Human Torch), then again in the 1990s and the mid 2000s. The first live action film is the infamous 1994 film by B-movie legend Roger Corman. The film was only made in order for the studio to keep the licence and only ever released as a leak. With the modern popularity of super hero films, two movies would be released in the 2000s; Fantastic Four and Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer. The films would be modest successes but the squeal made less than the first, despite costing more. A reboot of the series was released in 2015 and was met with negative reviews and was less successful than the other films.

Merchandise is ripe for the Fantastic Four. Any item you can think of, the team have had it. Toys, books, clothing, bedsheets, lamps, posters, confectioneries, albums and more have all been released based on the FF. Various video games have been produced in the past, with notable example being the 1997 release for the Playstation. Both of the 2000s films had video game tie-ins. You can play as the Fantastic Four until your heart is content today with online slots provided by Coral based on the team. The Fantastic Four have made numerous other appearances in video games, being playable in both Marvel Ultimate Alliance games, MMORPG Marvel Heroes, Lego Marvel Super Heroes and more.

The Fantastic Four have been around for over half a century and with all the ups and despite the downs, they’ll easily be around for the next half.

Featured: So, they’re making a live-action adaptation of The Lion King, huh?

0

We all knew it was coming, right? Last week Disney announced that they would be joining forces with director Jon Favreau to create a live-action adaptation of The Lion King. Well, as you’ll hear on Episode 189, we couldn’t let that news slip through the cracks on our show. Despite being in the middle of our Harry Potter Movie Series, we needed to discuss this further. So, for the first time since Episode 5 all the way back in 2013, we decided to forgo our Top 3 segment, making #189 the first show since then to not have some sort of list segment. And it was totally worth it.

For a little bit of context, I’m a *huge* fan of The Lion King. It was a big piece of my childhood and I would still argue to this day that The Lion King is one of the best animated films of all-time. It perhaps *is* the best animated film of all-time. Simply on principle, this news is alarming. However, my biggest questions are more fundamental. If this is supposed to be live-action, but it’s executed with heavy CGI in the same vein as The Jungle Book, isn’t that still technically animated since there are no human characters? Also, how are you going to replace the iconic vocal performance from James Earl Jones? Should you just re-cast him? And don’t even get me started on Hans Zimmer’s Oscar-winning score. How are they going to replicate the music of this film, which is itself a significant piece of cinema history?

Laying all of that aside, there is reason to be hopeful for this project. First of all, Disney seems to have their heads on straight with all of their properties. Of course this is subjective, but if you ask me, Disney Animation, Marvel, Star Wars and these live-action remakes have mostly been great, with only a few misses here and there. Meaning, Disney has all of their arms working in unison right now. As for the live-action remakes, Cinderella, The Jungle Book and Pete’s Dragon, have all been solid re-imaginations. I haven’t seen the Alice in Wonderland films but I hear awful things about them. Maleficent was disappointing as well, but outside of those two, I’ve really enjoyed what Disney has been doing with their live-action remakes.

And that brings us to Beauty and the Beast, which is another animated film I hold very close to my chest. In fact, Belle is my favorite Disney Princess. Now, I understand that the marketing for these remakes are going to pander to what people love about the original animated films, but the teaser trailer and images have absolutely captured the spirit of Disney’s original Beauty and the Beast. All of the evidence suggests to me that Bill Condon’s film will 1000% render the heart of that story while visually regurgitating what we love so much about Beauty and the Beast aesthetically. I am so excited for that film and love the direction that film is heading at the moment.

If Beauty and the Beast lands for me, coupled with my already love for The Jungle Book and Cinderella, I may actively be in favor of a remake for The Lion King. At the end of the day, I still have questions and the very idea makes me nervous, but the evidence says to me that I shouldn’t be at this point. If you’re like my co-host Brendan, and you didn’t like The Jungle Book or Cinderella or Pete’s Dragon, then I sympathize with your more severe hesitations. However those films did land for me pretty hard, and I’m a big fan of Favreau’s work. If he brings the same kind of enthusiasm and vision to The Lion King as he did with The Jungle Book, that only adds to my potential excitement for this project.

What about you though? Where do you sit on all of this?

Listen to more of our thoughts on Episode 189 below:

Podcast: Deepwater Horizon, The Lion King Remake, The Chamber of Secrets – Episode 189

This podcast is brought to you by us and the InSession Film Store! Get your t-shirt today!

This week on the InSession Film Podcast, we discuss Peter Berg’s latest film, Deepwater Horizon, starring Mark Wahlberg. Also, for the first time since Episode 5 (yep, that’ right), we forgo our Top 3 segment to discuss this business regarding the announcement of a live-action adaptation of Disney’s The Lion King in a segment we call Let’s Rethink This. Finally, we top off the show by continuing our Harry Potter Movie Series discussing Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets.

On this week’s show, we are joined by film critic Neil Ramjee, who was absolutely wonderful. The last time Neil joined us on the main show, he helped us review Jon Stewart’s Rosewater way back in 2014. So, he was definitely due to get back on the show, and he did not disappoint. We especially had a blast discussing The Lion King and where Disney may or may not be taking that film. It’s a film very dear to our hearts, as well as yours probably, so you can imagine the passion we had there.

On that note, check out the show and let us know what you think in the comment section. Thanks for listening and thanks for supporting the InSession Film Podcast!

– Deepwater Horizon Movie Review (6:53)
Grades
JD: B+
Brendan: B+
Neil: B

– Let’s Rethink This (39:59)

When Disney announced this last week that they were going to be doing a live-action adaption of The Lion King, you can imagine we had some thoughts come to my immediately. It’s been a very long time since we’ve done a main show without having some sort of “list” segment, however we did not want to pause our Harry Potter series, so we replaced our Top 3 section with another edition of Let’s Rethink This because we *needed* to have this conversation. What are your thoughts on this news of a remake for The Lion King?

Discussion Segment Sponsor: First Time Watchers Podcast

[divider]
RELATED: Listen to Episode 188 of the InSession Film Podcast where we discussed The Magnificent Seven!

[divider]

– Harry Potter Movie Series: Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (1:17:06)
Grades
JD: B
Brendan: B
Neil: A-

– Music

Take Me Down – Gary Clark Jr.
The Circle of Life (The Lion King version) – Carmen Twillie, Lebo M.
Prologue: Book II – John Williams
The Return of the Eagle – Atli Örvarsson

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Stitcher
InSession Film Podcast – Episode 189

[divider]

Next week on the show:

Main Review: Birth of a Nation
Top 3: Controversial Movies
Harry Potter Movie Series: Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

Sundance-Birth-of-a-Nation

[divider]

Help Support The InSession Film Podcast

If you want to help support us, there are several ways you can help us and we’d absolutely appreciate it. Every penny goes directly back into supporting the show and we are truly honored and grateful. Thanks for your support and for listening to the InSession Film Podcast!

VISIT OUR DONATE PAGE HERE

Movie Review: The Hollars is a mixed bag of hits and misses


Director: John Krasinski
Writers: James C. Strouse (as Jim Strouse)
Stars: Sharlto Copley, Charlie Day, Richard Jenkins, John Krasinski, Anna Kendrick, Margo Martindale

Synopsis: A man returns to his small hometown after learning that his mother has fallen ill and is about to undergo surgery.

[/info]

Ever since 2005, John Krasinski has filled our hearts with joy. Seeing him play Jim Halpert on The Office just made the world fall head over heels in love with the american actor. But, like most up and coming actors, Krasinski wants to achieve a bit more with his career, broadening his horizons and expanding his knowledge on film. Krasinski begins this process with his first feature film The Hollars.

The Hollars stars Krasinski in the lead role, and he shares the screen with several other all star actors and actresses. The Hollars revolves around John Hollar (John Krasinski) who returns to his hometown to visit his mother Sally Hollar (Margo Martingale) after it is discovered that she has a brain tumor the size of a softball. John returns home to take a glorified walk down memory lane with his ex-lovers, brother, father, and even some new enemies that emerge.

The Hollars is a wonderful statement on the life of suburban families. Despite that the meaning of the film is incredibly joyous, the film has several flaws. First of all, the screenplay is horrendous. A good majority of the lines that characters say are pure exposition. They speak their thoughts with no hesitation at all proving that bad screenwriting can ruin an otherwise perfect film. The Hollars has a lot of potential, and several things about the film create exquisite emotion with the audience. Just, the characters speak in one of the most fake ways I’ve seen in a film.

Another poor aspect to the film is the characters. Krasinski and his screenwriter Jim Strouse do an excellent job at making sure each character has an arch. Every character learns something, and has discovered a new aspect of themselves by the end of the film, which is
satisfying, but we as an audience have no reason to care about the characters’ growth. The characters do grow and morph into people with new perspectives on life but that means nothing if I can’t care or love the character. Events just sort of occur in The Hollars, without giving us any connotation as to why we should care about these characters. So when poor things happen to the characters, no emotion is shared with the audience. It’s all just pointless interactions with pointless results.

However, the film does manage to give quite the underlying message that does stick with you quite well. Even though the events that occur carry no substance, the events do bring a perspective about life to light. The message being “things happen, death, heartbreak, realization that you won’t be with someone again, you are going to let people down, and you are not always going to get what you want, but that’s okay.” And this is a magnificent way to bring an element of lightheartedness to the smorgishboard of depression that is splattered throughout the film. The Hollars does not deliver in a lot of areas, but as far delivering a message and making the audience understand something about human life, it does achieve this immaculately.

As far as directing for Krasinski, this is not something to be ashamed of. Krasinski clearly has a vision as a director, and knows what he is doing behind the camera. He manages to create emotion and get emotion in the performance of his actors, which is the most stressful part of directing, and he nails it. This is not a bad debut, Krasinski fires on all cylinders as a director, and I would be more than willing to be that the reason that this film lacks in many other ares is because of the screenplay.

The Hollars is an insanely average film. A film that tries to be serious at times, but cannot help but be comedic, while also managing to deliver a powerful stroke of emotion through it’s subtext. The Hollars cannot decide what it wants to be, so the film leaves it up to the audience for how they perceive what they just watched. And for me, the screenplay is horrendous, the acting is top notch with an all star cast, and Krasinski need to get another shot at directing more films because he clearly has a vision that needs to be seen and recognized.

Overall Grade: C

[divider]

Movie Review: Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children is an endearing adventure


Director: Tim Burton
Writers: Ransom Riggs (based upon the novel written by), Jane Goldman (screenplay)
Stars: Eva Green, Asa Butterfield, Samuel L. Jackson, Ella Purnell

Synopsis: When Jacob discovers clues to a mystery that stretches across time, he finds Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children. But the danger deepens after he gets to know the residents and learns about their special powers.

[/info]

Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children is the latest young adult book to transition to the big screen. There have been many lucrative franchises and films that never should have been greenlit, if you ask me. Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children, however, is a visionary spectacle in all phases. Tim Burton is the only person that can bring author Ranson Riggs narrative to the big screen. I went into this movie with no knowledge of the source material, but I think regardless of whether you’re a fan of the book or Burton himself, there is much to appreciate here. It’s perhaps an open question regarding potential sequels to this film, but on it’s own, Miss Peregrine does deliver some warmth.

Jacob “Jake” Portman (Asa Butterfield) is misunderstood by his parents but is very close to his grandfather Abraham (Terence Stamp). Grandpa tells countless stories about the time he lived in a house with “the special children” before joining the British army. After tragedy strikes, Jacob travels to Wales, the location of Grandpa’s old school, with his father Franklin (Chris O’Dowd ) to see if Grandpa’s stories and photos are real or just hocus pocus. The pair finds the house as nothing more than a shell of its former self, as it was hit by German bombs on Sept. 3, 1943. Searching his own, Jacob enters a portal that lands him back to Sept. 3, 1943, and he soon discovers Tim Burton’s marvelous set pieces. The school beautifully sits isolated by itself in a sea of trees and a myriad of plants and trees. Every inch on the school is a thing of beauty but nothing as beautiful as Miss Peregrine (Eva Green) herself. Miss Peregrine is dressed in all black and easily stands out among the crowd. Miss Peregrine can on occasion transform into a Peregrine falcon, and when she does it’s like watching the Mona Lisa being painted.

Jacob learns about the “recessive” gene of peculiarity and is introduced to the other children. Emma (Ella Purnell) is Jake’s low-key love interest who lightness requires her to metal boots so she doesn’t get whisked away. Other peculiars include a pyrokinetic teenager, an invisible boy and a teenager who can resurrect those dead for a limited time.

For the first hour, this movie is well on its way to being one of the Tim Burton’s best works due to its strong and vivid narrative. The film started to lose its steam though when we learn about the wights (undead human creatures that hunt and kill peculiars). The wights are lead by Mr. Barron (Samuel L. Jackson) and I just didn’t feel like they posed a real threat. Maybe the film didn’t flush out their characters enough for the film, but either way, they didn’t quite work here.

If Burton would have focused more on the relationship between Jake and Emma, instead on opting for an extravagant special effect ending, this really could have been something special. Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children is no Harry Potter but it has intrigued me enough to see a sequel if it does get greenlit. I would like to see how the relationship between Jake and Emma progresses and would also like to see more of Miss Peregrine.

Overall Grade: B

[divider]

Podcast: Rams, Jafar Panahi’s Taxi – Extra Film

This week on the InSession Film Podcast: Extra Film segment, we discuss two great foreign-language films in the Icelandic film Rams, as well as the Iranian film Jafar Panahi’s Taxi!

We’ve mentioned on the show a few times how indie films have been stellar this year and this week’s show only enhances that notion. Both Rams and Jafar Panahi’s Taxi are amazing foreign-language films that should be seen by all cinephiles. Hopefully our discussion will entice you to see them if you’re not sure.

On that note, have fun listening to this week’s Extra Film segment and let us know what you think in the comment section below. Hope you enjoy and thanks for listening!

– Rams Movie Review (8:40)
Grades
Brendan: A
JD: A

– Jafar Panahi’s Taxi Movie Review (38:56)
Grades
Brendan: A
JD: A

– Music

Rams – Atli Örvarsson
Daramad – Hossein Alizadeh
The Return of the Eagle – Atli Örvarsson

We try to make this the best movie podcast we possibly can and we hope you enjoy them. Subscribe today on iTunes and Stitcher and please leave us a review on iTunes. You can also find us on Soundcloud, PlayerFM and TuneIn Radio as well. We really appreciate all your support of the InSession Film Podcast.

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Stitcher
Rams, Jafar Panahi’s Taxi – Extra Film

[divider]

Mobile App

To hear this Extra Film episode and everything else we do, download our apps on the Amazon Market for Android and the Podcast Box app on IOS devices. The mobile app covers all of our main shows, bonus podcast’s and everything else relating to the InSession Film Podcast. Thanks for your wonderful support and listening to our show. It means the world to us!

[divider]

Help Support The InSession Film Podcast

If you want to help support us, we would greatly appreciate it! For more info, CLICK HERE.

Featured: Anticipated Deepwater Horizon

0

This weekend on Episode 189 we’ll be discussing Peter Berg’s latest film, Deepwater Horizon, starring Mark Wahlberg. Berg is clearly not the best director working today, but he has made some entertaining films over his career. Friday Night Lights is legitimately a very good film, if you ask me, and it’s easily Berg’s best film to date. In fact, I’d go as far to say that it’s one of the best football movies I’ve seen. However, after that Berg’s filmography becomes rather interesting. Personally, I’m a big fan of Lone Survivor but I’m willing to admit that the final act of that film is a big mess. I’d argue the first two acts of Lone Survivor are riveting and emotionally very stirring. It’s subjectively some of my favorite filmmaking from Berg. Additionally, the first half of Hankcock is also fun to watch. On Episode 181, I actually had drunk Hancock as an honorable mention when we discussed movie villains. I love Will Smith in the first half of that film in his hysterical drunk-rage. The second half of Hancock is ridiculous and flawed to say the least, but the first half is entertaining enough and laid the foundation very well for that premise. The Rundown has some fun moments as well but the rest of Berg’s resume after that is mediocre at best.

With all of that said, while Berg isn’t a director I get up for, he is someone who knows how to conjure entertaining scenes that can move you at a basic movie level. Deepwater Horizon is a film that on paper should serve Berg well in that manner. My major concern for that film, is that the story behind it is more than action and silly humor. Deepwater Horizon is a tragic story that left behind huge ramifications. There is serous drama here that should be depicted with diligence. Is Berg capable of handling that well? Sure, but I’m a bit dubious.

The other concern is Mark Wahlberg. Now, I’m a big fan of Wahlberg, however I haven’t seen serious Wahlberg in awhile. He was serviceable in Lone Survivor, but as stated above, this story will need to feature a different Wahlberg. I’m sure Wahlberg’s personality will seep through in the beginning, but can he carry the film’s emotion by the end? I don’t know yet, especially given the trajectory of his career over the last five years.

For what it’s worth, I’m a fan of this combo on paper. In theory, this could work with the pieces it has. Would I have chose them to tell this specific story? Not at all, but this could still work. I haven’t read any early reviews but have heard some rumblings that it’s not bad, which is promising. So here’s to hoping that all of my fears are put to rest this weekend. What about you? Are you excited for Deepwater Horizon?

[divider]

Here’s what else you can expect this weekend at the box office:

Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children

Masterminds
Queen of Katwe (wide)
American Honey (limited)
Denial (limited)
A Man Called Ove (limited)

Poll: What is your favorite movie directed by Peter Berg?

This weekend on Episode 189, we’ll be discussing Peter Berg’s latest film starring Mark Wahlberg, Deepwater Horizon. Now, I find this poll question fascinating because Berg is a director that has a rather precise resume. His films are consistenly middle of the road, outside arguably Friday Night Lights. So, I’m very curious to see where this poll goes, as I could see these votes being spread out. Surly Friday Night Lights wins this poll, but after that it could go anywhere!

On that note, what is your favorite Peter Berg film? Vote now!