Director: Alfonso Cuarón
Writers: Alfonso Cuarón, Jonás Cuarón
Stars: Sandra Bullock, George Clooney, Ed Harris

Synopsis: A medical engineer and an astronaut work together to survive after an accident leaves them adrift in space.

[/info]

DIRECTION
The first thing to know about Alfonso Cuarón’s Gravity, is that it’s not just a visual spectacle, but it’s an interesting character piece as well. However, it’s the visual style here that places this movie among some of the best we’ve ever seen. It’s the best 3D movie since Avatar and you can tell he’s been working on this for years. Many shots specifically rely on the 3D effect to give you the trill ride Cuarón is looking for and it’s incredibly effective. The aesthetic is the best I’ve ever seen for a space movie and is one of the more realistic one’s you’ll encounter to date. You really feel like you’re in space floating around and experiencing something you never have before. The camera almost operates as it’s floating around too. It circles often, turns in various ways and it very specific to show you depth and the different ranges of space. The visuals of earth and the sun are absolutely gorgeous and breathtaking. This is easily the best visual effects in quite some time and easily the best of 2013. Buckle up and enjoy the ride.

Grade: A+

[divider]

SCRIPT
The story is pretty simple on the surface. Ryan Stone, Sandra Bullock, is a medical engineer and is teamed up with astronaut Matt Kowalski, George Clooney, who are working on a new project up in space in lower Earth orbit when disaster strikes. It’s a simple survivor story right? Wrong. They both become adrift in space and now have to team up to survive and figure out how to get back home. Throughout the struggle, we find out that Stone has some bad heartache and is still learning to grieve and let go of her pain. Yet, Kowalski, is a fun-loving guy looking to break some space records but ultimately knows what to do in order to survive. Once you start digging beneath the surface, Gravity speaks to amazing concepts of struggle and the fight to survive. This is especially difficult when you don’t have anything to live for, but when you find that reason, it’s not about just getting by but living each moment like it’s your last. Sure, some parts of the script rely on coincidences and luck, but those moments are forgivable and small in the big picture of things.

Grade: A-

[divider]

PERFORMANCES
Sandra Bullock can be hit or miss, depending on who you ask, but in Gravity, she’s a homerun. Regardless of what you think about Bullock, she does drama well and as a character who is traumatized in life and now the situation she faces, Bullock shines. Her character has depth and she brings a lot of emotion to her which is incredibly effective. You fall for her character and the struggle that she’s in, both as a person and the situation. To me, this is Sandra Bullock’s best role she’s ever done. George Clooney has less screen time than expected but is also very good. He’s the jokster, fun-loving astronaut that has a lot of stories to tell. He’s also smart and comes across very engaging. Clooney doesn’t have as much to do but is really good for what his character calls for. And you have to love the Ed Harris cameo. He was amazing in Apollo 13 as the NASA commander and is back in Houston as the voice that communicates back to our struggling astronauts.

Grade: A+

[divider]

SCORE
This is by far Steven Price’s best score. He was great in The World’s End, but his score not only is effective here but it’s a critical piece to the film. This movie calls for emotion and is a huge spectacle and Price’s score reflects that beautifully. He uses a lot of strings mixed with digital music and even some voice work. It’s a good listen outside of the film and is perfect for what this film needed.

Grade: A+

[divider]

FINAL THOUGHTS
Gravity is a movie you want to see in 3D. In fact, go to the biggest IMAX 3D screen you can find. The visuals are absolutely stunning and gives you the best 3D thrill ride you’ve seen in a long time. The performances shine and you feel like you’re a part of the action in space. If you want to know what it’s like in space without ever going there, watch this movie. It’s absolutely incredible.

Overall Grade: A+

Director: Cody Cameron, Kris Pearn
Writers: John Francis Daley, Jonathan M. Goldstein, Phil Lord, Chris Miller, Erica Rivinoja
Stars: Bill Hader, Anna Faris, Will Forte, James Caan, Andy Samberg

Synopsis: Flint Lockwood now works at The Live Corp Company for his idol Chester V. But he’s forced to leave his post when he learns that his most infamous machine is still operational and is churning out menacing food-animal hybrids.

[/info]

DIRECTION
Cody Cameron and Kris Pearn knew exactly who they were preaching too in Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs 2. Not all animated films are built solely for kids, but this is definitely one of those movies. It’s cheesy, in all kinds of pun-y ways, goofy and is going for a kid’s laugh on every scene. The visuals are good and sometimes pretty funny. Cameron and Pearn’s biggest misses is the story, which doesn’t live up to the first one. Everything else is right in line with the first film. Overall though, it’s a film adults may not have as much fun with but your kid’s will love it.

Grade: B+

[divider]

SCRIPT
The story literally picks up right after the end of the first film. And I mean literally. We see the final scene of the first Cloudy and the story picks up from there. We find out that Flint Lockwood has an inventor idol, Chester V. and his The Live Corp Company, who has been tasked with the clean up of the island. The infamous food making machine is still alive and making menacing food animals that are destroying the island and trying to swim to the mainland. Lockwood is eventually tasked with going back to the island to destroy his machine once and for all. Every cliche you can think of is here and it lacks the kind of heart that made the first film so likable. Now, this movie does have heart and it takes a turn toward the third act that’s pretty good and says something about your friends’ and what they should mean to you. It also says something about having compassion towards things you may judge at a first glance which I though was done well too. But at some point it just becomes complacent with a cheesy, over-the-top story and relies heavily on puns to make it entertaining.

Grade: B-

[divider]

PERFORMANCES
The performances are much like the first one and they don’t give anything new. Bill Hader does a good job of playing Flint once a gain and brings the kind of voice to this character that was fun in the first film. Anna Faris is good as well and even brings a little depth later on in the film. Andy Samberg once again plays the annoying friend who likes to dress up in a chicken soon and Terry Crews plays the tough guy cop who won’t cry. I will say Kristen Schaal plays an ape in this film that eventually has a bigger role and delivers a good performance. She was good here. Given the script, these guys made the film funnny and did what was needed here.

Grade: B+

[divider]

SCORE
The music here is far from the best of the year for an animated film but it does deliver on some fronts. Mark Mothersbaugh’s score is okay but mostly forgettable as the soundtrack music cloud’s, all pun-intended, the score. The soundtrack music isn’t the greatest either but does add a nice variety that brings some good touches to the film.

Grade: B

[divider]

FINAL THOUGHTS
As an animated film, Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs 2 will bring lots of laughs for kids. They hardly wrote this with parents or adults in mind but it still works in many ways. It’s very cliche-driven and the story lacks big time compared to the first film, but it does have some good moments in the third act of the film. I wouldn’t waste money on this in 3D either. If you like food pun though, it’s the one for you.

Overall Grade: B

Release Date: 2012
Director: Joseph Gordon-Levitt
Writer: Joseph Gordon-Levitt
Stars: Joseph Gordon-Levitt (Inception, The Dark Knight Rises, Looper, (500) Days of Summer), Scarlett Johansson (Lost in Translation, The Avengers, The Prestige), Julianne Moore (Magnolia, The Big Lebowski, Children of Men, Crazy Stupid Love), Tony Danza (Crash, Who’s The Boss?, Taxi, Angels in the Outfield), Brie Larson (21 Jump Street, The Spectacular Now, Scott Pilgrim vs. The World)

Synopsis: A New Jersey guy dedicated to his family, friends, and church, develops unrealistic expectations from watching porn and works to find happiness and intimacy with his potential true love.

[/info]

DIRECTION

The feature-length directorial debut of one of America’s favorite young Hollywood stars is calculated, intelligent, and will spark a slew of  different conversations from moviegoers and critics alike. For myself, I had been looking forward to this movie all year, and had high hopes for it. Not only do I love a good social commentary, but since Lost in Translation, I’ve thought Scarlett Johansson is one of the more underrated Hollywood actresses and have wished for her to get more challenging, interesting roles. Her beauty overshadows her talent, and she is written off much too quickly by pundits. Unlike earlier this year with my disappointment in Sofia Coppola’s The Bling Ring, my lofty expectations were not just fulfilled, but built upon. This movie opens up with some shots that immediately tells the viewer to take note of the cultural commentary which this story is about to embark upon. A similar opening this year came from Spring Breakers, although Don Jon is much more softcore and subtle. I’d say that’s a good comparison of Gordon-Levitt and Harmony Korine, too. They both share their experiences in life in vastly different ways, but are able to connect with engaged viewers who are prepared for a satire and can relate to the world he works in. The way Gordon-Levitt directs this film shows he’s been paying very close attention to the talent which has surrounded him during his impressive yet young career. His choices are modern, memorable, and sometimes even innovative. This is a guy who understands American culture beyond the hills of Hollywood. This is a guy who connects with his audience. This is a guy who we have watched grow into his own, and if Don Jon is a preview of what is ahead for him, Joseph Gordon-Levitt is not only going to maintain his place in front of the camera, but behind it as well.

Grade: A

[divider]

SCRIPT

The story follows Jon, a guy in his late twenties who we might mistake for a cast member of MTV’s Jersey Shore. Fulfilling the “bro’ lifestyle by working out, hitting the clubs, and “smashing”, Jon sees women as little more than a piece of meat. As the dust settles from our introduction to Jon, we realize there is more to him than we expect. His addiction to pornography is as faithful as his addiction to the confession box after every Sunday Mass. His family life is interesting, and the people he’s surrounded by genuinely care about him (all except for his girls, of course). Gordon-Levitt wrote a script that feels current, if not futuristic. It shows the problems of young America through a brutally honest and refreshing lens–what we expect of each other, how we choose partners, and how selfish we can be. He provides caricatures that unfold into people we can identify with, even if we hate to admit it sometimes. This movie isn’t just about porn addiction or stereotypes, but it’s about family dynamics and generational differences. The most impressive thing about this script, though, was Esther (Julianne Moore). This character is not only enormously innovative and surprising, but also integral to the movie’s themes and ideas. The exploration of what millennials want in terms of a partner is tantalizing and after the movie, my date and I had a 2 hour conversation about us–the millennials. This script does what any great movie can do–it entertains, it provokes, and it moves the cultural conversation forward. This is a groundbreaking piece of screenwriting and I can’t wait to see what Gordon-Levitt has up his sleeve next.

Grade: A+

[divider]

PERFORMANCES

Joseph-Gordon Levitt completes the hat trick with his performance as Jon (which you know enough about already if you’re still reading). Scarlett Johansson is a consistent, confident, and well-versed actress who flexes her muscle as Barbara, the primary love interest of Jon. When watching Scarlett in this movie, keep in mind what roles she has done in the past and you will gain a clear appreciation of how much skill and range she possesses. Her accent in this film is so enjoyable, and Barbara’s vapid personality traits in some areas of life represent exactly what people might stereotype Scarlett as (so she knows exactly how to act them out). Tony Danza’s performance as Jon Sr. recalls memories of the surprisingly good performance given by Robert DeNiro in Silver Linings Playbook. Here we have a veteran actor who is normally cast as men similar to his role on late-eighties sitcom Who’s The Boss?. Here, he proves he has not lost a step even if his age does show physically. Julianne Moore’s performance might not seem as impressive as the character she is given but at the same time her presence itself in the film lends a great deal of credibility to the theme that Gordon-Levitt focuses on.

Grade: A+

[divider]

SCORE

The score/soundtrack to the film was nothing amazing but it did feel current, fresh, hip, and not overbearing. A memorable sing-along featured in the trailer occurs at a perfect time in the film, and even if this strength is the only thing you remember about the musical selections here, that’s not a bad thing.

Grade: B

[divider]

Final Thoughts:

Don Jon ranks among my favorite films of 2013 because I am around the same age as Jon and I do face similar challenges. With that said, this is a great piece of work and I believe most audiences around the country will admire its honesty if nothing else. Also, if you don’t discuss this one afterward, it won’t be because you aren’t left with anything to talk about.

Overall Grade: A+

Director: Ron Howard
Writers: Peter Morgan (screenplay)
Stars: Daniel Brühl, Chris Hemsworth, Olivia Wilde

Synopsis: A re-creation of the merciless 1970s rivalry between Formula One rivals James Hunt and Niki Lauda.

[/info]

DIRECTION
Ron Howard is amazing. His camera work here is absolutely incredible. I wouldn’t at all be surprised if the cinematography and the sound editing are nominated for Oscars. The engines roaring alongside Hans Zimmer’s score really gets you into the mood. The backdrop is gritty with lots of dark and grey colors giving it a tough 1970’s aesthetic. Howard places is camera so specifically and we get so many different angles that are gripping. Camera work inside the cars giving you the intense look of driving an F1 car as well as camera’s on the grass looking up as they fly by. Howard’s use of slow motion is also perfect and helps build the intensity of the rivalry he is exploring here. The racing is intense and the dangers are shown in some dramatic ways as the suspense keeps building up. The biggest problem is that Formula 1 isn’t the biggest of sports here in the U.S. If people can get past that and go see this, they won’t regret it.

Grade: A

[divider]

SCRIPT
The story follows two F1 drivers in the mid 1970’s that don’t always get a long but have a mutual respect for one another. It centers around British driver, James Hunt and the Austrian Niki Lauda. Peter Morgan’s scropt is brilliant and Howard brings it to life in some really great ways. In essence, both characters are the protagonist and the antagonist of the story. The film explores Hunt and his immature ways but at the same time makes him very likable. Then the story switches to Lauda and his quest to live his own life outside the big family business, yet again making him likable. However, at the same time each take their own turn in being the “bad guy” and showing you qualities that make this person flawed and unlikable in some ways. But then the movie brings it back around showing you why these characters are good characters to root for and the mutual respect they have for one another. It’s the competition that drives them in this story. What makes it so great though, is that the audience really gets to choose who they want to root for. They build up and tear down each character so flawlessly. The use of narration at the beginning and at the end was a perfect choice as well. The ending becomes a bit sentimental and hits the buttons that you’d expect from Howard and company.

Grade: A

[divider]

PERFORMANCES
Daniel Brühl and Chris Hemsworth are amazing. This is perhaps Hemsworth’s best as he portray’s James Hunt in some incredible ways. He’s the dangerous driver that has Tony Stark mentalities in terms of partying, women and being extremely likable. Yet Hemsworth shows some depth and some emotion here as well which this character calls for in some ways. Brühl, who you may know from Inglorious Basterds, almost steals the show. He’s the Austrian car genius who becomes famous for knowing how to make the cars lighter and faster, thus making him part of the Ferrari team. One can argue he’s the bigger lead here as he narrates a good chunk of the story and brings in some great perspectives. Brühl’s performance is spot on though and brings life to this character even when Lauda is more deadpanned. Olivia Wilde is good here although her character is a small role. This is about Brühl and Hemsworth and they carry the movie extremely well.

Grade: A+

[divider]

SCORE
Freakin Hans Zimmer. The dude is on fire lately. A lot of people like to criticize Zimmer for having score’s that are similar or nothing new but they work. His score for Man of Steel added a lot to that film and his score for The Lone Ranger was about the only good part of that movie. And his score for Rush was really great, again. It added a lot of intensity to the racing moments and has become something he’s perfected. The score here is more laid back and in the backdrop though many moments but when the action ramped up, so did his score as well as your emotion.

Grade: A-

[divider]

FINAL THOUGHTS
Rush was an unexpected pleasant surprise. Given the sports stature of F1 in the U.S., I didn’t have much expectations but Ron Howard usually delivers and he does once again. The cinematography is gorgeous and makes it visually very exciting. The performances are stand outs which makes the story feel so alive in many places.

Overall Grade: A

Director: Jeff Renfroe
Writers: Jeff Renfroe (screenplay), Svet Rouskov (additional writer)
Stars: Kevin Zegers, Laurence Fishburne, Bill Paxton

Synopsis: Forced underground by the next ice age, a struggling outpost of survivors must fight to preserve humanity against a threat even more savage than nature.

[/info]

DIRECTION
Jeff Renfroe’s The Colony is something like The Day After Tomorrow meets The Road but with bad visuals and some bad acting outside Laurence Fishburne and Bill Paxton. What’s disappointing about The Colony is that is started off really well but Renfroe lost something early on and then he drops it off an icy cliff. Like I said, the visuals are pretty bad for the most part and it feels literally like he merged two movies together. Renfroe does have some nice touches and has something to say about human endurance that is endearing.

Grade: C+

[divider]

SCRIPT
As I mentioned this story is like a crossover of The Day After Tomorrow and The Road. Imagine a group of people needing to survive right after the events of The Day After Tomorrow. People in a frozen apocalyptic earth are forced to live in groups called “colony’s”. Well this story follows Colony 7 where they do everything they can to survive including giving sick people the option to be shot and killed on the spot or to run out into the frozen wilderness to die. What a fun decision, right? Well once Colony 5 sends stress signals, a group decides to go and investigate to see if they need help. But what they discover is something awful and a premise I shouldn’t say since it may spoil it. It’s at that point, the story falls into a stereotypical, been-done-before apocalyptic movie. I’m okay with elements that have been done before but make it fun and appealing. The Colony isn’t that. A few characters are interesting but you don’t care for much of them, thus making the ending irrelevant. However, the story does say something about fighting till the end and keeping hope, which many of these type movies tend to do. But I think The Colony does do that part well.

Grade: C+

[divider]

PERFORMANCES
Laurence Fishburne and Bill Paxton are strong here. Fishburne is the leader you want with the voice that gives you hope of survival in an awful situation. He’s really good and gives the film a great lift. However his character takes a turn that isn’t surprising but lowers the movie a bit when it happens. Paxton is the bad guy you hate and you want to punch him in the face throughout the whole thing, thus meaning his performance is solid. The rest of the cast is dry and uninteresting. Kevin Zegers is okay but isn’t enough to carry the movie.

Grade: B+

[divider]

SCORE
Jeff Danna gets the nod to score here and it’s not bad. For a low budget B-movie, this is a score that’s fitting and has a nice element to it. It’s the dramatic, end-of-the-world score that we’d expect here but it’s not over-the-top or adding any melodrama. Danna knows the type of film he’s dealing with and does what he needs to.

Grade: B+

[divider]

FINAL THOUGHTS
The Colony starts off strong but ultimately falls flat due to bad visuals, lower-than-average acting outside Fishburne and Paxton and the story isn’t new and doesn’t add excitement for me to care. This is one you can skip or wait for it to come on TNT when it comes to TV.

Overall Grade: C+