Home Blog Page 41

Movie Review: โ€˜Nobody 2โ€™ Is a Repetitive but Fun Enough Bloody Romp


Director: Timo Tjahjanto
Writers: Derek Kolstad and Aaron Rabin
Stars: Bob Odenkirk, Connie Nielsen, Christopher Lloyd

Synopsis: Former assassin Hutch Mansell takes his family on a nostalgic vacation to a small-town theme park, only to be pulled back into violence when they clash with a corrupt operator, a crooked sheriff, and a ruthless crime boss.


Over four years after the 87Northโ€™s Nobody surprised audiences with its brutal action set pieces and iconic performance from Bob Odenkirk, a sequel finally arrives with director Timo Tjahjanto now at the helm. Many sequels will often try to outdo what worked about the first, to the point where the overall film is lost in trying to forge a different path or follows the original too closely. Luckily for Nobody 2, Tjahjanto manages to spice things up in the director’s chair. Nobody 2 is an absolute blast of a sequel that takes the simplicity of what worked so well in the first filmโ€™s story and cranks the blood-soaked chaos to new highs. Many will say itโ€™s to a fault as the often repetitive story beats within action screenplays, and even more thin plotting than its predecessor, make it less impactful on the whole; but the sequel clearly knows what it is and doesnโ€™t waste any time providing solid laughs and brutal dismemberments at a healthy rate. All of that, tied together with Bob Odenkirkโ€™s signature charm and the usual relentlessly pulpy action sequences from Tjahjanto, and you’ve got a pretty decent 89 minutes of fun, even if it pales in comparison to his other directorial efforts.

This continuation, more or less, has very little story to work with as we follow Hutch Mansell (Odenkirk) as he yet again struggles to connect to his two children and wife, Becca (Connie Nielsen). Every day, heโ€™s often in fist fights working to pay back the debt he owes to The Barber (Colin Salmon). Still, when he decides to take a vacation and spend time with his family at his childhood spot of Plummerville, it isn’t long before the fighting finds Hutch again, and he is in the midst of more violence and clashes with another corrupt crime world. Considering that these two films likely exist due to the success of John Wick and the recent surge in secret assassin action films, I usually donโ€™t mind recycled plot points and emotional beats as long as the elements surrounding them contribute to a great experience. However, this sequel can often come across as a retread. From the entire opening minutes repeating the same interrogation and days of the week scene from the original, to melodramatic beats of tension between Becca and Hutch, the film plays it a bit too safe. While there are differences like the setting change, the more playful tone overall, the story ends up as less of a fresh take on the concept in comparison.ย 

However, despite the presence of rushed and barely present story beats, the action and film setting are still exciting, thanks to one of the next great directors of action films being behind the camera. While never quite reaching the level of scrappy rawness found in Tjahjantoโ€™s Indonesian action films, such as The Night Comes for Us and The Shadow Strays, the sequel captures a similar kinetic energy that was absent in its predecessor. The camera is never stagnant and always finds new ways to creatively showcase a body being thrown into a car window or a katana going straight through someone’s face, and it’s amazing to witness. What manages to be even more creative in its use here is the theme park setting, especially within the funhouse madness of the filmโ€™s third act. Crane games, wack-a-mole machines, water slides, and even a full funhouse mirror sequence are all used for Home Alone-like bloody kills galore, in a similar vein to the first film, but in a much more unique environment.

These scenes are aided immensely when you have the talent of an actor like Odenkirk as the lead of your film, who could even read a phone book entertainingly. Christopher Lloyd as David Mansell and RZA as Harry Mansell also return to play their scene-stealing roles from the first film, but I was most surprised at the acting showcase of Sharon Stone as the main crime boss, Lendina, in the filmโ€™s driving antagonistic force. She doesnโ€™t get much to do aside from face value generic villain one-liners and unmemorable interactions with her corrupt goon police men within Plummerville, but I at least appreciate the silly nature that she brought forward in an otherwise placeholder villain role. She clearly knew the type of film she was in and rolled with it in the time she had.ย 

The first reactions to Nobody 2 hit social media

Nobody 2 doesnโ€™t quite match the fresh juice of the first film due to its redundant story beats and lack of depth, but it still manages to capture enough of the fun B-movie action tone that is promised, thanks to a brisk runtime and a great director crafting it all. With plenty of head-bashing, bloodied brawling, and gunplay to spare, it’s hard not to be satisfied with this sequel as a whole.

Grade: B-

Movie Review (Locarno 2025): โ€˜Arcoโ€™ is an Imaginative, Albeit Too Sweet, Animation Picture


Director: Ugo Bienvenu
Writers: Ugo Bienvenu, Fรฉlix de Givry
Stars: Margot Ringard Oldra, Oscar Presanini, Nathanaรซl Perrot

Synopsis: What if rainbows were actually time travelers flying across the sky? On his first flight through time, Arco (10) crash lands from the year 3000 into our near future. His fall is witnessed by a little girl, Iris, who helps him return home.


Every day, whether thinking about art, life, or the world itself, we wonder about the futureโ€”hopeful for prosperity or fearful of damnation. Nowadays, pondering the future and whatโ€™s in store for us comes with a melancholy feeling rooted in the past, as everything seems to be getting worse by the minute, with climate change being ignored and raging politicians stripping the freedom from the people they govern. It is hard to keep your head up at times, given the daily barrage of bad news. However, a small amount of hope lingers while we ponder and question. In graphic artist-turned-filmmaker Ugo Bienvenuโ€™s feature debut, Arco (screening in the Locarno Kids Screenings at the 2025 Locarno Film Festival), these worries and aspirations for a better world are represented through a colorful, imaginative time-travel adventure.ย 

Ugo Bienvenu views the past and future through a double-sided lens that reveals hard truths and warm beauties, yet in a manner that is both accessible to children and thoughtful enough for adults. He utilizes many films as references and inspirations for his pictures, sometimes at the cost of the storyโ€™s cohesion and structure. But the animation is so mesmerizing, and his world both immersive and creative, that the viewer remains quite enamored with the story. Arco begins in a distant future, many centuries ahead of our current reality. We are introduced to the titular character (voiced by Oscar Presanini), a young boy who lives in the skies alongside his magical family. They cover the skies in lovely rainbows, creating prismatic scenery that immediately taps into Bienvenuโ€™s imaginative mind, a sense of wonder and curiosity missing in most mainstream animation pictures.ย 

The younglingโ€™s family can time travel, with the help of a mystical robe and crystal ball that permit them to go to any place in time and history. Unfortunately, Arco cannot participate in those journeys because he is under the legal age to do so. Like any other child would behave when they canโ€™t do something everyone can, Arco gets jealous of the trips their family takes while heโ€™s stuck at home. Of course, he does not understand that this gift comes with numerous responsibilities and repercussions if done incorrectly. Arco just wants to get a sense of what it is like to escape from his world into a distant, alien place. He has heard countless stories from his sister, and Arco envisions what it would be like.ย 

One day, his curiosity gets the best of him and he steals the robe and crystal ball to head on an adventure of his own. As expected, Arco gets lost somewhere on the brink of time. Arco crashes down in 2075, a time plagued by environmental disasters and technological advancements that have distanced its inhabitants, like the sentient robots built to take some of the responsibilities off the humans. Holograms are also a thing in this world, giving people the ability to be in two places at once. Of course, this affects many families, as they are removed from the tenderness of their loved ones in exchange for modern-age technology. One of those affected by this technology is Iris (Margot Ringard Oldra).ย 

Iris is a ten-year-old girl who lives with her infant brother and the assistant robot, Mikki (Alma Jodorowsky and Swann Arlaud), whom her parents bought to help around the house while they are at work. She spots the crashing Arco and rushes toward him, intrigued by his rainbow trails. Both lost in their worlds and without a parent to guide them, Iris and Arco bond over their shared sadness and isolation, making it seem as if their souls were somehow intertwined. From there, the adventure continues as Iris searches for a way to bring Arco back home, traveling into the skies and to the distant future, eons away from her reality. Throughout the film, Bienvenu creates various imaginative worlds and their respective changes induced by climate change (forest fires, rising sea levels, melting ice caps).ย 

These creations are a thing of beauty, yet plagued by tragic pasts and the suffering of previous generations. From these, Bienvenu explores the duality of hope and despair, placing Iris and Arco, both young individuals who are unfamiliar with life before them, on a journey of reflection. Arco is shaped by these ideas of climate change, which have been passed down through generations, as the Earth slowly deteriorates towards self-inflicted decay, and the parent-son dynamics interlaced within โ€“ the loss of communication, lack of tenderness, and feeling isolated in a place constantly changing. These two outsiders, Iris and Arco, go around the world and through time in search of what their own time lacks. However, what they learn is to appreciate what they do have and try to protect it while they still can. That part of the film is what struck me the most with Bienvenuโ€™s storytelling.ย 

By passing through different pasts and distant futures, Iris and Arco both notice that, somehow, each of these variations of the world is plagued by the same things. Its approach to exploring this is too sweet and safe for my liking; it takes some of the emotion out of the story. For example, the antagonists of the time-traveling younglings chase them wherever they go. But rather than being conduits for the themes explored, the โ€œvillainsโ€ are here as mere excuses to move Arco and Iris on their route to their destination without giving them much of a background. Their shenanigans might entertain children. But they take up too much time from the main characters. Arco could have benefited from either developing them further or focusing entirely on Arco and Irisโ€™ cultural heritage and how it is affected by their relationship with their parents and technology โ€” an idea that Bienvenu has explored previously in his literary works, particularly in โ€˜System Preference.โ€™ย 


Regardless of these weak characters and their motives, Arco is a bright spot in the yearโ€™s animation catalog, not solely because of its imaginative design, cementing Bienvenu as a voice to keep note of, but in how it processes its ideas for all audiences, while showing that urgent topics can be presented to younger audiences without oversimplification. The best kind of childrenโ€™s entertainment is that which presents subjects to kids that parents may struggle to explain. There are also numerous excellent examples of animated films that comment on climate change or our relationship with technology, such as Nausicaรค of the Valley of the Wind and Princess Mononoke. While Arco does not have that pristine storytelling and thematic exploration of the aforementioned Studio Ghibli pictures, what Bienvenu brings to the table is spontaneous and rich enough to celebrate.

Grade: B

Movie Review (Locarno 2025): โ€˜Blue Heronโ€™ Shows Images as Gateways to the Past and Family Memory


Director: Sophy Romvari
Writer: Sophy Romvari
Stars: Eylul Goven, Amy Zimmer, Iringรณ Rรฉti

Synopsis: A family of six settles into their new home on Vancouver Island as internal dynamics are slowly revealed through the eyes of the youngest child.


Throughout her young career, Canadian filmmaker Sophy Romvari has dedicated herself to exploring her and her familyโ€™s history through meditative shorts that encapsulate the feeling of being at a distance in life. Whether induced by grief after losing a loved one or loneliness from fragmentation, Romvari confronts herself in her work to communicate what she holds deep inside, resulting in a haunting and emotionally relieving experience for the viewerโ€“a weird contradiction that just outright moves you. Through her memories and the stories shared, we ponder our own families and grievances relating to such; what begins as personal portraits becomes a collective mirror into our own experiences.ย 

The two shorts of Romvari that I enjoy the most, Still Processing and Itโ€™s Him, both stories about grief and the importance of images (and how they move us), remind me of a film that, ever since I saw it, I havenโ€™t been able to get out of my mind. And thatโ€™s Lucy Kerrโ€™s brilliant debut, Family Portrait (which also played at the Locarno Film Festival two years ago). A collective experience of a family photo, a token of remembrance, transpires to a melancholic outlook of lost time and affliction in Kerrโ€™s picture, where she has her lead (played by Deragh Campbell) trying to catch the โ€œuncatchableโ€โ€“time through portraits and moments through moving images. And I believe Romvari is doing the same with her work, in both her documentaries and fictional stories.ย 

She tries to freeze time in her pictures and make those moments she couldnโ€™t bask in more into immortal ones, thanks to the effect cinema has. In addition, they serve as an examination of lives before her own. Her feature-length debut, Blue Heron (screening in the Concorso Cineasti del Present section at the 2025 Locarno Film Festival), follows the cinematic pattern that Romvari has been pursuing in her career so far. By utilizing her family history as the foundation for her film, Romvari sparks conversations about memory, the passage of time, and the beautiful, ominous mystery of the details that remain, all viewed through the eyes of a child experiencing a significant change in her young life, serving as a surrogate for the director.ย 

In Blue Heron, a Hungarian family of six settles into their new house in a neighborhood outside Vancouver, as seen in the filmโ€™s remarkable opening shot, which hints at ghost story-adjacent voyagerism โ€“ the audience as spectral figures who see and hear things they arenโ€™t supposed to. Accompanying the opening shot is a line that paves the way for the filmโ€™s second half and Romvariโ€™s dissection of unearthed memories, tying together the past through cinema. The line refers to Sasha, the younger child in the family, being unable to remember much from her childhood; her memories are blurred by tragic events, new horizons, and blundering experiences that hindered her young mind and heart, only for her to try and piece them together years later.ย 

The parents of the family (played by Iringรณ Rรฉti and รdรกm Tompa), who remain unnamed, have relocated for a fresh start. The cause of the move is undetermined, but one suspects that one of the reasons is the self-destructive behavior of the eldest son, Jeremy (Edik Beddoes). The mother and father donโ€™t know how to address the situation to their children, which is why they occasionally talk in their native Hungarian language to avoid their English-only-speaking childrenโ€“sons Henry (Liam Serg) and Felix (Preston Drabble), and daughter Sasha (Eylul Guven)โ€“getting worried about his worsening condition. However, the kids still notice that something is wrong, and helping him becomes a daunting task.ย 

Rather than opting for the clichรฉs of films about parents and their troubled children, Romvari ensures that Jeremy is empathetic; she does not want Jeremy to be mistreated by the audience because of his psychological issues, or to dwell on the over-sentimental quandaries that come with the dramatic heightening of the material. Romvari remains truthful and grounded, without the need to pound the hammer of overwrought insincerity. The Canadian filmmaker focuses mainly on the toll Jeremyโ€™s behavior takes on the family rather than the actions, allowing a space for the charactersโ€™ (and the audienceโ€™s) meditation on the matter, and how varying these perspectives are.ย 

A young child in Sasha, who hears and sees things she doesnโ€™t understand wholly but slowly comprehends the weight of it all; parents who try their best to attend to his needs, yet canโ€™t because they need to care for their other three kids; the inability of affording proper treatment to get a diagnosis for Jeremyโ€™s behavior. The first half of Blue Heron is marked by this toll of being unable to act, becoming an emotional experience with each moment of silence or burst of pain. There are moments when Sashaโ€™s parents utilize a camera to take photographs of happy moments they would like to preserve in timeโ€“the camera, a key tool of immortality, and Romvariโ€™s gadget for self-reflection and remembrance in her cinemaโ€“and frame them as stamps for when the dark cloud of bereavement didnโ€™t strike.ย 

Nevertheless, the darkness from the household always finds its way into the picture, much like the aforementioned Family Portrait, where a family takes quick snaps of moments in bright, beautiful places yet canโ€™t erase the sadness that comes from within them. (Or, as another example, one of the most shattering moments in Steven Spielbergโ€™s The Fabelmans: Sammy Fabelman filming while his parents enter a serious argument, never noticing his ignorance until very late.) The coldness of glancing at picturesโ€ฆ decades later, you look and think back on what happened during, before, or after such events. Sometimes, there is bliss; on other occasions, it is quite the opposite. That is what Sophy Romvari has done with her work so far and in her debut picture.ย 

She reflects without nostalgia and ponders on the root of photographs and moving images. What does a camera signify if not a capsule of tokens of life? The second half of Blue Heron explores this search for meaning in the remnants of distilled images. Sasha (now played by Amy Zimmer), twenty years having passed, reaches out to ghosts from the past and spectators from her present for answers about Jeremy and whether there was a way to change things back then. It is a search for truth through testimonials and archive footage, which makes the film operate from the perspective of a repair technician, fixing up a camera to restore past experiences.ย 


As the film heads toward a moving, chilling finale, Romvari lays out her final reflections with care and honesty. The search through photographs and testimonials becomes an act of both reckoning and healing for Sasha and Romvari. This is an attempt to piece together fractured memories and understand her past from multiple perspectives. The images we see and the stories we hear preserve and distort Sashaโ€™s memories. But through the distortion lies truth, and it shapes her present. Blue Heron is patient and passionate, often allowing the audience to bask in the coldness of the unfolding situations instead of letting the warmth envelop the cinematic passages. The bittersweet impression in the filmโ€™s climax stings plenty because of that. However, Romvari makes it crucial for us to understand the impact and importance of being swayed by our past, whether in joyful moments or those we would like to forget, and the picturesโ€”mental or physicalโ€”we carry with us on our journeys across time.

Grade: A-

Movie Review: โ€˜Sketchโ€™ Barely Scribbles Its Contrivances Away


Director: Seth Worley
Writer: Seth Worley
Stars: Tony Hale, Dโ€™Arcy Carden, Bianca Belle, Kue Lawrence, Kalon Cox

Synopsis: When a young girlโ€™s sketchbook falls into a strange pond, her drawings come to lifeโ€”chaotic, real, and on the loose. As the town descends into chaos, her family must reunite and stop the monsters they never meant to unleash.


These days, itโ€™s difficult to talk about a movie being distributed by Angel Studios without dedicating a great deal of focus to the fact that said movie is being distributed by Angel Studios. The company was put on the map by the surprise (and controversial) success of its 2023 hit, Sound of Freedom, a drama about rescuing victims of child sex trafficking that starred a devout, anti-abortion, pro-QAnon Catholic in Jim Caviezel, and one that instituted a pay-it-forward ticketing scam โ€“ to call it what it was โ€“ that bolstered the filmโ€™s box office numbers and ultimately saw the filmโ€™s screenings reach capacity at alarming rates. Sound of Freedomโ€™s supporters wanted to make sure that people could see the film for free, to have them witness the magic of its messaging, even if that magic was and should still be considered dark. Since that movieโ€™s release, Angel has quadrupled down on its mission of forcing faith-based dramas into multiplexes, most notably the animated King of Kings, in which Charles Dickens tries to recite A Christmas Carol to a London audience only to be interrupted by his son, who wishes to tell the story of Jesus Christ.

In other words, Seth Worleyโ€™s Sketch deserves better. It deserves a better home, a more inclusive one to prop up its core themes โ€“ the importance of family and imagination foremost among them โ€“ and one that doesnโ€™t use the filmโ€™s credits as an opportunity to promote an app tie-in where fans can use AI to create their own monsters, ones inspired by the drawings that take center stage in the movie. It should be noted that Sketch premiered at the 2024 Toronto International Film Festival and was acquired by Angel in April, so itโ€™s not fundamentally a studio brainchild. But it begs a dispiriting question: When a distribution company has created so much ill will for itself on the shoulders of its core values and behaviors, and later inserts those tendencies into the final product of a perfectly fine film, why would anyone in their right mind send any good will its way, no matter how much the movie in question may deserve it?ย 

Iโ€™d argue that Worleyโ€™s film โ€“ a family drama that fills something of a genre void in a theatrical landscape that would prefer to pretend that The Fantastic Four: First Steps fits its mold โ€“ isnโ€™t actually worth the Angel-inflicted fuss, as while it is, indeed, perfectly fine, itโ€™s also precisely that: Fine. Even if it imagines adolescent trauma in a far more effective fashion than most modern offerings tend to, especially those in the horror genre, thereโ€™s a surface-levelness that is unmistakably rote. Starring Tony Hale as Taylor Wyatt, a father who internalizes his grief in the aftermath of his wifeโ€™s passing to the point where his children, Amber (Bianca Belle) and Jack (Kue Lawrence), feel theyโ€™ve been left on a depressing island to fend for themselves, Sketch exists with one idea in mind: The fact that processing your emotions is a difficult but necessary task. Creatively exorcising her demons is the only way Amber knows how to cope, and when the vaguely-frightening Sesame Street-esque illustrations she scribbles into a notebook that her guidance counselor gave her begin to come to life after falling into a magical pool โ€“ Together, anyone? โ€“ itโ€™s her job, along with her brother and the school bully/know-it-all (Kalon Cox) to navigate their now-uniquely colorful world.ย 

Tony Hale debuts new movie 'Sketch' with early Knoxville screening

As the youthful trio ventures through their town and nearby woods in an effort to outrun and outsmart the monsters of Amberโ€™s own creation, Taylor and his sister, Liz (Dโ€™Arcy Carden) search for the kids who are theoretically supposed to be in school. The affair is spirited enough, and Worleyโ€™s scribbled creations are brought to life spectacularly; the visual effects team deserves some serious kudos, especially considering how much humanity has been poured into each design, unlike the monstrosities that appear in the filmโ€™s credits. Yet thereโ€™s something missing when it comes to Sketchโ€™s handling of its central loss, that dances between offering unique ways to grieve and barely saying anything more than โ€œdeath is strong, but love is stronger.โ€ Thereโ€™s truth to that idea, and Worley and co. have a handle on the necessary knowledge that they arenโ€™t about to offer any revelations related to distinct heartbreak, only in how they depict it being endured. Perhaps that should be enough; in this case, it almost is. If only this criticโ€™s cynicism wasnโ€™t hardwired to balk whenever presented with the idea that any emotion can be made easy as long as it is felt by you and those you cherish as a whole.

Grade: C+

Episode 649: Top 5 Couples In Horror Movies

This weekโ€™s episode is brought to you by Koffee Kult. Get 15% OFF with the code: ISF25

This week on the InSession Film Podcast, inspired by the new horror film Together, we talk about our Top 5 power couples in horror films! Plus, a discussion on the wild Weapons discourse and the possibility of a new Bayformers movie.

– Opening Banter / Weapons Discourse (0:40)
We begin the show this week by digging into the absolutely insane discourse around Weapons that took place last weekend. It’s nothing new, but it still boggles the mind how dismissive and obtuse the conversation often gets on social media. Which is especially disappointing in this case because Weapons is a fascinating film to talk about, regardless of where you fall on it.ย 

– New Studio Comedy / Bayformers (32:46)
Off the heels of our discussion last week on the show and questioning if we’re in a new era for Hollywood, we thought it was quite interesting to hear that Jonah Hill will be directing a new studio comedy coming to theaters next summer. Is that a coincidence? Maybe, but perhaps it’s not. We also had some fun talking about the possibility of Michael Bay coming back to Transformers. The rumor mill is a buzzing and we’re excited about it.ย 


RELATED: Listen to Episode 610 of the InSession Film Podcast where we discussed our Top 10 Movies of 2024!


– Top 5 Couples in Horror Movies (47:19)
This was a unique and fun topic to discuss given that it’s not all that common in film conversation. Horror obviously comes with plenty to mine out of them, but romantic couples aren’t necessarily at the top of the list. Which made this both distinct, but also challenging when trying to narrow down our list. In the end, we had a great time with this one. With that said, what would be your Top 5 horror couples?

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
InSession Film Podcast – Episode 649

Next week on the show:

Highest 2 Lowest and Spike Lee

Help Support The InSession Film Podcast

If you want to help support us, there are several ways you can help us and we’d absolutely appreciate it. Every penny goes directly back into supporting the show and we are truly honored and grateful. Thanks for your support and for listening to the InSession Film Podcast!

VISIT OUR DONATE PAGE HERE

Movie Review: ‘My Mother’s Wedding’ Is Funny and Charming


Director: Kristin Scott Thomas
Writers: Kristin Scott Thomas, John Mickelthwait
Stars: Scarlett Johansson, Sienna Miller, Emily Beecham

Synopsis: ย Three sisters return to their home for the third wedding of their twice-widowed mother. But the mother and daughters are forced to revisit the past and confront the future, with help from a colorful group of unexpected wedding guests.


There’s a warmth to the family dramedy that never quite dissipates. Even if you don’t like the ensemble of eccentric characters or the plot, there’s something about entering someone’s home and being privy to their past, present, and future home life that feels like home. Something about a family that’s not our own sparks an empathy within us. We see ourselves and those we love and loath in equal measure and may understand an opportunity to make amends or confront someone in our own families after seeing one of these films. Co-writer, director, and actor, Kristin Scott Thomas joins some of the greats of the genre in crafting a good family dramedy with My Mother’s Wedding.

Unlike most of the other people working in the family dramedy space, Thomas brought in some autobiographical elements to her story. Like her heroines, her father and step father died in military actions. This creates a unique aspect of the film as the three sisters were raised exclusively by their mother, yet they have a mythical reverence for these two men. The way that Thomas and co-writer John Mickelthwait crafted the story, the titular mother is sidelined for much of the film as the daughters attempt to grapple with the heroic image of their fathers and the seemingly milquetoast man who is becoming husband number three. The outsider’s view of their mother makes for a much more thrilling conclusion.

The film, while maintaining a large cast, also has a focal character in Katherine (Scarlett Johansson), the eldest of the sisters. Katherine is an interesting focal character to have because she is a very intrinsic character. Much of her story is a slow reveal from her complicated relationship with her girlfriend, Jack (Frieda Pinto), to her ever present guilt about the last conversation she had with her step father. In the same way that the slow reveal is keeping the plot going, it’s also a bit unsatisfying when conclusions are reached. Even though she is the focal character, Katherine’s story is the least well developed of the three sisters.

Yet, Katherine’s story features a unique way to do flashbacks. Instead of the traditional live action scenes with younger actors, the filmmakers opted to have the flashback scenes animated. The animation is in black and white and almost looks like pencil drawings. They are always from Katherine’s perspective and come upon her like lightning bolts in a particular moment she finds herself in and often in response to something she doesn’t want to talk about outside her head. It’s an excellent device and in some ways explains Katherine’s reticence about her personal life and why she feels guilt about the past.

The cast is great, but the true stand out is Sienna Miller as Victoria. Victoria is a famous actress who is on a press tour for the fourth film in a franchise and is weighing whether or not she will accept the advances of a wealthy, but much older French businessman. Her arc could make a rom-com in its own right with childhood sweetheart Charlie (Mark Stanley) rekindling their flame while the chaos of the wedding happens around them. Miller has a tendency to stay in the background. She’s not always the flashiest performer, but as Victoria, she really shines and steals every scene she’s in. Her verve and vulnerability are on full display and she’s a delight to watch.

My Mother’s Wedding is a funny and charming film that may bring a tear or two to your eye. The plot gets bogged down a bit with all the story threads that need sewing back together. It’s hard too with a focal character who isn’t as forthcoming as a film like this needs her to be. Yet, it’s an enjoyable film to watch and immerse yourself in. If she chooses, Kristin Scott Thomas could give Nancy Meyers and Nicole Holofcener some stiff competition in the family dramedy game.

Grade: B

Movie Review (Fantasia 2025): โ€˜Stuntmanโ€™ is a Middling, But Enjoyable, Hong Kong Drama


Directors: Albert Leung, Herbert Leung
Writers: Anastasia Tsang, Oliver Yip
Stars: Terrance Lau, Stephen Tung, Cecilia Choi

Synopsis: ย A washed-up stunt director is struggling to find his way in a changing industry. He risks everything to stage a comeback, while also attempting to repair the relationship with his estranged daughter.


One of the best and best-kept Fantasia International Film Festival secrets are 35mm trailers of various classic Hong Kong movies played in front of the premiere of either a new release, or a restoration from the region. In front of Dickson Leungโ€™s Good Game, audiences were treated to a 35mm trailer of Chang Chehโ€™s Chinatown Kid. Better yet, in front of the 4K restoration of John Wooโ€™s Bullet in the Head, audiences were over the moon about the 35mm trailer for one of the greatest movies ever made (though Iโ€™ll make the case that it may be the greatest movie ever made): Hard Boiled.

The Hard Boiled trailer definitely primes you for the poetic succession of gun-fu violence Woo brings to the table in his bleak Bullet in the Head, where each bullet case reads like a tear being shed. However, for premieres of new Hong Kong releases, it usually sets unrealistic expectations that the film weโ€™re about to see is in the same vein of action artistry as the 35mm trailer that preceded it. For Albert Leung and Herbert Leungโ€™s Stuntman, we had the privilege of seeing a rare 35mm trailer for Tsui Harkโ€™s Aces Go Places 3, which made me believe that Albert & Herbert Leung would set their tribute to the Golden Age of Hong Kong cinema (which Hark was definitely a foundational member of) in that same trajectory.

In its opening scene, the directorial duo pay tribute to Jackie Chanโ€™s Police Story, which definitely sets the stage for a celebration of all things Hong Kong cinema. The stunt choreography harkens back to the Golden Harvest days, and the action scene undoubtedly lives up to that. However, we quickly realize that this scene is part of an action film being shot, with the relentless stunt coordinator Sam Lee (Lam Yiu-Sing) pushing his crew to the limit. His methods predictably results in the injury of one of its actors and tarnishes the reputation of a man known as โ€œHeartless Sam,โ€ who would repeat a stunt way beyond what the actor or stunt performer could do, until it was perfect in his eyes, but would be risky for everyone involved.

We cut to many years later, where Sam (now played by Stephen Tung) has left his past life behind and tries to rebuild a broken relationship with his daughter Cherry (Cecilia Choi), who is about to get married. As this occurs, he receives a call from his old friend Cho (To Yin-Gor), about the possibility of working on a movie again, after the initial stunt coordination and action design isnโ€™t up to their standards. Sam reluctantly accepts, while taking aspiring stunt coordinator Lee Sai Long (Terrance Lau) under his wing, so he can have tangible experience of what itโ€™s like to be working on the set of a high-octane action movie.

Quickly, tension begins to rise on set, and Sam is back to his old ways of being the heartless action choreographer he is known for. He clashes with not only Long and Cho, but stunt performer Wai (played by Philip Ng, who portrayed the main villain in Soi Cheangโ€™s masterpiece Twilight of the Warriors: Walled In, the best Hong Kong movie of the decade so far), who disagrees with his methods and thinks the set should foster a safe, conflict-free environment for everyone. As the movie progresses, we get to see what kind of person Sam truly is, and it eventually leads to a conclusion thatโ€™s in the more heartfelt than exciting territory.

Those who are expecting a flurry of well-choreographed martial arts action sequences will be disappointed, although Albert and Herbert Leung definitely understand that they shouldnโ€™t waste Philip Ngโ€™s talents in a movie about action movies if there are no action scenes featuring him. Whenever heโ€™s on screen, the film works more than it should, because his natural charisma (and martial arts talent) is unmatched. The camera moves swiftly, and Ng is in perfect control of the frame. We even get to see just how far Sam is willing to go for the โ€œperfect action scene,โ€ as he clandestinely stages a jewelry heist without a permit, which leads to a succession of unintentional disasters as bystanders believe an actual robbery is happening.

After this bravura sequence, however, Stuntman is relatively light on action and wants to give Sam a quasi-redemption arc. Does he deserve it? Some may debate on whether or not he has sufficiently atoned for his sins, either leaving his daughter behind when she needed him the most or attempting to โ€œpay backโ€ his friendship with a stunt performer who has been paralyzed for life because of his orders. Itโ€™s a profoundly sad film that slowly unpacks itself to more devastating territories as Sam reckons with whatโ€™s most important: the success of a film or the success of his life?

Through it all lies a profoundly moving lead turn from Tung, a veteran of Hong Kong cinema who not only approaches his portrayal of the character as a means for Sam to reflect on his life, but also as a way for Tung to look back on his illustrious career through the faรงade he wears as Sam. It leads to a relatively effective tearjerking conclusion that sadly gets hampered by one of the most ridiculous dramatic turns Iโ€™ve seen in a Hong Kong movie in a long time.

And it didnโ€™t work. Donโ€™t take my word for it: you shouldโ€™ve been there when the (sold-out) Fantasia audience erupted in unintentional laughter as they saw what Albert and Herbert Leung had in store for them during its coda. That said, the ending shot does allow the character to strive for a better life after the movie wraps production, but letโ€™s just say its execution was extremely poor and did not at all give the intended effect the filmmakers wanted.

Its action choreographies (or story) also donโ€™t hold a candle to Tsui Harkโ€™s Aces Go Places 3, or his entire filmography for that matter. Sometimes, Iโ€™d much rather see the movie theyโ€™re playing a trailer for than whatever screens next. But thatโ€™s Fantasia for you โ€“ a festival where, when you walk into a movie, you never know what youโ€™ll expect. Your expectations may be shattered, in a good or bad way, or exceeded so high because youโ€™ve discovered the next great thing. For Stuntman, it wonโ€™t be the next Twilight of the Warriors: Walled In (which played at last yearโ€™s Fantasia), but itโ€™s certainly a better step for Hong Kong cinema than most of the forgettable actioners theyโ€™ve been effectively churning out for some time.

But this feels like a Happy Meal before weโ€™ll eventually be served the prime rib, which will be Soi Changโ€™s grand return to the festival whenever Twilight of the Warriors: Dragon Throne finishes production. Now thatโ€™s going to be a (potential) Fantasia screening weโ€™re bound not to forget.

Grade: B

Podcast Review: Weapons

On this episode, On this episode, Brendan and JD discuss Zach Cregger’s new horror film Weapons! The discourse around this movie has been absolutely wild, so of course we also had to dive into that a little bit because the amount of dismissive finger pointing has been disappointing. Weapons is a fascinating film to talk about that does many things right *and* also makes some questionable choices. In one of our most thorough conversations this year, we had a great time talking about both sides of that coin and why it makes for a compelling film.

Review: Weapons (4:00)
Director: Zach Cregger
Writer: Zach Cregger
Stars: Josh Brolin, Julia Garner, Alden Ehrenreich, Amy Madigan

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
InSession Film Podcast – Weapons

Movie Review: ‘It’s Never Over, Jeff Buckley’ Mourns the Future That Never Was


Director: Amy Berg
Stars: Jeff Buckley, Mary Guibert, Rebecca Moore, Joan Wasser, Ben Harper, Aimee Mann

Synopsis: ย Never-before-seen footage, exclusive voice messages, and accounts from Jeff Buckley’s inner circle paint a captivating portrait of the gifted musician who died tragically in 1997, having only released one album.


The immortality of musicians gone too soon is a well-worn trope in movie history. It is how weโ€™ve received a combination of authorized and unauthorized stories of woe about Jimi Hendrix, Freddie Mercury, and Amy Winehouse. Because music taste and experiences are so personal and ephemeral, these stories seem to resonate within this industry more than any other. Itโ€™s Never Over, Jeff Buckley joins the recent splurge in documentaries about iconic โ€˜90s musicians, with his tragic death leading to one of musicโ€™s most tragic โ€œwhat ifโ€ scenarios.ย 

For many, Buckley became the iconic singer of โ€œHallelujahโ€ by Leonard Cohen, which recently crossed a billion streams worldwide. Yet the singer-songwriterโ€™s original songs remain undeniably influential, laying the groundwork for bands like Arcade Fire or the burgeoning Midwest emo scene to find pop success. Wisely, Itโ€™s Never Over, Jeff Buckley takes a much bolder stance than parading through dozens of artists talking about his greatness. Instead, director Amy Berg places us with the people who loved him the most: his family, his girlfriends, and his band.ย 

Berg, an acclaimed filmmaker and Oscar nominee for Deliver Us From Evil, knows there are pitfalls to musical bio-documentaries like Itโ€™s Never Over. The simple rise and fall story does not work in the case of Buckley, who died while writing his second album. Instead, his โ€œfallโ€ is filled with regret by those who knew him best. They wonder how they could have helped and recognize the incredible pressure he was under in life.ย 

Buckleyโ€™s mother tells stories about causing Jeff grief, including a time she fought with his critics in a Jeff Buckley chat room. As a young mother, she admits she โ€œgrew upโ€ with him, and more often than not, he was the more mature figure in their family. That unhealthy relationship becomes one of the most fascinating subjects for Berg to explore.ย 

 Jeff Buckley in ITโ€™S NEVER OVER, JEFF BUCKLEY, a Magnolia Pictures release. Photo credit: Dana Tynan. Photo courtesy of Magnolia Pictures.

When youโ€™re seemingly destined for greatness, these small moments can weigh on you. Buckley was especially unique, and his parentage made the specter of an early death hang over him like a grim reaper. While he seemed to embrace it, those who were around him explained that the fear was always present. Thirty years of hindsight might do that to a person, especially when grief forces you to relive all the moments you were unable to help someone you love.ย 

However, Buckley was a musical prodigy, and we all find ways to justify non-normative behavior when the opportunity to touch greatness presents itself. Berg wisely holds this truth in her hands and delivers a film that is not only accepting of that fact but also non-judgmental about his friends. Itโ€™s Never Over, Jeff Buckley provides them a place to mourn in public and to remind us that sometimes, the people we love most are the most foreign to us.ย 

She also adds a patina of chaos over the documentary. Itโ€™s Never Over, Jeff Buckley incorporates journals, his nonstop sketchings, and animation to bring the words of his music to life. The chickenscratch handwriting becomes illuminated, and unlike many documentaries about musical acts, Itโ€™s Never Over utilizes the medium to visualize Buckleyโ€™s words and the worlds they created. As we hear stories about Buckleyโ€™s insistence on taping over Michael Bolton cassettes with random cat noises and audience laughter, it becomes clear that Buckleyโ€™s mind was exploding with creativity. Yet, he never had the time to let it all out.ย 

 Jeff Buckley and Mary Guibert in ITโ€™S NEVER OVER, JEFF BUCKLEY, a Magnolia Pictures release. Photo courtesy of Magnolia Pictures.

While his rise at small venues and performing covers is exciting, the period after the release of Grace falls a little flat. The story slows down too much, and the bloated nature of the music documentary sneaks into the fold. We do not fault Berg for using every bit of archival footage she could collect. However, we had already established his love for Led Zeppelin and Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan. Exploring the moments he met both artists reveals a kinship but does little else to help us learn more about Buckley.


While the musical bio-documentary has become a way to celebrate the arc of a musicianโ€™s career, Itโ€™s Never Over, Jeff Buckley implores us to wonder about what could have been. It is a story soaked in tragedy, and as such, Berg gives the people who loved Jeff an outlet to express that sadness. While itโ€™s never as formally daring or as proficient as Buckley, Itโ€™s Never Over should help expand knowledge of his talent. Having more Jeff Buckley blasting through car speakers has only ever been a good thing.

Grade: B-

Movie Review: ‘The Pickup’ is Better Off Dropped


Director: Tim Story
Writers: Kevin Burrows, Matt Mider
Stars: Eddie Murphy, Pete Davidson, Keke Palmer

Synopsis: A routine cash pickup turns into a deadly pursuit when two mismatched armored truck drivers are ambushed by ruthless criminals with plans beyond the cash.


Iโ€™m beginning to wonder if Eddie Murphy is just cashing a paycheck at this point. In nearly every recent comedy heโ€™s done, he seems to sleepwalk through the script, taking on reserved roles that demand very little from him. Take his latest, The Pickup, for example. His co-star Pete Davidson gobbles up what might generously be called the fast-talking witticisms and charisma traits that used to define Murphyโ€™s screen presence.

The problem is, Davidson canโ€™t hold a candle to Murphy in that department. Murphy built his career on confidence, swagger, and razor-sharp satire. But now, he plays every role like heโ€™s Danny Glover muttering, โ€œIโ€™m too old for this sh*t.โ€ So why take on The Pickup, now streaming on Prime Video? Well, maybe when you get to that age, you start doing things for the money.

Then again, maybe itโ€™s not an age thing at all, which is kind of the crux of The Pickup. Everyone, from Davidson to the consistently excellent Keke Palmer (Nope, One of Them Days), seems to be phoning it in, slogging through a script packed with exposition, little on laughs, and even lighter on intrigue.

The story follows two armored car security guards at very different points in their lives. Russell Pierce (Murphy) has been on the job for nearly a quarter of a century and is just six months away from retirement. He kisses his wife (Eva Longoria) goodbye before heading to work, ready to celebrate their anniversary that evening. Russell takes his job seriouslyโ€”no food, no music, and certainly no fun inside the vehicleโ€”just straight professionalism.

The Pickup Review: I Almost Feel Guilty About How Much This Bad Movie Made  Me Laugh

However, those strict rules are tested when his boss (Andrew Dice Clay) assigns him a partner: the new guy, Travis (Davidson), who just last week made the mistake of pulling a gun on a woman at a bank who was merely trying to slip him her number. That woman, Zoe (Palmer), had only asked for a pen, but instead, she got a memorable โ€œHow I met your fatherโ€ story in the making. Travis mistook her gesture as the start of a robbery, not a romance.

Somehow, Zoe still agrees to go out with him, and they end up spending the weekend together. Travis is so smitten, he walks away from the experience beaming, and still wearing the same pair of underwear from Friday. I only bring this up because the script, by Matt Mider and Kevin Burrows, brings it up repeatedly, as if theyโ€™ve discovered an untapped reservoir of hygiene humor they feel compelled to return to again and again.

Prime Videoโ€™s The Pickup comes from writer-director Tim Story, which makes its listlessness a mild surprise given the talent involved. Storyโ€™s filmography includes several genuinely funny entriesโ€”Barbershop, Think Like a Man, and Ride Along (weโ€™ll politely leave out the turn of the century of The Fantastic Four films). While none of those are masterpieces, theyโ€™re consistently humorous and entertaining.

What those films had, beyond tighter scripts, was a strong cast chemistry. Here, Murphy and Davidson have little comedic friction, and the latter has even less spark with Palmer, not even enough to mine for laughs. The movie, like the Ride Along franchise, also leans heavily on yawn-inducing action, trudging through the genre playbook step by step, day by day, as the saying goes.

The Pickup (2025) - Movie Review

The plot is ultimately pointless, riddled with holes, as if someone dusted off an old โ€™90s script and forgot to update it for todayโ€™s tech-savvy world. In an age of digital surveillance, cell phone tracking, metadata, geotagging, and forensic monitoring, the film seems oblivious to how easily these characters would be caught, should I go on?

The Pickup isnโ€™t one of the yearโ€™s worst films, but it might only be entertaining in a Rob Schneider sort of way. Whatโ€™s most perplexing is the misuse of a talented cast, a seasoned action-comedy director, and writers Matt Mider and Kevin Burrows, who, after all, penned The Package for Netflix, which I still consider one of the funniest streaming comedies to date.ย 

But no, this isnโ€™t that. The Pickup is just another classic streaming disappointment, seemingly made to fill a content quota in the ongoing platform wars, nothing more or less. Which is a shame, because with this much comedic talent, there is no reason this couldnโ€™t be a mainstream crowdpleaser, instead of recycling the same old product almost weekly.ย 

Which begs the question: if streaming networks are just churning out movies and television to feed the content mill, why not take creative risks if you’re going to fill a quota anyway? Make your content stand out. Instead, I can scroll through my reviews for InSession and find a growing pile of Prime Video garbageโ€”The Pickup, Space Cadets, Canary Black, Brothersโ€”and struggle to find any reason these films exist other than to waste your precious time.

You can stream The Pickup only on Prime Video starting August 8th!

Grade: C-

Women InSession: The Castle & Australia

This week on Women InSession, we analyze the popular Australian comedy from 1997 The Castle and discuss its impact on Australian culture! Many of us that hail from the Western part of the world may not be familiar with this film, but as Zita eloquently lays out, the film was immensely admired in Oceania. So, we thought it would be fun to talk about why it had the impact it did and how it holds up today through a 2025 lens.

Panel: Zita Short, Kristin Battestella

On that note, check out this week’s show and let us know what you think in the comment section. Thanks for listening and for supporting the InSession Film Podcast!

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
Women InSession – The Castle & Australia

Movie Review: ‘Freakier Friday’ Is The Same Story, Done Well


Director: Nisha Ganatra
Writer: Jordan Weiss
Stars: Jamie Lee Curtis, Lindsay Lohan, Julia Butters

Synopsis: 22 years after Tess and Anna endured an identity crisis, Anna now has a daughter and a soon-to-be stepdaughter. As they navigate the challenges that come when two families merge, Tess and Anna discover that lightning might strike twice.


Legacy sequels have a power over us. They tug on that need for the familiar and nostalgia for something we once loved. Many of these films have come out in the last ten years and they donโ€™t always play by the rules of their originals or they change their tone to fit todayโ€™s market. Often they are a rehash or a reimagining of their original. Freakier Friday takes that route, where it is a continuation, but also a bit of a rehash of old material in a new package. Though for this franchise, that’s not at all a bad thing.

The 2003 Freaky Friday is a classic for a reason. Itโ€™s a simple story told well. The freakier sequel takes the elements that worked well and adds to it. Because of Disney magic (money), not just the swapped pair of Anna (Lindsay Lohan) and Tess (Jamie Lee Curtis), but the whole principle cast is back including original love interest Jake (Chad Michael Murray), boorish teacher Mr. Bates (Stephen Tobolowsky), and hunky stepdad Ryan (Mark Harmon). They even reunited the original members of Pink Slip, one of the coolest movie bands in history.

This is what’s different about legacy sequels almost a decade into their prominence. They know we’ve watched this film over and over. They know we would notice if an actor who hasn’t died or has been cancelled doesn’t make at least a cameo appearance. They know we are beyond remake territory, which involves call backs, references, and overt homage. We need a furtherance of the story that was. We need to know where these people are now and who they are now.

This is why it’s a bit of a let down that Freakier Friday‘s plot hinges on nearly the same goals as the original. Both films involve a life-changing concert and a rehearsal meal for a wedding between a single mother and a hunky new beau. The plot of Freakier Friday hits nearly every beat of the original while integrating in the new cast. The story, while still powerful with mother/daughter energy, now adds in sisterly and blended family energy, but it’s basically the same as the original. You don’t come to a film like Freakier Friday for a grand new scheme or Marvel level machinations, you come for the same chemistry from the original.ย 

Freakier Friday' Review: Round and Round, Here We Go Again - The New York  Times

Jamie Lee Curtis may have a long legacy of great roles in her career, but pretending to be a teenager who doesn’t understand the aging body she’s stuck in is something she’s perfect at. Let that be repeated that Jamie Lee Curtis is perfect in both Freaky Friday and Freakier Friday. She simply has a spark of youthful verve that is otherworldly and outrageously funny. Her physicality and ability to channel the essence of the character is uncanny.

This time Curtis has Lindsay Lohan as a partner and not an adversary. Here, Lohan reminds us why we so thoroughly enjoyed her in the early ’00s. She’s got great timing, an expressive face, and can still pratfall with the best of them. The scene she and Curtis share where they, playing the teenagers inhabiting them, try and seduce Anna’s former flame, Jake, is utterly, dementedly, crying laughing perfect. It makes you want Lohan to keep this momentum going and find projects worthy of her depth of talent because in spite of the twists and turns her career has taken, she’s a very talented actress and deserves more roles like this one.

Freakier Friday' Review: Body-Swap Sequel Kicks Off the Lohanaissance
Freakier Friday is a film that isn’t going to be a prestige player or going to change the way people see cinema, but it is a very enjoyable film. Not just enjoyable, but laugh out loud funny and tearjerking in the life lessons it imparts. It’s also got a far less problematic device for the body swap this time around and you get the absolute pleasure of seeing Manny Jacinto dance and Chad Michael Murray back lit by the sun as he gets off a motorcycle. Freakier Friday is purely a fun ride and sometimes that’s enough.

Grade: B

Chasing The Gold: Best Supporting Actor: Is It Time For The Sandman To Wake Up?

Whether you love or hate him, Adam Sandler ranks among the most successful comedic actors ever. Although only one of his films has exceeded $500 million in global box office sales, he has amassed over $3 billion in total worldwide box office revenue. Sandler is a recognizable figure, and in todayโ€™s Hollywood, where there are fewer stars than ever, especially ones that can sell a film on name recognition alone, he remains a standout presence. Widely known and seemingly admired by colleagues, one would think that he would have more success in securing industry awards. Yet, he has failed to receive an Oscar nomination, or frankly, many nominations at all, for any of his performances. However, Noah Baumbachโ€™s latest movie, Jay Kelly, might be the film that finally earns Sandler his first nomination, and possibly even a win.

Itโ€™s not surprising that Sandler hasnโ€™t received an Oscar nomination, considering the films heโ€™s made throughout his career. His standout roles in Billy Madison, Happy Gilmore, The Wedding Singer, The Waterboy, and Big Daddy solidified his status as a recognizable figure in the 1990s, celebrated both as a comedian and as a leading man in romantic comedies. However, these films didnโ€™t scream awards-caliber in either performance or overall quality. They are seen as comedy classics, but they didnโ€™t display Sandler as a quality actor in the eyes of voters. Aware of Sandler’s potential, Paul Thomas Anderson cast him in Punch-Drunk Love, his follow-up to his highly acclaimed and nominated film, Magnolia. For his performance as Barry Egan, Sandler earned his 1st major award nomination at the 2003 Golden Globe Awards. Nevertheless, he chose not to pursue prestigious roles with auteur directors at that stage of his career. By this point, Sandler had gained enough recognition to pursue projects that aligned with his interests. It became a bit of a running joke, but he would invite his friends to a luxurious resort, where they would film a movie while enjoying their time together. Although many of these films lacked critical acclaim, they typically did well at the box office and through word-of-mouth, enabling Sandler to fund the next โ€œvacationโ€ for himself and his pals. However, the same actor who starred in Punch-Drunk Love for the esteemed PTA still existed, and even without collaborating with the most celebrated directors, there were instances when Sandler delivered impressive performances in films that may not have garnered critical or commercial success. Regardless of the respective film’s outcome, his roles in Spanglish, Reign Over Me,, Funny People, and even parts of Click demonstrated that Sandler continued to have as much to offer as a serious actor.

In the late 2010s, other directors recognized Sandlerโ€™s talents as PTA had before, and his increasing self-assurance led him to pursue more substantial roles. 2019โ€™s Uncut Gems is widely regarded as the tour de force performance that established him as an actor with serious chops. The Safdie Brothersโ€™ manic anxiety-driven dramedy about a gambling addicted jewelry dealer was so brash and heart-racing that it caused many walk-outs because it wasnโ€™t an โ€œAdam Sandler movieโ€ as audiences believed it would be. However, this film was not only critically and commercially successful – at the time it was the highest-grossing A24 film – it was also the first time Sandler had begun to receive genuine Oscar consideration. In his role as Howard Ratner, he received lead actor nominations at both the Gotham Awards and the Critics’ Choice Awards, won at the National Board of Review (NBR) and the Independent Spirit Awards, and garnered numerous wins and nominations from critic groups. Unlike his previous acclaim for Punch-Drunk Love, after which he reverted to his comedic style, Sandler has embraced more nuanced dramatic roles, culminating in his first-ever Screen Actors Guild (SAG) nomination for 2022โ€™s Hustle. Although his latest film, Spaceman, may not have achieved the success many (myself included) anticipated, his delicate and subdued performance stood out as one of its best aspects. 

He previously received consideration for Noah Baumbachโ€™s 2017 film The Meyerowitz Stories, as, after its release at Cannes, the idea of Sandler being an Oscar nominee was floated around in early predictions and reviews. This year, Sandler is reuniting with Noah Baumbach for Jay Kelly, starring alongside Oscar winners George Clooney and Laura Dern, along with Greta Gerwig, Billy Crudup, Emily Mortimer, Patrick Wilson, and Riley Keough. Calling this cast loaded would be an understatement; however, among all of the talent this film has to offer, Adam Sandler has emerged as the early favorite of the actors most likely to earn an Oscar nomination. Directed by Baumbach and written by Baumbach and Emily Mortimer, Jay Kelly follows a friendship between an aging actor, played by Clooney, and his manager, played by Sandler. Clooney is the clear lead of the film playing the titular Jay Kelly, but Sandler is close behind as he not only received second billing, but was also the focal point of one of the film’s two main posters. The recent trailer focused primarily on Clooney (who is back in the Oscar race himself for the first time in quite a while) questioning his place as an actor, but also included Sandler reminding the aging actor how much he means to people. The trailer already seems to be heartfelt, but Clooney also recently all but confirmed a spectacular performance is coming in a recent interview where he calls Sandler a โ€œbeautiful, wonderful actor,โ€ mentioning that he made sure people on set took him seriously as an actor and not just a goofy comedian.

However, if Sandler continues to challenge perceptions seriously, it’s not a question of if he’ll be nominated, but when. While it is unlikely that he will earn any awards buzz for reprising his role as Happy Gilmore in Happy Gilmore 2; even if Jay Kelly doesnโ€™t earn him his first nomination, it seems as though the Sandman is moving in the right direction. His project with the Safdie Brothers has been paused, as Josh focuses on Marty Supreme and Benny on The Smashing Machine, though it appears to still be in development. Both films mentioned above have already been garnering awards buzz this season, so the second Sandler/Safdie collab could have more award heft to it than their previous collaboration. He doesnโ€™t currently have any other projects in the works, but during his press run for TรR, director Todd Field mentioned that Sandlerโ€™s performance in Punch-Drunk Love is โ€œone of the great screen performances of all time,โ€ noting he would love to work with the actor. While nothing has been formally announced yet, it suggests that prolific directors view Sandler as more than the loud SNL funnyman who makes vacation movies; they see him as a serious actor with the chops to carry a film.

Sandler is emerging as one of the standout performers this year. In early predictions for Supporting Actor, sources like Next Best Picture have Sandler second, AwardsWatch ranks him as high as third. At the same time, the Awards Expert app community also places him in second. Supporting Actor consistently proves to be one of the most competitive categories at the awards, and it seems like this year is no exception. Sandler will not only contend with his fellow ensemble cast members but also face stiff competition from Paul Mescal (The History of Sound/Hamnet), Andrew Garfield (After the Hunt), Jeremy Strong (Deliver Me from Nowhere), Sean Penn (One Battle After Another), Mark Hamill (The Life of Chuck), Delroy Lindo (Sinners), and strong contender Stellan Skarsgรฅrd for his role in the Cannes hit Sentimental Value

I currently have Sandler in the lead, primarily due to the significant emphasis on him in the film’s marketing, and because this could be a breakout hit of the fall festival season. With Sandler portraying a manager and friend to Jay Kelly, there’s reason to believe he’ll have significant screentime. Since it’s a Noah Baumbach film, it’s likely to be dialogue and monologue-driven, giving him plenty of chances to showcase his talents. Behind him, I have Skarsgรฅrd for his role as a filmmaker looking to re-enter the spotlight in the Cannes standout, Sentimental Value. Next, I favor Jeremy Strong, whose surprise nomination for The Apprentice could be followed by a nomination as Bruce Springsteenโ€™s manager and producer Jon Landau in Springsteen: Deliver Me From Nowhere. Andrew Garfield stars as a professor accused of wrongdoing in Luca Guadagninoโ€™s After the Hunt. Rounding out the top five, I have Paul Mescal for playing William Shakespeare in Chloe Zhaoโ€™s Hamnet. It wonโ€™t be easy for Sandler, as he must compete against a mix of past winners, nominees, and beloved actors yet to be recognized, to secure his first nomination. Still, a strong performance in a compelling film could earn him his first Oscar nodโ€”and maybe even his first win.

Predicted Nominees:

1. Adam Sandler, Jay Kelly

2. Stellan Skarsgรฅrd, Sentimental Value

3. Jeremy Strong, Springsteen: Deliver Me From Nowhere

5. Andrew Garfield, After the Hunt

5. Paul Mescal, Hamnet

Next Up:

6. Sean Penn, One Battle After Another

7. Delroy Lindo, Sinners

8. Mark Hamill, The Life of Chuck

9. Robert Pattinson, Die My Love

10. Jonathan Bailey, Wicked: For Good

Movie Review: ‘We Can Be Heroes’ Will Heal Your Inner Child


Director: Alex Simmons, Carina Mia Wong
Stars: Abby, Cloud, Dexter

Synopsis: A group of teens find belonging at a LARP camp, building a fantasy world facing climate disaster. Through roleplaying heroes facing apocalypse, they find strength to heal past trauma and emerge empowered in life.


Fantasy worlds have been a means for people of all ages to escape. Either from their grueling jobs or tedious schoolwork, these alternate worlds allow us to be who we are without judgment. Live-action roleplaying, better known as LARPING, takes the player to worlds only limited by their own minds. Bridging reality with fantasy is We Can Be Heroes, a documentary by directors Carina Mia Wong and Alex Simmons that will heal your inner child. It’s a window into the world of children of varying ages, genders, and walks of life, allowing us to take a peep into their extraordinary minds, helping them heal the ailments their minds are struggling with among their peers while also getting battle-ready.

As a child, I was always envious of those kids who got to pack up for a week or so in the summer and head off to summer camp. Always eager to hear their stories to live vicariously through them. Now, as an adult, I’m reminded of that jealous feeling with We Can Be Heroes. Seeing a group of children fully supported by those around them is about as magical as the world created in this film. Their camp is a one-week-long LARP session where children must work together to create a campaign they all can agree on. Their creativity is on full display, with some kids showing up to camp with already made foam armor and their backstories already written. Wong and Simmons make us all feel like kids again by highlighting a few kids who all have their own reasons for joining camp.

Through group work sharing what are some tough life challenges, the campers open up to one another, giving affirmations to make sure that each child knows they are loved and supported. Who stood out the most to me was the master swordsman Cloud. At just the age of 11, Cloud spends his time working on his fight choreography with his lightsabers. He has such a distinct matter-of-fact personality, and while LARPING, he likes to work in the shadows, planning and scheming in the background. Under his surface is a child who is having a difficult time coming to terms with his grandmother’s passing away. He displays a unique sense of maturity while talking about his mind’s roadblocks, which makes his twitch to his LARP character even more enthralling.

Cloud isn’t the only unique voice among the group; there’s also Dexter, a young man from a homeschooled background who hopes that his crush will be there so he can finally secure her phone number. While working on his newest installment of his graphic novel, he is leaving his comfort zone to be with other kids who are similar to him. We Can Be Heroes also shows how inclusive Wayfinder is; those who run the camp do everything in their power to make sure 17-year-old Abby can join in on the fun. Diagnosed with medical issues that cause her to live with a feeding tube, she faces life’s obstacles head-on. She’s one of the most captivating kids to see in the field of their fantasy world they call The Big Green. Choosing to be the only healer in the group, she’s an important part of the team.

What makes the connection of these campers feel so dear is that it takes place in a COVID world. Kids whose lives have been changed in ways we probably still don’t understand are more than ready to get away and be around other people. Wayfinder is their escape from their life issues, of course, but its importance now is at an all-time high. It highlights what being cooped up for months and years has done to younger generations during their most formative years. Wong and Simmons make sure to show all the great work that the camp has done for kids going back to its creation. They show that kids are a lot more accepting of each otherโ€™s quirks and differences than what is assumed.

To get the audience into the zone of The Last Green, the camera work brings us to the heart of the battle. Often it feels like we are members of the campaign ourselves, watching with our colleagues, trying to find a weak link in the chain mail of the enemy. We Can Be Heroes made me yearn for those sleepovers with my childhood friends, especially when the kids are in their sharing circle; the camera view has us sitting in the ring listening to fellow campers share secrets with one another. The best moments from cinematographer Peter Alton come when showcasing the epic moments of their campaign, especially when Cloud is serving up some sword-slashing action.

What makes We Can Be Heroes shine is the multitude of personalities on full display, with no shame or worry about being judged or ridiculed. Making the audience feel like one of the campers, it allows those who haven’t had a camp experience a small slice of being there. It’s refreshing to see acceptance on this level, and it’s a reminder that we could learn a thing or two about being ourselves from tapping into our inner child.

Grade: A

Movie Review: ‘Weapons’ Offers No Easy Answers


Director: Zach Cregger
Writer: Zach Cregger
Stars: Julia Garner, Josh Brolin, Alden Ehrenreich

Synopsis: When all but one child from the same class mysteriously vanish on the same night at exactly the same time, a community is left questioning who or what is behind their disappearance.


Weapons is from Zach Cregger, a filmmaker who has built quite a cult following over the past three years since his breakout 2022 independent horror film Barbarian. That smart, ominously funny, and frightening hit was one of the most unpredictable thrillers of the decade, delivering thrills, chills, and spills, proving that the line between horror and comedy is much thinner than most of us realize.

What Is 'Weapons' About? I Breakdown the Wild First Trailer | by Ryan  Thomas LaBee | Medium

The former comedian, floundering in comedy films since shifting to horror, has made his fourth film behind the camera. Although it’s not his best, it is damn close. Weapons is a thrilling, gruesome, and downright wicked horror thriller that packs a handful of dirty punches. A masterclass in frozen fear, Cregger’s latest horror haunt is completely creepy and gloriously ghastly from start to finish.ย 

The story tells the tale of the doomed community of Maybrook, a quaint small town in Pennsylvania. One of the residents is Justine Gandy (Julia Garner of Marvelโ€™s The Fantastic Four: First Steps), an elementary school teacher who discovers that all but one of her studentsโ€”Alex (Mankโ€™s Cary Christopher), the only child from Justine’s class to show up the next dayโ€”are missing, leading her to question what happened to the rest of her students.

An outbreak of chickenpox? Did they start testing for COVID-19 again? A field trip that no one informed Justine about? No, that would all be too simple. What happened was that seventeen of Justineโ€™s students, one by one, woke up at 2:17 in the morning, climbed out of bed, walked out the front door without their parents or family noticing, fled their homes, ran into the cold darkness, only never to return.ย 

Weapons' just took the lead as my most anticipated movie of summer 2025 โ€”  here's why | Tom's Guide

Justine, perhaps experiencing survivor’s guilt, is put on leave by her boss (Benedict Wong) as she becomes the target of the vengeful. She turns to alcohol to cope with the mystery. She seeks comfort from her ex-boyfriend, Paul (Blue Jasmineโ€™s Alden Ehrenreich), hoping that perhaps rolling around in the sheets with him will somehow shed light on what happened. Soon, Justine begins to have dreams of the children and a mysterious woman. One of the parents of a missing student, Archie (Josh Brolin), has similar nightmares. He soon confronts Justine, as they seek to unravel the mystery.ย 

Weapons is a nail-biting horror thriller, a real armrest-grabber, causing the hair on your forearms to stand and your knuckles to turn white. (The movie should come with a warning for those suffering from arthritis.) From the very beginning, Creggerโ€™s script grabs you and doesnโ€™t let go. Within the first few minutes, the children disappear, mob mentality begins to set in, and mass hysteria creates unbearable tension.ย 

Without giving away any spoilers, not all of the chances Cregger takes work, but itโ€™s the sheer ambition in his swings that keeps the viewer constantly engaged and entertained. Perhaps one of Cregger’s greatest gifts is the way he intentionally plays with his audience. He toys with us, winding us up. We know the dreaded โ€œjump scareโ€ is coming, but he creates such controlled anxiety that when the scene finally hits, it rips and hard.

That being said, Weapons tends to settle into a slow burn more than anticipated. Then again, thatโ€™s what slow burns are for. The cinematography from Larkin Seiple (Everything Everywhere All at Once) and the collaborative nature of the frenetic, pulsating score from Cregger, Hays, and Ryan Holladay can be felt viscerally. These are meant to make you feel uneasy, uncomfortable, and even unhinged.

Now Playing: Weapons is a horrifying, well-stitched work of art -  GadgetMatch

However, what makes Weapons even more powerful is that it offers no easy answers, and not every subplot is resolved. If anything, the metaphor is far from subtle, not exactly obvious, but so well executed that it elevates the genre picture into something bold, ambitious, and unwilling to pander. Cregger guides us with the hands of a steady and seasoned thriller filmmaker, forcing the viewer to look and take in what we would typically turn away from.


You can watch Weapons only in theaters on August 8th!

Grade: A-

Podcast VIP: Steven Knight Writing Bond

On this episode, we do an impromptu discussion on Steven Knight writing for James Bond and the current updates for The Social Network 2! We ran out of the time on the Main Show, but thought it would make for some fun VIP content.

Listen on Patreon
Listen with Apple Podcast Subscription
Watch with YouTube Membership

Podcast Review: The Naked Gun

On this episode, On this episode, JD and Brendan discuss Eva Victor’s incredible debut film The Naked Gun! This franchise is one of the best we’ve seen in terms of comedy over the years, and boy, does this new Naked Gun absolutely deliver in carrying that torch. Liam Needson and Pamela Anderson have never been better. There are a million jokes a minute. We had the best time talking about this one.

Review: The Naked Gun (4:00)
Director: Akiva Schaffer
Writer: Dan Gregor, Doug Mand, Akiva Schaffer
Stars: Liam Neeson, Pamela Anderson, Paul Walter Hauser, Danny Huston

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
InSession Film Podcast – The Naked Gun

Movie Review: ‘War Of the Worlds (2025)’ Is the Worst Movie of 2025


Director: Rich Lee
Writer: Kenny Golde, Marc Hyman
Stars: Ice Cube, Eva Longoria, Iman Benson

Synopsis: A gargantuan invasion is coming with this fresh take on the legendary novel of the same name, that is filled with present-day themes of technology, surveillance, and privacy.


It wasnโ€™t long ago when almost all of humanity was locked down due to the spread of the coronavirus across the globe. During that time, social interactions and engagement with news happened solely from within the confines of our four walls, virtually witnessing events and trying to make heads or tails of the world and what might come next. It was also during this time that art inspired by these moments of fear and paranoia began to be brought to life, be it in the form of movies, TV shows, or even video games, and it would appear that War of the Worlds, based on H.G. Wells’ masterful work of the same name, is no exception.

Will Radford (Ice Cube) is an analyst at the Department of Homeland Security whose job is to surveil everyone and look for any potential threats against the country. This surveillance allows him to track peopleโ€™s movements, pull up their personal info and even look at what they order through Amazon. While on his usual work day, he begins getting notified about strange weather occurrences by his friend at NASA, Dr. Sandra Salas (Eva Longoria), and as these begin to get more violent and frequent, it is followed by the arrival of aliens on Earth, who begin laying waste to everything in their path. Left to track everything on his screen and watch the end of the world unfold through social media, news channels, and video calls; Will has to figure out how to save his family and friends, as well as take on the alien threat.

The entire movie is shown through Willโ€™s computer, in a style similar to movies like Searching and Unfriended. These were immersive concepts done at the time, and even had some success with Missing, the spiritual sequel to Searching, but nonetheless an interesting medium to pull off storytelling when used right. The movie was also filmed during the pandemic in 2020, making use of the quarantined settings people found themselves in at the time, and trying to bring that quality to seeing a worldwide situation play out. On paper, this could be a fascinating concept to work with, and there are a lot of directions it can go as far as looking into conspiracies and paranoia that was rampant at the time. Unfortunately for War of the Worlds, it does none of those things, and instead spends 90 minutes showcasing the end of the world with shoddy CGI effects, terrible acting, and a thinly written script with plot twists you see coming from 10 miles away, making it, by far, the worst movie of 2025.

War of the Worlds was shelved for the last five years, until being unceremoniously released on Prime Video on August 1st, with a trailer for the movie uploaded online only a week prior to the movie. One need not have to guess why that was done soon after the movieโ€™s opening. From the start, it is made clear that something is going wrong with the world, and with all the information being shared with the audience, there is no sense of urgency created in any scenario. Everything that takes place in the movie is conveyed as if it is another Tuesday afternoon in the city, with hilarious videos like a mother showing a school being destroyed by a tripod with her child in it and saying โ€œeveryone and my kid is deadโ€ in the same way someone would read the ingredients off a cereal box. The acting from everyone does little to help their cause, as Ice Cube, Eva Longoria and co. act blankly through the video chat functions on their devicesโ€“working perfectly with Wi-Fi and data plans intact as all servers and communication lines are collapsing, mind youโ€“as if they arenโ€™t surrounded by literal aliens shooting at them, often just having the most nonchalant โ€œoh damnโ€ or โ€œwhoa thatโ€™s crazyโ€ reactions to seeing everything being torn to shreds in the blink of an eye.

War of the Worlds (2025) - Plugged In

The movieโ€™s attempts to make the viewer care about its characters are also incredibly flimsy. Will is shown to be a man who is trying to come to terms with the loss of his wife recently, creating a rift between him and his children. He wants to be there for them, but cannot seem to make the right decisions or be kind enough to them, particularly with his daughter, Faith (Iman Benson), who is pregnant and about to have a child. Yet throughout the entire movie, he is mostly shown to be indifferent to everyone around him, often spying on them and snapping back when called out on being very indifferent to them. It makes one scene where he finally tries to connect with Faith, in the middle of everything going to hell, and the conversation between them feels very haphazardly placed, almost in a way to add something meaningful because something was missing. The same can be said for Willโ€™s connection with his son Dave (H. Hunter Hall), who he always shuts down as his son tries to convey something about whatโ€™s happening, and refuses to listen to him as he believes Dave isnโ€™t serious about life. This eventually builds to a moment between them that similarly feels randomly added.

At 91 minutes, War of the Worlds also moves at a snailโ€™s pace, often just stalling to bring in different plot points ranging from an anonymous hacker threatening to reveal government secretsโ€“and building to a reveal that comes from 10 miles awayโ€“to Faithโ€™s boyfriend Mark being a skilled Amazon delivery worker whose biggest contributions to the movie involve telling the audience how good Amazon Prime is getting, an obvious attempt to tie the movie even more to the streaming service it is available on, to a potential government conspiracy built around surveillance and invasion of privacy. As a result, itโ€™s hard for the viewer to be invested entirely in an alien invasion when the movie keeps moving away from it and occasionally inserts CGI tripods that look like they were rendered with five minutes to spare. When the movie eventually builds to its โ€œthrillingโ€ climax, it feels unearned in every possible way, and any characters who want to attempt anything that feels like a major sacrifice do so in the most emotionally hollow manner possible.

War of the Worlds' Trailer - Ice Cube Stars in Screenlife Reimagining of  Sci-fi Classic Releasing Next Week - Bloody Disgusting
For all intents and purposes, War of the Worlds is the worst movie of 2025. It fundamentally misses the entire point of H.G. Wellsโ€™ book, and doesnโ€™t even come close to other adaptations like the far superior 2005 movie from Steven Spielberg. And yet, despite all this, War of the Worlds really should be seen by everyone. There is something so fascinatingly bad about every decision it makes, that it makes seeing what plays out unintentionally funny as well. When Ice Cube sees entire cities get wiped out on his screen with blank expressions that seem primed for future online memes, there are laughs to be had. So bring some people together, grab a few drinks and watch along. If nothing else, watching the end of the world has not been funnier in years.

Grade: F

Movie Review (MIFF 2025): ‘Dreams’ Has Too Many Targets To Hit


Director: Michel Franco
Writer: Michel Franco
Stars: Isaac Hernandez, Jessica Chastain, Eduardo Gonzalez

Synopsis: Romance blossoms between a wealthy socialite and a Mexican ballet dancer, intertwining their contrasting lives and cultures.


Mexican director Michel Franco is known for his unsparing vision into the selfishness of humans. In his latest effort, starring Jessica Chastain (in a far less sympathetic role than he placed her in Memory), Franco turns his eye to the world of performative philanthropy. The McCarthy family are part of San Franciscoโ€™s elite. How they made their money isnโ€™t relevant, but how they โ€œart washโ€ it is. The McCarthy Foundation, managed by Jennifer (Chastain) and Jake (Rupert Friend), the adult children of arts patron Michael (Marshall Bell), doles out major sums to galleries, education programs, cultural institutions, and extends those contributions over the border to Mexico on occasion. It was in Mexico where Jennifer met and began a passionate affair with Fernando (Isaac Hernandez), a talented ballet dancer and teacher who was deported from America over a decade ago for the minor offense of busking.

The film begins in a nightmarish manner where undocumented immigrants are left in the back of a truck dying from heat. It switches to night when โ€˜coyotesโ€™ open the doors of a truck roughly pulling those who made the border crossing out. Fernando is in that group and in the confusion, he walks into the night. His goal is to get to San Francisco and Jennifer. Itโ€™s a punishing journey but he makes it. Jennifer is seemingly pleased to find her lover in her bedroom in her tasteful but personality-vacant home. She is concerned, however, that he undertook a dangerous and illegal route to be there.

As their San Francisco relationship develops, Fernando notes Jenniferโ€™s habit of sidelining him in public which comes to a head when theyโ€™re on a weekend getaway and Jennifer sees a friend of her fatherโ€™s booking in to the lodge where they are staying. She demands that they immediately pack up and leave. Fernando is left with no doubt that, as much as Jennifer says she loves him, sheโ€™s not prepared to present an undocumented Mexican as her lover to the inner circle. A secret dalliance is as much as he will be โ€” and being an invisible secret means heโ€™s not only a rich womanโ€™s fetish, but heโ€™s also not going to be able to follow his own aspirations. He leaves her, something she finds unacceptable, and faces America without a wealthy safety net to ensure his survival. And yet, he survives and flourishes without her.

Francoโ€™s film wants to be too many things. A tale of thwarted obsession with Jennifer using every resource she can to track down Fernando. A biting look at self-congratulatory โ€œphilanthropyโ€ โ€” with every donation heralding Michael and his family as not only taste makers but dream makers for the disadvantaged. It barely registers for Jennifer that her Louis Vuitton luggage alone could pay her house cleanerโ€™s wage in her expensive Mexico City apartment. Actual money means nothing to her family as it is always going to be there to spend. The status the money offers, however, is something Jennifer has spent her entire life devoted to. Franco doesnโ€™t bother to tell the audience what it is that Fernando does until a significant amount of time into the film. The fact that heโ€™s a prodigiously talented dancer, talented enough that he finds his own way into The San Francisco Ballet, seems secondary. The fact that heโ€™s Mexican always comes first and the fact that the McCarthy family has the resources to make or break him is not lost on him nor the audience.

The film takes a decidedly dark turn in the third act which in part over-illustrates Francoโ€™s point and then later through an unnecessary depiction of sexual assault works to unravel the film and condemn it to that moment. Fernando has, until that point, been used abominably by Jennifer (who perhaps honestly has no idea how not to behave with extreme entitlement), but the empathy thatโ€™s been garnered for a man who genuinely wants to be able to fulfil the promise of his talents on the largest stage available dissipates.ย 

It has been noted that Franco is a cold and somewhat clinical director. Heโ€™s uninterested in creating comfortable scenarios or characters. The main diversion from his style was in the humanity of 2023โ€™s Memory which still featured compromised and morally ambiguous characters. However, the iciness of Dreams is a distinct impediment to the sections of the film that are supposed to burn with passion. Jessica Chastainโ€™s Jennifer is, for the most part, a beautiful creation of someone elseโ€™s making โ€” whether that be her perfect designer wardrobe or her carefully controlled public persona. The fact that she likes dirty talk with her sweat-soaked secret lover isnโ€™t so much a personality trait as it is an expected deviance for the ultra-wealthy.


Vacillating between too obvious and too ugly, Dreams tangles itself into a psychodrama played out between the vampiric rich and the talented โ€œunfortunatesโ€ with neither being interesting enough to want to spend time with. The major disappointment is that in the bones of the film is a compelling phenomenon to investigate that get lost in an enervated melodrama.

Grade: D-

Podcast Review: Sorry, Baby

On this episode, On this episode, JD and Brendan discuss Eva Victor’s incredible debut film Sorry, Baby! This film was getting a lot of buzz coming out of Sundance earlier this year, and while festival hype is a thing sometime, it was warranted in this case. For all the reasons we discuss, Sorry, Baby really is one of the best films of the year so far.

Review: Sorry, Baby (4:00)
Director: Eva Victor
Writer: Eva Victor
Stars: Eva Victor, Naomi Ackie, Lucas Hedges, John Carroll Lynch

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
InSession Film Podcast – Sorry, Baby