Home Blog Page 40

Women InSession: The Terminator / T2

This week on Women InSession, we get into the blockbuster spirit as we discuss James Cameron’s The Terminator and its sequel T2: Judgement Day! It was Amy’s first time catching up with these films, and we thought it would be fun to dive into them and talk about hwo they define Cameron’s remarkable career.

Panel: Kristin Battestella, Amy Thomasson, Megan Kearns

On that note, check out this week’s show and let us know what you think in the comment section. Thanks for listening and for supporting the InSession Film Podcast!

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
Women InSession – The Terminator / T2

Movie Review: Honey Don’t! Is An Irredeemable Mess of a Film


Director: Ethan Coen
Writers: Ethan Coen, Tricia Cooke
Stars: Margaret Qualley, Aubrey Plaza, Chris Evans

Synopsis: A dark comedy about small-town private investigator Honey O’Donahue, who delves into a series of strange deaths tied to a mysterious church.


There is a prestige and guarantee of quality when a film has the name โ€˜Coenโ€™ attached. The Coen Brothers have made a plethora of cultural driving, envelope pushing cinematic masterpieces and if you are reading this it really doesnโ€™t need any introduction. No Country for Old Men is often cited as one of, if not, the best film of the 21st century so far. So when I tell you that Honey Donโ€™t!, a comedy noir made by one of the guys that essentially mastered the genre is one of the sloppiest and worst movies of 2025 you may have to suspend your belief a little bit. But it is 100% true, Honey Donโ€™t! is an irredeemable mess of a film and I cannot in good faith recommend it to you.

Honey Donโ€™t! follows private investigator Honey Oโ€™Donahue (Margaret Qualley) as she investigates a string of strange deaths that are somehow linked to a religious cult led by leader Drew Delvin (Chris Evans). A lot of elements of No Country for Old Men is pulled into Honey Donโ€™t!, the central protagonist is walking into the lions den whether they know it or not. However, No Country for Old Men had Anton Chigurh, and the closest thing to that in this movie is delegated to a side character that holds much more intrigue than whatever is presented here.

Whatโ€™s difficult about these mystery crime thrillers is the โ€˜central mysteryโ€™. The goal of subverting your viewerโ€™s expectations reign supreme and creating an experience that is wholly one of one. Unfortunately, Honey Donโ€™t!ย swings too hard for subversion that it lands with a whimper rather than a bang. Rather, the drive is on gender politics and homosexuality – which has a lot of potential in and of itself – but only ever graces surface level ideas and never seeks to dig deeper than a โ€œI have a vagina, and I voteโ€ bumper sticker.

Honey Donโ€™t! has a bizarre oversaturation of sex and nudity. Which does have a place in the story being told but itโ€™s never done in service of the overall film, but rather comes off as some fetishized fantasy brought to film. Yeah, if you want to watch Chris Evans have a ton of sex or watch Margaret Qualley and Aubrey Plaza go at it – have fun! But itโ€™s a major missed opportunity, the movie is not freaky enough to satiate the level of debauchery, and the sex is too much for a plot as vanilla as this.

โ€˜Continuity errorsโ€™ in films can be such a lame criticism, but in this case it is a major eye sore. Multiple instances where hair and outfits were different shot by shot, a bloodied arm looking through a book without any form of violence occurring previously, nothing seems to work in conjunction with each other – a shotty job on all fronts. It seems this movie was phoned in by the creatives up top and the actors roll with what theyโ€™re given. And each of the actors in the film are fine actors, but itโ€™s unfortunate theyโ€™re given this material.

But the worst aspect has to come from its oversaturation of ideas. Itโ€™s as if every idea is trying to cram through a door all at once and in that nothing comes through. Ideas of abuse, body ownership, sexual desires, sexual manipulation, conservative isolation, religious fanaticism all squeezed in without any tact or nuance. The vehicle in which they decided to explore those themes had the potential, and anyoneโ€™s excitement for this movie is not unwarranted. There is something under all of the gristle that couldโ€™ve hit much harder, but unfortunately weโ€™ll never see that film.

By the time the credits roll on Honey Donโ€™t!, youโ€™re already forgetting what had happened right before you watched it. This movie is 89 minutes of messy nonsense, and all you are left with is a terrible twist and an excuse to spend an ungodly amount on an ICEE. Even with its immense sex scenes, you canโ€™t watch this on FX or AMC in a few years, there is no real avenue to see this unless you specifically seek it out. I still have immense reverence for Ethan Coen as a filmmaker and Iโ€™ll still go see whatever he puts out, but this is a gargantuan miss. Hereโ€™s hoping the next one is better (much better, hopefully).

Grade: D

Movie Review: โ€˜Splitsvilleโ€™ is Sidesplittingly Funny and Incisive


Director: Michael Angelo Covino
Writers: Michael Angelo Covino, Kyle Marvin
Stars: Dakota Johnson, Adria Arjona, Kyle Marvin, Michael Angelo Covino

Synopsis: After Ashley (Arjona) asks for a divorce, good-natured Carey (Marvin) runs to his friends, Julie (Johnson) and Paul (Covino), for support. He’s shocked to discover that the secret to their happiness is an open marriage, that is until Carey crosses the line and throws all of their relationships into chaos.


While the funnyman duo of Michael Angelo Covino and Kyle Marvin are experiencing what most might call a โ€œbig breakโ€ with their NEON-backed comedy of marital errors, Splitsville, it should be noted that these two jokesters have been at it โ€“ both the filmmaking game and, on screen, one anotherโ€™s throats โ€“ for a while. In 2019, they premiered their debut effort The Climb at the Cannes Film Festival to critical acclaim, though the film was relatively underseen due to its November 2020 release from Sony Pictures Classic. And thatโ€™s a shame, not just for the writing-producing-starring team, but for anyone who has even a semblance of anticipation for Splitsville: Not only would Covino and Marvinโ€™s first film make for one hell of a double feature with their new one, but the latter certainly owes a lot to the former.ย 

Thatโ€™s not say that The Climb isnโ€™t a resounding success with its own merits; quite the contrary is true, in fact, and should you have 95 minutes free before making your way to the theater for what amounts to Covino and Marvinโ€™s second installment in what could theoretically be a series called โ€œScenes From a Few Unfortunate Marriages,โ€ you could do worse than throwing it on. ($3.99 on most rental platforms, FWIW.) But the twosomeโ€™s debut โ€“ an increasingly-uncomfortable story of friendship in which Mike tells Kyle that he has been sleeping with his fiancรฉ, and chaos ensues โ€“ feels, in hindsight, a lot like a practice run for what Splitsville would become, one in which everyone is more thoroughly entertained.ย 

In their new jaunt โ€“ written, starring, and produced by both (Covino directs) โ€“ Marvin stars as Carey, a man whose wife, Ashley (Adria Arjona), abruptly asks for a divorce whilst the couple is en route to their best friendsโ€™ beach house. In response to the startling request, Carey ejects himself from the driverโ€™s seat of their car into the wilderness, only to magically land at the home of Paul (Covino) and Julie (Dakota Johnson), said best friends who await his arrival having already been visited by the newly-free Ashley. As Careyโ€™s nightmare night rolls on โ€“ and like The Climb, this story is divided into chapters with titles like โ€œTermination Eventโ€ and โ€œDisclosure of Facts,โ€ to name a few โ€“ his pals inform him that theyโ€™ve kept their relationship afloat thanks to an open relationship, one that permits feelings-less sex with other people, just as long as the other person knows nothing about the trysts.ย 

Carey, stunned by the notion that these two seemingly successful, attractive adults would ever partake in sexual acts with a partner who wasnโ€™t the other, quickly falls into bed with Julie, and though their evening together adheres to the bylaws of Julie and Paulโ€™s arrangement, Paul is incensed at the news. Nevermind that heโ€™s a bit of a prick, a workaholic, and a neglectful husband; his wife and best friend hooking up was never supposed to be on the table. Itโ€™s this idea where Covino and Marvin have the most fun, exploring the boundaries of all kinds of relationships and pushing them as far as they are willing to stretch before snapping entirely and offering up a romantic comedy far more incisive and brutally honest than the one they had crafted within their premise alone.ย 

This unique creative partnership thrives when crafting efficient, ridiculous humor that could feasibly exist in the real world, so it should be no surprise that Splitsville is both hilarious and absurd with neither quality outshining the other. Itโ€™s the sort of comedy that teeters on being of a style that would be at home in a dry sketch setting โ€“ they could call themselves โ€œPlease Do Destroyโ€ if that opportunity came to pass โ€“ though despite the Looney Tunes-esque physical comedy that the two regularly display and the quippy nature of their charactersโ€™ on-screen interactions, it never feels all that rehearsed nor fleshed out to the point of obsoletism. Ongoing gags in this film involve The Fray and the act of reading articles (or just the headline) but saying you read an entire book on a subject; quick one-liners see the cast confusing ALS (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis) with the ALDS (American League Division Series) and watching Lorenzoโ€™s Oil in a room full of someoneโ€™s ex-lovers. Itโ€™s a blink-and-youโ€™ll-miss-it affair, which could easily come off as cocky if the writers behind these jokes werenโ€™t self-aware enough to acknowledge the stupidity that festers within their creations. Covino and Marvinโ€™s works look and sound inane because they set out precisely to illustrate inanity, not for it to unintentionally seep through the seams and stain the production outright.

Itโ€™s because of this discernment that both Arjona and Johnson are allowed to play off of their more traditionally-funny counterparts, creating better comedy than either of the two actors have been able to before. Arjona was electric in Richard Linklaterโ€™s Hit Man, delivering many of the filmโ€™s best comedic moments, but that film hinged on the sensuousness of its co-leads (she starred alongside Glen Powell) more than it ever allowed their senses of humor to take charge; as Marvinโ€™s counterpart here, Arjona eschews the label of the complicated romantic interest for something altogether more fascinating and cleverly performed. Johnson is a bit of a different case, that of a movie star who had previously only ever turned in pure comedy as the lead in Sony/Marvelโ€™s Madame Web, and that project was unintentionally funny, no matter how many people try to convince you of it being authentic โ€œcamp.โ€ย  She has the most to do over the entirety of Splitsville, and the complications in Julieโ€™s own relationship with both men make not just for dramatic tension in a film that might otherwise lack it in a concrete sense, but for insightful commentary on the lives of married folks, especially whether or not divorce is the better option in the long run.

Splitsville may feature one too many dick shots โ€“ both on camera and from a fist, knee, or inanimate object โ€“ and go more cinematically intentional with its comedy than The Climb ever did to feel like a true parallel move for Covino and Marvin, but thatโ€™s by design for the duo. Where their first film was a subtle introduction to the brand of hilarity on which theyโ€™d quickly make their names, Splitsville represents an aggressively deadpan stride forward: The kind of film you can tell two stellar comics have been itching to realize for some time. Hereโ€™s hoping it wonโ€™t take another six years to see what they come up with next.

NEON will release Splitsville in select theaters on Friday, August 22.

Grade: B+

Episode 650: Denzel Washington Performances

This weekโ€™s episode is brought to you by Mission: Impssible – The Final Reckoning. Follow us on social media for your chance to win a FREE digital code!

This week on the InSession Film Podcast, inspired by Spike Lee’s new film Highest 2 Lowest, we discuss our Top 10 Denzel Washington performances! We also get into Alan Tudyk’s recent comments on I, Robot and we have new performance that we going to champion this awards season.

– Alan Tudyk Comments (3:19)
We begin the show this week by talking about Alan Tudyk’s recent comments about how he was rejected from the I, Robot press tour because test audiences loved his performance more than Will Smith’s performance. Which is saddening to hear because both Tudyk and Smith are excellent in that movie, and the test audiences were correct that Tudyk gives the warmer performance. Smith’s cynicism is what makes him great in that film, so we’re not sure what the studios were expecting, and thus we had to talk about it.

– Good Boy & Indy / Quentin Tarantino (14:17)
In 2015 we saw the release of White God and one of the best performances of the last decade with Bodie the dog. No, seriously. He was so good that we championed him all awards season that year. It was never going to happen, obviously, but it’s 2025 and we aren’t going to let Indy have the same fate. Indy, of course, being the start of the new film Good Boy. We also talk a little Quentin Tarantino as he continues to struggle with finding his tenth and “final” film. But maybe he already has great 10 movies?


RELATED: Listen to Episode 610 of the InSession Film Podcast where we discussed our Top 10 Movies of 2024!


– Denzel Washington Performances (43:07)
Denzel will go down as one of the best movie stars of his generation. A phenomenal talent with a remarkable range and an infectious personality. So we thought it would be fun to do another consensus ranking of his top 10 performances. As always, the top end was obvious, but the bottom five came with some debate and even a few surprises. Any time you get to talk Denzel Washington it’s a good day. With that said, what would be your Top 10 Denzel performances?

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
InSession Film Podcast – Episode 650

Next week on the show:

Ne Zha 2 and Honey Don’t

Help Support The InSession Film Podcast

If you want to help support us, there are several ways you can help us and we’d absolutely appreciate it. Every penny goes directly back into supporting the show and we are truly honored and grateful. Thanks for your support and for listening to the InSession Film Podcast!

VISIT OUR DONATE PAGE HERE

Movie Review: ‘Red Sonja’ Is A Soon-To-Be Cult Classic


Director: M. J. Bassett
Writer: Tasha Huo
Stars: Matilda Lutz, Wallis Day, Robert Sheehan

Synopsis: An adaptation of the comic book, Red Sonja, a vengeful warrior known as a “She-Devil with a sword”.


This year has been packed with superhero films, with Marvel bringing three new additions to the MCU and DC rebooting yet again with Superman, making it easy for something like Red Sonja to fall through the cracks. It doesn’t help that the film got a sprinkling of screenings, and a single day in theaters. But unlike Superman, and even The Fantastic Four: First Steps, M. J. Bassett does a lot more with a lot less. Red Sonja is a film that deserves to be seen on a big screen; from its mighty lead performance to its impressive practical effects, it’s a return to what makes these stories captivating. A lead that is as fiery as the color of her bold hair, Red Sonja is a fantasy lover’s dream with plenty of sword and sorcery to keep you hooked.

For those unfamiliar with the titular character, she’s been around since 1973 when she was first published by Marvel Comics, created by Roy Thomas and Barry Windsor-Smith based on the works of Robert E. Howard. But it wasn’t until Dynamite Comics got the rights to her that she really got a chance to shine; famously, Gail Simone penned a reboot of the character in 2013, which is often referred to as the character’s origin. In 1985, Brigette Nielsen portrayed the fierce red-headed warrior in a film that was met with mixed reviews but has since found a niche audience. It’s safe to say that there was more than enough lore to tap into for a new take on the character, and Bassett alongside writer Tasha Huo were the ones up to the task. Their final product is an action-packed fantasy epic that was never truly given the chance it deserved.

Deep in a mystical forest filled with creatures that resemble prehistoric beasts with a fantasy twist, we are first introduced to Sonja (Matilda Lutz). She travels through the sea of green on her horse, with whom she shares a special bondโ€”they even have a unique way of communicating with one another. Her gentle connection with the earth and the beings that inhabit it makes her a protector of the forest, though she still seeks her tribe and her people. As a child, she grew up in her homeland of Hyrkania, worshiping the forest goddess Ashera. After it was attacked by barbarians, she found herself growing up alone, yet always searching for those who were taken from her. It goes without saying that her protective instincts are triggered when hunters enter the forest and remove the large antlers from a family of forest creatures.

From the start, Bassett shows us that Sonja is a woman of her wordโ€”she doesn’t let anyone take from the forest without there being hell to pay. She soon finds herself outside a stronghold, surrounded by henchmen and women of all kinds. More importantly, she witnesses even more animals being abused. And while Sonja is kind-hearted, she is equally savage when provoked. However, she is eventually overpowered and enslaved by Emperor Dragan the Magnificent (Robert Sheehan) after being defeated by the blade of Annisia (Wallis Day). Thrown into a gladiator-style arena, Sonja is forced to train alongside other unfortunate contestants.

Osin the Untouched (Luka Pasqualino), the formidable Hawk (Michael Bisping), and his sly partner Petra (Rhona Mitra). During her training is where Bassett’s style shines; impressive action sequences shine with her mixture of slo-mo that highlights the physical power of her actors. And while Sonja is training alongside her new pseudo-colleagues is where we get to know more about her as a skilled fighter. Donning her iconic chainmail bikini, which offers no sort of protection, just gives the audience something to hoot and holler for. Bassett places numerous challenges in front of Sonja, having her face off with death and live up to her She-Devil moniker.

I can’t think of someone better to bring Red Sonja to the screen than Bassett; she has a distinct eye for these kinds of films. Low-budget fantasy can be tricky to nail because so much of it revolves around being able to immerse your audience in a magical world. Bassett does so with ease, making the most out of practical makeup on characters like General Karlak (Martyn Ford) and using CGI when needed to create buildings with flowing magic. She doesn’t let the action overshadow Sonja’s journey for freedom or avenging the forest, allowing her to be a fully fleshed-out character. The film has a rather straightforward script, and often Sonja’s journey feels reminiscent of Furiosa from the Mad Max franchise, two fierce and complicated women who were brutalized by their overlords. Huo injects plenty of humor into the narrative, and even some blushworthy romance that yearns for a sequel.

Bringing the titular character to life, Lutz brings her all to Sonja; if you’ve seen her in Revenge, then you know how resilient and savage Lutz can be. But she’s equally passionate in her portrayal of a wayward woman looking for her people. Not only does she look the part, but she is the part, making it hard to envision anyone but her playing the role. Lutz goes through many phases of Sonja in this film, from a free spirit in the forest to a blood-soaked avenger; she evolves into each one with ease. The film has an impressive supporting cast as well, but Day and Sheehan, as Sonja’s main foes, are what elevate this beyond its comic book genre. Day plays Annisia as an alluringly tormented warrior; even when you don’t want to feel badly for her, her performance makes you empathize with her. Paired with the twisted Dragan, Sheehan is often over the top, but it works. He gives this former slave boy an erratic yet genius mindset that leads to some gnarly battles.

It’s a shame that this is ending up going under many moviegoers’ radar, and it’s not totally their fault either. Bassett, her cast, and crew have created a fantasy epic that shows you where each dollar is spent. Lutz gives one of the best action performances of the year, and it’s basically being relegated to our television screens rather than in a theater. It’s unclear who, or what, or why its distributor is only doing select dual screenings with Bassett’s other film Solomon Kane, a one-day screening on August 13th from Fathom Events, and sporadic screenings here and there. The film teases the potential of a sequel that doesn’t feel likely to occur, which is a shame considering Bassett has more than enough to work with. Visually the film falters in some of its grander moments, like panning over CGI buildings. But its limited budget still manages to rival the VFX from big budget blockbusters released this year. Its release on digital will allow a wider audience to revel in its early 2000s grandeur.

Red Sonja marks yet another soon-to-be cult classic from Bassett, giving Lutz the spotlight to show off not only her physical abilities as an actor but also her complex approach to characters. With a solid cast, practical effects, and high-stakes action, Red Sonja is one of the best comic book films of the year.

Grade: B+

Movie Review: ‘The Final Run’ Is 88 Minutes of Your Life You Will Never Get Back

0

Director: Chris Helton
Writers: Walter Czura, Jason Usry
Stars: Jeff Fahey, Judd Nelson, Maddie Henderson

Synopsis: Pierce Butler, a former Marine and long-retired marijuana smuggler, whose wife is suffering from a rare type of cancer, must return to his drug-running ways and make one Final Load in order to save his house, his company, and his wife.


There are bad actors who are allowed professional opportunities. They exist, but most of the acting we consider bad or at least unbelievable is because a working actor is doing as their director wants. They aren’t pushed, challenged, or motivated to do more. This is either because of budget, they can’t afford more than a few takes, or because of vision. The acting in The Final Run isn’t bad, but the film lacks vision.

It starts with the script. The credited writer Walter Czura is given the “screenplay by” credit, but there is another writing credit for Jason Usry that reads “revisions by.” It may be Usry’s revisions are at fault for the screenplay having the emotional depth of a teaspoon. It may be that Czura’s original script is at fault for being so unoriginal that it could have been written by an AI who was fed the scripts for late 20th century thrillers. Who’s ever at fault, The Final Run says absolutely nothing new, has no unique elements whatsoever, and is wholly without artistic merit. So, what was this film made for? It’s when you start asking that, that the religious aspect of the film begins creeping in.

Films with a specific religious bent aren’t inherently bad. Some are well crafted, intriguing stories that are meant not for a broad audience, but for people who want to see their values reflected on screen. There are several filmmakers working within this space who are good filmmakers with unique points of view and an eye for craft. Yet, The Final Run feels like it completely tacked this aspect onto a general audience story. The film has a few scenes of faith based interactions and aspects of Christian values. Yet, those aspects are just used as a crutch for the gray areas of breaking the law for the right reasons. They are used almost exploitatively for a bland, tepid anti-thriller for not having curse words, gunplay, or sexuality of any kind.

The film has no teeth. The antagonists and protagonists have nothing to quarrel about and it seems the DEA agents on the case have no real interest in pursuing leads in an intelligent way. The law enforcement officers do not investigate and they seem to have no authority to actually question anyone about anything. No agent goes off half-cocked. No agent is dressed down because he can’t just let things go and do it by the book. There is nothing compelling or driving about the investigation. They literally know every single detail about the case, but they keep staring at a cork board wondering what they’re missing.

In one of the most frustratingly funny scenes, which is played for laughs, but you won’t laugh at what they want you to laugh at, sums up the slap-dash way the movie tries to create tension. Sloane (Judd Nelson) helps Pierce (Jeff Fahey) by calling in a fake shooting to 911. Sloane was chasing and caught Pierce for smuggling decades prior and sent him to prison, but because this last run is for Pierce’s wife’s cancer treatment, all is forgotten and Sloane’s on board with the operation. So Sloane sees the deputy approach semi full of drugs in the middle of a forest and calls 911. He puts on a terrible accident and with no urgency, inflection, or passion in his voice he tells the operator there is currently a shooting happening at his location. He tells the operator to listen. Then he hangs up. He didn’t even fake gunshots, yelling, or screaming. He gave no details of where the shooting is supposed to be taking place. He hung up on the operator without the operator balking or trying to keep him on the line. There is nothing. The distraction works (maybe through the miracle of utter stupidity?) and Sloane saves the day.

If that small snippet of a scene sounds confounding, then know the entirety of The Final Run is like that. There is absolutely no passion or urgency of any kind to the film. The characters never get mad, they just get disappointed. There is no personality to any character and the whole film feels like they shot the rehearsals of scenes rather than going for a take with some actual weight to it. In spite of the film’s 88 minute run time it feels like an eternity with subplots that are dull and a main plot that moves forward with little to no obstacle. This is 88 minutes of your life you will never get back, spend it doing anything else.

Grade: F

Podcast Review: Highest 2 Lowest

On this episode, On this episode, Brendan and JD discuss Spike Lee and Denzel Washington’s latest collaboration in Highest 2 Lowest! The movies these two have made over the last 30 years are astounding, so it should come as no shock to anyone that Highest 2 Lowest is another masterful notch on that belt. It’s funny. The performances are great. And it’s Spike wrestling with his legacy. A lot to love with his latest joint.

Review: Highest 2 Lowest (4:00)
Director: Spike Lee
Writer: Alan Fox
Stars: Denzel Washington, Jeffrey Wright, ASAP Rocky

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
InSession Film Podcast – Highest 2 Lowest

Movie Review: โ€˜Ne Zha 2โ€™ Is a Stunning Achievement in Animation


Director: Yu Yang
Writer: Yu Yang
Stars: Yanting Lรผ, Mo Han, Hao Chen

Synopsis: After a catastrophic event leaves their bodies destroyed, Ne Zha and Ao Bing are granted a fragile second chance at life. As tensions rise between the dragon clans and celestial forces, the two must undergo a series of perilous trials that will test their bond, challenge their identities, and decide the fate of both mortals and immortals.


Following the mega success of the first film, Ne Zha 2 finally dropped in theaters earlier this year and has since become the highest-grossing film of the year at 2.2 billion, smashing all kinds of records and becoming the most successful animated film of all time. To take such a mantle from films such as Inside Out 2 and Frozen 2 is a massive feat in itself, but while watching Ne Zha 2, it’s clear to see why it was able to take off like no other film has this year, as it’s a stone-cold stunner on basically every front. Not only does this sequel greatly improve from the more cutesy and crude elements of the original, but it also elevates everything that worked so well about it to the next level. From swift and elegantly choreographed hand-to-hand fight scenes to full-out war sequences on the scale of The Lord of the Rings, it’s utterly unbelievable to witness the majestic prowess mixed with the rich Chinese mythology and lore on display. While the sequel has a fair share of hiccups in minor tone clashes and confusion within large amounts of exposition and story, Ne Zha 2 is an animated spectacle like no other and is the best of its medium this year.

Ne Zha 2 continues the story right after the first film, following the demon child Ne Zha (born of the demon orb), son of Lady Yin and Li Jing, and Ao Bing (born of the spirit pearl), son of the Dragon King. After Ne Zha and Ao Bing became allies and broke the curse set upon Ne Zha, the two lost their bodies in the heat of battle and must now work with master Tayai to find a life-saving elixir to form a new body for Ao Bing. To save the lives of both Celestial and Dragon clans and themselves, the two must undergo four trials to become worthy of being immortal. Despite the admittedly heavy amounts of lore and story components put upon the viewer, writer and director Yu Yang does such a great job at not only conveying the simple aspects to understand, but also immerses you into the rich world of this film so well that it ends up a natural progression from the first film. A large reason why this works is because the core of this story remains intact: Ne Zhaโ€™s found brotherly bond with Ao Bing and his own care for his parents, Lady Yin and Li Jing, parents who still cared for him even when he was cursed as a demon. The development between the original and sequel truly led to some heavy emotional moments that are earned in every sense of the word, giving the filmโ€™s final stretch an extra dose of emotional punch.

Tonally, the film still maintains a balance between its goofy and juvenile cartoony jokes and more serious, thematically bold elements. In the first film, these elements meshed together a lot less well than they do in the sequel, which manages to set aside fart jokes and let more moments of characters talking through something sit, giving it so much more nuance to its mystical elements. The jokes are still largely hit or miss, but a lot more of them hit on this go around.

The animation of Ne Zha 2 is on a level most would think is unreal in the medium. It truly is an epic spectacle in every sense of the word, where every finite detail of battles, new worlds, and character design is meticulously developed and honed on an unbelievably beautiful level. The scale of every sequence is always something to behold, as the film always showcases a new and exciting marvel of animation with virtually every fleeting moment that never gets tiring to watch on a massive screen. The fight scenes, whether through exhilarating hand-to-hand Kung Fu or wide in scope war sequences, are truly relentless, but never tiring. The storyboarding and camera work on display are unique and thrilling, managing to raise the movie’s scale to another level with every passing moment, and as the quality between fights rises, so do the stakes of what our leads are fighting for.ย 

Ne Zha 2 is not only leaps and bounds above the quality of its predecessor, it’s also the best animated film of the year. Soaking itself within the beautiful chaos of its mythology, its lore, while also crafting animation at breathtaking scale and levels, this sequel truly is a spectacle like no other youโ€™ll see this year, and it’s a stunning achievement for the medium of animated films.

Grade: A-

Op-Ed: It’s been 20 Years and Wes Cravenโ€™s โ€˜Red Eyeโ€™ is More Thrilling Than Ever

When most people think of legendary genre director Wes Craven, they always lean towards his work in horror franchises. From the meta slasher wave that Scream kicked off, to his two genre-defining Nightmare on Elm Street films, these are certainly what he’s most known for. While Craven technically has other underseen gems like the relentlessly bleak The Hills Have Eyes or The People Under the Stairs, itโ€™s always been interesting to me that Red Eye was never really hotly talked about within his filmography until recently, when comparisons were made to 2025โ€™s Drop. Now, even 20 years after its release, with plenty of other thrillers to compare it to, I wanted to take a deeper look into why Cravenโ€™s slick and sweat-inducing thrill ride still manages to be one of the best examples of a quick but impactful 85 minutes.

Story-wise, Red Eyeโ€™s setup begins simply, involving Lisa Reisert (Rachel McAdams) on an overnight flight to Miami with her seatmate, Jackson Ripper (Cillian Murphy). The two seem to hit it off at first until Ripper reveals a devious plot to use her as a tool for an assassination attempt on the Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security, with her father (Brian Cox) at risk if she doesn’t comply. One of the best aspects of Red Eye isn’t just its compact runtime, but also how clearly Wes understands the most clever ways to execute the genre’s tropes, making it more entertaining than predictable. The best example of this lies in where the movie spends the vast majority of its runtime, the plane itself. Craven is playing a bit with post 9/11 panic at the time and common fears of flying, with Lisa being afraid of flights, but it’s the way he connects horror and thriller elements that makes the sequences more thrilling. The cat-and-mouse elements of Lisa outsmarting the much more calculated and cold Jackson are elevated by not only the different scenarios in which Lisa is placed, but also the strength of both McAdams and Murphy as performers.

When I think about where this is best showcased, the entire portion of the film on the flight is able to make such great use of unique predicaments, especially in limited space. Every time Lisa tries to alert someone of the situation sheโ€™s in, whether through faking a book signature or using soap to write a message on the bathroom mirror, each setup is more creative than the last. Even the filmโ€™s more cheesy elements โ€“ loud, suspenseful music cues, or the out-of-place moments of humor in subplots and surrounding our two leads โ€“ are effective in giving it all a classic, slick thriller feel that isn’t nearly as present in films today. The melding of these moments mixed with Murphyโ€™s chilling turn during this section and Cravenโ€™s razor-sharp genre sensibilities make for such tense moments of asking โ€œIs she gonna make it?โ€ that only the best type of thrillers create.

Even when the filmโ€™s third act delves into pure absurdity as Jackson chases Lisa in a full-on rollercoaster ride to her house, it remains extremely effective. Many, since the movieโ€™s release, argue that the complete shift in tone is more jarring than fun, but I see it as another example of Craven being one of the greats at implementing tension.  After Lisa brutally stabs Jackson in the neck with a pen on the plane in one of the filmโ€™s best moments, we enter a set piece throughout Lisaโ€™s childhood home and the movie turns into a balls-to-the-wall slasher where Lisa uses everything at her disposal, from hockey sticks to high heels, to get the best of Jackson. It’s certainly a turn, but one that’s more than welcome for such a curvy genre piece.

When I first watched Red Eye, I always just saw it as a solid enough thriller with a handful of standout moments, but not something that would stick with me for a long period of time. Itโ€™s crazy looking back at it now that the film remains one of the best examples of how to craft such a lean and mean thrill ride that has absolutely no fat to it, and I appreciate it for that. While the film will never be quite as iconic as Cravenโ€™s Scream or Nightmare on Elm Street films, it will forever be cemented in my mind as one of the greatest filmmakers there was delivering what they do best: thrills and chills.  

Movie Review: โ€˜War 2โ€™ is Bigger, Louder, Gayer


Director: Ayan Mukerji
Writer: Shridhar Raghavan
Stars: Hrithik Roshan, N.T. Rama Rao Jr, Kiara Advani

Synopsis: Things get complicated when Kabir Dhaliwal, a secret agent, is accused of betraying his nation, and his former batchmate Vikram is assigned the task of finding him.


If you thought Siddharth Anandโ€™s War contained lots of homoerotic tension, watch out, because Ayan Mukerjiโ€™s War 2 has even more of it. The highly-anticipated sequel to the hit 2019 film, and sixth installment overall in the YRF Spy Universe, is light on the gay subtext that made Anandโ€™s film stand out in contemporary Bollywood cinema, until its post-intermission half, where Hrithik Roshanโ€™s Kabir fights off against N.T. Rama Rao Jrโ€™s Vikram inside a secluded cave in the Arctic. With nothing to lose, the two wield phallic-shaped ice picks as weapons to kill one another instead of admitting that theyโ€™re actually in love.ย 

Donโ€™t believe me? Mild spoilers: thereโ€™s a moment where Vikram gains the upper hand and impales Kabir in the shoulderโ€ฆuntil Vikram does exactly the same thing so he can be as close as possible to his enemy? Friend? Lover? You decide! Some may think Iโ€™m reaching, but the first movie was dubbed โ€œGayer than Top Gunโ€ amongst critics when it released, and Anand himself has not been shy on the fact that, yes, it does contain some homoeroticism. Just look at comments he made on the matter when discussing Hrithik Roshanโ€™s now-famous entry in the film, where Tiger Shroffโ€™s Khalid looks at him in pure admiration as he walks out of a helicopter:ย 

โ€œIf Khalid looks at him with awe, you as the audience will look at him with awe. […] Heโ€™s looking at him like a fan would. The fact that Hrithik looks the way he does is also why you feel the homoeroticism. Even the men who are looking at him going, โ€˜Oh my god, how good looking is he?โ€™ You canโ€™t help but look at him with lust.โ€

While I wasnโ€™t a big fan of Anandโ€™s War, the scene I most remember is the scene Anand is describing, which made everyone have the exact same reaction the filmmaker is talking about. You canโ€™t help but look at him with the same desire Khalid has, and, at this very moment, could think Roshan is the hottest actor, from any country, whoโ€™s ever graced a screen. For the sequel, Ayan Mukerji, who previously helmed Brahmฤstra: Part One โ€“ Shiva dials up everything Anand built in the first installment, making almost every setpiece bigger, louder and gayer, which could be a feature, a bug, or both for anyone looking for 173 minutes of pure entertainment on the big screen. Narratively, thereโ€™s not much that makes sense, and the leaps in logic Mukerji takes with screenwriter Shridhar Raghavan are incredibly baffling.ย 

Itโ€™s hard to discuss the plot of War 2 without divulging some elements the filmmakers certainly want kept secret. However, the movie does undoubtedly deliver on the Hrithik vs. NTR (who is in his first Bollywood feature) confrontation that the trailers have advertised. The gist is that Khalid, who has been undercover in attempting to find the people behind a secretive organization that plans to destroy the very fabric of India, is accused of betraying his country when a misunderstood exchange between him and his mentor, Colonel Sunil Luthra (Ashutosh Rana) is sent to the colonelโ€™s daughter, Kavya (Kira Advani), who believes he has done something unconscionable when Kabir has always followed his advice ever since he became an agent: โ€œDeath before dishonour, service before self, India first.โ€

From there, the newly appointed RAW chief Vikrant Kaul (Anil Kapoor) tasks Vikram to find Kabir and bring him to headquarters, where the truth will be revealed once and for all. Itโ€™s a rudimentary synopsis weโ€™ve all seen before, but done relatively efficiently for the movieโ€™s first half. In fact, Mukerji seems more seasoned than Anand in crafting efficient action of tangible spectacle, particularly when staging a Tollywood-like introduction to NTRโ€™s character. The (very) loud background music blares in the IMAX cinema, as Vikram blows up an entire ship in the most scientifically improbable, yet effortlessly badass fashion.ย 

Thereโ€™s a real sense of play in the action sequences that Anandโ€™s War sorely lacked, from a bravura, gravity-defying, plane fight that puts the entirety of The Fast and the Furious and Zack Snyderโ€™s filmogrpahy to shame, and a boat chase that culminates in NTRโ€™s jet-powered naval vassel cruising the Formula 1 track in Abu Dhabi alongside many racecars (can you do that, Sonny Hayes? I donโ€™t think so!). Oh, and I havenโ€™t mentioned the train sequence, whose pure sense of nonsensical energy, from shifting character motivations to gargantuan superheroics that even people who suspend their disbelief may question, will confound as much as it will enthrall you.ย 

Of course, the real show-stopper is that homoerotically-charged confrontation between Kabir and Vikram, which goes on for an eternity and has more twists and turns than a glut of anime titles you can think of. Suppose you were disappointed at the lack of subtext in its pre-interval half. In that case, the post-intermission section of War 2, which develops the rivalry between the two characters in more interesting angles than the first, delivers on what fans of the first have been waiting for. Hell, all of this unnecessary bloodshed and alpha male domination could be avoided entirely if they just kissed already. Mukerji can haphazardly include a female character who dips for a good chunk of the filmโ€™s 173-minute runtime if he wants, but everyone knows the real love story is between Kabir and Vikram, who fight so hard not to kiss in that never-ending confrontation that one wishes they would just stop it all and say what they truly feel towards each other.ย 

They kinda do, which makes this push-pull all the more hilarious. Impressively so, though, we buy into this messy conflict because NTR and Hrithik Roshan deliver impassioned portrayals, which the latter hasnโ€™t done in ages. Roshan has been more concerned with promoting his HRX brand as much as possible than giving a damn, as he did in Koiโ€ฆMil Gaya or Karan Joharโ€™s Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Ghamโ€ฆ His turn as Kabir here is more meditative and sincere than his first go-around with the character, while NTR proves once again why he is the Man of Masses and will always live up to the mantle no matter what.ย 

Itโ€™s just a shame that War 2 begins to sag once it returns from its intermission. Its admittedly simple, but effective plot begins to overcomplicate itself until it has no idea where to go. As a result, it literally and figuratively jumps the shark with mass sequences in the hopes that the audience wonโ€™t notice how illogical the whole thing is. We do, and it takes many leaps for us to suspend our disbelief and immerse ourselves in the story, but we also donโ€™t care, because what Mukerji does with the sequel to the worst YRF Spy Universe installment is enjoyable enough in the places that matter. Namely, wall-to-wall, exhilarating action, fun musical numbers, and a gay subtext that sets the film apart from the bevy of Bollywood blockbusters being released today.ย 

Look, all things considered, the homoeroticism was probably unintentional (or not), but itโ€™s undoubtedly part of the charm โ€“ and fun โ€“ of a film like War 2. If youโ€™re not prepared, perhaps this hugely galaxy-brained, but sincerely entertaining, motion picture may not be for you. But youโ€™re missing out on some proper cinema if you donโ€™t at least seek one of these films out.ย 

Grade: B-

Movie Review (Locarno 2025): Radu Judeโ€™s โ€˜Draculaโ€™ Sinks Its Teeth Into AI and Capitalist Vampirism


Director: Radu Jude
Writer: Radu Jude
Stars: Adonis Tanศ›a, Gabriel Spahiu, Oana Mardare, Ilinca Manolache

Synopsis: In modern-day Transylvania, vampire hunts and labor strikes collide with sci-fi twists, romance, and AI-crafted tales, as multiple storylines blend folklore, classic horror, and contemporary elements into a fresh take on Dracula’s legend.


Since some filmmakers have opted to use artificial intelligence in their projects, peopleโ€”film critics, cinemagoers, and filmmakers alikeโ€”have been openly, and justifiably so, criticizing them for their actions against art and the beauty of the creative process. Everything about AI, in any sense, is rid of humanity and ideas; it is all fake and pure dribble. Many within the film industry have expressed interest in working with this new technology, which has been met with dismay by many. Others have openly criticized them to the point where some have even made films about such an inclination towards AI in cinema. One of them was French director Quentin Dupieux, known for consistently creating withering and hilarious satires about modern-day living and pop culture, with his latest work, The Second Act (Le Deuxiรจme Acte).

In said film, four actorsโ€“formed by a quartet of Franceโ€™s top talent: Lรฉa Seydoux, Louis Garrel, Vincent Lindon, and Raphaรซl Quenardโ€“are put through hell and back in the set of the first film written and directed by artificial intelligence. This blurred the lines between reality and performance, with the AI influencing the creative expression of the actors and their public image regarding their involvement in a project led by this technology. The satire, although interesting on paper, didnโ€™t develop into a substantial exploration of the topic and became quite repetitive. Enter Romanian provocateur Radu Jude, never one to shy away from commenting on any subject. He has decided that it is his turn to throw his hat in the ring against AI.

In Dracula (screening in the Concorso Internazionale at the 2025 Locarno Film Festival), his three-hour dissertation on generative AI, the vampirism of capitalist societies, and Romanian history, Jude, as always, places a boatload of ideas and commentary on current and ongoing situations. All seen through some provocative and creatively manic scenarios that few filmmakers have the gall to opt for. While some jokes and quips do lose their effect amidst the demanding structure and runtime, there are major props to be given to Jude and his team for being upfront about the topics at hand and bold as ever. Dracula is divided into fourteen chapters, narrated by a film director (whom Adonis Tanศ›a also provides the voice for) meant to serve as a surrogate for Jude.ย 

These chapters cover a range of topics, but they center on the central theme of vampirism โ€“ someone or something preying on the unsuspecting, consuming the humanity of those in these respective situations, whether political or art-related. The director is currently at a loss for ideas for his new film about the classic titular monster. This creative block has driven him to the point of considering bankruptcy and seeking help from artificial intelligence. He seeks the least artistic and unethical approach to conceive a project. To his assortment of immoral producers, this director reveals each pitch generated by Chat GPT to them, which includes a Dracula TikTok, where we see how the vampire would behave on social media, an erotic musical theater, and The Office-like workplace satire.ย 

Each of these pitches, and the many more presented, captures the abhorrent nature of work produced by artificial intelligence. You never know what to expect. Each segment of Dracula begins on a high note and evolves into an even more ballistic, hysterical, and utterly strange commentary. It starts with AI-generated images of Dracula, accompanied by vulgar and raunchy quotes. This barrage of images sets the tone and establishes the satirical texture of the film. But by the time you get to the story of a farm-woman and what grows in her cornfield, you may have thought you have seen it all from Jude. Never have you seen him in this unrestrained fashion, where he comes up with the most ridiculous things and gets away with it because it all adds up to a wonky yet ultimately fascinating thematic thread.ย 

This isnโ€™t the first time he has utilized the collage structure as the backbone for his satirical portraits of modern society. The Golden Bear-winning Bad Luck Banging or Looney Porn also incorporated this element into its story, albeit not to the same degree as his latest. In the film, Jude discussed hypocrisy and societal judgment in Romanian society. It is fragmented, utilizing archive footage and his film scenes to illustrate the various ways the media shapes people’s perceptions. The โ€œscandalousโ€ event that sets the story in motion develops into something far more unsettling and provocative. In Dracula, Jude delves even more into prodding the audience, with dashes of exploitation smeared around each chapter.ย 

This exploitation comes with reason. Radu Jude ties vampirism with the higher powers (business people, producers, politicians) plaguing society and exploiting the rights of every human. Add that to the double-edged sword use of generative AI in the filmโ€“a part of his critique towards its use in cinema, but he has a โ€œnecessityโ€ of using it to make his pointโ€“and you have a project that will easily make many viewers mad or feel entirely bothered. However, the two films, Bad Luck Banging and Dracula, become muddled with their overemphasis on each satirical quip and play in image. Nearly three hours long, Jude presents us with one comment after another that is easy to become exhausted by, especially when many of them repeat a previous point made earlier, only done more exaggeratedly. Yet, since the whole ordeal is so absurd and madly creative, you decide to go with what Jude brings your way, even if it becomes frustrating.

Like before, everybody is liable, from the actors to the subjects of the jokes, and it adds to the limitless expression of Judeโ€™s filmmaking. He never cares what everyone thinks; Jude just rolls with it, and if anybody is bothered, wellโ€ฆ he did what he intended. Dracula is a satirical epic that holds no punches and leaves no room for breathing, where people are heckled, and the viewer is provoked. It isnโ€™t his most thought-provoking work in his lengthy, audacious career. But Dracula marks a point where he is tired of things going the way they are, and why people must remain vigilant about corrupt politicians and the bankruptcy of AI. For all its flaws, Judeโ€™s fearless boldness and dynamism ensure Dracula stands out in his oeuvre.

Grade: B

Movie Review (Locarno 2025): โ€˜Mareโ€™s Nestโ€™ Uses Words as Lifelines in a Crumbling World


Director: Ben Rivers
Writer: Ben Rivers
Stars: Moon Guo Barker

Synopsis: Moon journeys through a world without adults, encountering a sage and translator in a mountain hut. She meets various people who share performances, films, and gifts while showing her different ways of life as she moves toward uncertainty.


Adaptations of the work of American novelist Don DeLillo donโ€™t happen often, and when they do, they donโ€™t come easy. It is related to DeLilloโ€™s writing style and his multi-layered stories, which encompass numerous topics and social critiques simultaneously. His work is fragmented, yet layered with meticulous attention to language and sentence structure. That keen attention to detail is what fascinates me each time I open one of his books; it draws me into its array of beautifully encompassed sentence structures that I havenโ€™t read in any writerโ€™s work, outside of Thomas Pynchon and William Burroughsโ€“both of whom I became interested in reading their work after seeing cinematic adaptations of โ€˜Inherent Viceโ€™ and โ€˜Queerโ€™ respectively.ย 

You have to be a brave and bold storyteller to pick up one of DeLilloโ€™s works and translate it into another medium. This is why the few adaptations of his novels have been made by filmmakers who have either experimented with genre (David Cronenberg with Cosmopolis, 2012) or played with the texture of language in their films (Noah Baumbach with White Noise, 2022). I have greatly loved the adaptations made so far, each one for its unique reasons. Cosmopolis blurred the lines between reality and simulation through a cold, urban landscape, presenting the world from the perspective of a paranoid financier whose empire is crumbling. Meanwhile, Baumbach had a beautiful yet haunting approach to the existential dread and anxiety induced by a technology-dependent and increasingly isolated society in “The Airborne Toxic Eventโ€ โ€“ it is a film that, to this day, I havenโ€™t been able to shake off from my mind.ย 

The latest adaptation from book to the big screen of a Don DeLillo project, Mareโ€™s Nest (screening in the Concorso Internazionale at the 2025 Locarno Film Festival), an adaptation of Don DeLilloโ€™s one-act play โ€˜The Word for Snowโ€™ directed by Ben Rivers, gets a better grip on the tone and texture of the novelistโ€™s writing technique and approach to language. Thanks to the authorโ€™s descriptive, haunting narrative, Rivers gets out of his comfort zone and makes his most adventurous, crafty film to date, implementing the staticness of his fragmentary documentary work covering the life of Jake Williams into the mystical, cold world of โ€˜The Worst for Snowโ€™ thatโ€™s free of adults, and its monuments are slowly crumbling down.ย 

Mareโ€™s Nest follows a child called Moon (Moon Guo Barker), as she travels a mysterious world populated only by children. The children in this world may be young in life, but are exceptionally astute and wise, often speaking in passages that recall a thousand lifetimes, like the History Men in Furiosa, who count tales of a land before them as records, recollections, and knowledge of the past has disappeared. They arenโ€™t ordinary kids; these are the sole survivors of a post-apocalyptic event, induced by climate change, that destroyed the lands yet enriched their mindsโ€™ eyes. We explore this scenery via a pieced-together car, which Moon drives off to where her curiosity leads her.ย 

Moon follows her instincts and the tingles in her spine to head towards a place of salvation in this wasteland, if there is such a place. It is curious to me that a few films released this decade have desert or wasteland settings treated as purgatories for the characters, with Mareโ€™s Nest being added to the list of extraordinary pictures alongside the aforementioned Furiosa and Oliver Laxeโ€™s Sirฤt. Although these films are vastly different from one another, they share a common thread that ties them together. And that is how they utilize these landscapes, not merely as backdrops to their singular visual storytelling, but as mirrors of the charactersโ€™ fractured souls.

The dream-like encounters Moon has with the other boys and girls give Mareโ€™s Nest a sense of wonder and imagination, becoming a more puzzling and vastly fascinating picture that one would like to dissect. Each conversation offers insight into the childrenโ€™s mentality, exposing the roots of how this place came to be and how humanity, or whatโ€™s left of it, has become tethered to the coldness of the mystic, mysterious plainsโ€“dark shadows, thick fog, and dust storms all over the screen on occasions to hide the inhabitants in this version of an abyss. One of these encounters has a Shakespearean quality to it, where Moon meets three sisters, along with their translator, who interprets their speeches and observations.ย 

This interaction reminds me of when Macbeth receives visits from the three witches (or the Weird Sisters), who sow seeds of ambition and thoughts of power in the mad king. While these sisters are not the evil forces placed by fate, like in โ€˜Macbethโ€™, they are a manifestation of a bigger, darker force lurking in this fantasyโ€”the dangers of fractured connections and societal collapse. These are all lost souls wandering a world that is slowly losing its essence of humanity, embedded in dialogue and understanding. Mareโ€™s Nest is not set in heaven or hell; it is a setting stuck in between the two. The grace of the former meets the malevolence of the latter. The two intertwine to create a place of both peril and vivacity. However, it is not entirely desolate or burdened by damnation.

There is an element of hope and aspiration forming within the backbone of Mareโ€™s Nest, revealed throughout the passages, and the characters often reply to Moonโ€™s questions. Since the film explores the importance of language as the bridge between the void and reality, Rivers treats his screenplay as both a lifeline and a labyrinth for us and the characters to navigate. Every exchange creates a text that feels both elusive and resonant. Its careful construction allows the screenplay to operate like a puzzle. The final image only emerges once the viewer has pieced together his thoughts and has pondered the weight of language. Rivers trusts his audience sufficiently to leave plenty of empty spaces and silences between one conversation and the next, never drowning the viewer in dialogue to interpret.ย 

Even so, this is his most expressive picture. Most of his work relied extensively on silence; he often left images linger and placed dialogue in the backdrop. In this case, there is a clear division between the two, where Rivers constructs staggering images while delivering touching, thought-provoking lines that prompt us to question our realities, which have been plagued by isolation and despondency on our paths towards understanding and exchange. Mareโ€™s Nest is a rarity. And Rivers has evolved into a storyteller who no longer needs to obscure his ideas behind abstraction alone. He does not sacrifice mystery with the embrace of clarity, crafting poetic and human cinema in the process.

Grade: B+

Women InSession: Critic Spotlight – Megan Kearns

This week on Women InSession, we continue our critic spotlight series as we get to know Megan Kearns and her journey to becoming a film writer/podcaster! Megan has been an incredible guest on the podcast in the past before her recurring role on Women InSession and even hosting some podcast reviews on the Main Show. We’ve loved having her on the team and getting to know her more in the conversation.

Panel: Kristin Battestella, Jaylan Salah

On that note, check out this week’s show and let us know what you think in the comment section. Thanks for listening and for supporting the InSession Film Podcast!

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
Women InSession – Critic Spotlight – Megan Kearns

Movie Review: ‘East of Wall’ is Perfectly Amateur


Director: Kate Beecroft
Writer: Kate Beecroft
Stars: Tabatha Zimiga, Porshia Zimiga, Scoot McNairy, Jennifer Ehle

Synopsis: After the death of her husband, Tabatha- a young, tattooed, rebellious horse trainer- wrestles with financial insecurity and unresolved grief while providing refuge for a group of wayward teenagers on her broken-down ranch in the Badlands.


In 1960, Orson Welles gave a famous interview with the BBC where he claimed the majority of his success with Citizen Kane came from ignorance. First-time director Kate Beecroft and a largely non-professional cast deliver a similar success with the modern Western East of Wall.

That’s not to say the filmmakers don’t know what they are doing. Instead, they are uninhibited by studio conventions or expected story beats. If you saddle (no pun intended) a more experienced filmmaker with this story, those expected story elements like a shoehorned romance or overly-dramatic event would have brought this film down. Instead, what Beecroft does not know, doesn’t hurt her.

Centering on a slightly fictionalized version of South Dakota horse trainer Tabatha Zimiga (playing herself), Tabatha lords over a group of wayward teenagers on her ranch. While dealing with the off-screen suicide of her partner and the mounting financial issues of her ranch, the emerging independence of her daughter, Porshia (again, playing herself) complicate matters further. Despite help from the teens and her drunken mother, Tracey (Jennifer Ehle), things look bleak for Tabatha and the ranch.

Enter Texas horse profiteer Roy Waters (a pitch-perfect Scoot McNairy), who recognizes Tabatha’s horse-training talent as well as her financial woes. While Roy offers to buy the ranch, while allowing everyone to stay on to train the horses. Accepting on an interim basis, Tabatha must come to terms with the reality of the situation, along with Porshia’s rebelliousness and her ever-expanding household.

Frankly, this isn’t about the narrative beats or plot mechanisms. This is all about setting the tone of authenticity for these people. Not only does Beecroft has a clear respect for these individuals, there isn’t an ounce of cynicism or judgement to be found in their portrayal. Each character is given the room and patience to evolve on screen, without the expectation of being anyone other than themselves. That’s the film’s greatest strength. This is not a story that needs these characters to act. The only two characters who do need to be playing a role, are the two actual actors.

And even those performances are shown as vessels rather than dramatic foil. Roy shows up as a too-good-to-be-true reversal of fortune for the family, but he doesn’t ever cross the line into evil or anything other than himself. You could easily imagine a film that feels the need to shoehorn in a romantic relationship between Roy and Tabatha, but that is not in any way what this film wants. Instead of pandering to convention, Beecroft and this community display a lifestyle, while not the most glamorous or with the most potential, is one of authentic truth and beauty. Even Tracey, who is presumably portraying a version of Tabatha’s mother, is too out there for a real person to play, so Ehle steps in and chews the scenery. Why would you let the real person be open to criticism, when a veteran like Ehle knows how to toe the line?

That’s not to say the film is perfect. The amateur actors are just that: amateurs. While they might not be the most refined in line delivery or acting conviction, when they perform on the ranch, it’s a totally different story. Porshia, specifically. rides a horse at full gallop with reckless abandon. A standout sequence includes Tabatha and Roy riding alongside Porshia as she breathtakingly speeds through a field. Austin Shelton’s understated by vibrant cinematography certainly helps the matter, while the South Dakota landscape does the rest.

Tabatha and Porshia, while being amateur actors, are not natural fits on screen in either looks or demeanor, but it doesn’t mean they aren’t exactly what the film needs them to be. Both project a strength and resilience along with a country aptitude you rarely see depicted on-screen. Other cast members also play versions of themselves, including the standout of Jesse Thorson as a semi-abandoned kid who Tabatha hopes to house. There is abundant tenderness and empathy each character has for the other that shines through in ever scene.

McNairy and Ehle, despite their veteran status, both know how to blend seamlessly into the ensemble. Ehle’s warmth and humor makes her immediately feel a part of the community, while she also has some of the film’s best monologues to deliver. McNairy is the closest thing the film has to a villain, but it’s actually not the case, either. He represents the idea of what could be considered gentrification of the ranch, but he is never anything less than transparent in his dealings. He is fair and decent, and McNairy exudes a charm that transcends any misgivings about the character.

Beecroft blends a mix of Aftersun sadness and recollection with Leave No Trace authenticity and respect. She shows the audience a modern West without taking a stand on what that actually means for the big picture. These people are trying to live their lives the best way they know how. They may never leave, but they shouldn’t feel bad about it, and neither should you. Beecroft might not have the experience, but she definitely knows what she is doing.

East of Wall is an immensely enriching experience to lovers of the modern western as well as those looking for a tender character drama. Filmmaking ignorance at it’s best.

Grade: B+

Movie Review (Locarno Film Festival 2025): The Past Refuses to Stay Buried in Jafar Panahiโ€™s โ€˜It Was Just an Accidentโ€™


Director: Jafar Panahi
Writer: Jafar Panahi
Stars: Vahid Mobassari, Mariam Afshari, Ebrahim Azizi

Synopsis: A small mishap triggers a chain reaction of ever-growing problems.


Jafar Panahi is a punk filmmaker, not in the stylistic or aesthetic sense of Derek Jarman with Jubilee or Alex Cox with Repo Man, but in spirit and attitude. Since the beginning of his career, Panahi has been a bold and brave director, often navigating the censorship and restrictions imposed by the Iranian regime in his films. Heโ€™s resilient and determined to tell these stories and share the injustices many people living in Iran and the Middle East face daily, which has gotten him in a lot of trouble, including arrests and imprisonments. However, through unconventional filming methods, Panahi has managed to convey his messages to the world on the big screen. Each of his pictures is a testament to his fearless persona, in which he addresses his current predicament and speaks about the need for justice for the Iranian people. Whether in house arrest or unable to leave his country, Panahi made films in his way, the punk attitude showing through each scene.ย 

Now, after many years of being under surveillance and arrested, he presents us with his first โ€œfreeโ€ film in a long while, and it is as bold as before and critical as ever. It Was Just An Accident (Un Simple Accident, screening in the Piazza Grande at the 2025 Locarno Film Festival and the most recent winner of the Palme dโ€™Or) may not be his most accomplished work, but that does not matter in the least. What is important about Panahiโ€™s latest, outside of its message, is the composition of the project itself โ€“ even in freedom, he still defies those suppressing forces that have stripped Iranians of their humanity, with a narrative that feels like it has been a long time in the making, a social critique bolstered by angst and noncompliance. There was a nice moment at the Cannes Film Festival where, as a surprise to everyone, he appeared, and everyone stood up and applauded the man. We all know his story and his legacy as a pioneering, punk cinematic figure. At that very moment, I knew something special was amidst us.ย 

Like some of Panahiโ€™s pictures, Accident begins in a car, where a man (Ebrahim Azizi) is driving his pregnant wife (Afsaneh Najm Abadi) and daughter back home in the dark of night. The streets are all empty, and the darkness covering them provides an ominous atmosphere wherever they travel. You begin to suspect whether they are heading to their house to rest, or if someone is following them and they are trying to escape the situation. This uncertainty during the filmโ€™s introductory passage paves the way for the other narrative beats, where doubt and disquietude fuel the charactersโ€™ every move. It all comes together through a series of conveniences, which causes them to think twice (or thrice) about their decisions. The first one, the simple accident from its French title that sets the path, is that the man hits and kills a dog with his car.ย 

From there, he heads to a warehouse near the accident site to investigate some trouble with their car. The worker at the warehouse recognizes the sound of the manโ€™s prosthetic leg. The squeak perturbed him, shaking him to the core. This is why, after fixing up the car, he silently follows him to his house. The next thing you know, the worker knocks out the man and ties him up in the desert. That worker is Vahid (Vahid Mobasseri). Vahid believes that the man he abducted is Eghbal (known as โ€œPeg Legโ€), an officer who spent months torturing him during his imprisonment. Panahi reverses the roles, turns the tables, and makes us think about the charactersโ€™ moral ambivalences, whether it is true that Vahid has captured the right man or abducted an innocent bystander and turned to violence when potentially facing the man who beat him repeatedly as a form of revenge.ย 

The seemingly simple accident that began the film has now evolved into a complex and ethically charged scenario. The man says that his prosthetic leg is from an accident from the previous year, and he has the fresh scars to prove it. However, Vahid is still convinced that he is indeed the one who tortured him. The only source of information to confirm his identity is a mere sound, as Vahid was blindfolded during the times he was mistreated and beaten. Facial recognition canโ€™t be made. That is why Vahid drives around in search of someone who can help him identify Eghbal. He comes across a wedding photographer, Shiva (Maryam Afshari), her ex-boyfriend, Hamid (Mohammad Ali Eliyas Mehr), and the couple sheโ€™s currently photographing, all to sort out this situation. Every one of them has been mistreated, one way or another, by the hand of Eghbal, holding onto that pain and trauma to this very day. They have nightmares about their harsh experiences, scarred for life, and unable to shake the suffering away.ย 

What will be the manโ€™s fate? They still donโ€™t know if that is truly Eghbal. So, where does that leave them? From place to place, these people search for answers and remain in the same spot from which they began, full of doubt and anger. But as the day keeps going, they begin to crack; their thirst for vengeance diminishes, and signs of mercy are shown. The group considers the โ€œimpossibleโ€ act of forgiveness. It Was Just an Accident thrives on that dilemma, where strangers, tied by a lingering suffering, are stuck in a void where morals and ethics are constantly shifting to reveal hard truths and saddening realities. Vahid and those who accompany him await redemption for what happened in the past, yet that redemption never arrives, and they must confront that reality. The opportunity then arises for them to expel their woes, sorrows, and grievances. Through Panahiโ€™s canvas and the purgatory-like desert plains, they resound loudly, resulting in an equally liberating and exhausting experience for the characters and a confrontational one for the audience watching.ย 


โ€œI had a guilty conscience, but became used to it with timeโ€ is one of the lines in the finale that details the adaptability to wrongdoing, as the potential former captor grew comfortable with actions as time went by. At the same time, Panahi in Accident does not let the outrage fade over time, keeping the injustices highly visible and present. There are a few moments of โ€œlevityโ€ with some slight jokes, and it adds some relief to the situation for the viewer. However, that element in the film does not detract from the edge and urgency of Accident. Many have tried to silence Jafar Panahi, but no matter how hard they try, he remains undeterred. Each time around, Panahi gets louder and angrier. This is the reason why we must protect and cherish someone like him, a filmmaker and activist who uses the medium as a means to deliver dissertations on the political climate in Iran. Heโ€™s a filmmaker who is as ungovernable as his cinema.

Grade: B+

Movie Review (MIFF 2025): ‘Exit 8’ is Disquieting and Effective


Director: Genki Kawamura
Writer: Kotake Create, Genki Kawamura, Hirase Kentaro
Stars: Kazunari Ninomiya, Yamato Kochi, Naru Asunuma

Synopsis: A man gets lost in an underground passage. He follows the “guide” through the passage, but one after another, strange things happen to him. Is this space real? Or an illusion? Will the man be able to escape the passage?


Iโ€™ll admit that I am uneasy in tunnels, underground walkways, IKEA stores, and anywhere I canโ€™t tell where the exit is. The notion of temporal distortion in malls and casinos causes me anxiety. Places where people are moving but also stuck in a maze where left and right donโ€™t seem to matter. Spaces that are meant to be passed through and navigated make me feel Iโ€™m Theseus moving in on the Minotaur but with no Ariadne to supply me with a red string so I can emerge again. Exit 8 is primarily set in an underground Japanese subway concourse that reconfigures itself as a maze bores directly into my subconscious tapping in on the primal fear of being buried alive. For that reason, Genki Kawamuraโ€™s video game adaptation is what I would consider a conceptual psychological horror par excellence.ย 

The sound of Ravelโ€™s โ€˜Boleroโ€™ โ€“ a piece of music based on repetition โ€“ fills the ears of a morning subway traveler (Kazunari Ninomiya). In the crowded carriage, a woman carrying a baby is excessively berated by a passenger. No one steps in to stop him. The traveller. whose point of view we experience in first person at the start of the film, watches the scene happen and hears the yelling and the quiet distress of the babyโ€™s mother. He returns to listening to โ€˜Boleroโ€™ and avoiding calls from his ex-girlfriend.

When he disembarks and begins to head to his new job he finally answers the call. His ex-girlfriend (Nana Komatsu) acknowledges that she understands the relationship is over. However, she is currently at a hospital where she is trying to decide whether or not to terminate a pregnancy conceived when they were a couple. She wants to know his opinion, to help her decide. Mentally taking in something potentially life-changing the man, now known as The Lost Man, wanders the Exit 8 concourse without paying much attention. When he begins to notice heโ€™s in a loop passing the same posters, lockers, and the Walking Man (Yamato Kochi) enough times to note something is very wrong. Heโ€™s also lost cell coverage and doesnโ€™t hear what his ex-girlfriend is leaning towards: keeping the child or a termination. He needs to join her at the hospital, but he is stuck.ย 

He eventually finds an information sign outlining the logic of his trap. Look for anomalies. If one is found (however minor), turn back. If there are none, move forward. He is on Level 0 with eight levels to go before he can emerge. However, no matter which level he is on, if he misses an anomaly, the concourse is reset, and he is at Level 0 once more. With his asthma being triggered by stress, the Lost Man might never reach the surface as time stretches and the underground concourse becomes an aggressive and hostile place.

โ€œDentist. Escher. Legal scrivener. Plastic surgery. High paying job. Subway etiquette,โ€ the Lost Man counts the posters on the white tiled wall. The Escher exhibition poster features the work โ€˜Mรถbius Strip II (Red Ants)โ€™ which is clearly a metaphor for the Lost Man and other works who daily take the crowded transport into their jobs. Itโ€™s also perhaps indicative of how the unknown power behind the concourse sees people โ€” small, irrelevant, worker insects who attach themselves to a path and follow it unquestioningly. At one stage or another there are three humans who find themselves trapped. Without pity, it keeps a young child (Naru Asanuma) who ran away from his mother hoping she would look to find him, and the Walking Man who accompanied the child along the concourse until an error rendered him โ€œnot human.โ€ When the Lost Man finds the Child he at first thinks he is an anomaly until he realises even a small soul can be trapped in a soulless place. A place which according to a young woman could be purgatory. She laughs cynically at the Walking Man and tells him that he has already put himself inside the space by every day going to a job that he hates as he tumbles into middle-age. An object warning to the Lost Man who perhaps still has a chance to be more than a drone.

Genki Kawamura and co-writer Kentaro Hirase understand the anxiety of living in stasis and becoming used to being led in a single direction. They also understand the emotional fear of unplanned parenthood and making a choice that fundamentally changes who and what you are. The concourse bleeds through the ceiling and walls, the lockers contain the sounds of screaming infants that it is impossible to set free. There is no cheating the system you have found yourself in no matter how deadening and repetitive it is. A recursive march through the underground thoroughfares of Tokyo where looking up is discouraged forms part of the capitalist unease โ€“ where does freedom and the individual exist? Even if one thinks theyโ€™re winning the game the game will morph and shift the goalposts so no matter what,ย  the individual is always placed at a disadvantage.


Exit 8 is an extraordinary feat of production design. Even before the Lost Man notices he is trapped, the claustrophobia of the subway and the liminal space where a familiar journey is halted is nightmarish. Exit 8 thrives on its maddening repetition and the broader implications that perhaps those who daily walk the white tiled halls are already dead. A minimalist and affecting horror that reaches into individual, national, and international disquiet. One of the best and most effective J-Horrors in years.

Grade: B

Op-Ed: ‘The Man From U.N.C.L.E’ On Its 10 Year Anniversary

Languishing in development hell for almost two decades, Guy Ritchie’s The Man from U.N.C.L.E. finally landed in theaters in August of 2015 to muted critical praise, and relative box office anonymity. Regardless of the reception at the time, the film’s quality deserves to transcend its legacy.

But, what actually is its legacy? The forebearer to Guy Ritchie’s mainstream career? A glimpse into a Henry Cavill-led Bond franchise? A breakthrough introduction to Elizabeth Debicki? A portrait of Armie Hammer’s squandered potential? It all comes together as an immensely entertaining time capsule of a missed franchise as well as a mid-2010s exercise in IP saturation.

Cavill stars as Napoleon Solo, a CIA agent working off his prison sentence for multiple high-profile thefts. With the Cold War raging in 1963 Berlin, Solo is tasked with extracting Gaby Teller (Alicia Vikander), the daughter of a Nazi rocket scientist, across the wall to the Western side. The pair are intercepted by Illya Kuryakin (Hammer), a Russian KGB operative. Despite a prolonged battle, Solo and Gaby make it across.

Solo’s handler, Sanders (a wonderfully grumpy Jared Harris), teams him up with Kuryakin to infiltrate the Vinciguerra Shipping Industries and stop them from using Gaby’s father, Udo (Christian Berkel), from building a nuclear bomb. Utilizing Gaby’s uncle Rudy (Sylvester Groth) as well as Solo’s debonair attitude with company head Victoria Vinciguerra (Debicki), the unmatched threesome must act quickly to avoid a nuclear device falling in the wrong hands.

Ritchie does not seem the type of filmmaker particularly suited for this material, but his rhythm and energy lends itself well to the film’s laid back tone. Despite a film filled with Cold War intrigue, life-or-death situations, and nuclear warheads, breezy would still be the best word to describe the film. In fact, one of the film’s resonating lines before the ultimate climax is “How’s that for entertainment?” Not only does this film aim to please, it knows what it is. It’s not trying to be anything other than a good time at the cinema.

That good time is exemplified through the cast. Cavill looks like he is having the time of his life, wearing expertly designed three-piece suits, womanizing at will, and personifying relaxed cool like few others can. It’s the film that best presents the capabilities of his screen magnetism. Hammer has to be more of a bummer, since Kuryakin is such an intense character, but when he gets to have fun is when we care more for him as a character. His characterization is meant to menace, but his performance is the clear weak link of the film (his off-screen behavior notwithstanding).

Equally as charming and relaxed is Vikander, in her only real opportunity in her career to have some fun, which she greatly takes advantage of. Not content in her spy-laden role, Gaby gets drunk and begins entices Kuryakin to dance to Solomon Burke’s “Cry to Me.” For all the seriousness in Vikander’s career, it’s by far the most charming thing she has done on-screen. Debicki gets the most complex role as the seductively villainous Victoria. Instead of relying on brawn or cruelty, she gets by on brains, wits, and exacting execution. It also helps when both women look stunning, dressed by Oscar-nominated costume designer Joanna Johnston.

Despite the film having a propulsive story, certain scenes stand out due to their unorthodox style. A mid-film setpiece where Solo and Kuryakin break into the Vinciguerra warehouse features a nicely stylized safe-cracking scene from Solo, which leads to a high-speed boat chase that abruptly ends when Solo is flung from the vessel. Rather than focus on Kuryakin’s attempts to flee, we see Solo calmly sit in a truck, listening to the radio, and enjoying a sandwich and a Chianti while Kuryakin evades in the background.

Later, as Solo is being tortured by Rudi, the scene is lit by a single overhead lightbulb swinging around overhead. Despite our hero’s on-screen torture and subsequent rescue by Kuryakin, it’s a standout scene of atmosphere and performance by both Cavill and Groth. Scenes like this pepper the entire film. Instead of one scene blending to the next, each one has a distinct flavor despite the clear connective tissue. Entertaining is one thing, but to be memorable is another.

Unfortunately for the filmmakers, the box office didn’t back up the quality. Opening against Straight Outta Compton and facing internal competition from the third weekend of fellow television adaptation Mission: Impossible – Rogue Nation, the film barely managed $64.6 million on a reported $80 million budget. Maybe it was a bad release date, or maybe it was oversaturation. The Marvel Cinematic Universe was in full swing, while other television adaptations including Get Smart, The A-Team, Dark Shadows, and the Hammer-starring The Lone Ranger had all premiered to various degrees of failure. Perhaps audiences just didn’t have the taste for a filmed adaptation of a 60-year-old television series.

But, the cast and crew live on. Richie has become wildly productive, directing eight films in the subsequent decade, with two more on the way in the near future. Cavill returned and departed his portrayal of Superman in the DCEU, while Vikander continues to do serious, understated, but interesting work since her 2015 Oscar win for The Danish Girl. Debicki dipped her toes in the Marvel machine with the third Guardians of the Galaxy, while picking up an Emmy for her Princess Diana portrayal in The Crown. Only Hammer has left the limelight, and the less we say about him the better. In the end, maybe the legacy of The Man from U.N.C.L.E is existing as an underseen gem in the early filmographies of successful actors. The argument could be made that it is also Guy Ritchie’s best film, and you wouldn’t hear me complain.

Interview: ‘Went Up the Hill’ Star Vicky Krieps

0

In this interview, I talk with the great Vicky Krieps about her new film Went Up the Hill! Directed by Samuel Van Grinsven, this is a film about the diorama of loss, intimacy, hauntings, and the irreparable nature of grief.

The enigmatic Krieps, whose resume includes roles in Phantom Thread, Bergman Island, Hot Milk, The Dead Don’t Hurt, and the upcoming Jim Jarmusch feature Father, Mother, Sister, Brother talks about finding planets in every director she works with, choreographing the possession scenes, writing song lyrics for all her characters, and having Dacre Montgomery as her scene partner.

Podcast Review: Together

On this episode, On this episode, Brendan is once again joined by Shaurya Chawla to discuss the new horror film from Michael Shanks in Together! As one can assume given its title, much of the body horror and tension is felt primarily because of Dave Franco and Alison Brie. They obviously have a great chemistry, and it works wonderfully on screen. But Shanks’ direction is also notable in some areas, even if we have a few questions about some decisions that he makes.

Review: Together (4:00)
Director: Michael Shanks
Writer: Michael Shanks
Stars: Dave Franco, Alison Brie, Damon Herriman

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
InSession Film Podcast – Together

Movie Review: โ€˜Nobody 2โ€™ Is a Repetitive but Fun Enough Bloody Romp


Director: Timo Tjahjanto
Writers: Derek Kolstad and Aaron Rabin
Stars: Bob Odenkirk, Connie Nielsen, Christopher Lloyd

Synopsis: Former assassin Hutch Mansell takes his family on a nostalgic vacation to a small-town theme park, only to be pulled back into violence when they clash with a corrupt operator, a crooked sheriff, and a ruthless crime boss.


Over four years after the 87Northโ€™s Nobody surprised audiences with its brutal action set pieces and iconic performance from Bob Odenkirk, a sequel finally arrives with director Timo Tjahjanto now at the helm. Many sequels will often try to outdo what worked about the first, to the point where the overall film is lost in trying to forge a different path or follows the original too closely. Luckily for Nobody 2, Tjahjanto manages to spice things up in the director’s chair. Nobody 2 is an absolute blast of a sequel that takes the simplicity of what worked so well in the first filmโ€™s story and cranks the blood-soaked chaos to new highs. Many will say itโ€™s to a fault as the often repetitive story beats within action screenplays, and even more thin plotting than its predecessor, make it less impactful on the whole; but the sequel clearly knows what it is and doesnโ€™t waste any time providing solid laughs and brutal dismemberments at a healthy rate. All of that, tied together with Bob Odenkirkโ€™s signature charm and the usual relentlessly pulpy action sequences from Tjahjanto, and you’ve got a pretty decent 89 minutes of fun, even if it pales in comparison to his other directorial efforts.

This continuation, more or less, has very little story to work with as we follow Hutch Mansell (Odenkirk) as he yet again struggles to connect to his two children and wife, Becca (Connie Nielsen). Every day, heโ€™s often in fist fights working to pay back the debt he owes to The Barber (Colin Salmon). Still, when he decides to take a vacation and spend time with his family at his childhood spot of Plummerville, it isn’t long before the fighting finds Hutch again, and he is in the midst of more violence and clashes with another corrupt crime world. Considering that these two films likely exist due to the success of John Wick and the recent surge in secret assassin action films, I usually donโ€™t mind recycled plot points and emotional beats as long as the elements surrounding them contribute to a great experience. However, this sequel can often come across as a retread. From the entire opening minutes repeating the same interrogation and days of the week scene from the original, to melodramatic beats of tension between Becca and Hutch, the film plays it a bit too safe. While there are differences like the setting change, the more playful tone overall, the story ends up as less of a fresh take on the concept in comparison.ย 

However, despite the presence of rushed and barely present story beats, the action and film setting are still exciting, thanks to one of the next great directors of action films being behind the camera. While never quite reaching the level of scrappy rawness found in Tjahjantoโ€™s Indonesian action films, such as The Night Comes for Us and The Shadow Strays, the sequel captures a similar kinetic energy that was absent in its predecessor. The camera is never stagnant and always finds new ways to creatively showcase a body being thrown into a car window or a katana going straight through someone’s face, and it’s amazing to witness. What manages to be even more creative in its use here is the theme park setting, especially within the funhouse madness of the filmโ€™s third act. Crane games, wack-a-mole machines, water slides, and even a full funhouse mirror sequence are all used for Home Alone-like bloody kills galore, in a similar vein to the first film, but in a much more unique environment.

These scenes are aided immensely when you have the talent of an actor like Odenkirk as the lead of your film, who could even read a phone book entertainingly. Christopher Lloyd as David Mansell and RZA as Harry Mansell also return to play their scene-stealing roles from the first film, but I was most surprised at the acting showcase of Sharon Stone as the main crime boss, Lendina, in the filmโ€™s driving antagonistic force. She doesnโ€™t get much to do aside from face value generic villain one-liners and unmemorable interactions with her corrupt goon police men within Plummerville, but I at least appreciate the silly nature that she brought forward in an otherwise placeholder villain role. She clearly knew the type of film she was in and rolled with it in the time she had.ย 

The first reactions to Nobody 2 hit social media

Nobody 2 doesnโ€™t quite match the fresh juice of the first film due to its redundant story beats and lack of depth, but it still manages to capture enough of the fun B-movie action tone that is promised, thanks to a brisk runtime and a great director crafting it all. With plenty of head-bashing, bloodied brawling, and gunplay to spare, it’s hard not to be satisfied with this sequel as a whole.

Grade: B-