Monday, June 30, 2025
Home Blog Page 190

Podcast: 2020 Best Picture Race – Chasing the Gold Ep. 14

On Episode 14 of Chasing the Gold, Ryan is joined by Dan Bayer of Next Best Picture to discuss the 2020 Best Picture Race! With most of the fall film festivals out of the way, now was a great time to launch season 2 of Chasing the Gold and see what might become the next Best Picture winner. And since Dan went to the Toronto International Film Festival, Ryan thought he bring a great prospective on some films that have been released yet and Dan didn’t disappoint. The guys also talked about their early best picture predictions, which will be good to look back at once the race is over.

On that note, have fun with this week’s Chasing the Gold and let us know what you think in the comment section below. Thanks for listening!

– 2020 Best Picture Race (5:57)

– Music

Brother Love’s Travelling Salvation Show – Neil Diamond
The Return of the Eagle – Atli Örvarsson

We try to make this the best movie podcast we possibly can and we hope you enjoy them. Subscribe today on iTunes, Spotfiy or Stitcher, and please leave us a review on iTunes. You can also find us on Soundcloud, PlayerFM and TuneIn Radio as well. We really appreciate all your support of the InSession Film Podcast.

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
2020 Best Picture Race – Chasing the Gold

[divider]

Mobile App

To hear this Extra Film episode and everything else we do, download our apps on the Amazon Market for Android and the Podcast Box app on IOS devices. The mobile app covers all of our main shows, bonus podcast’s and everything else relating to the InSession Film Podcast. Thanks for your wonderful support and listening to our show. It means the world to us!

[divider]

Help Support The InSession Film Podcast

If you want to help support us, we would greatly appreciate it! For more info, CLICK HERE.

Movie Review: ‘Dolemite Is My Name’ sees Eddie Murphy give his best performance since ‘Dreamgirls’


Director: Craig Brewer
Writers: Scott Alexander, Larry Karaszewski
Stars: Eddie Murphy, Wesley Snipes, Kodi Smit-McPhee, Keegan-Michael Key, Craig Robinson

Synopsis: Eddie Murphy portrays real-life legend Rudy Ray Moore, a comedy and rap pioneer who proved naysayers wrong when his hilarious, obscene, kung-fu fighting alter ego, Dolemite, became a 1970s Blaxploitation phenomenon.

[/info]

Rudy Ray Moore, best known as Dolemite, was a walking contradiction in the most classic ways. When he was on stage, he was a loudmouthed comedian that turned the stage of comedy clubs into something raunchy and spectacular. When he was on his own, he dealt with self-doubt and the crippling fear of failure that his father raised him with. All of this makes Eddie Murphy an interesting and excellent choice to play Moore in Craig Brewster’s Dolemite is My Name. Murphy hasn’t been in much of the public eye since his one-two punch of Dreamgirls (his best performance) and Norbit (his worst), popping up on occasion to deliver mediocre films like 2016’s Mr. Church. His performance here is his best since Dreamgirls, if not ever.

Rudy Ray Moore is a many-talented man who attempted to break into Hollywood by any means necessary. Moore spent time doing comedy, singing, dancing and anything inbetween, all to no avail. We see him for the first time while he’s working at a record store, trying to get an in store DJ (Snoop Dogg) to play his records. All of a sudden, a regularly alcoholic (Ron Cephas Jones) comes in to ask for change, talking of “Dolemite, the baddest motherfucker who ever lived.” Moore gets to thinking and realizes that some of those old tails of Dolemite could help build up a larger than life persona. He gets to writing, performing, and recording the material he’s written as Dolemite. He soon realizes that what he wants to do is make a Dolemite movie, including the things that everyone wants to see in a movie: “some titties, some funny, and some kung-fu.”

Filled out with a cast of lovable outcasts, Dolemite is My Name calls to mind other “outsiders make a movie” movies such as Ed Wood and The Disaster Artist, going so far to even be written by the duo behind the script of the former. What holds Dolemite is My Name up above the rest of the genre is that it doesn’t try and reinvent the wheel, but every individual component here is done with extra care. The writing is seriously funny, running with excitement and a one punchline a minute quota. That giddy feeling originates with the script, but it’s performed perfectly by a wide cast, ranging from Craig Robinson’s Ben Taylor, a wonderful soul singer, to Keegan-Michael Key’s Jerry Jones, a nebbish self-serious screenwriter. Each character wears a series of beautiful costumes, designed with period accuracy and love by legend Ruth E. Carter. Additionally, Brewster has never been a flashy director, but he makes the most of period detail to sustain the film. Every component here is about twice as good as it had to be, which gives new breath to a genre that’s been overdone.

Everything here comes back to Murphy’s performance. It’s the sharpest and funniest he’s been in ages, but it’s also his sweetest role in years. Motivated by deep self-doubt, Rudy Ray Moore is a fascinating character, but Murphy develops him with a bittersweet touch, allowing that doubt to come through. He anchors the film, letting a human feeling seep through the outrageous characters and comedy. Without him, Dolemite is My Name could be deeply average, but he elevates the movie beyond a “follow your dreams” cliche message, making it a lovely film about “fuckin’ up motherfuckers” and succeeding despite your insecurities.

Overall Grade: B+

[divider]

Poll: What is your favorite Judy Garland performance?

This weekend on Episode 345, we’ll be discussing Judy starring Renée Zellweger, a biopic on the life Judy Garland. She may be best known for The Wizard of Oz, but she’s given several great performances in other films that are worth considering as well. So, for our poll this week, we are asking for your favorite Garland performance.

Be sure to cast your vote!


Movie Review: ‘Ad Astra’ heads to space yet aims for hearts


Director: James Gray
Writers: James Gray, Ethan Gross
Stars: Brad Pitt, Tommy Lee Jones, Donald Sutherland, Ruth Negga, Liv Tyler, John Ortiz, Natasha Lyonne

Synopsis: Astronaut Roy McBride undertakes a mission across an unforgiving solar system to uncover the truth about his missing father and his doomed expedition that now, 30 years later, threatens the universe.

[/info]

In one stroke, James Gray checked two boxes: The space film that is the reverse of Interstellar and should have been the one to receive controversy instead of First Man.

The first point is clear from the majority of Ad Astra’s promos, which gives the final frontier either the least screen time or places it from nearly, to actually outside, of the printed margin. Appropriate, seeing as the subject being explored in the film is the human — Major Roy McBride (Brad Pitt) — or, to be even more specific, said human’s headspace. Through plenty of narration, we find out that Roy is an astrum of an astronaut, the son of the famed Clifford McBride (Tommy Lee Jones, seemingly securing his supporting Oscar) and the perfect man in U.S. Space Command’s eyes to retrieve him from the edges of the solar system. Why the latter? Thousands on Earth have died after a power surge reportedly stemming from the “Lima Project,” the extraterrestrial-searching venture of which McBride Sr. is the leader.

Gray and Ethan Gross’ script may have placed the film in an advanced, beautiful and, most importantly, hopeful future — International Space Antenna! Commercial deep-space flights! Applebee’s on the moon! Pirates on rovers! — but the central interest is in building the character more than the world, making clear the dives into one man’s heart and sprinkling the background with humankind’s thus-far steps all over the starry expanse. Pitt is certainly up to the task for this approach, using his eyes and head turns to audibly highlight the reactions to revelations. A standout would be when Roy gets summoned by the higher-ups of SpaceCom and hears how his father is responsible for the devastation: All the limited physical movements Pitt employs are just right and enough to deliver this observation home, as well as crisply reflecting Roy’s spiritual tug-of-war between the man on a mission and the man buried by all the missions. Often repeated is how calm Roy is in any situation, which is nice when you’re, say, freefalling from stratospheric heights (an opener vertiginously photographed by Interstellar’s d.p. Hoyte van Hoytema), but is calmness appropriate when he is about to face the familial star he deems an enigma, his superiors have made mythic and yet reportedly the scourge? Will whatever shell Roy has built be punctured the closer he reaches his goal? These questions orbit the mind, and never cease to, throughout Ad Astra, guaranteeing visibility to the human costs of the voyage. The brothers Nolan’s work on Interstellar, despite that same focus, often falls victim to the spectacle and spectacular theories.

As for the other half of the opening sentence, look to the flag that Ad Astra waves. After every stage of the journey, methodically plotted out by the script in the form of each subsequent planet Roy rockets toward, there will be a moment — and accompanying monologue — that shows the realization of limits, the cause to pursue answers rather than mysteries. There is, arguably, merit in the thought that the world in the film has evolved to the point where any further search for an answer will be hollow conquests, magnets for despair and the destroying of what has always mattered. This, too, is one of the conclusions derivable from Gray’s previous intimate epic, The Lost City of Z, which also commits the sin of underusing its actresses (but Ruth Negga’s arrival with the waves is a neat visual trick). It’s kind of daring to communicate the need to be undaring in a time when victories are said to only be recognizable if they are by the truckload, or when traits that are outright remnants get rendered as timely essentials. In the film’s father-son context, this reads as a push against the olden order. Where are the headlines for that, although looking at reality the act seems justified?

But even without flashes of First Man or Interstellar, Ad Astra would still have plenty of anchorage. Under the guise of a sizeable picture is a resonating meditation, a futuristic symphony with a most-relevant note that the known has what the unknown teases. Don’t let anyone tell you differently, but this is the companion piece to Jack Fawcett’s cinematic expedition.

Overall Grade: A-

[divider]

Hear our podcast review on Episode 344:

[divider]

List: Top 3 Brad Pitt Scenes

This week on Episode 344 of the InSession Film Podcast, inspired by Ad Astra and the face that he may be taking an acting break for awhile, we thought it would be fun be appropriate to talk about our favorite Brad Pitt scenes. Pitt has been a major star since the early 90’s, and while some may only see him through the lens of his Hollywood myth, the truth is that he’s delivered some legitimately great performances over the years. He’s always been aware of his persona, and some of his best performances are when he utilizes Pitt lore to enhance his characters. He’s also very funny in other roles. Meaning, there are many great scenes to choose from making this exercise a bit challenging. That said, what would be your Top 3?

(Note: Please keep in mind that we each had different criteria for our selections)

JD

1) Poor Boy Scene – The Tree of Life
2) Assassination Scene – The Assassination of Jesse James By the Coward Robert Ford
3) What’s in the Box? – Se7en

Brendan

1) Knife Scene – The Assassination of Jesse James By the Coward Robert Ford
2) Car Scene – Burn After Reading
3) When J.D. Reveals His Profession – Thelma & Louise

Erik

1) When J.D. Reveals His Profession – Thelma & Louise
2) Bathroom Scene – Fight Club
3) Happy Dance Sequence – Burn After Reading

Honorable Mentions (Combined)

Various scenes from Ad Astra, Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, Ocean’s trilogy, Fight Club, Inglorious Basterds, Fury, 12 Years A Slave, Moneyball, Babel, Spy Game, Interview with a Vampire, True Romance, 12 Monkeys, Deadool 2, Killing Them Softly, Burn After Reading, Fight Club, The Tree of Life, Se7en

Hopefully you guys enjoyed our lists and if you agree or disagree with us, let us know in the comment section below. Clearly there are many other great scenes to consider for this list that we skipped over for one reason or another. That being said, what would be your Top 3? Leave a comment in the comment section or email us at [email protected].

For the entire podcast, click here or listen below.

For more lists done by the InSession Film crew and other guests, be sure see our Top 3 Movie Lists page.

Podcast: Ad Astra / Top 3 Brad Pitt Scenes – Episode 344

This week’s episode is brought to you by Loot Crate. Save 10% on your first order today!

This week on the InSession Film Podcast, Erik Anderson from Awards Watch joins us to discuss James Gray’s Ad Astra and our Top 3 Brad Pitt scenes! JD also offers up his thoughts on Aladdin and Stockholm.

A big thanks to Erik for joining us this week. He’s always a great guest and he did not disappoint this week. We had a ton of fun discussing Ad Astra and Brad Pitt scenes. As you’ll hear in the review, we were big fans of the film and Pitt’s performance, and we did our best to dissect everything it had to offer. Regardless of how you feel about the film, our hope is that the discussion is enjoyable and thought provoking.

On that note, check out this week’s show and let us know what you think in the comment section. Thanks for listening and for supporting the InSession Film Podcast!

– Movie Review: Ad Astra (5:12)
Director: James Gray
Writer: James Gray, Ethan Gross
Stars: Brad Pitt, Tommy Lee Jones, Ruth Negga

– Notes / Aladdin / Stockholm (55:00)
As mentioned above, JD was able to finally catch up with Disney’s live-action remake of Aladdin, starring the great Will Smith. He also saw the Robert Budreau film Stockholm, which stars a wild Ethan Hawke, and of course JD had a lot to say about that specifically.

[divider]

RELATED: Listen to Episode 341 of the InSession Film Podcast where we discussed Apocalypse Now!

[divider]

Top 3 Brad Pitt Scenes (1:09:01)
Brad Pitt has been a major star since the early 90’s, and while some may only see him through the lens of his Hollywood myth, the truth is that he’s delivered some legitimately great performances over the years. He’s always been aware of his persona, and some of his best performances are when he utilizes Pitt lore to enhance his characters. He’s also very funny in other roles. Meaning, there are many great scenes to choose from making this exercise a bit challenging. That said, what would be your Top 3?

Top 3 Sponsor: First Time Watchers Podcast

– Music

To The Stars – Max Richter
Moonight Sonata – Max Ricther
Hymn to Dionysus – Gustav Holst
The Return of the Eagle – Atli Ãrvarsson

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on iHeartRadio
Listen on Stitcher
InSession Film Podcast – Episode 344

[divider]

Next week on the show:

Main Review: Judy
Top 3: TBD

[divider]

Help Support The InSession Film Podcast

If you want to help support us, there are several ways you can help us and we’d absolutely appreciate it. Every penny goes directly back into supporting the show and we are truly honored and grateful. Thanks for your support and for listening to the InSession Film Podcast!

VISIT OUR DONATE PAGE HERE

Podcast: Amazing Grace / Rolling Thunder Revue – Extra Film

This week on the InSession Film Podcast: Extra Film segment, Ryan and Jay discuss the musical documentaries Amazing Grace and Rolling Thunder Revue!

In effort to find something to watch as the fall movie season slowly starts, the guys go back to two documentaries that came out earlier in the year. With Amazing Grace, the film is considered one of the best reviewed films of the year but does have controversy surrounding the release of the film. The film is also a straight concert film, which can work for some viewers and not for others. Regardless of the circumstances of how Amazing Grace got released, it is a beautiful tribute to the late great queen of soul and lead to an interesting discussion over how simple the film might be.

In the back half of the episode, Ryan and Jay reviewed Rolling Thunder Revue, the newest collaboration between director Martin Scorsese and musician Bob Dylan. Billed as a documentary covering the extensive tour for Dylan;s “Desire” album, the film is a examination of the musical genre while also being about the stories artists tell. The movie is a wonderful ruse and the guys had a blast talking about it, even leading one of them to call it one of their favorite films of the year so far.

On that note, have fun with this week’s Extra Film segment and let us know what you think in the comment section below. Thanks for listening!

– Movie Review: Amazing Grace (4:57)
Director: Sydney Pollack
Stars: Aretha Franklin

– Movie Review: Rolling Thunder Revue (41:16)
Director: Martin Scorsese
Stars: Bob Dylan

– Music
Amazing Grace – Aretha Franklin
Hurricane – Bob Dylan
The Return of the Eagle – Atli Örvarsson

We try to make this the best movie podcast we possibly can and we hope you enjoy them. Subscribe today on iTunes, Spotfiy or Stitcher, and please leave us a review on iTunes. You can also find us on Soundcloud, PlayerFM and TuneIn Radio as well. We really appreciate all your support of the InSession Film Podcast.

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
Amazing Grace / Rolling Thunder Revue – Extra Film

Mobile App

To hear this Extra Film episode and everything else we do, download our apps on the Amazon Market for Android and the Podcast Box app on IOS devices. The mobile app covers all of our main shows, bonus podcast’s and everything else relating to the InSession Film Podcast. Thanks for your wonderful support and listening to our show. It means the world to us!

Featured: Sixth Edition – Seven Films From The Criterion Channel

0

Swing Time (1936)

Along with Top Hat, The Gay Divorcee, and The Barkleys of Broadway, it is among the most well-known films of Ginger Rodgers and Fred Astaire. Plus, it was directed by George Stevens, who would later do Woman Of The Year, A Place In The Sun, Giant, and The Diary of Anne Frank. It features some of the best dancing sequences from any film, pound-for-pound, and the swooping cameras that capture it all; the “Never Gonna Dance” sequence was shot 47 times. The songs from the film would among the biggest hits that year, namely “The Way You Look Tonight” which won Best Original Song at the Oscars, and symbolized the escapism needed during the Great Depression still clouding the country.

Scanners (1981)

David Cronenberg’s Canadian-based films were our opening into an innovative mind that had science fiction wrapped around his head after The Brood just two years earlier. This nearly perfect gem follows a group of people who have strong telekinesis, telepathic powers. One man, Daryl Revok, is set out to get other scanners and band together to take over the world, while another unfound scanner, Cameron Vale, is sought to help fight Revok and his dangerous crusade. Battling a blown budget,  incomplete scripts, and difficulty in getting the special effects right (they hired the legendary Dick Smith), Cronenberg is able to construct a literal battle of wits and minds between two opposite scanners connected by one final twist of fate.

L’Humanite (1999)

French director Bruno Dumont’s sophmore effort dives into the behavior of a police detectice who is hunting down a rapist and murderer. The detective has suffered his own tragedy and does not have yet the same emotion of being connected to others when he works on bringing down the killer of this heinous crime. The idea for L’Humanite came from his first film, La Vie de Jesus, about how a police officer has to emotionally keep in check his feelings when it comes to arrested certain criminals. Here, in a small town, the detective has to go in and find his man while as being reserved to others. This is a mystery spun with very few words in the vein of Robert Bresson’s minimalism to commit to images rather than speaking out things we already would know.

War And Peace (1968)

It was the Leo Tolstoy adaptation that so many tried to get off the ground and in complete form; the American 1957 version by King Vidor was 3.5 hours long but was so watered down it derelicts the point of Tolstoy’s novel. In four parts and a running time of 431 minutes, it was the most expensive film made in the Soviet Union and became a success all over the world. Director Sergei Bondarchuk co-wrote and starred in the main role, a demanding trifecta which earned him huge acclaim and won the Golden Globe and Academy Award for Best International Film plus civilian awards from the state. Technically, the film was an eye-opener, shooting on 70 mm film with massive crane shots and a six-channel audio system for sound, as well as astounding costumes and set decortations that is affluent as Gone With The Wind and Doctor Zhivago. It could be what the famous author had envisioned in its 1,225 pages.

Autumn Sonata (1978)

Ingmar Bergman collaborated with the other famous, non-related Bergman, Ingrid, in this story of a mother and daughter (played by Liv Ullman) trying to repair their acrimonious relationship by discussing the events that caused their estrangement. It’s a two-hander by two brilliant actresses and handled by someone who knew how to control and develop strong women fighting for self-respect from the other. Two things to note: this film was made in Norway and produced by West Germany because of Bergman’s fight with his native land over an alleged tax evasion accusation (he was later cleared). The second thing is a three-and-half hour behind-the-scenes documentary of the film could be found. From the very beginning to the very end, you can watch how just one film from among the greats came about naturally like a fly on the wall.

The Long Day Closes (1992)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OVREKuV5i8Y

After creating the beautiful Distant Voices, Still Lives (which I not have seen and desire to), writer/director Terrence Davies followed it up with The Long Day Closes. Both have autobiographical references. It is set in Liverpool in the 1950s where a shy 11-year-old is trapped in the bind of faith, work, and family and finds solace in going to the movies. Davies’ work like this one is a slow pace where the shots do all of the talking for us, capturing the mood of what the boy is thinking. It’s a brisk 85 minutes into the short span of the boy’s life and the early sensibilities about himself that reflect on Davies’ own childhood, including the tingles of his future in movies and being gay (as Davies is).

Trances (1981)

From Martin Scorsese’s World Cinema Project, a Moroccan band is followed as the documentary traces the history of African music and how the band, Nass El Ghiwane, became the biggest band in Africa with its influence of Western music, traditional folk lyrics, and social messaging at the time. The band is portrayed as Morocco’s Beatles, installing messages to society of what was happening and what needed to change, similar to the cries of Bob Dylan. Soon, their fame goes beyond Africa and into the Mediterranean nations in Spain, France, and Italy that become aware of this movement, world music that is for everyone.

Follow me on Twitter: @brian_cine (Cine-A-Man)

Featured: ‘Wild Rose’ and why it speaks to me so profoundly

*Slight spoilers for Wild Rose below.*

If you listened to Episode 330, you’ll know that I was a massive of Wild Rose and Jessie Buckley when it came out earlier this year. Some may dismiss it as derivative, but there’s so much more with this story than its surface level conventions. In the end, I’d argue anyway, Wild Rose is more Inside Llewyn Davis than it is Rocketman. Rose-Lynn (played by Buckley) doesn’t become famous. Or have some massive record deal. Her pursuit of music isn’t too dissimilar from Llewyn (played by Oscar Isaac in Inside Llewyn Davis) in that he ends up exactly where he began. In Greenwich Village with only a local music career to speak of. The only difference is that Rose-Lynn is a mother. So while her pursuit of music doesn’t go according to plan either, there’s a part of herself that is forced to change. That in itself is fascinating, but it doesn’t stop there.

Rose-Lynn is a mother of two who lives in Glasgow and has dreams of becoming a country music star. She sings at the local pub with her band and is full of ever-ending confidence. It doesn’t quite pay the bills though, so after she gets out of jail (which we see in the opening scene), she gets a job working as a housecleaner for Susannah (Sophie Okonedo). It doesn’t take long before Susannah realizes that Rose-Lynn has major talent and could have what it takes. So she helps push Rose-Lynn toward chasing her dream. At one point, Rose-Lynn meets up with a big time producer in London who confirms that she could be a star if she stays the course. As a result, Susannah throws a party for Rose-Lynn and asks her to perform with her band. A bunch of Susannah’s wealthy friends would be there and donate toward Rose-Lynn’s cause. Things were lining up perfectly for Rose-Lynn to get to Nashville, Tennessee and become everything she’s ever wanted. There’s a couple of scenes early on where Rose-Lynn talks about how music is the only she’s really good at, and that without it, she’s nothing. Every decision she makes tethers back to her ambitions, and thanks to Susannah, it seems as if all that work/hope is going to pay off.

But…there’s always a but. Rose-Lynn has two children who are incessantly diverting her energy and becoming a burden. This is compounded by the fact that she’s hidden them from Susannah. There’s a great scene early on in their relationship where Susannah asks Rose-Lynn if she wants kids some day, to which Rose-Lynn replies, “yeah, someday, just not yet.” There’s wonderful (and heartbreaking) irony in that while she is clearly lying to Susannah, the emotional reality is, it might be her truth. Perhaps Rose-Lynn regrets having children because all they do is disrupt her ambitions. I don’t think that’s the case, though. Rose-Lynn may not be a model parent, but she’s at least aware of what she’s doing by being dismissive toward her responsibilities as a mother. She is cognizant of the effects that her neglect has on Lyle and Wynonna (her two children).

In what is one of the best scenes of the year for me, there comes a moment where Wynonna walks into the kitchen to get a glass of water in the middle of the night. Rose-Lynn hears this, walks to her in the kitchen and has a small conversation with her. At the end of it, she picks her up to take her back to bed, and when she does Wynonna intensely hugs Rose-Lynn demonstrating how much she’s missed her mom. It was incredibly unexpected because Wynonna had been distant from Rose-Lynn and non-responsive toward her since coming back from jail. Something that amplified itself as Rose-Lynn continued to pursue her ambitions, often leaving Wynonna and Lyle with their grandmother or random neighbors. So this moment of embrace completely catches Rose-Lynn off guard, and her reaction to it is stunningly poignant. Buckley’s acting in the moment is nothing short of sublime. Beyond that though, it’s an affecting scene because of the surprise element, which is the result of her awareness that her children have been negatively effected by her choices. And therefore she did not expect Wynonna to embrace her in that way. It’s the first time that the dichotomy of ambition and responsibility showed itself to her in a significant way. As time goes on, she may not tell Susannah the truth about her chilfren, but Rose-Lynn starts to pay them more attention. She looks at them fondly. The balance of responsibility and ambition may be centering out slightly.

However, that notion metamorphosis quickly when the opportunity arises to raise money by singing at the party that Susannah was throwing for her. In order to get practice time with her band, she once again pawns off her children to anyone willing or able to look after them. But now things are different. She is conflicted. It kills her inside to negate the positive relationship building she’s had with her children, but this is a potentially once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. As a young single mother, what is she supposed to do? The heftiness of this question weighs even heavier when Lyle finds himself in the hospital, and instead of being at his bedside, Rose-Lynn attempts to leave for the party. She is able to get her mom to watch the kids, but before she leaves her mom utters, “if you can’t acknowledge your children there is no hope for you, and there sure as hell no hope for them.” Rose-Lynn, without saying anything, is devastated. The next shot is immaculate as we see Rose-Lynn trying to put on make-up, but she can’t keep it together. She’s worked her whole life for an opportunity like this, but the emotional costs are getting to high and it is destroying her.

So what does all of this have to do with me? Why does it speak to me so profoundly? Well, as you may have heard on the show, I am a father myself. I have my own ambitions. Operating InSession Film on a daily basis is time consuming. Between prepping for shows, recording the shows, producing/editing other shows, writing features or reviews like this, maintaining a content schedule, building relationships with our writers, being active on social media, and everything else in between, it takes up a lot of my time. However, Sam (my son) is the most important thing in the world to me. I am not willing to compromise that at any cost, no matter how much I love what we do here at InSession Film. But I’d be lying to you if I said it was easy. If there weren’t times where my wife, or even Sam, wanted me out of the office. I’d like to think that I’m a better parent than Rose-Lynn, but the reality is, her struggle is my struggle. At its most inner core, Wild Rose suggests that many parents have dreams and hopes like everyone else, but at what lengths are we willing to pursue them if the costs on our children are severe?

This is something I grapple with daily. And like Rose-Lynn, I’ve come to the realization that there’s no place like home. Regardless of what our goals are/were, and maybe things played out differently than initially though, but there is peace and jubilation in doing the things you love right where you are…with the people you care about the most. There are many things about Rose-Lynn that I can’t relate with, but that idea fundamentally, slayed me. Profoundly connected with me.

Jessie Buckley’s raw and tender performance will linger with me for a long time. It’s phenomenal in every way.

Movie Review: ‘Hustlers’ dazzles with complexity and great performances


Director: Lorene Scafaria
Writers: Lorene Scafaria (screenplay), Jessica Pressler (magazine article)
Stars: Constance Wu, Jennifer Lopez, Julia Stiles, Keke Palmer, Lili Reinhart, Wai Ching Ho, Trace Lysette, Cardi B

Synopsis: Inspired by the viral New York Magazine article, “Hustlers” follows a crew of savvy former strip club employees who band together to turn the tables on their Wall Street clients.

[/info]

Hustlers has been, by far, the biggest surprise for me at the movies this year. I went in with high expectations- but only for an entertaining, girl-power, crime flick starring JLo and Constance Wu. What I got instead was a powerful female-driven, crime drama, telling a new perspective of the 2008 financial crisis. It’s based on an article by Jessica Pressler entitled “The Hustlers at Scores” published in New York Magazine in 2015. The names have been changed and the story has been embellished, but it is based on real events. Hustlers had way more substance to it than I expected. This is writer/director Lorene Scafaria’s third film for the big screen; her first two being Seeking a Friend for the End of the World (2012) and The Meddler (2015). There’s been lots of talk and rumors about a big shot male director, known for his crime movies, turning down the opportunity to direct this film. I can’t confirm any of that, but what I can say is that Hustlers was better off in the hands of Lorene Scafaria. This film was meant to be made by women and I truly believe it would have been a completely different (and terrible) movie if it was directed by a man.

Hustlers follows main character Destiny (Constance Wu) as she navigates her career as an exotic dancer in the mid 2000’s. She is enamored with veteran dancer and superstar of the club Ramona (Jennifer Lopez). After befriending her during a rooftop smoke break, Ramona decides to take Destiny under her wing (or in this case, luxurious fur coat) and show her how to play the game- how to identify wealthy clients and how to make them spend their money. Just as things start looking up for the girls, the 2008 financial crisis hits and most of their wealthy Wall Street regulars stop coming to the club. It’s during this time the women band together and come up with a scheme to make money again.

I have so many good things to say about this movie I don’t know where to begin… Jennifer Lopez is as fantastic as everyone is saying. She’s clearly meant for portraying powerful women and deserves more screen time and more roles. I’m not hearing enough about Constance Wu though. She was mostly unknown to the general public before starring in Crazy Rich Asians (2018) and Hustlers proves she has more in her than rom-coms. Her character Destiny is complex, damaged, and equally powerful, but in a subtle way compared to Ramona. Wu has a presence that makes it hard to take your eyes off her; even when sharing the screen with Jennifer Lopez, Cardi B, and Lizzo. I expect great dramatic roles from her in the future. The only place I think “Hustlers” is lacking is in developing its supporting cast. There were so many interesting women in the cast, but we don’t get any development or backstory with their characters. The club dancers are nothing but cameos; including Cardi B, Lizzo, Trace Lysette, Marcy Richardson, and Mette Towley. The two larger supporting roles are filled by Keke Palmer and Lili Reinhart. They are also former dancers that join in on Ramona and Destiny’s scheme to take money from wealthy men. Julia Stiles also makes an appearance as the journalist writing a story about the former dancers and their method of survival during the financial crisis.

My favorite things about this film were the music, the editing, and how it portrayed the female characters as real women instead of objects or gimmicks. Just to give you an idea of how well the music was done in the film- we first see Ramona, who is obviously the crowd favorite, dancing to “Criminal” by Fiona Apple while being showered with money. Another track heard in the film is “Control” by Janet Jackson. Alternatively, during less intense scenes, like when Ramona is teaching Destiny some dance moves, you’ll hear lovely Chopin etudes. It sounds like an odd mix, but it works. They also did interesting things with sound; such as killing the sound completely when a character shuts off a recording device, and only hearing the dialogue through a police wire. It was unexpected and an interesting surprise included in the film.

The best thing about Hustlers is how it tells the women’s stories and how it’s not afraid to show the good and the bad. It covers issues like unwanted male attention, single motherhood, the desire for independence, abusive relationships, working as a stripper, etc. One scene that stuck with me was one featured in the trailers- where Jennifer Lopez is teaching Constance Wu pole dancing. In that scene JLo dances and goofs around, Constance Wu bends over lounging, and their stomachs, thighs, arms, etc were not digitally edited to be flat, smooth, and “perfect”. It was something I really appreciated and made the characters that much more realistic. The film also has some great writing. One of my favorite lines to date, delivered expertly by Lopez: “This city, this whole country, is a strip club. You’ve got people tossing the money, and people doing the dance.” Lines like that throughout the film reinforce that the movie is not about strippers; it’s about money and how having money gives you power over yourself and others.

Hustlers made its way into my top ten films of the year (so far). It surprised me with a much more complex story than advertised and impressive performances from its leading ladies. It’s not “just a stripper movie”, it’s a crime drama that I think will appeal to a wide audience. It’s an achievement to have a woman lead film, both in front and behind the camera, about a subject as taboo as exotic dancers, be taken seriously. I hope others enjoy this film as much as I did, and I’m curious to see what happens come awards season.

Overall Grade: B+

[divider]

Hear our podcast review on Episode 343:

[divider]

Poll: What is your favorite sci-fi film of the decade so far?

This weekend we’ll see James Gray’s latest film Ad Astra, starring Brad Pitt, and it looks to be a good one according to most early reviews. It may or may not end up being in the debate for best sci-fi film of the decade, but we are using it as inspiration for our poll this week regardless. The 2010’s have seen some great sci-fi films, some that will go down as all-timers in the genre, so this is a challenging poll.

That said, though, be sure to cast your vote below!


Movie Review: ‘The Goldfinch’ is one fatal brushtroke after another


Director: John Crowley
Writers: Peter Straughan; Donna Tartt (novel)
Stars: Oakes Fegley, Ansel Elgort, Nicole Kidman, Finn Wolfhard, Aneurin Barnard, Jeffrey Wright

Synopsis: A boy in New York is taken in by a wealthy Upper East Side family after his mother is killed in a bombing at the Metropolitan Museum of Art.

[/info]

For this fall, spotting a goldfinch in the wild — migration has begun! — is more rewarding than catching one in theaters. What the promos promise as the story of a stolen life is a film that wastes our time in its final form.

Although The Goldfinch is set decades later than Brooklyn and trades its central perspective from an Irish lass’ to a stateside boy’s, it’s valid to see the new effort from director John Crowley as another lap around the same track. Perhaps an improved one, even, since capturing his run is a master cinematographer and the source material that propels him is adorned with a Pulitzer. But there’s no negative split, or at least at even one, at the end. Why the shocking performance? There is much merit in pointing toward the screenplay that cinematizes Donna Tartt’s 2013 novel with lethargy and labor.

In conveying the journey of Theodore Decker (an alert Oakes Fegley, then an inert Ansel Elgort), a survivor of an art museum bombing that killed his mother when he was 13, writer Peter Straughan orders the events by theme rather than order. The other choice might have improved the experience as all that ping-ponging between Theo’s three phases — first a scarred boy who is taken in by the classy Upper East Sider Samantha Barbour (an icy Nicole Kidman), then a rebel when his loser father Larry (an aggressive Luke Wilson) returns, and afterward a criminal when he forges antiques behind his mentor’s, Hobie (a warm Jeffrey Wright), knowledge — fractures his evolution and from there fuses glaring awkwardness into the pacing. It’s a problem when The Goldfinch needs to take as long as the filming period of Boyhood to tell its story.

What’s also an issue is that, from that back-and-forth, whenever Theo has a life-changing moment it segments rather than layers him. The desired result is a Dickensian bildungsroman; in the current state it is part that–part antiquities reproduction 101–part tragic Thomas Crown. Too often is the processing of a moment in Theo’s tale gets interrupted with another moment from another chapter, onw with a different mood altogether. Only heaven knows why does Straughan think replicating the flipping of the pages more important than the contents in them. Nick Hornby’s take on Brooklyn may be low on surprises since Eilis’ life is laid out like nature would, but at least the moments and their accompanying emotions in Colm Tóibín’s text are carried over. As clear lines rather than odd smudges.

In every state, however, The Goldfinch never ceases to be visually alluring. The moment — a key one — where Theo picks up the Carel Fabritius’ painting per the instructions of an elderly man in the rubble is a particular standout: The framing mirrors how the boy is comforting himself with enigmatic purpose, an act that turns the rain of plaster around him into ashen snow. As for the best of the not-so-key ones, check out the angle chosen for Theo’s dad’s girlfriend Xandra (Sarah Paulson) to show off her sunbathed legs. Sure is odd when the image to remember the film by is anything but the intended avian… or, at certain hours of the day, the “Ukranian” accent from Theo’s émigré friend Boris (Finn Wolfhard, then Aneurin Barnard).

Overall Grade: D+

[divider]

List: Top 3 Performances by Musicians

This week on Episode 343 of the InSession Film Podcast, inspired by Hustlers, we thought it would be fun to discuss our favorite performances by musicians in film. It may not be their first passion, but there have been many tour de force performances in film by musicians over the years. Some have won Oscars. Others have been nominated for Oscars. And some are simply great, if not all-time, performances despite having no awards recognition. So, there are plenty to choose from for this list and we had some great fun with it. That said, what would be your Top 3?

(Note: Please keep in mind that we each had different criteria for our selections)

JD

1) Glen Hansard / Marketa Irglova – Once
2) Ben Dickey – Blaze
3) Doris Day – The Man Who Knew Too Much

Brendan

1) Björk – Dancer in the Dark
2) Cher – Moonstruck
3) Frank Sinatra – The Manchurian Candidate

Honorable Mentions (Combined)

Awkwafina – The Farewell
Lady Gaga – A Star is Born
Barbara Streisand – Funny Girl / The Way We Were
Debbie Harry – Videodrome
Eminem – 8 Mile
Ice Cube – Boyz n the Hood
Selena Gomez – Spring Breakers
Tim McGraw – Friday Night Lights / The Blind Side
Janelle Monáe – Moonlight
Mary J. Blige – Mudbound
Queen Latifah – Chicago
Justin Timberlake – The Social Network
Jennifer Hudson – Dreamgirls
Beyoncé – Dreamgirls
Mariah Carey – Precious
Hailee Steinfeld – The Edge of Seventeen
David Bowie – The Man Who Fell To Earth
Andre 3000 – High Life
Snoop Dog – The Beach Bum
LL Cool J – Deep Blue Sea / Any Given Sunday
Adam Levine – Begin Again
Mandy Moore – A Walk to Remember
Gwen Stafani – The Aviator
Lenny Kravitz – The Hunger Games
Redman / Method Man – How High
Keith Richards – The Pirates of the Caribeean: At World’s End
Ludacris – Hustle & Flow
Childish Gambino – Solo: A Star Wars Story
Whitney Houston – The Bodygaurd
Jennifer Lopez – Out of Sight
Will Smith – Ali
Mark Wahlberg – Boogie Nights

Hopefully you guys enjoyed our lists and if you agree or disagree with us, let us know in the comment section below. Clearly there are a lot of other characters to consider for this list that we skipped over for one reason or another. That being said, what would be your Top 3? Leave a comment in the comment section or email us at [email protected].

For the entire podcast, click here or listen below.

For more lists done by the InSession Film crew and other guests, be sure see our Top 3 Movie Lists page.

Podcast: Hustlers / Top 3 Performances by Musicians – Episode 343

This week’s episode is brought to you by Bark Box. Order today and one free extra month!

This week on the InSession Film Podcast, we discuss the Lorene Scafaria film Hustlers and our Top 3 performances by musicians in film. Brendan also offers up his thoughts on It Chapter Two and Late Night, while JD digs into Brittany Runs A Marathon and Blinded By the Light.

Since we had a lot to go over this week, there was no guest, but stay tuned to the very end of the show to hear a special feature with a new, younger guest that was very fun. We also quite enjoyed talking about Hustlers and musician-actors in film. It’s always exciting when you get surprises this time of year, and Hustlers was that film for 2019.

On that note, check out this week’s show and let us know what you think in the comment section. Thanks for listening and for supporting the InSession Film Podcast!

– Movie Review: Hustlers (4:55)
Director: Lorene Scafaria
Writer: Jessica Pressler (magazine article), Lorene Scafaria (screenplay)
Stars: Constance Wu, Jennifer Lopez, Julia Stiles |

– Notes / It Chapter Two / Late Night / Brittany Runs A Marathon / Blinded By the Light (44:33)
As mentioned above, both JD and Brendan had films they caught up with and wanted to talk about this week. For Brendan, he recently saw It Chapter Two and Late Night, and for JD he caught up with Brittany Runs A Marathon and Blinded By the Light. So, a pretty lengthy discussion segment, but hopefully an entertaining one as there was some light back and forth on It Chapter Two, and of course, JD’s thoughts on Brittany Runs A Marathon was quite the antithesis to Ryan and Jay’s Extra Film thoughts.

[divider]

RELATED: Listen to Episode 341 of the InSession Film Podcast where we discussed Apocalypse Now!

[divider]

Top 3 Performances by Musicians (1:19:45)
It may not be their first passion, but there have been many tour de force performances in film by musicians over the years. Some have won Oscars. Others have been nominated for Oscars. And some are simply great, if not all-time, performances despite having no awards recognition. So, there are plenty to choose from for this list and we had some great fun with it. That said, what would be your Top 3?

Top 3 Sponsor: First Time Watchers Podcast

– Music

Love in this Club – Usher
Hair Up – Justin Timberlake
Falling Slowly – Glen Hansard, Marketa Irglova
The Return of the Eagle – Atli Örvarsson

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on iHeartRadio
Listen on Stitcher
InSession Film Podcast – Episode 343

[divider]

Next week on the show:

Main Review: Ad Astra
Top 3: TBD

[divider]

Help Support The InSession Film Podcast

If you want to help support us, there are several ways you can help us and we’d absolutely appreciate it. Every penny goes directly back into supporting the show and we are truly honored and grateful. Thanks for your support and for listening to the InSession Film Podcast!

VISIT OUR DONATE PAGE HERE

Featured: Pabst And Present – From The Weimar’s Own

0

Georg Wilhelm Pabst became a massively influential figure in the short-lived Weimar Republic from 1918-1933. Starting out in the theater, Pabst joined the cinema trend when he was hired by pioneer Carl Froelich and got him his first full-time job with 1923’s The Treasure. He would go on to direct Greta Garbo in The Joyless Street (1925) and hire Leni Riefenstahl for The White Hell of Pitz Palu (1929), establishing himself as one of Germany’s foremost directors alongside Fritz Lang and F.W. Murnau in the years before the Nazi takeover. He discovered actors that would be lifelong icons, create socially conscious stories and placed a platform for the German cinema expansion that goes into today.

Some of his finest works below are part of his legacy and part of the German expressionist tone working with serious topics and playing to Germany’s reputation of cultural decadence a decade after the war. Pabst had the opportunity to experiment, especially when sound came in, to use different languages as part of the new internationalism and bring in players outside of Germany. Like many of his time, he fulfilled a play placed outside and challenged the censors (and the public) with conscious matters that no American film could have done or gotten away with.

Pandora’s Box/Diary of a Lost Girl (1929)

American actress Louise Brooks became the poster child of German seduction in Pabst’s two films. Pandora’s Box is more notable because of the character’s open sexuality as Lulu is the mistress of a newspaper publisher who soon finds herself in the middle of a love square. Love, deception, and murder is part of an unwilling femme fatale in Lulu, who proudly shows her legs, her bob cut, and risque body to seduce anyone who could get to her. In the next film, Brooks plays a naive young woman who becomes pregnant after a one-night stand, struggles in a rigid reformatory school, and falls into prostitution. Based on a controversial best-selling novel, Pabst recreates it as a critique of society and how it treats women who have become “fallen.” Once hated upon release, it. was reanalyzed decades later as equally impressive as Pandora’s Box.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGHZczuu2Sc

Louise Brooks was a trained dancer from Ziegfeld Follies and who was part of Paramount’s acting troupe until she quit over salary, freeing her to come to Berlin when Pabst sought her after watching A Girl in Every Port. She was his choice but the studio wanted Marlene Dietrich (already a star in Germany), but Pabst convinced them otherwise. As quickly as she rose, Brooks got tired of Europe and went back to America, where she never recaptured the same stardom and went into financial hardship that made her forgotten for decades. Only from the 50s onward, when pre-war films were rediscovered, including the best of Pabst, Brooks regained some fame and gave interviews about her career until her death in 1985. The French film historian Henri Langois said about Weimar cinema, “There is no Garbo! There is no Dietrich! There is only Louise Brooks!”

Westfront 1918 (1930)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNKmDf0MmsU

Set in the last months of the war, Pabst’s first talking film follows four soldiers who are faced with physical and emotional challenges separately. Made simultaneously with America’s All Quiet On The Western Front, Pabst’s own version of an insane maze of fire and self-fury captures the young men not stopping and discussing the morality of the conflict. They are robots where their feelings are kept inside of them and only the ending does any side of it come out, especially when “The End” has a “?” attached to it. In fact, we only know one by name – Carl – one by where they come from –  The Barvarian – and two simply as  “The Student” and “The Lieutenant.”

Based on an anti-war novel, Pabst’s realism shocked audiences among its release as a graphic reminder to the pain a whole decade earlier that surviving veterans could attest to. This was a movie that allowed him to go deeply visual with the setting and worked very well in the trenches and the human condition to its horror. No one as young as they could be shielded. As the first talkie film, Pabst made progress in placing the camera in compromising views where there is no escape. Our characters are surrounded completely. He reminds viewers of what even the losing side saw and that they are victims too.

Kameradschaft (1931)

Set not long after the war, a mining community is split into along the German/French border. The two sides remain bitter over the result, in which the Germans are totally stripped of their potential and pride, while the French, even victorious, struggle to rebuild. When French miners below are trapped due to a partial collapse, it is the Germans that drop grudges and come to the rescue. The title of the film means, “Comradeship,” in German. Pabst is promoting unity between the feuding states in a period and even used French and German actors to speak their own language, some not even understanding what the other actor was saying. It was promoted by left-wing journalists but derided by right-wing provocateurs as bowing to the enemy, a similar charge to Westfront 1918. Years later, German film critics refer to Kameradschaft as one of the best films in the first half of the 20th century and still highly acclaimed in the 21st century.

His interwar years were marked by decline and isolation when he fled to France after Hitler’s takeover. Pabst also spent time in the United States but quickly learned the Hollywood system was not for him, and in 1939, he went to his native Austria, now controlled by the Nazis. Although he had no Nazi sympathies, circumstances regarding his extended family trapped in Austria led to his arrival. Pabst made three films there, including Komodianten (1941), which won him Best Director at the Venice Film Festival (which is considered voided by its history books), before the war freed him and allowed him to move toward anti-Nazi films in the last decade of his career.

Pabst made his final film in 1956 and spent the last 11 years of his life at home in poor health. He left a positive legacy on early German cinema with the rest of a filmography with Joyless Soul, The Threepenny Opera, L’Atlantide, The Trial, and The Last Ten Days. Pabst is an important founding father of early international cinema, especially in the transition from silent to sound, and one that crossed lines with a visual representation of desire and horror.

Follow me on Twitter: @brian_cine (Cine-A-Man)

Podcast: Brittany Runs A Marathon / American Woman – Extra Film

This week on the InSession Film Podcast: Extra Film segment, Ryan and Jay discuss the Jillian Bell comedy Brittany Runs A Marathon and the Sienna Miller drama American Woman!

This week’s show takes an interesting turn as the fellas decided to run against the grain when it comes to Brittany Runs A Marathon, so the feedback should be interesting. Film criticism is all about perspective, though, and the guys certainly offer up a different one that is quite interesting. Their discussion of American Woman was also compelling and it’s great to see Sienna Miller getting such a great and hefty role.

On that note, have fun with this week’s Extra Film segment and let us know what you think in the comment section below. Thanks for listening!

– Movie Review: Brittany Runs A Marathon (3:26)
Director: Paul Downs Colaizzo
Writer: Paul Downs Colaizzo
Stars: Jillian Bell, Michaela Watkins, Micah Stock

– Movie Review: American Woman (39:04)
Director: Jake Scott
Writer: Brad Ingelsby
Stars: Christina Hendricks, Aaron Paul, Sienna Miller

– Music

The Finish Line – Duncan Thum
American Woman – Lenny Kravitz
The Return of the Eagle – Atli Örvarsson

We try to make this the best movie podcast we possibly can and we hope you enjoy them. Subscribe today on iTunes, Spotfiy or Stitcher, and please leave us a review on iTunes. You can also find us on Soundcloud, PlayerFM and TuneIn Radio as well. We really appreciate all your support of the InSession Film Podcast.

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
Brittany Runs A Marathon / American Woman – Extra Film

Mobile App

To hear this Extra Film episode and everything else we do, download our apps on the Amazon Market for Android and the Podcast Box app on IOS devices. The mobile app covers all of our main shows, bonus podcast’s and everything else relating to the InSession Film Podcast. Thanks for your wonderful support and listening to our show. It means the world to us!

Podcast: Cinephile: A Card Game (Round 2) – Ep. 342 Bonus Content

HELP SUPPORT THE SHOW

To hear our bonus content episodes early, subscribe now on Patreon. In some cases, though, we offer our bonus content for free on the InSession Film app or here on the site, and we do encourage (and very much appreciate) a small donation of $0.99 as a way to help support the show if signing up on Patreon isn’t for you. Click on the PayPal button below to donate and thanks so much for your support. You can also hear much of our Bonus Content via our mobile apps. See the information at the bottom of the post for more details.


One-Time Donation



[divider]

Listen!

For our Episode 342 Bonus Content, JD, Brendan and Ryan are joined by creator of Cinephile: A Card Game Cory Everett to discuss the game and even play a few rounds! Check it out!

To listen, subscribe to the show, see the media player above or click here!

[divider]

Mobile Apps!

Listen to all of our bonus content on our apps for just a one-time fee! Whether you have an iPhone, Android or Windows phone, our apps are available in many different ways that is convenient for you. With our mobile app, not only can you listen to all of our bonus content, but our main shows and our Extra Film podcasts as well. Click here for more info!

If you don’t want to purchase our bonus content, but still want to support us, there are other you can help us out. Click here for more info.

Movie Review: ‘It Chapter Two’ is a satisfying conclusion to the Losers Club story


Director: Andy Muschietti
Writers: Gary Dauberman, Stephen King
Stars: Jessica Chastain, James McAvoy, Bill Hader, Bill Skarsgård

Synopsis: Twenty-seven years after their first encounter with the terrifying Pennywise, the Losers Club have grown up and moved away, until a devastating phone call brings them back.

[/info]

When It was released in 2017, it quickly established itself as one of my favorite films of the year. Despite having a (completely normal) fear of clowns and a general hatred of horror films that feature children, I loved the R-rated/supernatural horror meets The Goonies vibes It had. Since then, I’ve been equal parts looking forward to and dreading seeing the sequel. It Chapter Two picks up 27 years after its predecessor and introduces us to the grown-up version of the Losers Club. Mike (Isaiah Mustafa) is the only member of the group that has stayed in Derry. His self-appointed mission is to keep an eye on things and call his friends home when he is certain Pennywise has returned. The Losers reunite and join forces to try and defeat Pennywise for good.

I am still torn whether or not I enjoyed this movie. I think it’s a worthy conclusion to the first film, but it disturbed me more than any horror movie has in a long time. It wasn’t your average scary movie filled with jump scares and gore. It Chapter Two had a masterful balance of building tension, making you dread what was coming, then hitting hard with a jump scare or extended terrifying scene. It left images in my head that lingered hours after watching the film. (I can never eat another fortune cookie) Once scene in particular that stuck with me was the funhouse mirror maze sequence. It’s partially featured in a few of the trailers, I don’t want to give anything away, but it’s intense. The film also starts with a brutal controversial scene that is causing a lot of debate. Again, I won’t spoil it, but it’s the second chapter of the book, and its purpose is to demonstrate how the entire town of Derry is affected by Pennywise’s presence. The locals are unnaturally indifferent to racism, homophobia, missing children, etc. Which leads to one of my biggest complaints about the films. Without multiple viewings or reading the book, it’s easy to miss this affliction on the town of Derry and I consider it to be an important element to Pennywise’s character and the development of the members of the Losers Club. Another common negative I’m hearing about the film is its runtime. It’s just under three hours long, but I didn’t feel the film dragged or felt long at all until the final showdown with Pennywise. Even with the almost three-hour runtime, I felt like some of the needed backstory was left out. We get hints at important character details, what’s happened since the first film (especially Richie’s character), but it still leaves many questions unanswered.

There were a lot of great things about It Chapter Two. The casting for this film was phenomenal. It was easy to identify which child actor from the first film each adult actor was portraying. Bonus points and all the awards to whoever made the final casting decision on Richie (Finn Wolfhard/Bill Hader), Ben (Jeremy Ray Taylor/Jay Ryan), and Eddie (Jack Dylan Grazer/James Ransone). Hader and Ransone are a hilarious duo, just as entertaining as their child counterparts from the first film. James Ransone (Eddie) and Jay Ryan (Ben) also look extremely similar to their younger selves. I was genuinely shocked to find out they weren’t related to the kids from the first film. The only casting choice I was not fully satisfied with was Jessica Chastain as adult Beverly. I love Chastain, she’s a phenomenal actress, but for some reason her portrayal of adult Beverly didn’t remind me of child Bev at all. At lot of things happen to her character from the end of the first film and through the 27 years before we meet her again in the sequel. Any of that can explain the differences in her personality, but I still felt like something was off there. I also need to praise Bill Skarsgård for his amazing portrayal of Pennywise the clown. That man has an unnatural ability to control every inch of his face and contort it and the rest of his body in unsettling ways. He has to be one of my favorite villains of the decade. There is also a fantastic cameo from Stephen King, so be on the lookout for that. I was also very happy with the balance of humor to horror in the movie. The jokes were well timed and placed just when you needed a break from the disturbing scenes. They also managed to weave in an anti-bullying message and a running theme about being okay with who you are without it being too obvious.

To wrap up, It Chapter Two is a good conclusion to the Losers Club story. It definitely has more Stephen King flair than the first film, but gives you everything you’d want from a supernatural horror. The film also has its controversial moments and is genuinely disturbing at times, so prepare yourself if you plan to see this on the big screen. The cast is by far the best thing about it and is worth the price of admission.

Overall Grade: B

[divider]

Hear our podcast review on Episode 342:

[divider]

Poll: What is the best performance by a musician in film?

This week for our poll, we are looking to the new film Hustlers starring Jennifer Lopez, Constance Wu, Cardi B and Lizzo. Musicians trying their hand at acting is nothing new, with some delivering Oscar-caliber performances and unforgettable moments. So, using that as our inspiration, what is the best performance by a musician in film?

Vote now!


List: Top 3 Stephen King Characters

This week on Episode 342 of the InSession Film Podcast, inspired by IT Chapter Two, we thought it would be appropriate to discuss our favorite Stephen King characters in film. King has written dozens of novels, and it seems as if most of them have been adapted to film, so this topic has no shortage of options. Some of these characters will go down and some of the best of all-time. It’s nearly impossible to hear the name “Stephen King” and not immediately think of Jack Torrence or Andy Dufresne. King is a master storyteller and his characters are iconic for a good reason. Hopefully we did him some justice here. That said, what would be your Top 3?

(Note: Please keep in mind that we each had different criteria for our selections)

JD

1) Andy Dufresne – The Shawshank Redemption
2) Annie Wilkes – Misery
3) Bill Denbrough – It / It Chapter Two

Ryan

1) Andy Dufresne / Ellis Boyd ‘Red’ Redding – The Shawshank Redemption
2) Annie Wilkes – Misery
3) John Coffey – The Green Mile

Nate

1) Andy Dufresne / Ellis Boyd ‘Red’ Redding – The Shawshank Redemption
2) David Drayton – The Mist
3) Kids – It / Stand By Me

Honorable Mentions (Combined)

Gordie – Stand By Me
Chris – Stand By Me
Carrie – Carrie
Jack Torrence – The Shining
Danny Torrence – The Shining
Brooks – The Shawshank Redemption
Warden Norton – The Shawshank Redemption
Paul Edgecomb – The Green Mile
Wild Bill Wharton – The Green Mile
Mrs. Carmody – The Mist
Roland Deschain – The Dark Tower
Jud Crandall – Pet Semetary
Pennywise – It
Kurt Dussander – Apt Pupil
Mort Rainey – Secret Window
Jessie Burlingame – Gerald’s Game
Mike Enslin – 1408
Ben Richards – Running Man
Johnny Smith – The Dead Zone

Hopefully you guys enjoyed our lists and if you agree or disagree with us, let us know in the comment section below. Clearly there are a lot of other characters to consider for this list that we skipped over for one reason or another. That being said, what would be your Top 3? Leave a comment in the comment section or email us at [email protected].

For the entire podcast, click here or listen below.

For more lists done by the InSession Film crew and other guests, be sure see our Top 3 Movie Lists page.