Well, here we are again. It’s taken way too long but now I’m back. From outer space. Okay, obviously not but I couldn’t pass up the opportunity to say that.

So, it’s probably a given by now but I had not seen ROTLA until the day I wrote this article. I’d seen both of the sequels and had the misfortune of watching Crystal Skull for my podcast (BlokeBusters), but until today I’d never seen the film which sparked the franchise. I’ve seen parody after parody, visited the stunt spectacular at Disney World and even made references to it. But today I finally watched the source material. Today I got to see Indy on his first cinematic adventure. What did I think? Well, you’re about to find out….

…after a little more set-up. My opinion of Indy before watching this film was that the character was fun and well played by Harrison Ford. Just the right amount of smugness and yet never the best *insert-skill-here* in the room. The side characters could get annoying (DR JONES!!!!!!!) and the films were full of cliches (the Stormtrooper Training School graduates were everywhere!), but all-in-all they were a fun ride and always entertaining. And then I watched Raiders Of The Lost Ark.

I was not disappointed! The camp acting from the Nazis was sublime. The damsel-indistress was a force to be reckoned with (most of the time)! The side characters were actually fun! I’ll say that again. They were genuinely fun! The last time I actually enjoyed ALL of the side characters was in The Fifth Element. I felt invested in what Indy was doing, I wanted to see how he got out of the situations he got into. Obviously I knew he had to get out, but it was never an issue to me that I knew that. And I promise you that me saying that is a big deal.

It’s odd to come at this the way I have. I’ve seen the choices that they made going forward. I knew which aspects of his character changed down the line, which ones stayed the same. Imagine coming to The Matrix having seen both the sequels and The Animatrix first. You’re looking at the man who became God before he opens his eyes for the first time. I knew that the man I was watching was nick-named after his father’s dog. I knew about his alien encounter. I knew all about the magical fedora. And yet it wasn’t diminished at all for me. I enjoyed seeing the man before his adventures (though chronologically not true, in terms of filming I’m still right!) and his very rough fighting style. In many ways, I’m glad I saw this last. Wait, what?

Well, had I seen this first I probably wouldn’t have been overly interested in watching the sequels. True, I just said how much I enjoyed it but that’s because I was watching the origin of a franchise I’ve enjoyed. As a story, and especially the way it ends, I couldn’t get behind it. Without giving it away, the ending is VERY Deus-Ex-Machina and I have a real issue with it. It looks cool but felt as if the writers went “Wait, they’ve got to get away! Bugger. Ok, how about this…”, and that’s never good. In fact, I would have been far more interested had the Ark turned out to be a fake in the end and the ‘real’ Ark actually still out there.

But hey, that’s by-the-by. I’ve now finally seen the film that most people are shocked to hear I haven’t seen and probably enjoyed it a lot more than I would have had I watched it first. I hope you enjoyed my take on it, and I’m not going to be rating these watches due to… well…. I feel like I’d be lining myself up for a firing squad if I didn’t score “correctly”.

So everybody pop on your leather jacket, worn fedora and whip and let’s get out there and find us some history. Oh yeah, watch out for those snakes!

This weekend features the release of the new live-action Ghost in the Shell, starring the always wonderful Scarlett Johansson. Up until earlier this week, I was not very familiar with this property in any way. However, I was able to catch up with the 1995 animated film, Ghost in the Shell, which really blew me away. The intelligent and creative concepts that the film introduces is robustly imaginative and very human in its execution. The existential ambiguity of Motoko is vastly nuanced and smartly constructed, but what I loved about it the most, is how emotionally rooted it all is for her. For how deep the intellectual rabbit hole is in Ghost in the Shell, it’s equally as strong in the emotional undercurrent.

Personally, I’m not expecting the new live-action Ghost in the Shell to be quite as apt in exploring the ideas that Mamoru Oshii executed to near perfection. Nothing against Rupert Sanders, the director of the live-action remake, but he doesn’t strike me as someone experienced enough to render the complexities of Ghost. If you’ve seen the trailer, there is no doubt the film will be gorgeous to look at. Aesthetically speaking, Sanders will deliver on that end. If you’ve seen Snow White and the Huntsman, you’ll know that he can do visuals. It’s the story and characters that concerns me. It’s the themes of Ghost and the deeply interconnected emotions that come with those notions. I’m not sure Sanders will deliver on the “ghost” inside his aesthetic “shell” if you will.

As for Johansson, a lot of people were understandably upset when she was cast in the leading role as Major. Ghost in the Shell is based off a Japanese manga of the same name, so I can sympathize with the outrage, even though I love Johnsson as an actress. In terms of sheer talent, she is perfectly capable of leading a franchise like this and resonating the emotional and intellectual qualities that is necessary for her character and the film overall. I’m not saying we should forgive the studio, but that Johansson is a proven actress that I think is very good. At the same time, this could have been a great opportunity for a Japanese actress to jump into the spotlight to showcase her talents, which I would have loved to have seen as well. Either way, I’m hoping and rooting for a female-led franchise do well.

What about you? Are you excited for Ghost in the Shell this weekend?

[divider]

Here’s what else you can expect at the box office this weekend:

The Boss Baby

The Zookeeper’s Wife
The Blackoat’s Daughter (limited)
The Discovery (limited)

If you listened to Episode 213, you heard us preview our discussion for Power Rangers, which was meant to be our featured review on Episode 214. Well, we have decided to call an audible on that. Given the critical reviews for Life, which have been surprisingly more positive than we anticipated, we thought that film would foster better discussion. I’m still nostalgically curious to see what Power Rangers has to offer, but Life has given me new….ya know…on that film.

I was expecting Life to essentially be Alien-lite, and the trailers beat that drum rather heavily. In terms of marketing, nothing about Life seemed all that new or interesting. Group of individuals on a spacecraft of some kind. New life form enters ship. Group attempts to study it. S*** goes down. Sound familiar? Everything about the trailers come across as nothing but a blatant rip on Alien and other space-horror films. Additionally, director Daniel Espinosa’s last film, Child 44, was an utter disaster. Going into 2017, I had little to no excitement for Life, despite its wonderful cast (more on that in a bit).

Well, as it turns out, all of that familiarity is apparently….on purpose. Now, I would never spoil anything on purpose, but my next talking point could be considered a spoiler if you haven’t read any reviews or know what Life is actually about. So be warned, slight spoilers are below.
.
.
.
.
.

Okay, so as it turns out, Life is actually a satire on the space-horror genre. At least, that’s what reviews seem to be pointing towards. On the surface the film will play out as a horror-thriller in space, a la the Alien aesthetics and tone you feel from the trailer. But we could possibly expect the film to highlight and comment on certain tropes that characters make in those kinds of movies. Coming off the heels of Deadpool, no wonder Ryan Reynolds was cast for this film.

Speaking of, and I’m not sure how I missed this before, but the satirical approach to Life makes so much sense when you realize that the writers for this film are Rhett Reese and Paul Wernick, the same writers for Deadpool. Say what you want about the film, but Deadpool‘s writing was very clever and inventive for its type. Perhaps the comedy didn’t work for you – although I loved it personally – but you have to admit the writing was unique for the commentary it was tackling. If Reese and Wernick apply that same logic to space-horror films, I think we’re in for a treat.

On top of that, the cast I referenced above is quite great here. Alongside Reynolds, we’ll see the likes of Jake Gyllenhaal, Rebecca Ferguson and Hiroyuki Sanada among others. I’m a big fan of all those actors, and there’s no doubt they will fall into the rhythms of this film in great ways.

At this point, my only concern is Espinosa as the director. Outside of Child 44, the only other film I’ve seen of his was Safe House, also starring Reynolds. And I wasn’t terribly high on that film either. Perhaps space satire is up his alley, but right now there is a sense of dubiousness with him in the director’s chair. If everything else falls into place though, perhaps his effect on the film will be minimal.

What about you though – are you excited for Life? Ya know, the movie about aliens and stuff?

[divider]

Here’s what else you can expect this weekend at the box office:

Power Rangers
CHIPS

Wilson (limited)
Victor (limited)
Slamma Jamma (limited)

To many, Disney is not just an art or genre in and of itself. Different generations grew up with all eras of Disney animated films, from the start with Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs in 1937 to the resurgence in the early 1990’s with The Little Mermaid and Beauty and the Beast. And with many classics still in between, this has created an empire of 56 films by Walt Disney Animation, and a timeless one that will only continue to grow instead of die.

So to reinstate the top, Disney is not just an art in and of itself; Walt Disney was a childhood friend to us all, and a friend to many children still today. His films offered us a window to the soul of a child, filled with imagination and fantasy without sacrificing honesty or even heartbreak. In other words, Walt Disney taught us all how to grow up.

With the release of Bill Condon’s Beauty and the Beast, the latest in Disney’s string of live-action remakes, I felt compelled to revisit my favorites in the Disney animated canon, and decided to share these thoughts in a list of my top 10 favorite films by Walt Disney Animation Studios (not including Pixar or any existing live-action films). The beauty of Disney is that we all can have very personal reasons for responding to these films and in different ways, which is my friendly way of saying that you will NOT agree with this list; just don’t get angry when you see some of your very favorites near the bottom of my own list.

On with the show…

[divider]

Brendan Cassidy’s Top 10 Favorite Disney Animated Films:

10) Mulan (1998)
Some would argue that Mulan was the last great film of Disney’s 1990’s resurgence, and coming after a string of arguable misfires (I personally don’t care for Pocahontas or Hercules, nor did I love Tarzan which came after), it wasn’t just a welcomed return, but also a progressive one. Featuring an incredible female lead, with spunk and sympathy to boot, Mulan set a precedent for how ahead of its time animated films could ultimately be. And with today’s films looking to embrace feminist notions, Mulan came in at just the right time. This progressiveness would be worthless if the film itself wasn’t anything special on the surface, but it is thankfully epic in scale, exciting, and dramatically stirring. Plus it features some of the best songs during the Disney resurgence in “I’ll Make a Man Out of You” and “Reflection”.

9) Dumbo (1941)
Dumbo is one of Disney’s most efficiently told films, clocking in at just over one hour yet conveying such powerful notions on discrimination and motherhood; if you don’t tear up during the “Baby Mine” sequence, I have nothing to say to you. But what makes Dumbo so much more fascinating is how our main characters are mere observers; Dumbo and his mother never speak a word, with all dialogue reserved for the supporting characters. This makes Dumbo a surprisingly introspective film, and conveys the film’s notion with that much more pathos because of that approach. Perhaps the drunken pink elephant scene goes on a little too long, but for a film at just over one hour, it’s an easy one, to revisit. It also makes me wonder if the film’s notions of flight drew any influence from WWII; this was 1941 after all.

8) Peter Pan (1953)
I can acknowledge that Peter Pan was a product of the times, especially with its depiction of Native Americans, which feels like controversial stereotyping nowadays. But with those imperfections aside, Peter Pan represents every young boy’s dream; adventure, pirate fighting, effortless flight, and infinite childhood innocence. Peter Pan is one of the most enjoyable films in the Disney canon, with absolutely stunning imagery and a great sense of humor; Peter himself has a loveable cockiness that never annoys, and the relationship he forms with Wendy is adorable perfection (their first exchange when he states how girls talk too much is something I can watch on endless repeat). The rivalry between Wendy and Tinkerbell as they battle for Peter’s affection never crosses the line, and instead helps complement the film’s notions of avoiding adult temptations, despite adulthood’s inevitability. And you can’t talk Peter Pan without mentioning Captain Hook, one of the best and funniest Disney villains; yet another scene I can watch on repeat is Hook and Smee’s slapstick routine with the crocodile.

7) The Lion King (1994)
I know, I’m a traitor for only have this at number 7. So let me start off by saying that I love The Lion King; it’s the largest and most cinematic of Disney’s films, the animation is beyond breathtaking, and its notions on hiding from your past are admirable and poignant. On top of that, the film gives us one of the most heartbreaking deaths in any Disney movie, as well as one of the more compelling villains of Disney’s renaissance period. Why it only sits at number 7 for me may have to do with the massive time jump that occurs halfway through the film, and if I’m being honest with myself, the later romance between Simba and Nala always felt slightly forced for me (maybe that’s because I just never cared for “Can You Feel the Love Tonight”, go ahead and hate me). But the remaining songs are beyond catchy and pertinent to the film overall, and you cannot deny the film’s overall sense of greatness. I just wonder how I would feel about the film if it wasn’t as cinematic.

6) The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh (1977)
Why do we find it so easy to love Winnie the Pooh himself? As I ponder this, but also look at him from Christopher Robin’s own perspective, Winnie the Pooh is our outlook into childhood insecurity and growing up. Many of us have had imaginary friends, or perhaps gave living personalities to our toys, and they’ve all been a reflection of our own childhood experiences and mistakes, a way of comprehending those experiences. This is what Pooh himself embodies with such a loveable innocence, and The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh, through its series of highly entertaining vignettes of trouble and friendship (all friends with such distinct personalities), captures it all with childlike wonder. For these reasons, the film resonated with me even more upon a rewatch. But what sealed this into my top 10 were the final moments shared between Pooh and Christopher Robin; “Pooh, promise you won’t forget me? Ever?” Wow; now I can see where Toy Story 3 got its influence from.

5) The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1996)
“You have THIS above The Lion King?!” I’m sure that’s what you’re thinking, but let me explain my personal preference. As a movie, I do acknowledge The Hunchback of Notre Dame has problems; the gargoyles are a bit obnoxious, and the narrative structure (especially as it relates to the gypsies) can get quite messy. But through a more subjective lens, this is one of the most daring and thematically rich films Disney has ever released, and it moves me immensely. It can be viewed superficially as a story of how appearances can be deceiving, but what I respond to most are the film’s notions on open-mindedness as it relates to the contradictions of religious faith. Frollo himself is a walking contradiction to this all, and even acknowledges that he is, making him one of my very favorite Disney villains; he uses his beliefs for political dominance yet still lusts for a gypsy woman who’s culture he sees as demonic. On top of that, Quasimodo’s plight is as beautiful as it is tragic, and I also fully buy into the friendship he forms with Esmerelda and Phoebus (notice I said “friendship”, the romance between those other two works wonders for me). Oh and for the record, the gargoyles are a figment of Quasimodo’s imagination; there, I said it. Also, Alan Menken’s songs rank among some of the best work he has ever done; there, I also said it.

4) Fantasia (1940)
Fantasia is, in a word, fascinating. An animated symphony of colors and movement, the film flows more like an experiment than an actual film. This will turn off some people, and while it’s a film I don’t come back to as often for pure enjoyment, it’s one I consistently ponder over. As a music lover myself, the idea that music can evoke a vivid sense of visualization is where this experiment works wonders. Throughout much of the film, particularly the first segment featuring abstract images backed by Bach’s “Toccata and Fugue in D Minor”, I found myself trying to imagine how I would visualize these musical sequences. Sometimes I agreed with the film’s visual choices, other times I did not, and that was the joy in the film for me. While I have fun with the classic Sorcerer’s Apprentice vignette, it’s this sense of musical to visual questioning that sticks with me most. And for such a solely visual experience to evoke thematic questions around religious faith, science, and nature, that’s monumental; these notions are summed up in the final “Ave Maria” sequence (by Franz Schubert), one of the most breathtakingly beautiful sequences ever put to animated film.

3) Bambi (1942)
To find myself ranking Bambi this high was a surprise to me. In my revisiting of this film, I had an experience that was so unlike how I remembered it from my childhood. As a child, you respond to the cute and adorable forest dwellers like Thumper and Flower, but as an adult, I was completely hypnotized by the film’s gorgeous watercolor greens, its efficient storytelling (in only 70 minutes), and the organic and natural growth of our central hero. I think Bambi is a nearly perfect movie, through and through. Bambi is one of my favorite coming-of-age tales, and arguably one of the most fascinating films ever to depict parenthood. Some have argued about the film’s “flawed” notions on the absent father figure (heck, even Roger Ebert wrote that Bambi was one of the earliest films depicting sexism), but the significance comes in Bambi’s learning of love and companionship (from his mother) while balanced with survival and individualism to be his own man (from his father). Bambi’s stance in the film’s final shot is one of the most striking and beautiful moments in animated film history, an overcoming of how tragedy can strike at any place and any time (for the record, I don’t see the film as a stance against hunting), all coupled beautifully with the film’s wonderful score and song in “Love is a Song”.

2) Beauty and the Beast (1991)
Not just one of my all-time favorite animated films, but one of my favorite musicals of all time. There’s not much more I can say that hasn’t already been said on our Extra Film episode where we reviewed this beauty (pun intended), so I recommend you check that out. In a nutshell, Beauty and the Beast features my very favorite Disney princess in Belle (a humanly selfish and selfless being representing the greatest notions of womanhood and individualism), and also features the best work of Alan Menken and Howard Ashman’s career. The film’s title song, teaching lovers to look into each other’s hearts instead of their flaws, is coincidentally flawless. And so is the film. Click here to listen to our full review of this animated classic.

1) Pinocchio (1940)
Jiminy Cricket asks, “Maybe you and I had better have a little heart to heart talk.” And Pinocchio innocently responds, “Why?” For Disney’s second feature film, the charm of Pinocchio is seeing our young hero behave so distinctly like a little boy; he questions everything, fails to understand Jiminy Cricket’s sarcasm (his screaming of “Goodbye Honest John” always cracks me up), and still manages to find joy even amidst the trauma. Pinocchio himself is the everyboy, which makes Geppetto the everyman, and watching the film from Geppetto’s point of view sheds new light into this story. We can sense that Geppetto has a potentially dark and lonely past, one that is wonderfully never explained; he’s a talented woodcarver with arguably too much time on his hands (clock symbolism?) due to a lack in companionship. Geppetto doesn’t just wish for a boy, he wishes for a family. These added layers on fatherhood, and even religious faith (I’ll let you theorize who the Blue Fairy represents), make Pinocchio a riveting coming-of-age film, especially riveting when you learn you’ll turn into a jackass if you drink and smoke under age (shudders). We may selfishly wish for things in our own lives, but a wish’s power only proves truthful when you rightfully earn it, and no better time to learn such a lesson than your youth. Pinocchio is arguably perfection, and one of the best coming-of-age films in any genre. Either Walt Disney wished upon a star to make such a gorgeous film, or he was just insane enough to work hard at it; I’m thinking it was both.

And in case you’re wondering where your favorites would rank further on my list, here is how I would round out my top 25.
11) The Fox and the Hound
12) Alice in Wonderland
13) Robin Hood
14) Tangled
15) Zootopia
16) Wreck-It Ralph
17) The Jungle Book
18) Aladdin
19) Lady and the Tramp
20) Cinderella
21) Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs
22) The Little Mermaid
23) The Princess and the Frog
24) Winnie the Pooh
25) Lilo & Stitch

[divider]

See JD’s Disney ranking on Letterboxd!

[divider]

So, do you disagree or disagree heavily? Let’s at least agree on one thing; we all love Disney. Thank you, Walt. Leave a comment in the comment section below or tweet us @InSessionFilm.

To hear us discuss the latest live-action Disney remake in Beauty and the Beast, subscribe to us on iTunes, Stitcher, Soundcloud or you can listen below.

This week on our Extra Film podcast, we’ll be talking about the 1991 animated version of Beauty and the Beast, and as you’ll hear on that show, it’s one of my favorite animated films of all-time. Belle, to this date, is by far my favorite Disney princess. She’s the first heroine in Disney’s canon that didn’t need to be rescued by a man, in fact, she’s the one that did the rescuing. This would eventually become somewhat of a trend with other characters such as Mulan (Mulan), Pocahontas (Pocahontas) and Elsa (Frozen) as a few examples. However, it was Belle who was among the early ones to change the conventions of what a female character could be among the Disney formula. In the animated film there are even certain lines of dialogue that blatantly point the finger at old stereotypes. “It’s not right for a woman to read. Soon she starts getting ideas and thinking,” Gaston shouts out at one point. The film is clearly painting a different picture for the Disney princess, while still providing the same endearing qualities we’ve always enjoyed in Disney animated films. As a result, Belle is an engrossing character to me that I absolutely adore.

I love Emma Watson, but she has a lot to live up to. I have no doubt that Watson can deliver, however, I am worried about the possible changes the new live-action version is going to make. Don’t get me wrong, I’m all for advancing or rendering new qualities in Belle. We don’t want Bill Condon to do a shot-for-shot remake. However, I’m slightly concerned about the script’s ability to make any changes to Belle feel more impactful, at least based off of the marketing I’ve seen. Any dubiousness I have isn’t relating to Watson herself, it’s more from a screenplay standpoint. Purely from a subjective point of view, I would hate to see such a beloved character come across awkwardly because of the film’s modernization.

On a similar note, the music to Beauty and the Beast is iconic. The fact that Alan Menkin is back to compose the score, while adding new songs, is massively exciting. How is the music going to compare to the original? Are they going to add new elements to the songs and score? Well, I’ve listened to the soundtrack several times already. I’ll just say this for now; the concerns I have for Belle have already been confirmed in updates made to several of the songs. Keep in mind though, I’m basing these thoughts strictly on the soundtrack alone. These changes could work wonderfully in the context of the film. The new score by Menkin, on the other hand, is quite riveting.

With those concerns out of the way, I can now get to why I’m still very excited to see the new Beauty and the Beast. Again, based off of the film’s marketing, I love what Condon is doing here aesthetically. The film feels more like Guillermo del Toro’s Pan’s Labyrinth than the original animated Beauty and the Beast. In fact, outside of costuming, the differences aesthetically are quite vast. Perhaps some of the staging is homaging the classic animated film, but it appears to me that Condon is bringing a new and unique approach to the live-action adaptation.

Another enticing element to the new version is the extensive and wonderful cast. I already mentioned Watson, but this iteration also features the likes of Dan Stevens, Luke Evans, Josh Gad, Kevin Kline, Ewan McGregor, Ian McKellen, Emma Thompson, Stanley Tucci and so many more. Wow. That is one heck of a cast there. Surely the performances will be great, right? Well, on paper the answer to that is an easy yes. I have a few concerns (none of which are about Gad and his character’s sexual orientation – get over yourself if you have a problem with that), but again it’s mostly due to the script’s attempts at modernizing the material.

Beauty and the Beast is one of my more anticipated films of the year. I love the animated film and I’m excited to see how this new version stacks up. It’s always hard not to draw comparisons, but the 1991 Beauty and the Beast is one of my favorite animated films of all-time. In theory, there is no way the live-action film can compete. But I’m not letting that stifle my anticipation, I’m merely going in with the appropriate blinders on so I can judge the new version on its own. And I’m hoping for the best.

What about you? Are you excited for the new Beauty and the Beast?

For what it’s worth, this trailer is one of my favorite pieces of marketing I’ve seen all year.

[divider]

Here’s what else is coming to theaters this weekend:

Raw (limited)
The Belko Experiment (limited)
T2 Trainspotting (limited)
13 Minutes (limited)