Home Blog Page 259

Movie Review: ‘Paddleton’ may shift tones, but it earns the ability to do so


Director: Alex Lehmann
Writers: Mark Duplass, Alex Lehmann
Stars: Mark Duplass, Ray Romano

Synopsis: An unlikely friendship between two misfit neighbors becomes an unexpectedly emotional journey when the younger man is diagnosed with terminal cancer.

[/info]

Sometimes when talking about movies, we say that a film is “tonally inconsistent.” Which, I guess, means that we think films should stick to one tone or another. But life is not like that. If we’re being honest with ourselves, we’ll look at life and see that tones shift and change almost at a moment’s notice. I think what we really mean is that films need to earn their shifts in tone. If a film is going to display life’s wanton curveballs, it needs to show that it’s willing to get down into the grittiness of this thing we call life.

Paddleton, a new Netflix film written by Mark Duplass and Alex Lehmann and directed by Lehmann, is a film that is more than willing to get down into life’s grittiness. At various times in the film, I laughed out loud (one such instance was a joke about the speed of ostriches). At other times, I was moved to heart-stopping sadness.

This is the story of two friends – Michael (Duplass) and Andy (Ray Romano). Andy lives in the apartment directly above Michael. Their friendship has rules that govern it. They eat together, they say hello each morning as they both go to work, they say goodnight each night after watching kung-fu movies, and they play paddleton together. Paddleton – the game of their own making – is where they hit a ball off a rundown drive-in theater screen and attempt to get the ball to bounce into an old oil drum. But we learn all of this after the film’s inciting action which takes place in the very first moments we see on screen.

That is when Michael is informed that he has what seems to be terminal cancer. He is referred to an oncologist – the “cancer one” – to be sure. After getting a second opinion, the diagnosis is confirmed. This sets off the film’s tonal balancing act. At all times, we know Michael is nearing death, yet this endearingly-lovable friendship pushes through.

Romano and Duplass make the perfect pairing for a film such as this. They trade mumbled phrases and hilarious musings about the world around them. Their performances bolster the film, especially considering that they are the only ones on screen for most of the film’s runtime.

The story really takes shape once Michael makes a decision about his course of treatment for the cancer. To see this through, he and Andy must take a road trip to procure the medicine he needs. As you might imagine, this road trip offers ample opportunities for laughs, but it brings the characters to the ultimatum that they’ve been putting off.

If it seems as if I’m treading lightly around the plot, there’s a reason. That reason is best left unsaid to allow the viewer the opportunity to engage with the film the way it wants to be viewed. But there’s a reason I started this review the way I did. This story runs the tonal gamut, and I would imagine that phrases like “tonal balancing act” will make their way into many a review of the film. But, again, I think that is true to life. The story must earn its ability to tell that slice-of-life story, and I think this film does that.

Without giving away spoilers, I will say that I’m not quite settled on how the film chooses to end. I’ll grant that it gives one of the characters the release that is needed. And the ending is true to life too, in its own way. Still, it felt like a departure from the type of storytelling the film had set up prior to that, but this is surely a minor quibble.

All in all, I think this is a fine film. It is sad, but it has its moments of happiness too. It is funny, but it has its dry moments at the same time. It’s a story about lives – how they join together and how they end. In the hands of artists like Duplass, Romano, and Lehmann, it’s a story well-told.

Overall Grade: B

[divider]

Hear our podcast review on Extra Film:

[divider]

Featured: SXSW 2019 Daily Dispatch – Day 2

Howdy everybody, welcome back to my coverage of the 2019 SXSW Film Festival that is going on in Austin, TX. Riding the high of day one and seeing one of the most buzzed about films of the year in Us, I was very much looking forward to see what the day would bring and seeing how the festival could elevate itself. And while it didn’t start off so hot, the day turned itself around big time. By the end of the day, I started to realize how much I need South by Southwest in my life and that you always stay till the end of the movie.

So with my first screening of the day, I went to see the directorial debut of Tom Cullen’s Pink Wall staring Tatiana Maslany and Jay Duplass, which chronicles their character’s relationship through the six moments in their six-year relationship, one moment to define the year. It is an interesting premise but unfortunately it didn’t work for me as a whole. There are three or so moments within the six that work for me but as a whole I just couldn’t get on board with it. The film has a lot to say about what each other’s role in a relationship should be, chasing your ambitions in life and the ramifications of good and bad decisions can affect the lives of the ones you love. While the film does talk about all of these issues, nothing the script gives us sounds new in any way and thus didn’t feel fresh enough to elevate Pink Wall from being just an average relationship movie. But with that said, Maslany and Duplass do have very good chemistry in the film, and Maslany gives the best performance of her career. She is the true reason why this film worth seeing and when by the time I got to the final scene of the film, I realized that I want to see her in more films because when she is given roles, whether it is this or Stronger, she can really knock it out of the park.

I then made it over to The Paramount Theater for a back to back screening of two of the headliners for the festivals, and what could be the best one-two combo I’ve seen in recent memory. The first film was The Beach Bum, which was the long awaited return of director Harmony Korine, the director of indie hit Spring Breakers from 2012. The Beach Bum is a weed-fueled magnum opus for Korine, who examines the world and our lack of adventure through the eyes of one of the craziest characters to be put on screen in Matthew McConaughey’s Moondog, in a role that McConaughey was born to play. The film is an absolute joy drive, with laughs galore, a soundtrack full of great sing-a-long needle drops and a supporting cast that is portrayed perfectly by Isla Fisher, Snoop Dogg, Martin Lawrence, Jonah Hill and Zac Efron, all who shine in their scenes with McConaughey and show they are having just as much fun making this film.

Once The Beach Bum ended, I headed back in line, then literally back into The Paramount to catch the newest Seth Rogen comedy co-staring Charlize Theron, Long Shot. The film follows Rogen as a journalist that is hired as a speech writer for the Secretary of State, played by Theron, to write speeches for her upcoming announcement for her bid to become the next President of the United States. The thing is, when they were younger, Theron babysit Rogen and she was his first ever crush and thus the film puts these two complete opposites together and hilarious hijinks commences. But don’t be fooled by the fact that this is Seth Rogen comedy, this film is directed by Jonathan Levine, who last worked with Rogen on a film called 50/50, which was a movie that had a lot of great humor to go with tons of heart and that is exactly what you get with Long Shot. The chemistry between Rogen and Theron, who is fantastic as always, is off the charts and it’s kind of crazy that it works so well. Sure some of the scenes run a little long and felt a little disjointed, it was hard not being fully into this movie because the two leads just have so much fun and you really connect with them by the end. It doesn’t come out till May but you will be hard pressed to find another mainstream comedy come out this year that is as funny and charming as this one.

Check back here tomorrow for my day 3 recap and follow me on Twitter @ryanmcquade77 for more coverage of SXSW.

Featured: SXSW 2019 Daily Dispatch – Day 1

Hello to all of our great InSession Film fans! Over the next couple of days, I will be giving my daily recaps to my adventures here at film festival part of South by Southwest, located in the beautiful, vibrant and always weird Austin, TX. This is the first time I’ve ever been to a film festival and the first time covering it for the website to represent InSession film. Before I get into the films, I have to thank the great JD Duran for recommending me and applying for me to be a part of SXSW and I am forever grateful to him for helping me cross this opportunity off my bucket list.

Now one would think that the first film you would see at SXSW would be something that was on the schedule but the first screenings weren’t until around 5 pm CST, so I had some time to kill. So I went to one of the many Alamo Drafthouse’s in town and caught the newest film in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, Captain Marvel. While I will not give a full review on the film, I will say that I had a lot of fun with the film, thought Brie Larson and Samuel L Jackson were fantastic and had great chemistry. Plus, the film did a solid job of setting up what is to come this summer with Avengers: Endgame. So once the screening ended, I headed down The Paramount Theater, located in the heart of downtown Austin, and is the location for most of the big premiers throughout the festival. There I got in line for the festival opener and one of the biggest films of the year, Jordan Peele’s Us.

After waiting three and a half hours in line, I can confirm that Mr. Peele is a new master filmmaker and not just for the horror genre. I don’t want to get too much into spoilers or talk too much about the plot since the film comes out this week and I want everyone to go into the movie as fresh as possible but I must say that he came to play hard with this film. Us is a film that has a lot to say and once it was done, I knew I needed to see it again. The writing and direction that Peel presents us in this film is so much more nuanced and unique, it’s like you are watching a director fully come into his own. The cast are extraordinary, led by a powerhouse performance from Lupita Nyong’o, who gives a performance that lives up, and dare I say is better, then her Oscar winning performance for 12 Years a Slave. But the number one this I will never forget about this film was the crowd’s reaction during and after this film, which was ecstatic and eating ever part of this movie up. When you are watching a Jordan Peele movie from now on, you will know you are in good hands and thus he has turned into an event director, which mean that whatever he does in the future, it will be an event that all film lovers must see.

Once Us was over, I went to the Stateside Theater next do and caught a film called Yes, God, Yes from first time director Karen Maine, whose short story was the inspiration to the 2014 film Obvious Child. Yes, God, Yes follows a high school girl named Alice (Natalia Dyer) is discovering herself sexually while going to a strict Catholic high school. While the film can play like a conventional high school coming of age story, it is elevated by hilarious humor and a lead performance from Dyer that is truly special. The movie plays like a rift between Eight Grade and The Miseducation of Cameron Post but done in such a lighter tone. This was a great discovery and I hope you all get to check it out soon because I think this could be a real fun discovery for anyone that gives it a shot. And with that, my day one was complete. Stay tuned for more coverage here on the website and some full reviews once the festival is done. Follow me on Twitter also to get my instant reactions and more from SXSW.

Podcast: Paddleton / The Boy Who Harnessed the Wind – Extra Film

With Ryan gallivanting in Austin for South By Southwest in Austin, Jay is joined by Brendan this week on the InSession Film Podcast: Extra Film show, Jay is joined by Brendan. The pair discuss the Netflix films Paddleton and The Boy Who Harnessed the Wind.

Paddleton, from director Alex Lehmann, stars Mark Duplass and Ray Romano. It is the story of middle-aged friends who take a trip when one of them is diagnosed with terminal cancer. The film features powerhouse performances and has garnered much praise from critics. Do Jay and Brendan fall in line with those critics, or do they go out on a limb with a hot take?

After the Paddleton conversation, the fellas discuss Chiwetel Ejiofor’s directorial debut, The Boy Who Harnessed the Wind. Having worked with some of the most acclaimed directors in the business, Ejiofor seems destined to have a good career as a filmmaker. His first film is a based a true story that was turned into a popular children’s book. In addition to directing, Ejiofor also stars in the film, adding some Hollywood punch to the cast. Listen to find out what the InSession guys think of the film!

Let us know what you thought of these films on social media and enjoy the show! Thanks for listening!

– Movie Review: Paddleton (7:35)
Director: Alex Lehmann
Writer: Mark Duplass and Alex Lehmann
Stars: Mark Duplass and Ray Romano

– Movie Review: The Boy Who Harnessed the Wind (31:09)
Director: Chiwetel Ejiofor
Writer: Chiwetel Ejiofor
Stars: Maxwell Simba, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Lily Banda, and Aïssa Maïga

– Music

Drugdealer – The Real World, Sheer Agony
The Boy Who Harnessed the Wind – Antonio Pinto
The Return of the Eagle – Atli Örvarsson

We try to make this the best movie podcast we possibly can and we hope you enjoy them. Subscribe today on iTunes, Spotfiy or Stitcher, and please leave us a review on iTunes. You can also find us on Soundcloud, PlayerFM and TuneIn Radio as well. We really appreciate all your support of the InSession Film Podcast.

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
Paddleton / The Boy Who Harnessed the Wind – Extra Film

[divider]

Mobile App

To hear this Extra Film episode and everything else we do, download our apps on the Amazon Market for Android and the Podcast Box app on IOS devices. The mobile app covers all of our main shows, bonus podcast’s and everything else relating to the InSession Film Podcast. Thanks for your wonderful support and listening to our show. It means the world to us!

Movie Review: Brie Larson helps make ‘Captain Marvel’ fun and inspiring


Director: Anna Boden, Ryan Fleck
Writers: Anna Boden, Ryan Fleck, and Geneva Robertson-Dworet
Stars: Brie Larson, Samuel L. Jackson, Jude Law, Ben Mendelsohn

Synopsis: Carol Danvers becomes one of the universe’s most powerful heroes when Earth is caught in the middle of a galactic war between two alien races.

[/info]

Captain Marvel is the origin story of Carol Danvers (Brie Larson) or Vers (pronounced Veers), a member of the Kree Starforce with no memory of her past and some interesting super powers. Her team of warrior-heroes is tasked with ridding the galaxy of the terrorist, shape-shifting Skrulls and their leader Talos (Ben Mendelsohn). During one of their missions she is separated from her team, ends up on Earth, and begins to learn more about herself and her powers. The film also reintroduces us to known MCU characters like Ronin the Destroyer (Lee Pace) and one of his future henchmen Korath (Djimon Hounsou) from the first Guardians of the Galaxy movie. We also get to see a younger Nick Fury (Samuel L. Jackson) and new-ish S.H.I.E.L.D.

I am so happy with the casting of Brie Larson, she met all my expectations. Sadly, I’m not too familiar with her prior work, so I wasn’t entirely sure what to expect (I will remedy that shorty). Larson expertly portrayed the Carol Danvers I’m familiar with from the comics. She was snarky and tough, and a perfect counterpart to Nick Fury. They had some awesome buddy cop / Men in Black vibes going on. Her characters growth throughout the film was relatable and fun to watch. I loved all the little details Brie Larson put into the character. The film has a message of embracing who you are and perseverance- get back up, don’t give up even if everyone is telling you to. I think it’s an excellent “girl power” movie, while also being a good superhero movie. It’s not an in-your-face feminism, just for girls film, I think anyone can enjoy it.

The supporting cast was also great, especially Samuel L. Jackson and Ben Mendelsohn. I’ve decided I’m a Ben Mendelsohn fan for life and have to go out and watch everything he’s ever been in or will be in. I also liked Jude Law as Kree commander Yon-Rogg and Lashana Lynch as awesome pilot and Danver’s bff Maria Rambeau. I think everyone will agree that the true star of this film is Goose, an adorable orange cat. She (Yes Goose is female in the movie and in the comics) manages to share the screen with Brie Larson and Samuel L. Jackson and still stand out. The movie also has lots of fun things to try and spot. It’s filled with 90s nostalgia and takes place sometime between the release of True Lies and The Smashing Pumpkins’ Mellon Collie and the Infinite Sadness. There are also comic book references sprinkled throughout the movie. There are two huge, but subtle, hints at another awesome female character potentially making an appearance in future MCU films. Another positive for me was the music. The score was appropriately epic and the use of cleverly timed 90s tracks was fun and also added something extra to the film, especially the action sequences. It made me think of all my favorite action movies from the 90s, but with much better special effects.

I’m a fan of the MCU and the comics, so I did not want to be disappointed by Marvel’s first female led film. I had a few questions and expectations going into this movie- Is this going to be a good stand-alone film, or will the viewer need 10 years of MCU backstory to understand what’s going on? Will Captain Marvel give us hope or any clue into what is going to happen in Avengers: Endgame? Does it live up to the comics? Thankfully, it answered most of my questions and fulfilled my expectations. First, the film 100% stands on its own; you don’t really need any prior MCU knowledge to enjoy it. It obviously helps, and there are inside jokes and things to look for, but it’s not required. It doesn’t give us any clues as to what’s going to happen in Avengers: Endgame but seeing Captain Marvel’s powers on-screen definitely has me excited and even more impatient to see how things with the Avengers pan out.

I did have a few complaints. There are some continuity issues this film creates within the MCU. One in particular (a certain valuable object makes an appearance) is perhaps unnecessary and I’m not sure why they did it other than to bring in an element fans were familiar with. The Kree were also confusing and I don’t think they explained their lifestyle or society very well. The beginning of the film is jumpy and it’s hard to follow what’s going on and who’s who. It does get better when Fury shows up. None of these things were “bad” enough to make me dislike the movie. I also saw this at an Alamo Drafthouse theater, they show short relevant clips and movies in the 20 minutes before a movie starts. For this film they used that time to explain the history and many variations of Mar-Vell, Ms. Marvel, Captain Marvel, and Shazam. I think that was beneficial, especially if you haven’t read any comics.

To wrap up, I loved Captain Marvel. It gave me almost everything I wanted and introduced us to an amazing new character. It was fun and inspiring and gave me lots of fuzzy 90s nostalgic feelings. I can’t wait to see her in Avengers: Endgame later this year. If you do see this in the theater, make sure to stay until the very end of the credits.

Overall Grade: A-

[divider]

Hear our podcast review on Episode 316, coming soon.

[divider]

Featured: Cassavetes – The Original Independent Man

John Cassavetes’ acting career is in itself highly impressive, having starred in numerous television shows including Alfred Hitchcock Presents, Johnny Staccato, and Burke’s Law, as well as noted movies including The Killers, The Dirty Dozen, and Rosemary’s Baby. He also appeared in his own movies (some of which stared his wife, the brilliant Gena Rowlands) where he scraped enough money to finance himself through his work, enstalled improvisation to his actors, and shot it in the non-traditional, open flow style similar to French New Wave. Cassavetes is considered a pioneer in American independent cinema long before many others went to form their own production companies that worked outside the Hollywood system.

Cassavetes wrote and directed a dozen films with multiple other unproduced screenplays left behind after his death in 1989. A few are considered superior and astounding works that cut enough into the critics’ ranks at the time; some were panned but reevaluated afterward. Here are among his best works.

Shadows (1959)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1l-SuuOqwA

In his directorial debut, a white man has a relationship with a woman he does not realize initially comes from an all-black family, which shocks them that she is even going out with a white man. Her dark-skinned brothers are struggling jazz musicians who disapprove of her interracial relationship, but she is an independent woman who will not conform with her ways of life. Cassavetes shot this twice; first in 1957, where it was poorly received, and then in 1959, which was acclaimed and won at the Venice Film Festival. The cast were all non-professionals, made on location, and spent an extensive time improvising a young generation that was more open-minded and lively as the beat in a jazz club.

Faces (1968)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmGGXUHvqs8

Marriage Under Fire would be a fitting alternative title about the dissolving relationship between a couple who go off and spend a night with friends drinking and hooking up with others to fill in their sexual needs. This isn’t short and straightforward as his previous film. Faces was presented in various cuts, from three hours at its premiere to the 2:10 cut it had for general release. (That is the case above but the Criterion cut is 17 minutes longer than this version.) The turns in mood never changed as we cut back and forth and witness the couples’ head-first slide into the debacle of a crashing relationship. Even with the grainy black-and-white 16-mm, it is shot in, viewers can pick up on the extensive realism Cassavetes puts on that was virtually scripted, not improvised as Shadows was.

A Woman Under The Influence (1974)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RINU1ngwtQc

In terms of his direction, Cassavetes hit the highest note by letting his wife, Gena Rowlands, play a housewife who suddenly has a mental breakdown, forcing her husband, played by Mr. Colombo himself, Peter Falk, to put her in an institution. The first half watches the slow breakdown of Rowlands’ character and the decision by him to put her in a hospital for 6 months. The next half is how he struggles to handle their children all alone and then watch her come back as only a person held together with bandages. Her deterioration and Rowlands’ portrayal as a mother who is losing grip with reality, even when she’s told to be herself, is something of another range of acting and something right out of Cassavetes’ style that couldn’t fit more perfectly. The same can be said for Peter Falk’s character as the father struggling to keep things together even with the major fracture (“A loose screw,” he tells a co-worker) in the woman he loves.

The Killing Of A Chinese Bookie (1976)

Ben Gazzara plays a nightclub owner named Cosmo (yes, there was one before Kramer) who pays his gambling debt in full to a loan shark, only to fall into debt again after a poker game to the mob. To clean his debt, Cosmo is given the task of performing a hit on a rival bookie, who Cosmo learns afterward was actually the boss of the Chinese mafia in America. Suddenly, Cosmo finds himself double-crossed and has to shoot his way out of his debt. This was Cassavetes dipping into the criminal side of the dark spectrum and explore the uglier side of people. Cosmo is sleazy but he is no hitman, just a fool to go into the red again after just climbing into the black. Through its disorganized feel is a sense of uncertainty with Cosmo’s behavior and how he’s just a second-rate owner not cut out with the really rough stuff on the street.

Love Streams (1984)

https://youtu.be/REQByBHnAZA

Cassavetes and Rowlands play brother and sister, he is an alcoholic writer while she has just gone through a divorce. The writer is on a path of self-destruction that seems almost telling of Cassavetes own personal struggles; he battled alcoholism his whole life before dying. The sister tries to pick up the pieces of her life by trying to help her struggling brother. This was his last film (he technically did one more film, Big Trouble, but he was hired to take over after it started and later distanced himself from it) and is the closest to a mainstream film that he would direct coming out of his own fruition. Two people dealing with the difficulty of love shattered and hammering away is no new story, but Cassavetes takes a sledgehammer when they go off yapping.

https://youtu.be/-0-ZKSSqWys

John Cassavetes is an icon of independent cinema that spawned numerous directors to succeed outside the Hollywood system in order to get inside later for major works. There’s a reason an award is named after him at the Independent Spirit Awards. His ability to finance films on his own, control the rights to them (still owned by his estate), and tell the stories in his style made him a highly respectable figure for those who wanted to seek the same power. He made his acting personal, stripping and rebuilding the performances and threw away the glamour of what the camera sees, keeping a more raw look that was grainy. In its unpolished touch, there is no gloss that shields the bleak in the background or on the faces of his characters. That is the real life Cassavetes wanted and got.

Follow me on Twitter: (Cine-A-Man) @BrianSusbielles

Podcast: Inglourious Basterds – Ep. 315 Bonus Content

Listen!

For our Episode 315 Bonus Content, we continue our Patreon Series with a suggestion via Lori Stanley where we discuss the Quentin Tarantino film Inglourious Basterds!

*Note: While this review originates from a Patreon subscriber, it is available to the public on our main show feeds.

[divider]

HELP SUPPORT THE SHOW

To hear our bonus content episodes early, subscribe now on Patreon. In many cases, though, we offer our bonus content for free after a certain period of time and we do encourage (and very much appreciate) a small donation of $0.99 as a way to help support the show if signing up on Patreon isn’t for you. Click on the PayPal button below to donate and thanks so much for your support. You can also hear much of our Bonus Content via our mobile apps. See the information at the bottom of the post for more details.


One-Time Donation



[divider]

Mobile Apps!

Listen to all of our bonus content on our apps for just a one-time fee! Whether you have an iPhone, Android or Windows phone, our apps are available in many different ways that is convenient for you. With our mobile app, not only can you listen to all of our bonus content, but our main shows and our Extra Film podcasts as well. Click here for more info!

If you don’t want to purchase our bonus content, but still want to support us, there are other you can help us out. Click here for more info.

Poll: What is your favorite 90’s superhero film?

This week’s poll is inspired by Captain Marvel, a film that wasn’t made in the 1990’s but it is set during that time period, so we thought we’d go back there as well. The 90’s weren’t exactly kind to the genre, but there were still some great films to come out of that era. Perhaps the options this week are more slim than usual, but a challenging poll nonetheless.

That said, what is your favorite superhero film from the 90’s? Vote now!


Movie Review: ‘Greta’ had the potential to be so much more


Director: Neil Jordan
Writers: Ray Wright, Neil Jordan
Stars: Isabelle Huppert, Chloë Grace Moretz, Maika Monroe

Synopsis: A young woman befriends a lonely widow who’s harboring a dark and deadly agenda towards her.

[/info]

Greta is the story of Frances McCullen (Chloë Grace Moretz), a young woman living in New York City with her friend Erica (Maika Monroe). One day on the subway Frances finds a purse that has been left behind and decides to return it to its owner. The bag belongs to Greta Hideg (Isabelle Huppert) of Brooklyn, so Frances bikes over there to give it back. Greta is a lovely, seemingly innocent older lady who is grateful that someone would return her purse. After a chat over coffee, Frances, who recently lost her mother, empathizes with Greta’s loneliness and the two become odd friends. Their friendship quickly turns sour and Greta is revealed to be something more sinister than her charming French exterior.

This film features strong performances by Huppert and Moretz. Much of the rest of the movie was bland, but watchable. The plot suffered from pacing problems. It would go through slow patches, then something exciting or scary would happen, then it would drag again. I think this messed with the overall feeling of tension a film like this needs to be successful. I think the “stalker” bad guy can make for an excellent thriller but this one didn’t quite do it for me. It’s saving grace is Isabelle Huppert. She lures you in with her charm but still manages to leave you feeling uncomfortable after every scene. She transitions from friend to psychopath very easily, and I would love to see her in another villain role in the future. Chloë Grace Moretz was also a good addition to the film. She was young and naive and really should have listened to her roommate, but she was still a mostly likeable main character. Moretz did a decent job with the material she was given. The music was also a high point for me. The film opens with Julie London singing “Where are You”, which under most circumstances is a beautiful ballad, but in this film sets the creepy tone for what’s to come.

There were also a lot of things I didn’t like about the movie. Most of the background characters are forgettable or useless. The roommate annoyed me until later in the film, I’m sorry I doubted her. Frances’ dad (Colm Feore) was also unlikable and completely pointless. The only thing his character did was introduce us to Stephen Rea’s character and play “concerned dad” for a few minutes. Rea is kind of wasted on this film, his character has a purpose but not for long, but I like Stephen Rea so I’m not entirely mad. I also felt they tried to push this backstory and tension between Frances and her father. They are at different points in their lives after the mother’s death and they’re weird about it. We don’t get enough information on the mom or the dad, so their strained relationship bit felt sloppy and unnecessary. I understand this family drama is needed for Frances’ character, I just wish it was handled better. This is also the second movie in the thriller/horror genre in 2019 that features Colm Feore and a secretly Hungarian bad guy. If I see one more Hungarian villain this year I will be annoyed. I’m Hungarian, I know the language is weird and different and can sound creepy if it’s unfamiliar to you, but we’re not all secretly psychopaths…

Greta has its high points and lows, and overall, it’s a watchable film that frustratingly had potential to be much more. If you’re a fan of Isabelle Huppert this film is another opportunity to see her shine. Her performance as Greta was the highlight of this otherwise unmemorable movie.

Overall Grade: C+

[divider]

Hear our podcast review on Episode 315:

[divider]

List: Top 3 Titular Movie Characters

This week on Episode 315 of the InSession Film Podcast, inspired by Greta, we thought it would be fun to talk about our favorite titular movie characters. Boy, that was a mistake. Just kidding, we did enjoy this exercise, but man was it difficult. Of all of the Top 3 lists we’ve done over the last six years, this is arguably the most challenging we’ve done yet. Or, ironically, it’s in the Top 3. There are so many films that are titled after their respective main characters, and it was quite stressful to just try and recall all of them, let alone narrow them to three for the list. In the end, we are proud of the characters that we ended up talking about, but this is an exercise we may re-visit in the future. That said, here are our lists:

(Note: Please keep in mind that we each had different criteria for our selections)

JD

1) Carol – Carol
2) Malcolm X – Malcolm X
3) Ivan Locke – Locke

Brendan

1) Babe – Babe
2) Carrie White – Carrie
3) Truman Burbank – The Truman Show

Vince

1) Rebecca – Rebecca
2) Laura – Laura
3) Coraline – Coraline

Honorable Mentions (Combined)

Jackie Brown – Jackie Brown
Llewyn Davis – Inside Llewyn Davis
Steve Jobs – Steve Jobs
Dr. Strangelove – Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb
Logan – Logan
Blade – Blade
Deadpool – Deadpool
Paddington – Paddington
E.T. – E.T.
Wall-E – Wall-E
Mulan – Mulan
Ralph – Wreck-It Ralph
Pinocchio – Pinocchio
Iron Giant – The Iron Giant
Moana – Moana
Annie Hall – Annie Hall
Capote – Capote
Lady Bird – Lady Bird
John Wick – John Wick
Scott Pilgrim – Scott Pilgrim vs the World
The Godfather – The Godfather
Max – Mad Max: Fury Road
Indiana Jones – Indiana Jones
Django – Django Unchained
Rudy – Rudy
Rocky – Rocky
Adonis Creed – Creed
Luke – Cool Hand Luke
Lebowski – The Big Lebowski
Mary Poppins – Mary Poppins
Harry Potter – Harry Potter series
Juno – Juno
Jaws – Jaws
Tommy – Tommy Boy
Dom Hemingway – Dom Hemingway
Sherlock – Sherlock Holmes
Marie Antoinette – Marie Antoinette 
Erin Brockovich – Erin Brockovich
Napoleon Dynamite – Napoleon Dynamite
Edward Scissorhands – Edward Scissorhands
Barton Fink – Barton Fink
Forrest – Forrest Gump
Ace – Ace Ventura
(Drunk) Hancock – Hancock
Marnie Edgar – Marnie
Hanna – Hanna
Gloria – Gloria
Elizabeth I – Elizabeth
Stoker Family – Stoker
Dr. Henry Frankenstein – Frankenstein
Rosemary Woodhouse – Rosemary’s Baby
Bill – Kill Bill
Thelma / Louise – Thelma & Louise
Ivan – Ivan’s Childhood
Hugo Cabret – Hugo
Will Hunting – Good Will Hunting
Tess Nastassia – Tess
Matilda – Matilda
Amelie – Amelie
Leon – Leon: The Professional
Michael Clayton – Michael Clayton
Veronique – The Double Life of Veronique
Sweeney Todd – Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street
Tenenbaum Family – The Royal Tenenbaums
Ron Burgundy – Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy
Shaun – Shaun of the Dead

Hopefully you guys enjoyed our lists and if you agree or disagree with us, let us know in the comment section below. As mentioned above, there are so many films to consider and grapple with for this exercise that it’s very likely your list is going to be different than ours. That being said, what would be your Top 3? Leave a comment in the comment section or email us at [email protected].

For the entire podcast, click here or listen below.

For more lists done by the InSession Film crew and other guests, be sure see our Top 3 Movie Lists page.

Podcast: Greta / Top 3 Titular Movie Characters – Episode 315

This week’s episode is brought to you by the short film, Falsified. See the film today by clicking here!

This week on the InSession Film Podcast, Vince Leo from Qwipster joins us to discuss the stalker-mystery-thriller Greta and our Top 3 titular movie characters in film. The guys also give their reaction to the 91st Academy Awards and JD gives his thoughts on the Mads Mikkelsen starring film Arctic.

Our thanks to Vince for joining us on the show this week. He is one of our favorite people, and it was a pleasure to hear his voice once again. Greta may not have been the most in-depth film to talk about, but it led to some interesting conversation that we quite enjoyed. The Top 3 this week was especially fun.

That said, check out this week’s show and let us know what you think in the comment section. Thanks for listening and for supporting the InSession Film Podcast!

– Movie Review: Greta (3:48)
Director: Neil Jordan
Writers: Ray Wright, Neil Jordan
Stars: Isabelle Huppert, Chloë Grace Moretz, Maika Monroe

– Notes / Arctic / Oscars (46:53)
As mentioned above, JD was able to catch up with the Mads Mikkelsen film, Arctic, that was discussed at length on our latest Extra Film. He gave his thoughts on the film and surprisingly they aligned with Jay Ledbetter’s, an historic day here at InSession Film. JD and Brendan also talked briefly about the 91st Academy Awards and what they thought about this year’s ceremony.

[divider]

RELATED: Listen to Episode 308 of the InSession Film Podcast where we discussed our Top 10 Movies of 2018!

[divider]

– Top 3 Titular Movie Characters (1:06:05)
Of all of the Top 3 lists we’ve done over the last six years, this is arguably the most challenging we’ve done yet. Or, ironically, it’s in the Top 3. There are so many films that are titled after their respective main characters, and it was quite difficult to just try and recall all of them, let alone narrow them to three for the list. In the end, we are proud of the characters that we ended up talking about, but this is an exercise we may re-visit in the future. That said, what would be your Top 3?

Top 3 Sponsor: First Time Watchers Podcast

– Music

Where Are You – Julie London
Fare Thee Well (Dink’s Song) – Oscar Isaac, Marcus Mumford
Carol – Carter Burwell
The Return of the Eagle – Atli Örvarsson

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
InSession Film Podcast – Episode 315

[divider]

Next week on the show:

Main Review: Captain Marvel
Top 3: TBD

[divider]

Help Support The InSession Film Podcast

If you want to help support us, there are several ways you can help us and we’d absolutely appreciate it. Every penny goes directly back into supporting the show and we are truly honored and grateful. Thanks for your support and for listening to the InSession Film Podcast!

VISIT OUR DONATE PAGE HERE

Movie Review: ‘The Boy Who Harnessed the Wind’ is an impressive debut from Chiwetel Ejiofor


Director: Chiwetel Ejiofor
Writers: Chiwetel Ejiofor (adaptation), William Kamkwamba (based on the book by)
Stars: Chiwetel Ejiofor, Maxwell Simba, Felix Lemburo

Synopsis: A boy in Malawi helps his village by building a wind turbine after reading about them in a library book.

[/info]

“Ngati mphepo yofika konse – God is as the wind, which touches everything.”

“The wind blows wherever it pleases. You hear its sound, but you cannot tell where it comes from or where it is going. So it is with everyone born of the Spirit.” John 3:8

The wind takes on spiritual connotations in many different cultures. It is fleeting, ethereal, and unknowable. It is that spiritual presence that moves throughout the newly-released Netflix film The Boy Who Harnessed the Wind.

This is the feature film directorial debut for Chiwetel Ejiofor, an actor who has given us a litany of powerful roles throughout his career. He brings the same combination of gravitas and tenderness to his work as writer, director, and actor in this film as he has in all those great previous roles.

The film is adapted from the book of the same name by William Kamkwamba and Bryan Mealer. William Kamkwamba is the real-life “boy who harnessed the wind” and he is played by Maxwell Simba in the film. Ejiofor plays his father, Trywell. Trywell is married to Agnes (Aissa Maiga) and they also have a daughter, Annie (Lily Banda). The family lives in Malawi, and we meet them in the throes of familial tragedy. Trywell’s father, John (Felix Lemburo), has just died. He leaves behind an inheritance of farming land that has been in their family for years. However, he decides to leave the land to Trywell’s brother, Jeremiah (Robert Agengo).

Ejiofor does a masterful job of merging multiple storylines into a cohesive narrative. While the story of the Kamkwamba family is always the foundation of the narrative, themes of the importance of education, the corruption of government, and the transcendence of nature all play their part as well. For a first-time director, Ejiofor displays great deft at juggling all these narrative elements at once.

The basic point of tension comes from the fact that the Kamkwamba land is rendered nearly worthless by governmental overreach. Jeremiah decides to sell his portion of their father’s land to cash in and get needed food. Trywell feels that the government’s price is still too low, but the decision is basically rendered moot by the fact that Jeremiah’s land held trees that kept the floods of Mozambique at bay. With the trees ripped down, nothing stops the flood waters from decimating the Kamkwamba’s farmland. After the rains are done, the dry season ensues. With their farmland ruined, the family is left without food. This is when William must step up.

The familial interplay is maybe the most fascinating aspect of the film. There’s the drama that comes from John’s decision to give the land to Jeremiah and the influence that has on Trywell. That father/son dynamic is given even more dramatic power as we learn more about the relationship between Trywell and William. It was Trywell who spent more than most fathers around him on the education of his children. He provided a way for William to learn and develop his unique mind. But as the food begins to run out, so does the money. William is left to his own devices to learn the skills he must, and it is fascinating to see how that affects his relationship to his father.

This is a feel-good film, yes, but it is also much more than that. There are painful moments along with the joyful ones. As I said before, there are many themes present here for the viewer to process. This film has layers, and each one is worthwile.

One scene that affected me personally was one where Trywell, Agnes, and William are speaking with the school headmaster after the dry season has decimated the food stores across the community. Agnes talked about how she and Trywell had vowed not to be like their ancestors who prayed for rain. She and her husband wanted to face their problems with a modern approach. But now, after all their striving, their approach had brought them to their lowest point. And this is where the film’s spiritual elements kick into high gear.

At the beginning of the film, a strange group of masked figures appear. Some of them make other appearances throughout the film. I was never quite sure of who they were, although it is clear that they are of some cultural and spiritual significance to the local community. In my research, I found this interview with Ejiofor from NPR.org where he explains the importance of the group and the lengths to which he had to go to film them. Here’s an excerpt:

“They’re called the Gule Wamkulu, and they are the kind of spiritual center of Malawian cultural life. They’re a secret society of dancers, and they turn up at different cultural events, which can be funerals, which can be weddings, a chief’s inauguration…when I went to Malawi, I was really trying to find the Gule…they were very difficult to find, to pin down — I mean, they’re a secret society after all. And so that became a kind of frustrating process for me, because I did want them to be in the film, but I didn’t want to put people in costume, you know, sort of as dancers pretending to be the Gule Wamkulu kind of thing. I wanted the actual Gule to be in the film…it was only kind of late in our pre-production period that we were sort of finally invited to a village to see the Gule perform. And it was one of the most magical afternoons of my life. And so, you know, the Gule agreed to be in the film.”

Even without knowing their full significance, you feel the film going for a spiritual tone. Just by the film’s title, you get a small hint of the ethereal nature of the film. That is why I opened this review the way I did. The first quote I reference is the final typography that appears on screen at the end of the film. As much as Trywell and Agnes might have wanted, the spiritual realm cannot be fully disregarded. They live off the land and the wind and weather. There are things outside their control. Yet, it is William who realizes that engaging with and using that great power is their way to salvation.

While the film’s real-life story and even the title may give you a sense of how the film ends, this is one film where knowing the ending doesn’t detract from the experience. That, again, is a testament to the way Ejiofor is able to infuse more than just a feel-good narrative out of this story. This is easily the best 2019 release I’ve seen so far, and it is definitely worth streaming on Netflix.

Overall Grade: A-

[divider]

Hear our podcast review on Extra Film, coming soon!

[divider]

Podcast: Arctic / Fighting with My Family – Extra Film

This week on the InSession Film Podcast: Extra Film show, Ryan and Jay review a couple of very different films: the quiet, patient survival drama, Arctic and the big, broad comedy, Fighting with My Family.

Director Joe Penna had his hands full with Arctic, a film that could easily be a slog. It is incredibly tough to keep a movie with only one speaking character engaging throughout. Did Penna and star Mads Mikkelson pull it off? The first half of the episode finds Ryan and Jay in relative agreement on Arctic‘s quality, but you have to listen to find out if that quality is high or low! It’s also worth nothing that Stephen Merchant’s Fighting with My Family, the WWE-produced comedy, stars future household name Florence Pugh and doesn’t, despite what the marketing tells you, star The Rock.

Let us know what you thought of these films on social media and enjoy the show! Thanks for listening!

– Movie Review: Arctic (11:44)
Director: Joe Penna
Writer: Joe Penna and Ryan Morrison
Stars: Mads Mikkelson

– Movie Review: Fighting with My Family (39:10)
Director: Stephen Merchant
Writer: Stephen Merchant
Stars: Florence Pugh, Lena Headey, Nick Frost, Jack Lowden, and Vince Vaughn

– Music

Arctic – Joseph Trapanese
Born To Raise Hell – Motorhead
The Return of the Eagle – Atli Örvarsson

We try to make this the best movie podcast we possibly can and we hope you enjoy them. Subscribe today on iTunes, Spotfiy or Stitcher, and please leave us a review on iTunes. You can also find us on Soundcloud, PlayerFM and TuneIn Radio as well. We really appreciate all your support of the InSession Film Podcast.

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
Arctic / Fighting with My Family – Extra Film

[divider]

Mobile App

To hear this Extra Film episode and everything else we do, download our apps on the Amazon Market for Android and the Podcast Box app on IOS devices. The mobile app covers all of our main shows, bonus podcast’s and everything else relating to the InSession Film Podcast. Thanks for your wonderful support and listening to our show. It means the world to us!

Movie Review: ‘How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World’ crystallizes a fantastic animated trilogy


Director: Dean DeBlois
Writers: Dean DeBlois, Cressida Cowell (based upon the “How to Train Your Dragon” book series by)
Stars: Jay Baruchel, America Ferrera, F. Murray Abraham, Gerard Butler

Synopsis: When Hiccup discovers Toothless isn’t the only Night Fury, he must seek “The Hidden World”, a secret Dragon Utopia before a hired tyrant named Grimmel finds it first.

[/info]

How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World is the latest from Dreamworks and it caps off one of the best trilogies we’ve seen in recent years, animated or not. It’s arguably the lesser of the three films, but it’s still great in progressing the relationship of Hiccup and Toothless, and of course the striking emotion that comes with that, which is as stirring as ever.

The Hidden World picks up some time after the events of How to Train Your Dragon 2 where Hiccup and his gang have continued to rescue dragons and bring them back to Berk. The problem, though, is that Berk is now on the verge of being overrun with too many people and the dragons they care about. Hiccup now has to find them a new home that has enough space for everyone, and he remembers of a secret place that his father told him about when he was a young boy; a hidden world where all Dragons originated. While this is happening, Toothless finds and becomes entranced by a Light Fury (a white-scaled Night Fury) whom he tries to court. In the process, those two narrative throughlines collide in ways that provoke some of the more robust emotional moments in the series.

How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World, like its predecessors, is first and foremost about the central relationship of Hiccup and Toothless. They both endeavor on parallel romantic arcs that advances their individual characterization while simultaneously tapping into notions regarding the nature of human and non-human relationships. Hiccup and Astrid talk about possibly getting married while Toothless goes off on his own, really for the first time since meeting Hiccup, to romantically pursue the Light Fury. It’s quite funny and endearing to see how Toothless goes about doing that, demonstrating an innocence and exuberance that continues to make him a fascinating character. At the same time, however, the romanticism that comes about is arresting, graceful and beautiful. In particular, the moment where Toothless and the Light Fury engage in a gorgeous aerial ballet that cements their bond is one of the most breathtaking scenes in all of animation. The visual imagery is incredibly evocative and rivals the space dance scene in Wall-E. The moment is also vital because it forms this interesting dichotomy where Hiccup realizes how/why Toothless needs the Light Fury for his own growth, but it’s going to come at the cost of something deeply personal for himself.

The Hidden World, much like Ralph Breaks the Internet last year, is about place and why it’s important for us to be exactly where we are meant to be. Ralph Breaks the Internet filters that idea (profoundly I might add) though the lens of co-dependency and insecurity, something that Hiccup veers dangerously close to himself. It’s not verbatim, but in a similar way to Ralph being lost without Vanellope, Hiccup finds himself identity-less as Toothless goes on his romantic quest. This makes him vulnerable and it puts Berk in danger as it severely effects his decision making. Things get even more complicated for Hiccup once he realizes that finding The Hidden World will not give him the answers he’s seeking, but rather change his relationship with Toothless forever. This beautifully ties back to the first How to Train Your Dragon which depicts dragons and humans’ inability to co-exist, an idea that becomes deconstructed throughout the trilogy. The Hidden World suggests that co-existence is possible, but perhaps Stoic was right in the sense that humans have their place, and dragons have their own as well. Those themes are not only sophisticated and nuanced, but they crystallize in gut wrenching fashion.

There will be a lot said about the final ten minutes of How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World, and for good reason. It sticks the landing impeccably. The resolution between Hiccup and Toothless is extremely poignant, elegant and thematically perfect. It says a lot about co-existence and place, and how sometimes those things aren’t exactly what we wanted them to be.

The Hidden World isn’t without its faults. Some of the film’s humor is awkward and tacky, especially in the utilization of Ruffnut and Tuffnut, who are a bit overly used. The main antagonist of Grimmel is effective in driving the main story, its emotion and themes, but as a character on the page he’s somewhat thin and underdeveloped. A great vocal performance from F. Murray Abraham helps make up for that though. Other performances, such as Jay Baruchel, America Ferrera, Cate Blanchett and Gerard Butler also help band-aid any blemishes that come with this film.

Overall, the How to Train Your Dragon trilogy will, and should, go down as one of the best we’ve seen over the years. The duo of Hiccup and Toothless is unforgettable and their journey is endlessly engaging. The emotion of this series is affecting for both children and adults alike. John Powell’s scores for these films are all-timers. Easily some of the best composition ever made for an animated film. Dreamworks may be best known for its Shrek series, but it’s How to Train Your Dragon that aligns them next to Pixar and Disney as creating some of the best animation to date.

Overall Grade: A-

[divider]

Hear our podcast review on Episode 314:

[divider]

Movie Review: ‘Cold Pursuit’ flips the script on what a Liam Neeson film is supposed to be


Director: Hans Petter Moland
Writers: Frank Baldwin (screenplay by), Kim Fupz Aakeson (based on the movie ‘Kraftidioten’ written by)
Stars: Liam Neeson, Laura Dern, Micheál Richardson

Synopsis: A snowplow driver seeks revenge against the drug dealers he thinks killed his son. Based on the 2014 Norwegian film In Order of Disappearance.

[/info]

Maybe the biggest compliment I can pay Cold Pursuit is that the film wasn’t what I expected. In 2019, it is hard to imagine anything beyond a cookie cutter construction of a film that includes both the words “revenge” and “Neeson” in the synopsis. Comparisons to the Taken franchise, which have come define Neeson’s on-screen persona for the last decade (despite great, meditative performances in more ambitious films like Silence and The Grey), are inevitable, but the pleasant surprise of Cold Pursuit is how different it is than the traditional early-year action releases we are used to from Neeson. Cold Pursuit is a unique creature (once you get past the fact that it is a direct remake of the Norwegian film, In Order Appearance– which was also directed by Hans Petter Moland), in that it aims far higher than most of its Dump-uary counterparts, and certainly far higher than the film’s marketing implies. It is a very funny, very violent film that challenges the ethos of the films Neeson usually stars in, builds a surprisingly realized world, and packs a good amount of heart amidst its black comedy.

Cold Pursuit is the story of Nelson Coxman (whose name immediately goes into the Reynolds Woodcock Memorial Names That Immediately Make You Laugh Hall of Fame), played by Liam Neeson, a snowplow driver and newly anointed “Citizen of the Year” in the resort town of Kehoe, Colorado. When Nels’ son (Micheál Richardson) is murdered by a local gang, Neeson must do the thing that Neeson does- get revenge. The conceit of the film is truly that simple, which is part of the beauty. Making the film narratively straightforward allows Moland to work on the other, more interesting elements of the film. If the film was hamstrung by twists and turns, we wouldn’t be able to have as many funny exchanges, great visual humor, over-the-top moments of violence, or alarmingly sincere moments of contemplation.

The approach of Cold Pursuit, perhaps because it was made by a filmmaker with no prior experience in the Hollywood system, operates in a different sphere than the action films we are used to. It takes its protagonist seriously, but the world built around him is wildly heightened. We feel the weight of Nels’ son’s death, but he also carries around a badass, sawed-off rifle (a great choice that illustrates the little choices of this film that separate it from the pack; most films would use the classic sawed-off shotgun, but Moland knows better) and uses his snowplow like the truck driver in Steven Spielberg’s Duel. Cold Pursuit takes familiar images and plot construction and gives it a twist in sensibility to create a unique experience. The car (or plow) looks the same, but it is what’s under the hood that gives it its power. Despite its indulgence and bombast, it is the subtlety of the filmmaking that really makes it all click.

It’s not all perfect, though. The film’s main antagonist, Viking, is thin on the page and is played accordingly by Tom Bateman. This may have been a play on the typically weak villains of the genre, but in a film that transcends the tropes, it works against the film. His tone and attitude rarely, if ever, change and the dialogue doesn’t crackle like it does out of the mouths of other characters. Additionally, the great Laura Dern is completely wasted as Nels’ wife. The character would hardly be noticeable if it were played by a less interesting actress, but the fact that we are deprived of more of Dern’s services is very disappointing. I can’t help but wonder what this movie would have been like if Neeson teamed up with Dern, in some capacity, in his quest for revenge. We know Dern can elevate her energy and work in a darkly comedic world like this one (just watch Twin Peaks: The Return), I just wish Hans Petter Moland had given her the opportunity.

While those supporting players left a lot to be desired, most of the bit players are fantastic. Outside of having to worry about Nels hunting him down, Viking is now involved in a turf war (and eventually something far more complicated than that) with the Native American gang in Kehoe. Some critics have posited that the film’s presentation of the Native American characters is thin, but I thought they teemed with life and personality. They provide some of the best humor of the film and the depictions of their spirituality in relation to the rest of characters was a fascinating element that came out of nowhere. Tom Jackson plays White Bull, the stoic but dangerous leader of the Ute gang. He is the cool, calm yin to Viking’s over-the-top yang. The dichotomy established between Viking’s gang and that of White Bull adds another piece of food for thought as it relates to the traditional revenge thriller. I appreciated that the Utes were able to act in many of the same ways that the other characters are, not simply being shown as some sort of mystical presence (although that element is certainly present).

The C-plot of the film involves two police officers, played by John Dolan and Emmy Rossum (who desperately needs to be in more movies). The small-town cops seem out of their depth as they try to track down Nels on his violent spree in search of Viking, but Emmy Rossum’s character, Kim, is young and naive enough to believe that she can solve the case that Doman’s “Gip” has already put out of his mind, resigned to the idea that they will hand it off to the authorities in Denver. Their dynamic keeps the film afloat when the focus shifts. Kim’s arc is almost as fascinating as anyone else’s and Rossum brings a confidence and enthusiasm to the role that few others would have been able to.

With Cold Pursuit, Hans Petter Molland was able to take down the type of film we expected it to be and build up one that we truly wanted. He makes some stylish choices that make his vision more and more unique over time. The decision to break the film up using the deaths of characters as transitions by showing the now-dead character’s name (or, late in the film, about 20 names) along with the religious place of rest of their choosing as white text on a black screen works as both a way to make the deaths more impactful and a unique humor tactic.

But underneath all of the violence and dark humor is a story about fatherhood, and what fatherhood truly entails. The film is about a 3 fathers at war in the name of their sons. Each one of the men parents differently and each one has different rules when it comes to what merits sufficient revenge. Through Nels, we feel the heartache of losing a child, even as he bashes someone’s head into a snowplow. Neeson is one of our finest silent actors, which is something that both Martin Scorsese and the Coen Brothers have latched onto in recent years. In both of those films and in this one, that tool is used very differently, a testament to Neeson’s versatility. There is much more of a punch and more introspection than a film like Taken or The Commuter. Add to that a biting sense of humor and a singularity of vision, and Cold Pursuit might end up being one of the highlights of Dump-uary.

Overall Grade: B+

[divider]

Podcast: Reaction to the 91st Academy Awards – Chasing the Gold Ep. 10

On Episode 10 of Chasing the Gold, Ryan is joined by Amanda Spears of Gold Derby and Karen Peterson of Awards Circuit to recap the 91st Academy Awards – all of the good and bad!

It’s finally over. A long and arduous journey, but it’s done. The 2018 awards season will go down as one of the most notorious in recent years, and for good reason. However, there were lots of great films and performances to celebrate, and The Academy did do some great things on that front, even if some others were left to be desired. That is to say, there was a lot to talk about on this episode.

On that note, have fun with this week’s Chasing the Gold and let us know what you think in the comment section below. Thanks for listening!

– Final Oscar Predictions (3:08)

– Music

Shallow – Lady Gaga
The Return of the Eagle – Atli Örvarsson

We try to make this the best movie podcast we possibly can and we hope you enjoy them. Subscribe today on iTunes, Spotfiy or Stitcher, and please leave us a review on iTunes. You can also find us on Soundcloud, PlayerFM and TuneIn Radio as well. We really appreciate all your support of the InSession Film Podcast.

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
Final Oscar Predictions (for Winners) – Chasing the Gold

[divider]

Mobile App

To hear this Extra Film episode and everything else we do, download our apps on the Amazon Market for Android and the Podcast Box app on IOS devices. The mobile app covers all of our main shows, bonus podcast’s and everything else relating to the InSession Film Podcast. Thanks for your wonderful support and listening to our show. It means the world to us!

[divider]

Help Support The InSession Film Podcast

If you want to help support us, we would greatly appreciate it! For more info, CLICK HERE.ictions

Poll: What is the best directorial debut by an actor from the last five years?

For our poll this week, inspired by Chiwetel Ejiofor’s directorial debut The Boy Who Harnessed the Wind hitting Netflix this weekend, we are talking about directorial debuts from actors who decided to step behind the camera. From Jordan Peele, to Greta Gerwig, to Bo Burnham, to Paul Dano, we’ve seen some stellar debut’s from actors who flipped the switch and took the mantle as director in the last five years. This is not at easy one to narrow down, which should make for an interesting conversation.

Vote now!


Podcast: Medicine for Melancholy – Ep. 314 Bonus Content

Listen!

For our Episode 314 Bonus Content, we finally started our Patreon Series catching up with films that we owe our patrons for signing up. First up, per Brian B., we discuss Barry Jenkins’ Medicine for Melancholy from 2008!

*Note: While this review originates from a Patreon subscriber, it is available to the public on our main show feeds.

[divider]

HELP SUPPORT THE SHOW

To hear our bonus content episodes early, subscribe now on Patreon. In many cases, though, we offer our bonus content for free after a certain period of time and we do encourage (and very much appreciate) a small donation of $0.99 as a way to help support the show if signing up on Patreon isn’t for you. Click on the PayPal button below to donate and thanks so much for your support. You can also hear much of our Bonus Content via our mobile apps. See the information at the bottom of the post for more details.


One-Time Donation



[divider]

Mobile Apps!

Listen to all of our bonus content on our apps for just a one-time fee! Whether you have an iPhone, Android or Windows phone, our apps are available in many different ways that is convenient for you. With our mobile app, not only can you listen to all of our bonus content, but our main shows and our Extra Film podcasts as well. Click here for more info!

If you don’t want to purchase our bonus content, but still want to support us, there are other you can help us out. Click here for more info.

List: Top 3 Scenes from Trilogy Closers

This week on Episode 314 of the InSession Film Podcast, inspired by How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World, we thought it would be interesting to talk about the best scenes/moments from trilogy closer films. This was one of the more challenging and complicated Top 3 lists we’ve perhaps ever done on the show. For one, there is a gray area as to what defines a “trilogy” these days, as many franchises have surpassed the 3-film mark, which in theory could undermine the third film as being a “closer.” However, depending on how you look at it, having more than three films isn’t necessarily undermining the first three acting as a trilogy. That is to say, we had some lengthy criteria this week to help decipher how this topic operated within our lists. Once that was done, because there are so many great trilogies out there, the amount of scenes to choose from was endless, making this exercise all the more difficult. But it was really fun too! That said, here are our lists:

(Note: Please keep in mind that we each had different criteria for our selections)

JD

1) Luke Saves His Father – Star Wars: Return of the Jedi
2) Apes Together Strong – War for the Planet of the Apes
3) “You bow to no one” – The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King

Brendan

1) Grave / Final Showdown – The Good, The Bad and The Ugly
2) Apes Together Strong – War for the Planet of the Apes
3) Opening – Three Colours: Red

Justin

1) Ending – L’Eclisse
2) Grave / Final Showdown – The Good, The Bad and The Ugly
3) 107 Steps Sequence – Dancer in the Dark

Honorable Mentions (Combined)

Ending Argument – Before Midnight
Dinner Scene – Before Midnight
“I am no man” – The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King
Lighting of the Beacons – The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King
“I can’t carry it, but I can carry you” – The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King
Luke tells Leia the Truth – Return of the Jedi
Opening Battle – Revenge of the Sith
Final Duel – Revenge of the Sith
Ending – How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World
Dance Sequence – How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World
Incinerator – Toy Story 3
Ending – Toy Story 3
Luca’s Death – War for the Planet of the Apes
Donkey’s Sacrifice – War for the Planet of the Apes
Opening – War for the Planet of the Apes
Caesar’s Death – War for the Planet of the Apes
Waterloo Scene – The Bourne Ultimatum
“Look at us, look at what they make us give” – The Bourne Ultimatum
Jason Breaks into Office – The Bourne Ultimatum
Ripley Sacrifice – Alien 3
Final Showdown – Matrix Revolutions
The Motorcycle Chase – Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade
Henry finally calls his son Indiana – Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade
Ending Reveal – MIB3
Highway Chase – Transformers: Dark of the Moon
Ending Reveals – Terminator 3
Final Sequence – Spider-Man 3
Car Chase – The Dark Knight Rises
Apu’s Final Scene with Son – Apur Sansar

Hopefully you guys enjoyed our lists and if you agree or disagree with us, let us know in the comment section below. As mentioned above, there is a lot of criteria that goes into this list and many, many scenes to consider, so there’s a good chance your list is different than ours. That being said, what would be your Top 3? Leave a comment in the comment section or email us at [email protected].

For the entire podcast, click here or listen below.

For more lists done by the InSession Film crew and other guests, be sure see our Top 3 Movie Lists page.

Podcast: How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World / Top 3 Scenes from Trilogy Closers – Episode 314

This week’s episode is brought to you by the Patreon. Sign up today and get some cool rewards!

This week on the InSession Film Podcast, Justin Herring from the Casual Cinecast joins us to discuss How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World and our top 3 scenes from trilogy closer films. We also talk about Justin’s new feature film, Camino, now out on VOD.

Big thanks to Justin for joining us on the show this week. We are big fans of his show, but as you’ll hear on the episode this week, his film was quite enjoyable as well. So, it was a pleasure to have him on this week to talk about it and what the process was like for him. Finally, it can’t be overstated as to how excited we were to talk about Dragons once again! We love this series and were happy to talk about its conclusion.

That said, check out this week’s show and let us know what you think in the comment section. Thanks for listening and for supporting the InSession Film Podcast!

– Movie Review: How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World (4:22)
Director: Dean DeBlois
Writers: Dean DeBlois, Cressida Cowell (based upon the “How to Train Your Dragon” book series by)
Stars: Jay Baruchel, America Ferrera, F. Murray Abraham

– Notes / Camino (52:06)
As mentioned above, it was really fun to talk about Justin’s new feature film, Camino, a dark comedy that is reminiscent of the early days of Richard Linklater or Kevin Smith. It’s quite good and we loved talking to Justin about the film. See the film on Amazon here.

[divider]

RELATED: Listen to Episode 308 of the InSession Film Podcast where we discussed our Top 10 Movies of 2018!

[divider]

– Top 3 Scenes from Trilogy Closers (1:08:32)
This was one of the more challenging and complicated Top 3 lists we’ve perhaps ever done on the show. For one, there is a gray area as to what defines a “trilogy” these days, as many franchises have surpassed the 3-film mark, which in theory could undermine the third film as being a “closer.” However, depending on how you look at it, having more than three films isn’t necessarily undermining the first three acting as a trilogy. That is to say, we had some lengthy criteria this week to help decipher how this topic operated within our lists. Once that was done, because there are so many great trilogies out there, the amount of scenes to choose from was endless, making this exercise all the more difficult. But it was really fun too! That said, what would be your Top 3?

Top 3 Sponsor: First Time Watchers Podcast

– Music

The Hidden World – John Powell
The Return of the King – Howard Shore
Apes Together Strong – Michael Giacchino
The Return of the Eagle – Atli Örvarsson

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
InSession Film Podcast – Episode 314

[divider]

Next week on the show:

Main Review: Greta
Top 3: TBD

[divider]

Help Support The InSession Film Podcast

If you want to help support us, there are several ways you can help us and we’d absolutely appreciate it. Every penny goes directly back into supporting the show and we are truly honored and grateful. Thanks for your support and for listening to the InSession Film Podcast!

VISIT OUR DONATE PAGE HERE