Home Blog Page 22

Chasing the Gold: โ€˜Sinners,โ€™ Best Director and the case for Ryan Coogler

“When a film likeย Sinnersย breaks box office records, breaks the all-time record with nominations (surpassing Best Director-winning films), pushes technical boundaries, and centers Black voices both in front of and behind the camera, it raises honest question: if a film like this still struggles to be viewed as a frontrunner or a winner: what does that suggest about how voters define excellence in the Best Director category?”ย 

As Black History Month recently came to a close, it becomes a natural moment to reflect on both the progress made and the hurdles that still remain. Both realities come into focus when discussing the trajectory of the Best Director category at the Academy Awards. One of the five nominees this year is Ryan Coogler for his genre-bending film Sinners. As we count down the days until the March 15th ceremony, this nomination represents something deeper than what may appear on the surface.

Coogler is by no means the first director to break barriers in his genre or for his community. Yet his nomination carries a striking historical context. With this recognition, Coogler becomes only the seventh Black director ever nominated for Best Director in the Academy Awards’ nearly century-long history.

That statistic becomes even more striking when placed in the context of the Academy’s broader history.  Across the Academyโ€™s history, more than 480 films have been represented in the Best Director lineup. Of all those nominations, only 7 have been directed by Black filmmakers.

The previous Black filmmakers nominated for Best Director include:

John Singleton โ€“ Boyz n the Hood (1991)

Lee Daniels โ€“ Precious (2009)

Steve McQueen โ€“ 12 Years a Slave (2013)

Barry Jenkins โ€“ Moonlight (2016)

Jordan Peele โ€“ Get Out (2017)

Spike Lee โ€“ BlacKkKlansman (2018)

Each of these films helped move the industry forward and made it possible for a nomination like Cooglerโ€™s to exist today.

Yet, Cooglerโ€™s achievement with Sinners pushes those boundaries even further. The film is not simply a historical drama reflecting the era of segregation in the American South. Instead, it blends supernatural horror, musical expression, and action-driven storytelling while exploring themes of faith, racism, culture, and identity. The result is a bold theatrical experience that celebrates the possibilities of genre filmmaking.

The film also pushed both technical and commercial boundaries.ย Sinnersย became the highest-grossing live-action original American film in over a decade. It expanded the possibilities of large-format photography through its collaboration with cinematographer Autumn Durald Arkapaw using 70mm IMAX filmmaking. Led by a predominantly Black ensemble cast, the film demonstrated how culturally specific storytelling can also achieve massive commercial success. The Academy clearly recognized that impact. Sinners earned sixteen nominations, breaking the long-standing nomination record previously held byย All Aboutย Eve (1950),ย Titanicย (1997), andย La La Landย (2016). It is worth noting that all three of those films took home the award for Best Director.ย 

The Best Director category this year includes an impressive lineup of filmmakers: Paul Thomas Anderson for One Battle After Another, Chloรฉ Zhao for Hamnet, Josh Safdie for Marty Supreme, and Joachim Trier for Sentimental Value. It represents one of the strongest and most diverse directing lineups in recent memory.

Yet, the awards race also raises an interesting question about how the industry evaluates stories about race and social struggle. The current frontrunner appears to be Anderson for One Battle After Another, which has already secured major wins at the BAFTAs, Critics Choice Awards, Golden Globes, and the Directors Guild of America. Historically, victories in those categories often translate to an Academy Award.

Andersonโ€™s film is widely respected, and its recognition is well earned. Drawing in part from his experience raising a biracial family, the film explores themes of immigration, systemic injustice, and political unrest. In a time when tensions are high due to the current political climate with ICE, the Black Panther Party resurgence, and post-Bad Bunny Super Bowl discourse, this feels very appropriate to acknowledge. But One Battleโ€™s prominence in the race also reflects a familiar pattern in Oscar history.

Many celebrated films that explore racial tension or social inequality have historically done so through the perspective of white filmmakers or white protagonists. Films such as Driving Miss Daisy (1989), Crash (2005), The Help (2011), and Green Book (2018) were widely praised for tackling issues of race while primarily centering white viewpoints. This observation does not diminish the intentions or artistry of those films. But it does raise a fair question about how the industry chooses which perspectives are most often elevated in major award categories. 

When a film likeย Sinnersย breaks box office records, breaks the all-time record with nominations (surpassing director winning films) pushes technical boundaries, and centers Black voices both in front of and behind the camera, it raises honest question: if a film like this still struggles to be viewed as a frontrunner or a winner: what does that suggest about how voters define excellence in the Best Director category?ย 

Whether or not Ryan Coogler ultimately wins the Oscar, the achievement itself already represents something meaningful. His nomination signals a continued expansion of what kinds of stories, filmmakers, and creative voices can occupy the center of Hollywoodโ€™s most prestigious stage.

And sometimes, progress in Hollywood is measured not only by who wins the award, but by the doors opened for those who follow.

Interview: โ€˜Matter of Timeโ€™ Director Jeremy Snead

Jeremy Sneadโ€™s filmย Matter of Timeย opened on Friday, February 27th. A documentary filmmaker and video game expert, he directed this feature film with the love and support of fellow artists he had worked with in the past, including Sean Astin, who co-stars.

In an interview with InSession Filmโ€™s Amy Thomasson, Snead discussed his previous career in video game development and documentary filmmaking, his new film, and future possibilities.

Movie Review: ‘The Napa Boys’ is Utter Nonsense


Director: Nick Corirossi
Writers: Nick Corirossi, Armen Weitzman
Stars: Armen Weitzman, Nick Corirossi, Sarah Ramos

Synopsis: Jack Jr, Miles Jr, and the gang are back for one last wine-related journey set forth by the mysterious “Sommelier.” Joined this time by Puck, a fan of The Napa Boys comics, the group will learn about love, loss, friendship, and viticulture.


Who wouldโ€™ve thought that the ever-growing, multi-million dollar Napa Boys IP would reach its fourth installment, and a spinoff entirely focused on The Napa Girls bowing out in theatres soon? Well, here we are with THE Napa Boys 4: The Sommelierโ€™s Amulet, and fans of the comics โ€“ and prior films โ€“ will not be disappointed. After Napa Boys 3: Return of the Grape, the franchise had peaked, but somehow director Nick Corirossi has given us a bolder, more thematically rich entry than its predecessor. How he pulled it off feels like a miracle, and yet here we are. 

Of course, Iโ€™m joking. The Napa Boys is not part of a franchise, although this movie is introduced as the fourth installment of a longstanding intellectual property and runs with it, which could prove disconcerting for audiences, but is, in actuality, one of the greatest troll jobs Iโ€™ve likely ever seen. Not all of it works, and I suspect many will hate this feeble-minded, pea-brained comedy that seems to throw every joke targeted at four-year-olds in a blender and see what sticks. 

Did I laugh? Yes. More than once? You bet. Thereโ€™s something so stupid about it that your eyes eventually canโ€™t look away, even during a sequence that involves, as a character would mildly put it, โ€œshit and cum.โ€ That scene is definitely the most disgusting, unbelievable thing about this extremely dumb movie, yet its sincerity canโ€™t be overstated. At any moment where you think Corirossi will open up the film to give some texture to the characters, from the sex-crazed Jack Jr. (played by Corirossi himself), the depressed Miles Jr. (Armen Weitzman), or the Napa Boys superfan Puck (Sarah Ramos), who wants to be a part of a group of wine aficionados who travel to Napa County for the Great Grape Festival, he does the exact opposite. 

None of the characters has a modicum of development, nor are they people youโ€™d want to spend time with. Theyโ€™re all ridiculously selfish, perverse, and completely misogynistic towards any women they meet. That may be why some audiences will be immediately put off by the filmโ€™s gross-out humor and attempts at empty provocation, and there definitely are some jokes that donโ€™t land as well as others (sadly, more often than not). Anything revolving around the main antagonist, Squirm (Paul Rust), is a bit more childish than funny, but perhaps thatโ€™s the point?

The thing is, this movie is utter nonsense. In fact, itโ€™s pure nonsense, distilled from the nether regions of stupidity. You canโ€™t get any more nonsensical than that. Youโ€™re either fully on board with it from the moment it opens and consistently tests your patience, or you arenโ€™t. In my case, I love any good movie that blatantly antagonizes its audience and directly tells them, โ€œYou are wasting your time, and weโ€™re going to make sure you realize this,โ€ although it might not be the stroke of genius Corirossi might have hoped for. Still, the visual gags and DIY inventiveness of its filmmaking are as good as Matt Johnsonโ€™s Nirvanna the Band the Show the Movie, which more than makes up for the movie’s so-so verbal humor. 

That said, there are a number of incredible quotes, such as โ€œNapa Valley is the closest Earthly embodiment of Cesar Catalinaโ€™s vision for Megalopolis,โ€ or โ€œDonโ€™t shoot up your school! If thereโ€™s anything that ruins the vibe in America, itโ€™s a school shooting.โ€ If this level of dark โ€“ almost niche โ€“ comedy doesnโ€™t make you laugh, perhaps this thing isnโ€™t for you. However, if youโ€™re a sucker for a generational shitpost, youโ€™ve come to the right place. Everything feels so off, yet the actors are perfectly in tune with the atmosphere they want to convey. They want you to embark on this crazy, nonsensical journey and have a bit of fun, even if itโ€™s likely going to offend many, many people. 

But Corirossi doesnโ€™t care, and neither should you. However, one has to recognize that this movie wonโ€™t be for everyone, and there will be critics (and audiences) who will say that The Napa Boys is one of the worst movies ever made. I am not one of those people, even though I appreciate Quentin Dupieux trolls more than this film. Bring on The Napa Boys 5 and The Napa Girls. The world needs real cinema, now more than ever.

Grade: B+

Movie Review: โ€˜Hoppersโ€™ is What Pixar Needs More Of


Director: Daniel Chong
Writers: Daniel Chong, Jesse Andrews
Stars: Piper Curda, Bobby Moynihan, Jon Hamm

Synopsis: A 19-year-old animal lover uses technology that places her consciousness into a robotic beaver to uncover mysteries within the animal world beyond her imagination.


Within the recent years of Pixarโ€™s output, the famed animation company hasnโ€™t been โ€œwashedโ€ per se, more so in a lull, post the doldrums of the COVID-19 pandemic. Their string of theatrical releases post their three straight-to-Disney+ films have ranged from complete creative and financial misfires like Lightyear to sequel mega hits and struggling new originals like Inside Out 2 and Elio, respectively. While none of their films (besides Lightyear) have been poor in quality, theyโ€™ve often missed the spark that made Pixar films so distinct in the first place and have remained in a somewhat average state, which is why a film like Hoppers is so important within its placement in the Pixar catalog. Director Daniel Chong of Cartoon Network fame brings an absurdist charm of heart and humor to the 3D-animated medium that is completely unique to the landscape of Pixar in ways, adding a new flavor to their films that is sorely needed. The film blends an unhinged nature of shock and infectious energy that might throw some off, but Hoppersโ€™ delightful quirks and strong message of unity amongst nature add up to a truly delightful experience and one of the best Pixar films of the current decade.

Hoppers starts its clever premise from the view of our lead, Mabel (Piper Curda), at a young age. Mabel has always longed for nature and protecting the animals of her community to the point of attempting to steal class pets and free them into the wild. She feels her aspirations and care never felt by anyone until she forms a special bond with her grandmother Tanaka (Karen Huie). The two shared a love for animals and the plights of protecting the environment by any means necessary, learning to be at peace with the elements of the world, on top of a glade where they would go to sit and view the world’s beauty each day.

Now in the present day, Mabel is an energetic 19-year-old college student, wanting to make her grandma proud after her unfortunate passing, but protecting their sacred glade from local mayor Jerry Generazzo (Jon Hamm), who is driving animals away from there to complete the construction of a brand new highway for the city of Beaverton. Mabel is stumped on how to stop her plans until she discovers her professor, Dr. Sam (Kathy Najimy), is testing out an experiment she just finalized, where humans can now โ€œhopโ€ their consciousness into incredibly realistic robot animals, allowing the species to connect with one another. Mabel goes rogue with the tech and transfers her mind into a robotic beaver in order to find more beavers and animals alike to help her stop Jerryโ€™s plans, but along her journey, she makes insane discoveries about the animal world that are beyond her wildest dreams.

Hoppersโ€™ log line is just as absurd as the experience of watching the filmโ€™s zaniness unfold, but the inherent wild nature of the story is exactly what makes it stand out amongst other Pixar originals. Films like Elio and Elemental had otherworldly premises but lacked a truly compelling hook that made their more compelling angles extremely predictable as their stories unfolded. For some, Hoppers will have the opposite problem of being a bit too unhinged, but that’s what’s so great about it. Chong and writer Jesse Andrews craft such a delightfully unpredictable story that’s intriguing to explore across so many multiple avenues that the bounds of Hoppersโ€™ humor and chaotic energy are distinct in all of the best ways. 

When the story further introduces the world of these and the character of King George (Bobby Moynihan) the humor starts flying a mile per minute with its goofy idiosyncrasies, dark jokes, and conversational humor making it the hardest I’ve laughed at an animated feature in years (always appreciate an Avatar joke), aligning perfectly with the humor of Chongโ€™s Cartoon Network series We Bare Bears, but what ends up even more creative is the use of the hopping technology itself. In many ways, the heightened sci-fi feels like a mix of Back to the Future and Studio Ghibli, and as the hopping between multiple humans and different species of animals escalates, it leads to some of the most wildly deranged series and third acts ever conceived for a Pixar movie, and it only makes Hoppers more of a blast. 

This isn’t to say that Hoppers doesn’t have its fair share of emotional and poignant highs, too, as the film blends its quieter themes and absurd plotbeats beautifully. The filmโ€™s connection to themes of preserving our environment and unity amidst our differences is present throughout many films, but the characterization of Mabel, specifically how she feels helpless in multiple sections of the film, is the driving force. Mabel is insanely lively throughout the film, going to great lengths to save the glade, no matter how far things escalate, and she feels the need to do so because a lot of the time it feels like she’s the only one who cares about changing the world for the better. 

I love how much the film delves into not only the complexities of how much you can do to change things within your certain role in the world, but the overarching theme of how nature being what can connect us even through the worst of human conflict as people and animals alike even characters that completely oppose each other like Mabel and Jerry find their own connections by the end. It’s not groundbreaking material, but it represents an emotional core that will resonate with adults and children alike, and Piper Curdaโ€™s spirited vocal performance only further elevates that.

Even the filmโ€™s animation, despite not being too different from the modern norm, has its own edge to stand out amongst the crowd. Pixar is well renowned for the quality of their film visuals and that remains no different here; the art style lends itself will to louder and wackier moments and touching emotional beats alike and it style showcases that it isn’t afraid that things don’t look nearly as realistic as the animation within other pixar films and it lends itself well to the tonal indications of this world.ย 


Hoppers fits alongside Turning Red in the Pixar oeuvre, while taking a bigger swing in both style and tone that will inevitably not meld with all viewers, but Hoppers is a welcome change of direction in nearly every avenue for the studio. It’s a weird, chaotic comedy blending emotional nuance and lovely craziness that features the studio at the most creative level theyโ€™ve been from a writing perspective. Hoppers is one of the best Pixar films released in the 2020s, and the type of innovative energy that the studio needs more of. A pure delight through and through.

Grade: A-

Movie Review: ‘Dolly’ is Not to Be Played With


Director: Rod Blackhurst
Writers: Rod Blackhurst, Brandon Weavil
Stars: Fabianne Therese, Russ Tiller, Michalina Scorzelli

Synopsis: Macy, a young woman, is abducted by a monstrous figure intent on raising her as their own child.


Rod Blackhurst clearly adores Tobe Hooperโ€™s 1974 slasher classic The Texas Chain Saw Massacre and has put all his efforts into making his feature, Dolly, a replica of abject madness in the South. Therein sits the primary issue with Dolly (scripted by Blackhurst and Brandon Weavil). Where Tobe Hooperโ€™s film was in part investigating the economic failures in society that could create a family of cannibals in rural Texas, Blackhurst has no thesis beyond, โ€œThereโ€™s a creepy masked killer with a creepy house in the creepy woods with creepy dolls.โ€ And while most would admit that dolls in horror films are indeed creepy, and a killer who wears a porcelain dollโ€™s mask is likely to unsettle, itโ€™s not nearly enough to hang an entire movie on. Yes, Dolly is gore-tastic and will likely make the viewer squirm in places, but even at under 90 minutes there is almost no plot and the plot points given are either irrelevant or scratchings of poorly copied homework.

Split into chapters for no discernible reason, Dolly begins inside the home of the masked menace (Max Lindsey). A giant woman dressed in a red childโ€™s playsuit cutting the fingers off a beheaded corpse. Flies buzz around the body and Dollyโ€™s emotional state is telegraphed by using signs of hand posturing and stimming related to non-verbal autism. Itโ€™s one of the filmโ€™s greatest sins to decide to project intellectual difference and assumed disability as monstrousness. Yet here we are with it on full display. Dollyโ€™s world is deeply infantilized with dingy floral wallpaper and dirty lace frills meeting shagpile carpet and doll after doll after doll. Dollyโ€™s domain spreads out to the woods where she (presumably) has decorated the forest with her unending collection of vintage fetishes. An open grave is attended by a circle of dolls where the corpse will lay. Dolly is remarkably strong, lifting the body as if it were made of tissue paper. Dolly is โ€œdisturbedโ€ yet methodical. Violent in moods, yet able to plan. Dolly is a terribly drawn character โ€“ the monster who wants to mother.

Macy (Fabienne Therese) plays with her boyfriend Chaseโ€™s (Seann William Scott) daughter Evy (Eve Blackhurst) in a car before he drops her off at his auntโ€™s house. Chase has plans to propose to Macy on a hiking trip. As Chase is speaking with his Aunt Macy, she is facetiming her sister Rachel (Kate Cobb) about how sheโ€™s not sure she wants to be a mom to anyone, especially as their mother was a monster. Macy does adore Chase and Rachel assures her that Macy will be a good mother. Macyโ€™s uncertainty about her ability to mother is plot padding as it doesnโ€™t pay off in any manner. Whatever her mother did is also abandoned as a plot device. The primary take away from this section is Chase is serious about Macy, and she about him, and soon they will be in one of his favorite places, a vast forest where he will ask her to be his wife.

It doesnโ€™t take a genius to realize that this forest is also the forest where Dolly has created a bizarre garden of corpses and doll attendants. Macy and Chase come across the doll forest and Chase notes, โ€œThis is new.โ€ Macy takes it all as a joke, or an art project and plays kissy with dolls who could represent Chase and herself. Chase would prefer she didnโ€™t, and they go on to the scenic outlook where he plans to propose. Before he can do so they hear an odd lullaby from a toy radio and Chase decides to investigate. Whatโ€™s waiting for him is Dolly and her shovel (Leatherface had his chainsaw, Dolly has her shovel). Chase approaches her gently, trying to assist her. For his trouble he is picked up like a doll himself by Dolly (Max Lindseyโ€™s wrestling physicality is used to good effect) choking under Dollyโ€™s grip. Dolly then throws him on the ground and uses the shovel to cut into his leg and then split his mouth so his jaw is hanging only by tendons. 

Macy had jokingly told him not to go off the path but becomes concerned when he doesnโ€™t return. She finds him positioned against a tree and Dolly ready to take her for her own. Although Macy is faster than the lumbering Dolly, she trips and knocks herself out in the woods. When she awakes she is dressed in babydoll clothing and placed in a cradle inside Dollyโ€™s nursery. From that moment on, itโ€™s a fight to the death so Macy can escape her deranged captor who thinks Macy is her baby.

Blackhurst then decides to go full Tobe Hooper madness, although his horror is gynocentric. Big โ€œbabygirlโ€ wants to mother little Macy (everyone is little in comparison to Dolly). Any transgression by Macy is met with violence thatโ€™s familiar to Dolly. Dolly tries to feed her baby and when Macy refuses slop and the bottle, Dolly pulls out her breast which Macy takes a solid bite from.

It’s unsurprising that Dolly is a result of some tremendous trauma inflicted on her in the backwoods house of horrors. A wheedling voice through the wall (Ethan Suplee) attempts to help Macy get free and Macy, being not the brightest spark, listens to it. Trap after trap must be overcome for Macy to find her way back to civilization, and most of the time itโ€™s pure dumb luck that gets her over the line.


Dolly has some very good practical effects (and some very bad SFX) and the cinematography by Justin Derry shooting on 16mm gives a particular crackle to the proceedings, as does the score by Nick Bohun. However, it barely exists as a script and drags itself from one gross out to the next with no care for the why and how of a narrative. Dolly wants to be a throwback, so much so one of the characters is called Tobe. What Dolly is amounts to very little. Great if youโ€™re after something that acts as a particularly mindless slasher/survival horror. Not so great if youโ€™re after a functioning work that goes beyond the premise of โ€œDolls, girls, women, mothersโ€ฆ horrifying!โ€ Blackhurst relies on throwing enough blood and bone-cracking around that no one will notice how incredibly slight, hackneyed, and generally offensive his movie is.

Grade: F

Chasing the Gold: PGA Locks in โ€˜One Battle,โ€™ SAG Goes Big For โ€˜Sinners’

A weekend of awards ceremonies has made the 2026 Oscars the most unpredictable Academy Awards of the modern era.

Saturdayโ€™s Producers Guild Awards handed the top prize to One Battle After Another, setting it on a clear path to win Best Picture on March 15th. The top documentary prize went to My Mom Jayne, a film not even shortlisted by the Academy.

The Screen Actors Guild held their newly renamed Actor Awards on Sunday (live-streamed on Netflix) and awarded the top prize ensemble prize to Sinners. And with wins for Michael B. Jordan, Amy Madigan, and Sean Penn, it seems our only acting sweep of the season will be Jessie Buckley.

With Oscar voting happening now, and the Oscars less than two weeks away, we can look forward to an Oscar ceremony with a number of races still in play. Let chaos reign!

See the full list of PGA and SAG winners below. And check out our Oscar Predictions page for the most up-to-date tracking of all 24 races.

The 2026 PGA Winners:

Darryl F. Zanuck Award for Outstanding Producer of Theatrical Motion Picturesโ€œBugoniaโ€โ€œF1โ€โ€œFrankensteinโ€โ€œHamnetโ€โ€œMarty Supremeโ€โ€œOne Battle After Anotherโ€ *WINNERโ€œSentimental Valueโ€โ€œSinnersโ€โ€œTrain Dreamsโ€โ€œWeaponsโ€Award for Outstanding Producer of Animated Theatrical Motion Picturesโ€œThe Bad Guys 2โ€โ€œDemon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba Infinity Castleโ€โ€œElioโ€โ€œKPop Demon Huntersโ€ย *WINNERโ€œZootopia 2โ€Norman Felton Award for Outstanding Producer of Episodic Television โ€“ Dramaโ€œAndorโ€โ€œThe Diplomatโ€โ€œThe Pittโ€ *WINNERโ€œPluribusโ€โ€œSeveranceโ€โ€œThe White Lotusโ€Danny Thomas Award for Outstanding Producer of Episodic Television โ€“ Comedyโ€œThe Bearโ€โ€œHacksโ€โ€œOnly Murders in the Buildingโ€โ€œSouth Parkโ€โ€œThe Studioโ€ *WINNERDavid L. Wolper Award for Outstanding Producer of Limited or Anthology Series Televisionโ€œAdolescenceโ€ย *WINNERโ€œThe Beast in Meโ€โ€œBlack Mirrorโ€โ€œBlack Rabbitโ€โ€œDying for Sexโ€Award for Outstanding Producer of Televised or Streamed Motion Picturesโ€œBridget Jones: Mad About the Boyโ€โ€œThe Gorgeโ€โ€œJohn Candy: I Like Meโ€ *WINNERโ€œMountainheadโ€โ€œNonnasโ€Award for Outstanding Producer of Non-Fiction Televisionโ€œaka Charlie Sheenโ€โ€œBilly Joel: And So It Goesโ€โ€œMr. Scorseseโ€โ€œPee-wee as Himselfโ€ย *WINNERโ€œSNL50: Beyond Saturday Nightโ€Award for Outstanding Producer of Live Entertainment, Variety, Sketch, Standup & Talk Televisionโ€œThe Daily Showโ€โ€œJimmy Kimmel Live!โ€โ€œLast Week Tonight with John Oliverโ€โ€œThe Late Show with Stephen Colbertโ€ย *WINNERโ€œSaturday Night Live 50: The Anniversary Specialโ€Award for Outstanding Producer of Game & Competition Televisionโ€œThe Amazing Raceโ€โ€œJeopardy!โ€โ€œRuPaulโ€™s Drag Raceโ€โ€œTop Chefโ€โ€œThe Traitorsโ€ *WINNERAward for Outstanding Producer of Documentary Motion Picturesโ€œThe Alabama Solutionโ€โ€œCover-Upโ€โ€œMr. Nobody Against Putinโ€โ€œMy Mom Jayne: A Film by Mariska Hargitayโ€ *WINNERโ€œOcean with David Attenboroughโ€โ€œThe Perfect Neighborโ€โ€œThe Tale of Silyanโ€Award for Outstanding Sports Programโ€œ100 Foot Waveโ€โ€œBig Dreams: The Little League World Series 2024โ€โ€œFormula 1: Drive to Surviveโ€ *WINNERโ€œHard Knocks: Training Camp with the Buffalo Billsโ€โ€œSurf Girls: Internationalโ€Award for Outstanding Childrenโ€™s Programโ€œLEGO Star Wars: Rebuild the Galaxy โ€“ Pieces of the Pastโ€โ€œPhineas and Ferbโ€โ€œSesame Streetโ€ *WINNERโ€œSnoopy Presents: A Summer Musicalโ€โ€œSpongeBob SquarePantsโ€Award for Outstanding Short-Form Programโ€œAdolescence: The Making of Adolescenceโ€ *WINNERโ€œThe Daily Show: Desi Lydic Foxsplainsโ€โ€œHacks: Bit By Bitโ€โ€œOvertime with Bill Maherโ€โ€œThe White Lotus: Unpacking the Episodeโ€PGA Innovation Awardโ€œASTEROIDโ€โ€œBig Wave: No Room for Errorโ€โ€œD-Day: The Camera Soldierโ€โ€œterritoryโ€โ€œThe Wizard of Oz at Sphereโ€ *WINNERDavid O. Selznick Achievement Award for Theatrical Motion Pictures: Amy PascalMilestone Award: Jason Blum

Norman Lear Achievement Award in Television: Mara Brock Akil

The 2026 Actor Award (SAG) Winners:

Film Performance Categories

  • Outstanding Performance by a Male Actor in a Leading Role
    • Timothรฉe Chalamet, โ€œMarty Supremeโ€ (A24)
    • Leonardo DiCaprio, โ€œOne Battle After Anotherโ€ (Warner Bros.)
    • Ethan Hawke, โ€œBlue Moonโ€ (Sony Pictures Classics)ย 
    • Michael B. Jordan, โ€œSinnersโ€ (Warner Bros.)ย **WINNER
    • Jesse Plemons,ย โ€œBugoniaโ€ (Focus Features)

  • Outstanding Performance by a Female Actor in a Leading Role
    • Jessie Buckley, โ€œHamnetโ€ (Focus Features)ย **WINNER
    • Rose Byrne, โ€œIf I Had Legs Iโ€™d Kick Youโ€ (A24)
    • Kate Hudson,ย โ€œSong Sung Blueโ€ (Focus)
    • Chase Infiniti, โ€œOne Battle After Anotherโ€ (Warner Bros.)
    • Emma Stone, โ€œBugoniaโ€ (Focus Features)

  • Outstanding Performance by a Male Actor in a Supporting Role
    • Miles Caton, โ€œSinnersโ€ (Warner Bros.)
    • Benicio Del Toro, โ€œOne Battle After Anotherโ€ (Warner Bros.)
    • Jacob Elordi, โ€œFrankensteinโ€ (Netflix)
    • Paul Mescal, โ€œHamnetโ€ (Focus Features)
    • Sean Penn, โ€œOne Battle After Anotherโ€ (Warner Bros.)ย **WINNER

  • Outstanding Performance by a Female Actor in a Supporting Role
    • Odessa Aโ€™Zion, โ€œMarty Supremeโ€ (A24)
    • Ariana Grande, โ€œWicked: For Goodโ€ (Universal Pictures)
    • Amy Madigan, โ€œWeaponsโ€ (Warner Bros.)ย **WINNER
    • Wunmi Mosaku, โ€œSinnersโ€ (Warner Bros.)
    • Teyana Taylor, โ€œOne Battle After Anotherโ€ (Warner Bros.)

  • Outstanding Performance by a Cast in a Motion Picture
    • โ€œFrankensteinโ€ (Netflix)
    • โ€œHamnetโ€ (Focus Features)
    • โ€œMarty Supremeโ€ (A24)
    • โ€œOne Battle After Anotherโ€ (Warner Bros.)ย 
    • โ€œSinnersโ€ (Warner Bros.)ย **WINNER

Television Performance Categories

  • Outstanding Performance by a Male Actor in a Television Movie or Limited Series
    • Jason Bateman, โ€œBlack Rabbitโ€ (Netflix)
    • Owen Cooper, โ€œAdolescenceโ€ (Netflix)ย **WINNER
    • Stephen Graham, โ€œAdolescenceโ€ (Netflix)ย 
    • Charlie Hunnam, โ€œMonster: The Ed Gein Storyโ€ (Netflix)
    • Matthew Rhys,ย โ€œThe Beast in Meโ€ (Netflix)

  • Outstanding Performance by a Female Actor in a Television Movie or Limited Series
    • Claire Danes,ย โ€œThe Beast in Meโ€ (Netflix)ย 
    • Erin Doherty, โ€œAdolescenceโ€ (Netflix)
    • Sarah Snook, โ€œAll Her Faultโ€ (Peacock)
    • Christine Tremarco, โ€œAdolescenceโ€ (Netflix)
    • Michelle Williams, โ€œDying for Sexโ€ (FX)ย **WINNER

  • Outstanding Performance by a Male Actor in a Drama Series
    • Sterling K. Brown, โ€œParadiseโ€ (Hulu)
    • Billy Crudup, โ€œThe Morning Showโ€ (Apple TV)
    • Walton Goggins, โ€œThe White Lotusโ€ (HBO)
    • Gary Oldman, โ€œSlow Horsesโ€ (Apple TV)
    • Noah Wyle, โ€œThe Pittโ€ (HBO Max)ย **WINNER

  • Outstanding Performance by a Female Actor in a Drama Series
    • Britt Lower, โ€œSeveranceโ€ (Apple TV)
    • Parker Posey, โ€œThe White Lotusโ€ (HBO)
    • Keri Russell, โ€œThe Diplomatโ€ (Netflix)ย **WINNER
    • Rhea Seehorn, โ€œPluribusโ€ (Apple TV)
    • Aimee Lou Wood, โ€œThe White Lotusโ€ (HBO)

  • Outstanding Performance by a Male Actor in a Comedy Series
    • Ike Barinholtz, โ€œThe Studioโ€ (Apple TV)
    • Adam Brody, โ€œNobody Wants Thisโ€ (Netflix)
    • Ted Danson, โ€œA Man on the Insideโ€ (Netflix)
    • Seth Rogen, โ€œThe Studioโ€ (Apple TV)ย **WINNER
    • Martin Short, โ€œOnly Murders in the Buildingโ€ (Hulu)

  • Outstanding Performance by a Female Actor in a Comedy Series
    • Kathryn Hahn, โ€œThe Studioโ€ย (Apple TV)
    • Catherine Oโ€™Hara,ย โ€œThe Studioโ€ (Apple TV)ย **WINNER
    • Jenna Ortega, โ€œWednesdayโ€ (Netflix)
    • Jean Smart, โ€œHacksโ€ (HBO Max)ย 
    • Kristen Wiig, Palm Royal (Apple TV)

  • Outstanding Performance by an Ensemble in a Drama Series
    • โ€œThe Diplomatโ€ (Netflix)
    • โ€œLandmanโ€ (Paramount+)
    • โ€œThe Pittโ€ (HBO Max)ย **WINNER
    • โ€œSeveranceโ€ (Apple TV)
    • โ€œThe White Lotusโ€ (HBO Max)

  • Outstanding Performance by an Ensemble in a Comedy Series
    • โ€œAbbott Elementaryโ€ (ABC)
    • โ€œThe Bearโ€ (FX)
    • โ€œHacksโ€ (HBO Max)
    • โ€œOnly Murders in the Buildingโ€ (Hulu)
    • โ€œThe Studioโ€ (Apple TV)ย **WINNER

Stunt Performance Categories

  • Outstanding Performance by a Stunt Ensemble in a Motion Picture
    • โ€œF1โ€ (Apple Original Films/Warner Bros.)
    • โ€œFrankensteinโ€ (Netflix)
    • โ€œMission: Impossible โ€“ The Final Reckoningโ€ (Paramount Pictures)ย **WINNER
    • โ€œOne Battle After Anotherโ€ (Warner Bros.)
    • โ€œSinnersโ€ (Warner Bros.)

  • Outstanding Performance by a Stunt Ensemble in a Television Series
    • โ€œAndorโ€ (Disney+)
    • โ€œLandmanโ€ย (Paramount)
    • โ€œThe Last of Usโ€ (HBO Max)ย **WINNER
    • โ€œSquid Gamesโ€ (Netflix)
    • โ€œStranger Thingsโ€ (Netflix)

Movie Review: ‘Scream 7’ is a Betrayal of Legacy


Director: Kevin Williamson
Writers: Kevin Williamson, Guy Busick, James Vanderbilt
Stars: Neve Campbell, Courteney Cox, Isabel May

Synopsis: When a new Ghostface killer emerges in the town where Sidney Prescott has built a new life, her darkest fears are realized as her daughter becomes the next target.


The next chapter in the Scream franchise is not horrendous. It is certainly not great, just eye-openingly unpleasant and, at times, lazy. The 2022 relaunch recaptured what made the original films clever, addictive, and humorously meta, a rare horror film that was in on the joke and always smarter than its built-in audience. However, the filmmakers never looked down their noses at the fanbase or the genreโ€™s staples.

Thatโ€™s what makes Scream 7 so disappointing. The madman behind the slasher horror phenomenon, Kevin Williamson (I Know What You Did Last Summer), finally steps behind the camera after writing the original thirty years ago. Williamson co-wrote the script with Guy Busick, whose breakout script for Ready or Not, like Scream decades earlier, reinvented the horror genre with staggering results.

Yet, Scream 7 has no laughs, comic relief, or magnetic appeal. The slasher scenes are tepid, lacking cleverness, and settling for brute brutality without emotional stakes. The plotting is vapid, the tone is all over the place, and the self-referential humor is now a distant memory. The final product is hubristic, displaying an unearned confidence rooted in the names on the marquee and an intellectual property that has reached creative exhaustion.ย 

Another point of contention is that the opening scene, a franchise staple, does nothing to set up the movie other than serve as a red herring. A true-crime superfan, Scott (Jimmy Tatro), and his girlfriend, Madison (Landmanโ€™s Michelle Randolph), visit the site of the gruesome murders at Stu Macherโ€™s (The Life of Chuckโ€™s Matthew Lillard) residence. Scott retells a rumor that Stu may still be alive, roaming the area after having his head smashed in by a television set.

The scene is lazy, not to mention narratively untethered, creating a hollow inciting tease. (After watching the movie, youโ€™ll understand there is no reason for the sequence to exist.) This leads to the return of Sidney Prescott (Neve Campbell), who is raising her family in Pine Grove. Sidney is married to Mark (Joel McHale) and is trying to keep their daughter, Tatum (Isabel May), from letting her boyfriend (The Fabelmansโ€™ Sam Rechner) sneak into the house at night.

From there, the film becomes rinse-and-repeat well past the point of nostalgia. Sidney receives a phone call from Ghostface. There is a slight twist here that I will skip to avoid spoilers. The infamous villain tells their old friend that they are about to murder her daughter at school. The script still operates on the basic principle that, in this day and age, no cloud-based surveillance systems, cell phone tracking, or even plain old locks on doors exist.

There are very few surprises in the latest chapter of Scream, which had to find a new trajectory after Melissa Barrera was let go after social media posts about the Israel-Hamas war, and Jenna Ortega left after the franchise pivot. That would be like taking the original without Sydney and Gale Weathers (Courtney Cox). The result is a paint by the bloody numbers brutality that does not have nearly enough fun with the script as it should.

Williamson and Busickโ€™s script settles into a tired rhythm. They set up a killing, insert nostalgic callbacks to previous chapters, then repeat. All scenes are so loosely connected, the film unfolds like a first draft, or so is chopped from cast changes, comes across as stitched together storyboard. In addition, the big reveal of who the killer is is easily the biggest letdown and is nothing more than a tribute-killing trope. 

The ending combines two clichรฉs from hour-long dramas. First, if youโ€™ve watched movies as long as I have, you know that when a recognizable actor from the 2000s appears in a small role, theyโ€™re part of the plot. Then thereโ€™s the eye-rolling reveal of a close family friend, which is something anyone can see coming. Itโ€™s remarkable how little thought went into the execution, with ineptitude masked by one gruesome killing.

Scream 7 is a chapter that betrays the slasher thrillerโ€™s legacy. A franchise that taught multiple generations how to survive a horror film now outlines how to leave one behind, and without regret. 

You can watch Scream 7 only in theaters starting February 27th!

Grade: D+

Chasing the Gold: Interview: ‘The Perfect Neighbor’ Director Geeta Gandbhir

Director Geeta Gandbhir already has Emmy and Peabody awards to her name. Now the Academy Awards have come callingโ€”in historic fashion. Gandbhir is the first woman ever nominated in both documentary categories in the same year.

The Devil Is Busy, co-directed with Christalyn Hampton and streaming on HBO Max, is nominated for Best Documentary Short Film. The film follows Tracii, a security guard at a womenโ€™s healthcare clinic in Atlanta, as she navigates the volatile aftermath of the Supreme Courtโ€™s overturning of Roe v. Wadeโ€”capturing, the human cost of a political decision still reverberating nationwide.

The Perfect Neighbor, nominated for Best Documentary Feature and streaming on Netflix, embeds viewers within a Florida community where a dispute over children at play escalates into tragedy, intersecting with racism and the stateโ€™s lax gun and โ€œstand your groundโ€ laws. At its center is the killing of Ajike Owens, a 35-year-old mother defending her children.

Groundbreaking in both form and urgency,ย The Perfect Neighborย is constructed, primarily from police-obtained body camera footageโ€”placing viewers inside the mechanics, and failings, of a system as it unfolds in real time. The effect is devastating. By refusing distance and narration, Gandbhir forces the audience to confront not just what happened to Owens, but how it happenedโ€”and why the structures that enabled it remain firmly in place.

Owens was a family friend of Gandbhirโ€™s. When she was killed, the filmmaker jumped in to help the only way she knew howโ€”help spread the wordโ€”about Owensโ€™ killing, the case that followed, the systemic racism that gave way to the violence, about the kind and selfless mother Ajike Owens was for her four children.

In conversation with InSession Film awards editor Shadan Larki, Gandbhir discusses sharing Ajike Owensโ€™ storyโ€”one now known across the world, and using her camera to help make sense of a world that seems senseless and cruelโ€”most often to those who are most vulnerable. Still, Gandbhirโ€™s dedication to social justice and to telling the stories of those who fighting on the frontlinesโ€”for decency and for the future, offers hope. And positions Gandbhir as one of our foremost nonfiction filmmakers working todayโ€”one finally receiving long-overdue recognition.

Women InSession: Thirsty for Vampires

This week on Women InSession, we discuss some of our favorite vampire movies and why it’s one of the best subgenre’s in horror! From Nosferatu to Dracula to Sinners, there are so many great vampire movies that not only make for great thrills, but often it’s full of incredible queer subtext and eroticism that make them even more captivating.

Panel: Kristin Battestella, Megan Kearns

On that note, check out this week’s show and let us know what you think in the comment section. Thanks for listening and for supporting the InSession Film Podcast!

Subscribe to our Podcast RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on Apple Podcasts
Listen on Spotify
Listen on iHeartRadio
Women InSession – Thirsty for Vampires

LISTEN TO THE PODCAST

Chasing the Gold: Final Actor Awards (SAG) Predictions

The 32nd Annual SAG Awards will stream on Netflix, Sunday March 1st, beginning at 8pm EST.

Listen/Watch to the latest episode of Chasing the Gold for more in-depth analysis an see the latest updates on our Oscar Predictions page.

Here are awards editor Shadan Larkiโ€™s final predictions for the film categories at the 2026 Actor Awards, presented by SAG-AFTRA.

Cast Ensemble in a Motion Picture

  • โ€œFrankensteinโ€ (Netflix)
    David Bradley, Christian Convery, Charles Dance, Jacob Elordi, Mia Goth, Oscar Isaac, Felix Kammerer, Lars Mikkelsen, and Christoph Waltz
  • โ€œHamnetโ€ (Focus Features)
    Joe Alwyn, Jessie Buckley, Noah Jupe, Paul Mescal, and Emily Watson
  • โ€œMarty Supremeโ€ (A24)
    Odessa Aโ€™zion, Sandra Bernhard, Timothรฉe Chalamet, Emory Cohen, Fran Drescher, Abel Ferrara, Penn Jillette, Koto Kawaguchi, Luke Manley, Tyler Okonma, Kevin Oโ€™Leary, Gwyneth Paltrow, Gรฉza Rรถhrig, and Larry Sloman
  • โ€œOne Battle After Anotherโ€ (Warner Bros.) โ€” Possible Upset
    Benicio del Toro, Leonardo DiCaprio, Regina Hall, Chase Infiniti, Sean Penn, and Teyana Taylor
  • โ€œSinnersโ€ (Warner Bros.) โ€” Projected Winner
    Miles Caton, Buddy Guy, Michael B. Jordan, Jayme Lawson, Delroy Lindo, Omar Miller, Wunmi Mosaku, Jack Oโ€™Connell, and Hailee Steinfeld

Male Actor in a Leading Role

  • Timothรฉe Chalamet, โ€œMarty Supremeโ€ (A24) โ€” Projected Winner
  • Leonardo DiCaprio, โ€œOne Battle After Anotherโ€ (Warner Bros.)
  • Ethan Hawke, โ€œBlue Moonโ€ (Sony Pictures Classics)
  • Michael B. Jordan, โ€œSinnersโ€ (Warner Bros.) โ€” Possible Upset
  • Jesse Plemons, โ€œBugoniaโ€ (Focus Features)

Female Actor in a Leading Role

  • Jessie Buckley, โ€œHamnetโ€ (Focus Features) โ€” Projected Winner
  • Rose Byrne, โ€œIf I Had Legs Iโ€™d Kick Youโ€ (A24)
  • Kate Hudson, โ€œSong Sung Blueโ€ (Focus Features)
  • Chase Infiniti, โ€œOne Battle After Anotherโ€ (Warner Bros.)
  • Emma Stone, โ€œBugoniaโ€ (Focus Features)

Male Actor in a Supporting Role

  • Miles Caton, โ€œSinnersโ€ (Warner Bros.)
  • Benicio Del Toro, โ€œOne Battle After Anotherโ€ (Warner Bros.) โ€” Projected Winner
  • Jacob Elordi, โ€œFrankensteinโ€ (Netflix) โ€” Possible Upset
  • Paul Mescal, โ€œHamnetโ€ (Focus Features)
  • Sean Penn, โ€œOne Battle After Anotherโ€ (Warner Bros.)

Female Actor in a Supporting Role

  • Odessa Aโ€™zion, โ€œMarty Supremeโ€ (A24)
  • Ariana Grande, โ€œWicked: For Goodโ€ (Universal Pictures)
  • Amy Madigan, โ€œWeaponsโ€ (Warner Bros.) โ€” Possible Upset
  • Wunmi Mosaku, โ€œSinnersโ€ (Warner Bros.) โ€” Projected Winner
  • Teyana Taylor, โ€œOne Battle After Anotherโ€ (Warner Bros.)

Stunt Ensemble in a Motion Picture

  • โ€œF1โ€ (Apple Original Films/Warner Bros.) โ€” Projected Winner
  • โ€œFrankensteinโ€ (Netflix)
  • โ€œMission: Impossible โ€” The Final Reckoningโ€ (Paramount Pictures) โ€” Possible Upset
  • โ€œOne Battle After Anotherโ€ (Warner Bros.)
  • โ€œSinnersโ€ (Warner Bros.)

Criterion Collection: March 2026

Two months into 2026 (already?), we are given six new releases from Criterion. There are no new box-sets, no new Criterion Premieres, but we get a slate of excellent films that I don’t think get enough love. What weโ€™re getting includes a physical media release of the latest modern masterpiece from Americaโ€™s greatest auteur, an overlooked film from an audacious Spanish filmmaker, a couple underappreciated films hailing from the French New Wave, and an absolute humdinger of a film from a Hong Kong legend. This month of releases are not all super popular, but theyโ€™re opportunities to broaden your personal cinematic horizons.

Viridiana (1961)

Luis Buรฑuel is a filmmaker I adore a great deal. The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie, That Obscure Object of Desire, and ร‰l are all fiendish, provocative, and biting in their own right. In Viridiana, Buรฑuel tackles the taboo of sex in the way that only he can. This film is served best by going in completely blind, it is a trip. Most modern โ€˜provocativeโ€™ filmmakers wish they could do what Buรฑuel was doing – and he was doing films on the subject orgies, sexual violence, and lust. The craziest part is that he was doing this in the 1950s and 1960s, when these topics were reviewed by governmental bodies (not studios – GOVERNMENTS). This film is no different, there was a censored ending by the Spanish board of censors. This film is a 4K+Blu-Ray combo pack with a new 4K restoration from Criterion.

Testament (1983)

Oppenheimer, while an excellent film, articulated a long standing fear that the entire world can grapple with – nuclear devastation. Testament is a fictional story about the aftermath of a hypothetical nuclear devastation. In reference to my earlier point, in Oppenheimer we are given this sort of rising anticipation and nihilistic fear of the possibilities of nuclear war. Testament, while fictional, is a show of the harrowing pain of what a world could look like afterwards. It is incredibly difficult for a film to project our long standing anxieties in a tactful 89 minute runtime, but Lynne Littman nailed it and then some. Testament is a devastating film that should be seen by as many people as possible. This film is a Blu-Ray release with a new 4K restoration from Criterion.

Classe tous risques (1960)

Classe tous risques is a hidden masterpiece from the French New Wave. A French crime thriller that would inspire the brilliant Jean-Pierre Melville, Classe tous risques is one of the many support beams forming what the modern crime thriller would look like. This film released during the height of the Nouvelle Vague (New Wave) and had to compete with Breathless, Shoot the Piano Player, and Les Bonnes Femmes. However, Classe tous risques would lead the way for films such as Le samouraรฏ and Le Cercle Rouge – and to add, Classe tous risques is a clencher of a film. This film is a 4K+Blu-Ray combo pack with a new 4K restoration from Criterion.

Killers of the Flower Moon (2023)

I feel like praising Martin Scorsese in any capacity is the equivalent of saying โ€œwater is greatโ€, โ€œair is incredibleโ€, or what have you. Killers of the Flower Moon came, absolutely rocked, won zero awards – much to my chagrin, then was left to rot in Appleโ€™s digital graveyard. A physical media release of any kind wouldโ€™ve been welcome, and a Criterion 4K release would be best case scenario. Soโ€ฆwe won? An incredible film from our greatest living filmmaker coming to Criterion is always stupendous. I donโ€™t even know what else to say, if you havenโ€™t seen Killers of the Flower Moon – rectify that ASAP. I mean, Scorseseโ€™s entire career has always shown a light on the ugly side of America and Killers of the Flower Moon is the ultimate version of that. This is a 4K+Blu-Ray combo pack release with a new 4K digital master approved by Martin Scorsese.

A Man and a Woman (1966)

French romantic melodrama has never been this lush. A sensory treat for the eyes and the ears, A Man and a Woman is Claude Lelouchโ€™s cinematic masterpiece. This film utilizes a variety of film formats and the result is entrancing and drives home interesting visuals that complement the narrative. Furthermore, the filmโ€™s theme song is instantly recognizable and is one of cinemaโ€™s great theme songs – itโ€™s as if France was bottled up into a piece of music. A Man and a Woman is just as captivating today as it was 60 years ago, one of the French New Wave greats. This is a Blu-Ray release with a new 2K digital restoration approved by Claude Lelouch.

The Blade (1995)

Hong Kong cinema is a one-of-one type of film product. Mostly operating on limited budgets, the golden age of Hong Kong cinema delivered the most over the top action films the world has ever seen. Eccentricities galore, in terms of plot, filmmaking, and placement in filmโ€™s grander scope – without Hong Kong cinema we wouldnโ€™t have the types of creative swings featured in John Wick, for example. Tsui Hark, director of The Blade was a major figure in this golden era of Hong Kong cinema and The Blade is an absolute stunner of a film. Brutal & heavily stylized, The Blade wasnโ€™t a success at its release but has since become a beloved film amongst action film fans. Any piece of Hong Kong cinema is good cinema, the people behind the camera operate at full throttle and aim to please the viewer at every turn. This is a must get for fans of action, full stop. This is a 4K+Blu-Ray combo pack release with a new 4K digital restoration.

Last month I said that we may get a new flash sale in February, and unfortunately that didnโ€™t happen. But, it is almost certain that the sale will happen in March. Keep your eyes peeled on Criterionโ€™s social media, and check out some of their new releases as they release!

Chasing the Gold: Reactions to 2026 BAFTAs

On this episode of Chasing the Gold, Shadan is joined by Zak Ahmed and Robin Write to break down this year’s BAFTA awards and the stirring discourse that sprouted in the ceremony’s aftermath! There is plenty to talk about regarding the winners and how many categories feel even more up in the air now, but we of course had to also address the show’s controversy as well.

Check out this week’s show and let us know what you think in the comment section. Thanks for listening and for supporting the InSession Film Podcast!

Subscribe to our Podcast RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on Apple Podcasts
Listen on Spotify
Listen on iHeartRadio
Chasing the Gold – Reactions to 2026 BAFTAs

WATCH/LISTEN TO THE PODCAST

Movie Review: ‘Undercard’ is a New Angle on the Boxing Movie


Director: Tamika Miller
Writers: Anita M. Cal, Tamika Miller
Stars: Wanda Sykes, William Stanford Davis, Bentley Green

Synopsis: A boxing trainer re-connects with the son she abandoned.


The majority of boxing movies focus on the fighters. That’s where the drama is built from, a boxer’s need to win and to prove their worth. They bring everything from their lives into that ring and we watch them work their bodies and lives into shape. The heart of the fighter is what we come to see. Even though the trainer is an important piece of that puzzle, they’re a mentor and a guide and their troubles only serve to motivate the boxer. What the filmmakers of Undercard do to great effect is to show us the complicated life of a person who was in that ring and now teaches others to survive. This film is the inner life of someone who’s no longer in the spotlight and the toll that takes. It’s a hard role to make compelling.

When a comedian makes the shift from comedy to drama there will almost always be a bit of incredulity at first, but as quick and hilarious as Wanda Sykes is, there’s no doubt she has the gravitas for drama. Her performance in Undercard never feels like she’s acting. For the whole film, the actor we know is completely transformed through body language and an imposing presence. Sykes is able to command the screen with her willingness to lay herself bare. It’s a very raw role and one that can’t be hidden behind a large cast. Sykes proves she has the moves to go toe-to-toe with anyone and everyone. This story needed an actress like her to make it compelling.

Undercard is a unique take on a redemption story. Cheryl (Sykes), who earned the fighting nickname โ€œNo Mercy,โ€ is not just down on her luck, but battling more demons than just that of the ignominious end to her career. She’s not like other aged fighters who feel their only shot at creating a legacy is fighting for themselves. Cheryl understands her skill is more powerful when she can train others to fight like she does. The conflict lies in keeping her past from encroaching on and debilitating her present. Writers Anita M. Cal and Tamika Miller, who also directed, created a story that has depth and history to it. It’s more than a sports drama. Undercard uses sports as a way to tell a harrowing domestic drama. The layers and twists and turns of the story are as riveting as the way the film plays visually.

One of the most intriguing aspects of the film is the way the boxing scenes are shot. Director Miller and cinematographer Ana M. Amortegui shot most of the action from outside the ring. Not just overhead or at the level of the ring itself, but from below, where the trainers stand. These shots remind us that as much as it is Keith’s (Bentley Green) or Kordell’s (Xavier Mills) fight to win, it’s Cheryl who has everything riding on their success. This combined with the brilliant move to have Cheryl, Baba T (William Stanford Davis), and Hector (Berto Colon) completely audible during the fight, doling out advice, puts us squarely in their perspective.

If the film has a fault, it is in its antagonists. In some ways Hector functions as a bit of comic relief, but his need to refer to himself in the third person is at first confusing, then a little silly, and ends up being kind of annoying. The same goes for the very arch presentation of sleazy all-powerful boxing promoter, Bob Fox (Danny Pardo). He’s so smarmy and moustache twirling that it wouldn’t surprise us to see him lighting his cigar with a hundred dollar bill while laughing maniacally.


Even with these missteps in character, Undercard is a good boxing movie. Not only that, but it is a great domestic drama that uses boxing as a crucial common ground for Cheryl to try and make amends for the worst mistakes of her life. The performances are excellent and the story is very moving. It has a depth and emotional heft that most boxing movies can’t compete with. It’s a film well worth seeing and getting immersed in.

Grade: B

Episode 676: Top 5 Horror Movie Kills

This weekโ€™s episode is brought to you by Koffee Kult. Get 15% OFF with the code: ISF26

This week on the InSession Film Podcast, inspired by Scream 7 hitting theaters this weekend, we discuss our favorite horror movie kills! The horror genre is full of all kinds of death and carnage, featuring some of the most gnarly thrills that cinema has to offer, and we thought it would be fun to parse though the best sequences that define horror film.

– Olympics / Hockey / Miracle (0:59)
We begin the show this week with JD opening up about his childhood, how he fell in love with hockey and why this last weekend was incredible. Until it wasn’t. Team USA winning the Gold Medal game was a sports moment that turned JD into a 10-year-old kid again, but the aftermath immediately reverted back and we had to talk about it. We do, of course, bring movies into the conversation as art does play a role it all.ย 

– Gore Verbinski / Pirates Trilogy (35:10)
Two weeks ago, we did a consensus Verbinski ranking and it was a ton of fun. Now that we’ve seen his new film Good Luck, Have Fun, Don’t Die, we wanted to update our ranking to see where it places. We also revisited Verbinski’s incredible Pirates of the Caribbean trilogy over the last week, and boy do we have some passionate thoughts to share.ย 


RELATED: Listen to Episode 670 of the InSession Film Podcast where we discussed our Top 10 Movies of 2025!


– Top 5 Horror Movie Kills (59:11)
Horror has been around since the beginning of cinema, and a significant amount of movie iconography is centered about horror movie kills. When you hear the topic, there are several iconic images that immediately come to mind. Let alone the vast amount of incredible kills we’ve seen in the genre over the decades. There are literally hundreds of great scenes to choose from for this list, so while challenging, it was a lot of fun trying to narrow it down to five. That said, what did you think of our top 5 horror movie kills?

Subscribe to our Podcast RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on Apple Podcasts
Listen on Spotify
Listen on iHeartRadio
InSession Film Podcast – Episode 676

Next week on the show:

Pillion

Help Support The InSession Film Podcast

If you want to help support us, there are several ways you can help us and we’d absolutely appreciate it. Every penny goes directly back into supporting the show and we are truly honored and grateful. Thanks for your support and for listening to the InSession Film Podcast!

VISIT OUR DONATE PAGE HERE

Podcast Review: Crime 101

On this episode, JD and Erica discuss Michael Mann, oh I’m sorry, I mean Bart Layton’s new film Crime 101! Starring Chris Hemsworth and Mark Ruffalo, Layton deeply leans into his inner Mann to deliver a captivating crime thriller. We have a little debate over some of the details, but on the whole there’s a lot to appreciate with this film.

Review:Crime 101

Director: Bart Layton
Writers: Bart Layton
Stars: Chris Hemsworth, Mark Ruffalo, Barry Keoghan, Monica Barbaro

Subscribe to our Podcast RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on Apple Podcasts
Listen on Spotify
Listen on iHeartRadio
InSession Film Podcast – Crime 101

Movie Review: Zhang Yimou Fumbles the Bag with the Horrendous โ€˜Scare Outโ€™


Director: Zhang Yimou
Writer: Liang Chen
Stars: Jackson Yee, Zhu Yilong, Song Jia

Synopsis: Vital intelligence leaked. The national security team vowed to find the traitor, but arrests failed repeatedly. As tension mounted, suspicion turned inward to the team itself. A silent battle unfolded amid trust and betrayal.


There may never be a better example of the sentence โ€œwhen you find out your goat washedโ€ than in watching Zhang Yimouโ€™s Scare Out, a film whose questionable politics are the least of its problems, because every single aesthetic choice made by one of the most prolific Chinese filmmakers working today completely sinks this entire thing. Itโ€™s even baffling to wonder how the same guy who gave us the staggering works of art of Hero, House of the Flying Daggers, and Shadow could ever direct something this incompetent, where every attempt at dazzling the audience through a series of intricate stylistic flourishes goes catastrophically wrong. 

Even Zhangโ€™s most recent works, while imperfect, didnโ€™t look (or feel) this sloppy. This is truly something to behold. One may even be tempted to watch this to see how such a great visual artist could stoop so low, especially a few years after the incredible Full River Red (which also starred Jackson Yee), but Iโ€™m here to tell you all to avoid it altogether. Zhang has rarely disappointed, and less so in the visual department (The Great Wall, while terrible, looks immaculate in IMAX 3D). This is a complete disaster right from the get-go, which attempts to blend the digital textures of Michael Mannโ€™s Blackhat and Michael Bayโ€™s Ambulance, alongside a galaxy-brained approach to Tony Scottโ€™s Enemy of the State. Yet, none of its filmmaking inspirations feel earnest in any way, or as exciting as when Zhang meaningfully paints with his camera and crafts tableaux the likes of which youโ€™ve likely never seen anywhere else. 

This is a film where one single artistic choice โ€“ hyperactive editing โ€“ ruins everything. I donโ€™t want to sound hyperbolic, but Scare Out is likely the worst-edited film Iโ€™ve ever seen, trumping Olivier Megatonโ€™s TAK3N by a country mile. In fact, that film is smartly edited and looks coherent compared to this trainwreck. For reasons I canโ€™t explain, which bear no meaning to the paranoia Zhang wants to instill in the story of two security officers (played by Jackson Yee and Zhu Yilong) who are suspected of being a mole after crucial intelligence leaks outside their purview, the movie is edited as if someone wanted to break the world record of most nonsensical cuts during a film. 

Hereโ€™s an example: instead of cutting a typical foot chase in a relatively standard fashion, which would mean intercutting between the antagonist running away from the people chasing him, and the point of view of the protagonists, which would create a sense of rhythm within the action, Zhang cuts within the scene. This means that in the middle of a shot where the supposed good guys are running, heโ€™ll cut to nowhere (heโ€™s basically showing the same frame split twice), and often weirdly zoom into a given character, not with his camera, but with the digital tools of his editing software. This creates awkward, unnatural compositions that are always hampered by the most random cuts at any given occasion. It never allows the audience to sit with anyone or anything, because no one can actively discern whatโ€™s happening. The lyricism that defines Zhangโ€™s work is completely gone. 

Scare Out moves at a mile-a-minute pace without ever making the threat (or the โ€œscaring outโ€ of who the mole may be) urgent enough for the good guys to find the plant before more information is leaked. Only an inexplicable phone explosion, which comes out of left field, brought me the biggest laugh of any film Iโ€™ve seen this year so far. That must be seen to be believed, but should you trudge through at least an hour and a half before you get to this point? Thatโ€™s debatableโ€ฆ

As far as the rest is concerned, Zhang canโ€™t muster up interest in this thriller devoid of any dramatic tension and political intrigue. It almost feels like youโ€™re watching an extended episode of an elongated soap opera, complete with ridiculous wigs, bludgeoning string-heavy music that tells the audience when a big moment is coming, and twists that make little sense as the movie progresses. Instead of homing in on one specific plot point, which is finding a mole who may be a part of a shadowy organization that could be much vaster than he thinks, Zhang adds several nonsensical reveals that turns this self-serious conspiracy picture into a pure farce, one whose last scene landed with such a thud its almost sold-out crowd laughed at how preposterous the whole thing was.ย 


Thatโ€™s also how I would describe the entire viewing experience of this profoundly perplexing motion picture by a once-great artist who has now fully become a mouthpiece for government propaganda. The signs were there in his post-Coming Home films, but theyโ€™ve reached their apotheosis inScare Out, a movie that has completely removed the modicum of artistic imprint that was left after Full River Red, as Zhang has now embarked on a โ€œfor-hireโ€ era of painfully unremarkable pictures that the Western world will completely ignore, except this critic who longs for the return of his great masterworks. Maybe heโ€™s got one more left in him, but today is not that day.

Grade: F

Movie Review: ‘Man on the Run’ Reinvents Paul McCartney After The Beatles


Director: Morgan Neville
Stars: Paul McCartney, Ringo Starr, John Lennon

Synopsis: An intimate portrait of Paul McCartney’s journey after The Beatles, as he and wife Linda form Wings.


When The Beatles splintered in 1970, the cultural aftershock was mighty. Fans mourned, critics circled, and its four members were left to redefine themselves under an unforgiving spotlight. The one who was blamed the most: Sir Paul McCartney. Man on the Run, directed by Morgan Neville, steps into that uncertain terrain with an emotionally attentive lens. Running at 1 hour 55 minutes, the film traces Paul McCartneyโ€™s life in the immediate aftermath of the bandโ€™s dissolution, foregrounding not only the formation of Wings but the sustaining force of his partnership with Linda McCartney. It is less a conventional rock doc and more a reflective musical odyssey.

McCartney, bruised by legal disputes and the public narrative that painted him as the bandโ€™s pragmatic villain, retreats, first emotionally, then physically, to recalibrate. The film makes shrewd use of period footage: scrappy home recordings, pastoral scenes on the Mull of Kintyre, and chaotic early rehearsals. Through this documentary, McCartney is depicted as a man fumbling through uncertainty, desperate to prove he is more than one-quarter of a phenomenon.

McCartneyโ€™s voice-over is used throughout, taking audiences through his love of music, how he enjoyed experimenting, and how that led to his albums. He describes music as his freedom and magic. It would have been nice to see him and make that connection to the words stronger, as a multitude of images does become repetitive. At times, it feels like a compilation of Beatles archives that you could watch on YouTube. Other voice overs include Mary, Lindaโ€™s daughter, who speaks about her mother. 

Through candid opinions and previously unseen photographs, Linda emerges as both creative collaborator and emotional crutch. The film is at its most moving when exploring how her presence countered the vitriol McCartney faced in the early 1970s. Critics derided his domestic turn; audiences questioned his seriousness. Yet Man on the Run argues persuasively that this retreat into family life was not an abdication of ambition, but a redefinition of it. There are images of Lindaโ€™s photography and an insight into how she felt during this time, and the scrutiny she was also under.

There is also a tonal tightrope that Man on the Run occasionally struggles to walk. Nevilleโ€™s affection for his subject is palpable. While the film acknowledges the lawsuits, the critical maulings, and the perception of McCartney as overly sentimental, it rarely lets audiences sit in the true darkness. The edges are softened. Rivalries are contextualized rather than interrogated. For some viewers, this will feel like a refreshing corrective to decades of caricature; for others, it may register as selective framing. 

Man on the Run wants to be more than a standard post-Beatles chronicle by its insistence on showing the psychology of starting again. And while McCartney was able to salvage a career and build a life, this documentary lacks depth and face-to-camera interviews to feel like anything more than a nostalgia trip. There are times when they occasionally feel indulgent. Certain sequences could have been tightened, and a sharper editorial hand might have drawn clearer contrasts between public perception and private reality. And a little more insight into the lives of the McCartney family – some home tours, some close-ups of guitars, something from the present for audiences to chew on. So, unfortunately, whilst this documentary film is entertaining and interesting, itโ€™s also one you can easily turn off. 

Ultimately, Man on the Run is a tender portrait of resilience. It reframes a turbulent chapter not as a fall from grace, but as a recalibration powered by partnership. By centering the love between Paul and Linda, Neville offers a quietly radical thesis: that survival in the glare of fame may depend less on ego than on intimacy. The film does not dismantle the mythology surrounding McCartney, but it does complicate it. Instead, it reveals a man who ran not from his past, but toward a different future. This documentary will be a nice watch for fans of music and McCartney. 

Grade: C+

Women InSession: Live-Action Disney Films

This week on Women InSession, we discuss our favorite live-action Disney films! Understandably most might think of their animated canon first, but Disney has a surprisingly great variety of live-action films that we love just as much and we had a great time parsing through the films that resonate the most with us.

Panel: Megan Kearns, Zita Short

On that note, check out this week’s show and let us know what you think in the comment section. Thanks for listening and for supporting the InSession Film Podcast!

Subscribe to our Podcast RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on Apple Podcasts
Listen on Spotify
Listen on iHeartRadio
Women InSession – Carice van Houten

LISTEN TO THE PODCAST

Movie Review: ‘In Cold Light’ is a Slow Burn With Soul


Director: Maxime Giroux
Writer: Patrick Whistler
Stars: Maika Monroe, Troy Kotsur, Allan Hawco, Helen Hunt

Synopsis: Ava attempts to go straight after prison, but her twin is murdered and being a witness to the shooting, she is forced to run for her life.


In Cold Light is a crime thriller directed by Maxime Giroux and written by Patrick Whistler. The 96-minute film follows a familiar trajectory: a recently released ex-con is pulled back into the underworld and tries to escape. The film attempts to carve out its own corner of the genre through atmosphere, performance, and an undercurrent of family reckoning, but falls short on drama and action. Starring Maika Monroe, Troy Kotsur, Allan Hawco, and Helen Hunt, the film is a slow burner but with soul.

Ava, played with coiled restraint by Monroe, emerges from prison, realising the world she left behind has shifted. Trust has evaporated, alliances have calcified, and before she can reassert herself, she is framed for the murder of her beloved twin brother. What follows is a tight spiral of pursuit: police on one side, a vindictive crime boss on the other, and Ava trying to navigate through it all. 

Monroe has built a career playing women on the periphery of danger, and here she sharpens that persona into something more commanding. Ava is not a wide-eyed innocent nor a cartoonish antihero. Instead, Monroe presents her as someone perpetually calculating, scanning rooms for exits, measuring people for weakness. Yet the filmโ€™s most compelling moments occur when that armor cracks, particularly in scenes opposite Kotsur.

Kotsurโ€™s performance is beautifully modulated; regret flickers across his face without tipping into sentimentality. In these scenes, In Cold Light briefly transcends its genre trappings and becomes a meditation on inherited damage, how cycles of crime and emotional withdrawal echo across generations.

If Monroe and Kotsur provide the heart, Hunt supplies the frost. As the ruthless crime boss tightens the net around Ava, she avoids flamboyance. Even with very little screentime, Hunt underplays beautifully, delivering threats in measured tones that make them more unsettling. It is a smart choice; in a film so attuned to restraint, a scenery-chewing villain would have felt misplaced.

That said, the filmโ€™s commitment to leanness is both a strength and a limitation. The secondary characters, including Hawcoโ€™s morally ambiguous law enforcement figure, sometimes feel sketched rather than fully realized. The plot mechanics, particularly the framing device that propels Ava into flight, rely on a few conveniences that sharper scripting might have avoided.

There are no operatic shootouts or swaggering montages of excess. This sobriety gives the film a grounded tension; survival feels precarious rather than heroic. Whilst there is a lot of tension, the story does go in directions which feel under-planned and under-explained. Fans wanting more excitement might find the filmโ€™s slow pace disengaging. 

The film’s palette is one of its strongest points; from warm tones of the sun and dusty sand from the ranch, to steel blues and washed-out greys that reflect Avaโ€™s emotional state as the film progresses. The dialogue is sparse, so the film really trusts you to pay attention as a viewer. The lack of speech does build some tension, but it never really amounts to anything. The heavy breathing might also wear thin; it even carries over the bulls and cows’ mooing. 

Thematically, the film circles questions of identity and reinvention. Can Ava ever step outside the shadow of her past, or is she doomed to replay it? The narrative suggests that reclaiming power in a corrupt system may be less radical than walking away from it, though the film stops short of offering easy redemption.

Toward the end, audiences might begin to feel a little twitchy as it does begin to feel like a lot of talk and no action. But sit with it, as the ending is more heartfelt than expected. Although maybe a little more action could have helped the last act be memorable. Ultimately, In Cold Light is a controlled, performance-driven thriller that favors mood over momentum. It does not radically reinvent the crime genre, but it refines it with icy discipline. Anchored by Monroeโ€™s steely presence and deepened by Kotsurโ€™s quiet humanity, the film offers a bleak but compelling study of a woman fighting not just external enemies, but the gravitational pull of her own history.

Grade: C

Movie Review: ‘Redux Redux’ is Thrilling Multiverse Mayhem on a Shoestring Budget


Directors: Kevin McManus, Matthew McManus
Writers: Kevin McManus, Matthew McManus
Stars: Michaela McManus, Stella Marcus, Jeremy Holm

Synopsis: Irene Kelly travels through parallel universes, repeatedly killing her daughter’s murderer. As she becomes consumed by vengeance, her humanity hangs in the balance


There are few things in this life more satisfying than a sci-fi concept done masterfully on a small budget. For example, the 2023 film Aporia beautifully depicts the consequences of making small adjustments in time through in-camera visuals. Redux Redux accomplishes a similar result, only instead of time manipulation, it’s a multiverse of never-ending vengeance. In a cinema landscape where studios throw money at everything to achieve spectacle, Redux Redux is a solid refresher that genuinely great sci-fi can be executed with the smallest of resources, as long as we care about the characters.

Directed and written by Kevin and Matthew McManus, the film centers on Irene (Michaela McManus), a woman who journeys through endless multiverses in search of a universe in which a twisted teenage girl murderer, Neville (Jeremy Holm), has not killed her daughter, Anna (Grace Van Dien). The film sets the stage very clearly for the viewer. Irene is seen visiting the same diner in every universe, and when Neville is not at his day job washing dishes or cooking in the back, she hunts him at his home, typically leading to his death. The filmmakers offer a striking visual in one universe, showing Irene setting Neville on fire in the middle of a desert. It’s the same visual used in the film’s marketing posters. Each time before ultimately killing Neville, she asks the same questions. Where did he put her daughter? Does he remember her?

Irene’s multiverse of death isn’t always the same. She often finds a subtle romance with a charming local named Jonathan (Jim Cummings). It’s implied that Irene met Jonathan before her multiverse spiral, as she knows he attends the same weekly support group for grieving adults. It’s a subplot that is both remarkable and potentially a plothole. The details provide Irene’s history and indicate how long she has been in this vengeful nightmare. At the same time, it’s unclear if time resets after every multiverse jump or if it continually moves forward. Especially because Jonathan almost looks the same in every encounter.

The violent, chaotic world Irene inhabits is disrupted when she finds a living survivor, Mia (Stella Marcus), at Neville’s house. The discovery happens after jumping to a new universe. It’s in this new dynamic that Irene begins to see a possible redemption for herself. By caring for Mia, she could see a second chance at offering protection where she couldn’t for her own daughter. The problem is that Mia is a reckless teenager who wants to see Neville burn. She craves the vengeance Irene has experienced over and over. But the emotions become clouded when Mia is forced to multiverse-jump with Irene, further confusing her state of mind as she enters a new timeline.

The strongest areas of Redux Redux stem from how far it stretches its universe with so little. The multiverse vehicle is shaped like a coffin, with a metallic shell and a personality akin to the Bill and Ted phone booth. With each jump, the in-camera visual effects wonderfully show how the energy explodes inward. For example, one scene shows Irene running from the cops. As she initiates a universe jump in the machine, the device, which sits inside a hotel, pops to a new dimension, and the hotel doors, along with the cops, fly into the hotel room, almost like a bomb popping in reverse.

The film briefly explores the expansive underworld of multiverse jumping. It’s in these details that the screenplay by Kevin and Matthew McManus proves thoughtful in its attempt at world-building. The subplot is brief but depicts the grimy underbelly of multiverse dealers who supply parts and various forms of multiverse machines. Taylor Misiak, best known from the FX series Dave, takes on a surprising role in the film. Her character, Billie, a multiverse trader and transporter, is a role that stretches her talents into dark places, which is a refreshing choice given Misiak’s charm in the Li’l Dicky show.

The dark tone extends to the film’s serial-killer backdrop. While most ofRedux Redux leans into the fun side of telling a multiverse story on the smallest of budgets, various sequences have the flavor of an old-fashioned thriller. Throughout the storyline, Kevin and Matthew McManus weave moments of Fincher-esque dread, providing the audience with an undertone akin to that of Mindhunter or The Silence of the Lambs. One sequence feels eerily reminiscent of Mindhunter Season 2’sย  BTK killer opener, showing Irene walking toward the bathroom in Neville’s house as the synth-inspired score from Paul Koch becomes aggressive. As she opens the bathroom door, we can’t see the horror in front of her, but we understand it’s terrible. The story ultimately pays off the serial killer subplot with fantastic suspense. It never becomes a slasher or horror movie, but the characters are in enough peril to make the viewer question the outcome.


It’s the balance between crafting an effective thriller involving a serial killer and providing a multiverse kick that makes the experience gripping. As seen this weekend by the release of Psycho Killer, some filmmakers are unable to satisfy one of these characteristics, much less both. Redux Redux demonstrates how far the imagination can stretch with minimal resources, while delivering a genuinely suspenseful film. The film is far from perfect and potentially has questionable logic in its multiverse mechanics. Regardless, the blending of a vengeance narrative in a multiverse setup is executed wonderfully. Kevin and Matthew McManus are showing tremendous potential here, and it will be exciting to witness what they are capable of with more resources.

Grade: B