Wednesday, July 9, 2025
Home Blog Page 88

Movie Review: ‘Return To Seoul’ is Not To Be Missed


Director: Davy Chou

Writer: Davy Chou

Stars: Park Ji-min, Oh Kwang-rok, Guka Han

Synopsis: A twenty-five-year-old French woman returns to Korea, the country she was born in before being adopted by a French couple, for the very first time. She decides to track down her biological parents, but her journey takes a surprising turn.


Davy Chou’s exceptional character study is about the haunting empty void of hollow identity and the non-existent end to finding closure. Equipped with a simply stunning turn by newcomer Park Ji-min, Return to Seoul is wonderfully nuanced. A multi-layered and deeply felt cinematic experience of the trauma of childhood abandonment that is inherent to international adoption.

The story follows Frédérique Benoît (Ji-min). Known as “Freddie,” she is a French Korean woman who was given up for adoption at the Hammond Home (The most prominent adoption agency in South Korea). Now, Freddie returns to South Korea for the first time. Why? The obvious answer is to locate her biological parents. The other appears to be not a search for personal identity but a cultural one.

Freddie is a tiny tornado looking to leave a wake in the Korean cultural establishment. She is staying with Tena (Guka Han), who is a French-speaking translator, her guide to Korea, and her helping hand with Hammond. While having dinner with Tena and her friend, Dongwan (Son Seung-Beom), begins to run to surrounding tables. One by one, she pairs young single men and women at a table. She begins saturating her new friends with an overflowing amount of soju. Freddie is now almost mocking the Korean tradition of pouring one’s drink by caring to serve the entire room, as opposed to just one. She is now rebelling against a culture that rejected her.

Freddie is not trying to fit into her new surroundings, but making those around, who are highly malleable, conform to her. Chou’s script continuously pits east versus west cultural norms against each other. Freddie frequently experiences triggers by her biological family’s unearned concern and guilt-ridden apologies discomforting. Her biological father (Oh Kwang-rok) is a tragic figure, reliving the haunting events of giving up his daughter almost a quarter century ago. So much so that his wife shares with Freddie that he drinks and cries every night before he sleeps, ruminating over her.

The trauma of childhood abandonment makes for a significantly more complex story. Also, being seen through a lens of international adoption is deeply felt throughout Chou’s phenomenal film from different angles. The script really stands out because you learn about individual characters’ triggers, viewing them in other lights, which makes even the smallest of roles three-dimensional. It’s a multifaceted experience. Freddie goes through crescendo-decrescendo patterns and behavior patterns, even during periods of descending and ascending maturity through different life stages. It’s breathtaking, really. Specifically, seeing Ji-min’s burning aggression and anger, heartbreaking sadness, and withdrawal takes us on her journey. All lead to mental health diseases such as major depressive and bipolar disorder and self-medicated substance abuse.

Yes, Freddie was raised in a loving environment, but feeling lonely and isolated. It’s quite a high-wire act Chou clears here. You get the perspective of what some call the child mill of the adoption industry in Korea. (With over 200,000 adoptions since what the Asian Centennial calls the “child diaspora” sparked in 1955 by Bertha and Henry Holt). A simple Google search will also shine a light on the overrepresentation of females in the Korean (and international) adoption system. You’ll also see a reflection of the unspoken bond between other adoptees she connects with in Seoul. The theme of the hot-button topic of international adoption is particularly interesting. This practice has been cut by 72% since 2005—a result of many questioning the practice that was becoming an issue of forced cultural migration. Here, the character of Freddie is a product of intended and unintended consequences that have come full circle.

Return to Seoul is a soul-stirring film (pun intended) that slowly sneaks up on you. As a viewer, Chou will have you asking yourself where the story is taking you. The film’s constant emotional material, like rocks on the bottom of the riverbed, displays devastating effects that shape familial generations. Nevermore apparent in one of the film’s very best scenes, where her biological father makes sure he locates a cab for her with a preset destination to avoid Seoul’s famed Itaewon district because Freddie is achieving a period of sobriety. By the film’s end, you will be in awe of Ji-min’s jaw-dropping arc of maturity and how she deals with yet another moment of disappointment.

Return to Seoul‘s complex portrait of the trauma that comes from abandonment that leads to ethnocultural identity confusion is spectacular —a one-of-a-kind experience that cannot be missed.

Grade – A+

 

Podcast: Top 5 Sports Movies – Episode 524

This week’s episode is brought to you by the film Devotion. Follow us on Twitter for your chance to win a FREE Blu-ray!

This week on the InSession Film Podcast, inspired by Creed III, Brendan and JD talk about their Top 5 sports movies! We also discuss who will be the next breakthrough star in Hollywood similar to Jonathan Majors this year.

On that note, check out this week’s show and let us know what you think in the comment section. Thanks for listening and for supporting the InSession Film Podcast!

– Top 5 Sports Movies (10:05)

This is actually the second time we’ve done this exercise as we talked about our favorite sports movies all the way back on Episode 8 back in 2013. So, we felt it was time to bring it back and revisit what makes these movies so inspiring and fun.

[divider]

RELATED: Listen to Episode 516 of the InSession Film Podcast where we discussed our Top 10 Movies of 2022!

[divider]

– Next Breakthrough Star (1:17:44)

Jonathan Majors has come a long way since The Last Black Man in San Francisco back in 2019. He’s shown incredible charisma and range in just a short time, and has become one of Hollywood’s most notable breakthrough’s in some time. So we thought it would be fun to discuss a few other candidates who could be the next one to have a similar run in the near future.

Show Sponsor: First Time Watchers Podcast

– Music

About Today – The National
Glasgow – Jessie Buckley
The Return of the Eagle – Atli Örvarsson

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
InSession Film Podcast – Episode 524

[divider]

Next week on the show:

2023 Oscars

[divider]

Help Support The InSession Film Podcast

If you want to help support us, there are several ways you can help us and we’d absolutely appreciate it. Every penny goes directly back into supporting the show and we are truly honored and grateful. Thanks for your support and for listening to the InSession Film Podcast!

VISIT OUR DONATE PAGE HERE

Women InSession: Top 5 Worst Best Picture Nominees – Episode 28

On Episode 28 of Women InSession, we discuss our least favorite Best Picture nominees! Some of these come from a place of bafflement, some from frustration and others from fury. Either way, these are the films that should have never have been nominated for Hollywood’s biggest prize.

Panel: Kristin Battestella, Zita Short, Amy Thomasson

On that note, check out this week’s show and let us know what you think in the comment section. Thanks for listening and for supporting the InSession Film Podcast!

– Music

The Return of the Eagle – Atli Örvarsson

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
Women InSession – Top 5 Worst Best Picture Nominees

[divider]

To hear this Extra Film episode and everything else we do, download our apps on the Amazon Market for Android and the Podcast Source app on IOS devices. The mobile app covers all of our main shows, bonus podcasts and everything else relating to the InSession Film Podcast. Thanks for your wonderful support and for listening to our show. It means the world to us.

Podcast Review: Creed III

On this episode, JD, Brendan and Ryan discuss Michael B. Jordan’s directorial debut in Creed III! Between Jordan behind the camera, and the inclusion of Jonathan Majors, there’s plenty to love about the latest in the Rocky/Creed franchise. But does it land all of its punches? We discuss.

Review: Creed III (8:30)
Director: Michael B. Jordan
Writers: Keenan Coogler, Zach Baylin
Stars: Michael B. Jordan, Jonathan Majors, Tessa Thompson

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
InSession Film Podcast – Creed III

Cool Eighties Comedies

In our turbulent times, it’s always pleasant to retreat to these epitome of cool, nostalgic comfort comedies.

 

Bill and Ted’s Excellent Adventure

Time traveler George Carlin (Dogma) must help Alex Winter (The Lost Boys) as Bill S. Preston, esquire and Keanu Reeves (The Matrix) as Ted “Theodore” Logan save the future in this memorable 1989 teen classic. The Wyld Stallyns duo uses their phone booth time machine to collect famous figures – including Billy the Kid, Sigmund “Freud Dude,” “Beeth-Oven,” “So-Crates,” and Abraham Lincoln – to pass their history class. Although the onscreen antics and paradoxical premise are preposterous and some of the derogatory comedy is dated, it almost doesn’t matter. Our actors look and sound the tweedle dee and tweedle dumb part; their quirky humor, witty chemistry, and time travel mayhem balance anything nonsensical or silly. Sharp dialogue and air guitar exclamations provide chuckle worthy moments that have seeped into the cultural lexicon almost because of the terrible fashions, simplistic eighties effects, and the bizarre vision of a future utopia brought together by cool music montages. You can tune in to this fun, nostalgic time capsule at any point in the movie and see something that keeps you coming back. Excellent!

 

Clue

Butler Tim Curry (The Rocky Horror Picture Show) invites mysterious guests Eileen Brennan (The Sting), Christopher Lloyd (Back to the Future), Madeline Kahn (Blazing Saddles), and more to a foreboding mansion for a fifties dinner party serving murder, blackmail, and red herrings in this 1985 based-on-the-board-game farce. Be it “Flames…on the side of my face…” or “One plus two plus one plus one,” each member of the ensemble has a memorable moment, trademark, or catchphrase. Sure, cliche victims or accomplices serve their purpose and the killer plots are up for debate, but the outrageous set ups, slapstick situations, and self-aware lightning clashes punctuate the clever word play and deadpan dialogue. Risqué puns and double talk timing provide mature chuckles as well as laugh out loud moments thanks to a smart script that works for viewers young and old. The nom de plume attire of each character and quirky eighties score peppered with good old doo wop on the phonograph create a high end old fashioned film noir mixed with an eighties comedic pace perfect for repeat viewing. Multiple endings toy with character deliveries, subtext, and the whodunit of it all without pulling the rug out from under the audience via pleasant deductions and winks.

 

Crocodile Dundee

“That’s a knife!” Paul Hogan and Linda Kozlowski (also of the lesser but still fun Crocodile Dundee II) steam it up in this 1986 Down Under fish out of water romp. Granted, some of the Bushman in New York scenes don’t work today, the foreign slang will still be tough for some, and a few conversations are offensive and racially questionable. The music, rad eighties styles, casual drug party scenes, and veiled Reagan era subtext are of their time as well. After a great Australian start with the titular encounters, Indigenous humor, and lovely Outback locales, the typical American explorations drag the middle of the film. Fortunately, the culture clash charm and genuine onscreen chemistry carry the clichés. The classic New York scenery is also now sentimental, and multiple viewings are needed to pick up all the visual gags and winking bemusements culminating in a surprisingly pleasing subway confession. There’s man’s man adventure and around the world romance – something for everyone, mate!

 

Summer School

Much in this 1987 comedy starring Mark Harmon (NCIS) and Kirstie Alley (Cheers) wouldn’t fly today. Director Carl Reiner (The Jerk) populates the eponymous course with slackers, a beach bum gym teacher, goofy field trips, juicy foreign exchange students, strip clubs, study bribes, and a Texas Chainsaw Massacre classroom viewing. Fortunately, shoulder pads, one earring styles, surf boards, cute dogs, and lighthearted tunes maximize the eighties innocence amid going to jail on roller skates and not so raunchy innuendo. Peppy montages assure everyone has their absurd moment as punchlines, visual gags, food, oral fixations, and performances accentuate the comedy rather than rely on today’s gross out extremes. Serious issues such as family troubles, student/teacher crushes, teen pregnancy, toxic behaviors, and dyslexia are also touched upon; grades are not a reflection of an underachiever’s potential but not every smug educator is in it to prevent failing youths from slipping through the system. The number of students changes, the big test doesn’t mean much, and the parents are inexplicably pleased with the havoc, but such charming preposterousness makes for a laid back re-watch.

 

The War of The Roses

From throwing plates and kitchen appliances mayhem to sauna dangers, almost cooked pets, and chandelier disasters – Kathleen Turner, Michael Douglas, and director Danny DeVito poke fun at their previous Romancing the Stone and Jewel of the Nile adventures in this dark 1989 divorce comedy. The sharp, innuendo loaded script starts blissfully enough with naughty gymnastics and humble struggles before making partner workaholics and the perfect mansion filled with all the curated best antiques. The classy manor and decades old splendor provides the perfect backdrop as the sexy suggestions devolve and the creative violence escalates in the yuppie keeping up with the Joneses upstanding pressures. The stars are at their peaks with witty deliveries and clever physicality accenting the divided chemistry. The passage of time transitions, boxy fashions, and eighties hairstyles may be too of the past now, and the brief saucy is probably tame today. However, adults of a certain age will appreciate the bitter marital minutiae as the deranged exploits culminate in a cynical yet entertaining crescendo.

 

Movie Series Review: As Tears Go By

On this episode, Ryan and Jay begin our Wong Kar-wai Movie Series with his 1988 debut film As Tears Go By!

Review: As Tears Go By (8:30)
Director: Wong Kar-wai
Writers: Jeffrey Lau, Wong Kar-wai
Stars: Andy Lau, Maggie Cheung, Jacky Cheung

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
InSession Film Podcast – As Tears Go By

Kick Ass Women’s Comedies

These eighties and nineties ladies knew how to take names and bring the laughter in these pleasing, palate cleansing, nostalgic comedies.

 

The Beautician and The Beast

James Bond himself, Timothy Dalton (License to Kill) dons a mustache as the faux Eastern European dictator to The Nanny’s Fran Drescher in this 1997 New York hairdresser turned government saving governess comedy. Cultural stereotypes and cliches from both sides of the pond pepper the typical, preposterous premise. Every romantic movie staple is here, too – from her shaving and feeding him to dressing like a princess for the big, all revealing final ball. Though pretty, the castle-esque Prague scenery is surprisingly small in scale, dressings, and stature. Deeper social commentaries and political debates don’t get enough attention and seem out of place amid some of forced, on the nose scenes between the leads. Obviously, Drescher is ultimately playing her Fran Fine character, and audiences will either love her nasal accent and tacky, over the top style or hate the canned humor. Having said all that, thankfully, there are some great wisecracks and charming circumstances to carry the viewer over the thin, rough spots. Dalton is so bad it’s good in the button up stuffiness that’s supposed to be poking fun at that stiff upper lip. The awkward misunderstandings and crisscrossed romance has a goofy, so annoying it’s charming endearment that remains kitschy for fans of the cast.

 

Big Business

“What’s a cow flop, Mommy?” Bette Midler (Beaches) and Lily Tomlin (Grace and Frankie) double the fun as two sets of mismatched twins in this 1988 romp from director Jim Abrahams (The Naked Gun) with everything from Benny Goodman tunes and Bette Midler yodeling to a superb ensemble and eighties New York pastiche. Those of a certain age will pick up on the now tame innuendo and dated Dynasty references, but the Plaza Hotel time capsule setting adds to mistaken plots, twin twists, and country versus city situational farce. The split screen and dual effects are apparent today; however the shoulder pads, pink polka dot dresses, big hats, and tiaras do more for the multiple performances. Midler and Tomlin master four separate characterizations with zingers, press on nails, mint juleps, and sass to match. Despite the twofer predictability, under-cooked romances, and of the time flaws, multiple viewings are a must, because “Is a frog’s ass watertight?”

 

Serial Mom

Kathleen Turner (Romancing the Stone) stars in writer and director John Waters’ (Hairspray) 1994 Susie Homemaker satire with based on a true story winks, angelic credits, idyllic kitchens, and golly gee family. A fly in the butter and its bloody splat, however, forebode the tightly wound sadistic contrasting the floral wallpaper, sunshine, and sewing baskets. Retro button up styles, corded telephones, and cassettes add eighties nostalgia to match the 9:37 a.m. foul mouthed split screen prank call to the local parking spot stealer. After baking cookies, it’s time to sing along in the station wagon and run over the school teacher before a trip to the car wash. Ruined bird watching leads to killer scissors and a filthy neighbor who doesn’t recycle amid pearl clutching over films being a bad influence and vintage porn. Eating sweets and swapping price tags layer the life’s little naughtiness parody when not stabbing a philander with a fire poker or bludgeoning an old lady with a burned rack of lamb. Bloody weapons, fingerprints, killer scrapbooks, witnesses – if you don’t rewind, there will be consequences! The murderous pursuits are filmed in full horror suspense, yet debates on whether the Mrs. needs a lawyer or an agent and selling t-shirts at the courthouse invoke a bemusing sensationalism. Her TV Movie rights are sold to Suzanne Summers, Patty Hearst is one of the jurors, and you must not wear white shoes after Labor Day. The dark wit, social exposé, and cheeky performances remain a relevant reflection of our humorously horrible celebrity obsessions.

 

She-Devil

Roseanne Barr’s ugly and unloved housewife Ruth reads romance novels and dreams of making herself as beautiful as enchanting author Meryl Streep (Doubt) in this witty 1989 revenge tale. When Streep’s perfectly pink Mary Fisher has an affair with Ruth’s sleazy husband Ed Begley, Jr. (St. Elsewhere), Ruth takes matters into her own hands – vowing to destroy his home, family, career, and freedom. Director Susan Seidelman (Desperately Seeking Susan) provides a sarcastically quotable and multilayered story with suggestive dialogue and well balanced physical comedy matching the on form cast’s deadpan delivery. Whether she’s smooth talking marshmallows with her publisher or cursing out the kids, Mary means business. Streep has a good time as the straight woman socialite desperate to salvage her lux lifestyle amid degrading slapstick and turnabout fair play. Frumpy Ruth’s vengeance is not undeserved but she goes to humorous extremes with a charming ensemble along for the ride. Ruth grows confident, stylish, and likable – we delight in her understandable rage as the dismissed homemaker. Though largely a story for women, the humor here can be enjoyed by all audiences and grows better with age.

 

Straight Talk

“Get down off the cross honey, somebody needs the wood!” and “I’m busier than a one legged man in a butt kicking contest!” quips and Dollyisms cement this 1992 Dolly Parton (9 to 5) sleeper. Sure, Dolly is largely just being her lovable self amid the mistaken circumstances and country bumpkin rags to riches feel good. However her evolution from dumb blonde dancer to fun airwaves advice doctor feels refreshingly genuine despite the commonplace fish out of water cum radio doctor swindle. James Woods (Casino) as a washed up journalist antagonist turned romantic foil leads the pleasant supporting cast, and a few good tangos with original music from Dolly accent the morality, heart, and truthfulness. Quiet bemusements and mature moments raise the story above formulaic romantic comedy expectations without resorting to the usual foul or saucy. There are, however, six separate montages and a dated job search sagging the middle – leaving the reasonable ninety minutes seeming short or poorly paced with a material missing feeling. Despite the enjoyable Chicago scenery, the on air confessions, break ups, make ups, and horns honking finale are seriously predictable, but thankfully, this remains a cute charmer with a little something to put a smile on anyone’s face. 

 

Movie Review: ‘Cocaine Bear’ Has High Thrills, But Its Screenplay is a Mess


Director: Elizabeth Banks

Writer: Jimmy Warden

Stars: Kerri Russell, Alden Ehrenreich, O’Shea Jackson Jr., Ray Liotta

Synopsis: An oddball group of cops, criminals, tourists, and teens converge on a Georgia forest where a huge black bear goes on a murderous rampage after unintentionally ingesting cocaine.


How can you screw up something so basic like Cocaine Bear? That was the question I asked myself while sitting through Elizabeth Banks’ insanely promising, yet terribly unfunny movie that lacked both fun and cathartic slapstick humor and massive amounts of gore. The film is based on the true story of a Black Bear who shortly died after ingesting a duffel bag full of cocaine in 1985. However, it revises the part where the bear died and instead goes on a killing spree while looking for more cocaine to snort. Doesn’t that sound incredible? Doesn’t that sound like the return of cinema? Music to my ears! Finally, this could be Hollywood’s answer to Quentin Dupieux’s Rubber, and yet…

There are some sequences that do work in this movie, and spoiling them would rob you of the pleasure of discovering them for yourself. All of them involve Margo Martindale’s Ranger Liz, who oversees the national park in which the Bear is located. Martindale’s comedic timing is perfect, teetering the line between absurdly self-aware and just frightened enough that when the Bear charges, you believe in her willingness to protect visitors at all costs. She’s the best part of the film (she has every funny line and best action setpieces to herself), alongside Alden Ehrenreich whose delivery of “The bear! It f—ing did cocaine!” is exactly why he was cast in the role in the first place. 

Ehrenreich has decent enough chemistry with O’Shea Jackson Jr. who plays his drug dealing partner, but Jackson can’t match the same level of comedic skills that Ehrenreich, Martindale, or even Isiah Whitlock Jr. (who plays a police detective whose deadpan line deliveries are legendary) bring to the table. It’s unfortunate that every other actor in this incredible ensemble are nowhere near as good as the ones mentioned above. Even the late Ray Liotta, in one of his final film roles, looks completely bored playing Syd, the drug dealer on top of the operation to retrieve the cocaine-filled duffel bags. He’s barely in the film, and when he’s in it, his performance is a total sleepwalk. What a shame, since this will be one of the last times audiences will see Liotta on screen. 

And while there are many cathartic sequences in Cocaine Bear, most of its insanity lacks a severe amount of gore. The CGI Bear doesn’t look convincing, nor scary. It makes a weird guttural sound every time he’s close to cocaine, which doesn’t make it feel like a menacing creature, and the same can be said for how the film edits the bear’s drug trips. At one point, a character mentions “it’s Christmas with cocaine,” and Christmas bells are heard to signal that, hey, this is snow for the bear! Boring. 

The action is also quite haphazardly shot. There’s an incredible ambulance chase that happens almost halfway through the movie, but it’s the only sequence where the bear feels like a menacing threat to the characters. It’s also the only time in which Banks and cinematographer John Guleserian craft something visually exciting and push the gore to the extreme. One shot of a hand barely hanging on a character’s arm is powerful enough to provoke a strong reaction. The film’s climax is so poorly shot and set in the laziest setting possible (a dark cave!) that all momentum it tries to create is lost in a sea of murky cinematography, poorly conceived CGI, and shoddily written dialogue. 

As such, the insanity that is Cocaine Bear is only reserved for its trailer, which promises an insane ride at the movies, only for the movie to be a total whimper. It never doubles down on its premise enough to make it feel like a blast. Aside from a few great performances and select fun action scenes, most of Cocaine Bear’s impact falls flat. This could’ve been the movie to save all self-referential movies. However, it’s the single biggest disappointment of a film made in the 2020’s so far. That’s not good. 

Grade: D+

 

Training Day Revisited on 4K

Antoine Fuqua’s 2001 film Training Day takes place over the course of a single day, and for the first time, that fateful day in which Jake Hoyt (Ethan Hawke) and Alonzo Harris (Denzel Washington) meet, is available on 4K right at home. From the dazzling opening sunrise robotically waking up Hoyt at 5 in the morning, it’s a film that handles characterization moreso through action than anything else. The body language of Hoyt is of a man clearly anxious to impress on his first day alongside the veteran narcotics officer Harris, who plays by his own rules (meaning many other rules get broken). Even before the two meet, the phone call they share dictates the clear power dynamic that will be at play throughout the rest of the film. At a lean 122 minutes, this film is a taut thriller that plays hard and fast, serving as the perfect vehicle for one of the all-time great Oscar-winning lead performances from Denzel Washington.

As Hoyt sits down across from Harris at a diner early in the morning, his superior all but disregards his very existence. “Looking for entertainment”, as he likes to put it, one might think that Harris acts the way he does merely to keep his company on their toes. But on the contrary, the more startling revelation is that Harris appears to act this way less out of boredom and more out of habit. He’s a man that does not see a blurred line between the law and street justice, but rather, one that is forcefully bent to his very will. It’s a performance that could either be played very run-of-the-mill, or fall into downright parody. “A bad boy cop who doesn’t play by the rules” is a cliched role that’s as old as the noir genre itself. Yet, in the hands of Washington, he commands the performance in an unparalleled manner. It’s such a great performance that some could argue undercuts the very essence of the movie. It’s dazzling in every which way, making each tense moment feel amplified to the utmost degree due to the genuine sense of not knowing what really might be going on behind those piercing, menacing eyes of his.

Make no mistake, Fuqua’s Training Day is one of the finer films to take place over the course of a single day. As the moral boundaries of a man are tested, Fuqua and writer David Ayer shine a light on just how effective, or not, both policemen can be following their respective codes. It’s an introspective layer that lends itself very well to the massively entertaining film. Alongside the film are a handful of fun and interesting special features. Including an alternate ending, additional scenes, and a commentary from Fuqua; There’s also some music videos from Nelly and Pharoahe Monche. With films like these, celebrating 100 years of Warner Bros. is surely going to be a fun, thrilling, and perhaps most importantly, wildly entertaining experience.

Movie Review (Berlinale 2023): ‘The Klezmer Project’ Explores the Erasure of Culture


Directors: Leandro Koch and Paloma Schachmann

Writers: Leandro Koch and Paloma Schachmann

Stars: Rebecca Hanover, Leandro Koch, Cesar Lerner

Synopsis: A sense of humour to flourish and gives rise to a powerful groundswell of emotions that carries us away in music.


The Klezmer Project (‘Adentro mío estoy bailando’) is both a love story and a documentary about lost traditions at the same time, as Leandro Koch and co-director Paloma Schachmann concoct a fascinating, albeit messy (in parts), project that interweaves fictionalized narratives and history of klezmer melodies to heighten the audience’s curiosity. 

Before the Holocaust, Klezmer music dominated the Yiddish-speaking world’s musical expressions, primarily the eastern regions. This traditional folk-like music borrows inspiration from various genres and styles, like classical and synagogue – the title comes from the contraction of two Hebrew words: instrument (kley) and song (zemer). In his documentary debut, The Klezmer Project, Argentinian filmmaker Leandro Koch and co-director Paloma Schachmann try to explore the last glances of this slowly disappearing iconic instrumental tradition. At the beginning of the film, the narrator, whom we later discover is Koch’s grandmother, quotes: “Culture and language never die; it’s not natural. They were assassinated.” That remark is the basis for the documentary’s exploration of culture and rite’s importance in people’s lives through the traces of customary klezmer music. 

There have been many documentaries in which its creators take a more in-depth look at their respective cultures to reflect on the past and how it has influenced them. However, this documentary has many intriguing twists and turns, slowly intertwining fiction and reality. Koch is an Argentinian from a Jewish background, and he’s playing another version of himself. In The Klezmer Project (which recently won the GWFF Best First Feature Award at this year’s Berlin Film Festival), Koch is a frustrated wedding cameraman that isn’t entirely interested in his family’s religion and cultural aspects. But, like all artists, he wants to create something worthwhile, a picture that takes his name into the spotlight. But, when he immediately falls in love with a klezmer music-playing clarinetist named Paloma, Koch starts fabricating a documentary. 

Simply to impress her (and spend some time with her), Koch tells her that the project he is working on is based on his musical heritage, which happens to be the music Paloma loves playing, hence revealing one of the many meanings of its title. Koch and Schachmann take the sensibilities of documentary filmmaking and take us on a journey from Buenos Aires (Argentina) to Eastern Europe in search of identity, passion, and the lost klezmer melodies safeguarded by the Romani before the Second World War. The viewer hears Koch’s story about falling in love via voice-over. But, we never know if all of this actually happened in real life or if it is just a figment of their imagination, just to add to the distortion between fantasy and truth. There’s an element of curiosity pouring out of the screen, both from the leading players in the documentary and us watching. 

Because there are minor details in the overall storyline of its imaginary parts, the audience remains curious about every cinematic turn The Klezmer Project takes. The film interlocks Koch’s personal story about finding his identity by searching for local bands in both South America and Europe. Just by these self-referential descriptions of The Klezmer Project, you should know that this documentary is not, in the least, a straightforward documentary about klezmer music or the musicians behind it. Instead, it is an occasionally confusing, but still amusing and humorous, piece of work forged by two intertwining love stories and the exploration of a lost tradition. This isn’t your regular “run-of-the-mill” presentation and strategy for documentaries. Still, Koch and crew manage to mostly pull it off, taking the viewer on a journey filled with scrutiny and intrigue on a topic most of us know little to nothing about. 

Of course, with all these narrative and storytelling elements, some aspects of The Klezmer Project might seem messy or disorganized. However, whether purposefully or not, the cluttered characteristic adds a creative underlining to the story Koch wants to tell. What the directing duo creates, in the end, is a funny and personal work that slowly unravels itself into a tale about the cross-generational erasure of culture and individualism. And in addition to those personal notes, it is a documentary about making art, in which Koch and Schachmann use The Klezmer Project as a piece of self-reflection regarding their pasts, presents, and futures. This may not be the best documentary I saw at this year’s Berlinale, but I am interested in seeing what the duo does next in their young careers. 

Grade: B

Podcast Review: Cocaine Bear

On this episode, Brendan and JD review the latest from Elizabeth Banks in the schlocky comedy-horror film Cocaine Bear! It’s obviously going for fun and came, but does the the film succeed in what it’s attempting to be? We debate.

Review: Cocaine Bear (8:30)
Director: Elizabeth Banks
Writers: Jimmy Warden
Stars: Keri Russell, O’Shea Jackson Jr., Christian Convery, Alden Ehrenreich, Brooklynn Prince

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
InSession Film Podcast – Cocaine Bear

Movie Review: ‘We Have a Ghost’ is a Tonally Awkward Misfire 


Director: Christopher Landon

Writer: Christopher Landon

Stars: Jahi Di’Allo Winston, David Harbour, Anthony Mackie, Jennifer Coolidge  

Synopsis: Finding a ghost named Ernest haunting their new home turns Kevin’s family into overnight social media sensations. But when Kevin and Ernest investigate the mystery of Ernest’s past, they become a target of the CIA.


Recently, I engaged in a strange double feature of Ingmar Bergman’s Oscar-winning 1973 drama Cries and Whispers and Christopher Landon’s newest horror comedy We Have a Ghost, the latter now available on Netflix. The two films surprisingly have a couple of things in common, namely the central ideas of death and grief, but something the films don’t share is the same running time. Cries and Whispers is a finely observed and richly detailed narrative that packs a lot into its brief ninety minutes, director Bergman not wasting a single minute to moments that don’t matter. We Have a Ghost, on the other hand, should’ve been the same length, and yet the movie drags on to an outrageous two hours and seven minutes. The one I wanted to go longer was Cries and Whispers. The one that could’ve ended by the hour-mark? The very bad and empty We Have a Ghost

One of the pains of watching a terrible movie like We Have a Ghost is knowing it was written and directed by an incredibly talented person. Christopher Landon has been a quiet master at the comedy horror genre, the two Happy Death Day movies being blissfully entertaining, and his 2020 genre entry Freaky a delight, and his best work yet. This is a guy who knows how to pace a horror film, where to put the comedic bits, how to use a gifted cast, and where to dump the buckets of blood. Therefore, I found myself scratching my head a lot as I took in We Have a Ghost, which never knows what kind of movie it wants to be and which has a slow, often sloppy pace that’s made even worse with its sinfully long running time.

The movie begins like a standard haunted house movie, Kevin (Jahi Di’Allo Winston) and his family, including his dad Frank (Anthony Mackie) and his mom Melanie (Erica Ash), coming to realize there’s an adult male ghost living in the attic—a man with a bad comb-over named Ernest (David Harbour). For about a half-hour, We Have a Ghost explores an interesting concept—what if instead of being scared by the ghost in our house, we tried to profit off it and become social media superstars by sharing the ghost’s images and videos online—and it’s this segment of the story that works the best, one that brings in Jennifer Coolidge as an egotistical psychic. But then the film drops that idea and starts veering all over the place, getting Ernest out of the house, sharing how he came to die, and giving us about seven different endings that are mostly serious, in a film that comes across as nothing more than a silly horror comedy.

Classic horror comedies like Beetlejuice know what they’re trying to be, and they don’t apologize for it. If you want to be a scary haunted house movie, fine, commit to it. If you want to be a horror comedy like Ghostbusters and Beetlejuice, then commit to that. The biggest problem with We Have a Ghost is that it never knows what it is, the tone is all over the place, so it’s hard to ever become invested in the story and characters. Ultimately the film fails at pretty much everything it’s trying to do. In a film like this, tone is everything, it’s even more important I’d argue than pacing and raising the stakes, and with three or four movies essentially battling it out, the viewer is left closing their hand, and grasping only air.

There is a moment at the end of We Have a Ghost, for example, in which I believe the director wants us to be welling up with tears. But the film hasn’t earned those tears. Ernest for the longest time is a goofy-looking jokester ghost who makes dumb boo noises while floating through the air and tearing CGI flesh away from his face. We’re supposed to then feel sympathy for him later when the film turns serious? Imagine if at the end of Beetlejuice, Tim Burton gave us a five-minute scene of Geena Davis and Alec Baldwin reuniting with their living loved ones, sans irony or humor. It would come off as odd, right? 

The cast in We Have a Ghost try, but they’re all playing their roles as if they’re in different movies, Anthony Mackie playing things for real, David Harbour trying to emulate Slimer from Ghostbusters, Jennifer Coolidge playing her role like an SNL sketch. And then there’s the villain of the film, which I won’t give away here, but he’s playing his role as if he’s in a terrifying follow-up to The Conjuring. Nobody seems to know what kind of movie this is supposed to be, including its own writer-director. The mix of tones reminded me a bit of Peter Jackson’s 1996 box office bomb The Frighteners, which has elements of horror and comedy and then turns serious in the final half-hour. But no matter the flaws, The Frighteners is always entertaining and filled with creativity and imagination. We Have a Ghost just leaves you feeling nothing.

Christopher Landon is a talented filmmaker, and I want to think this is a mere hiccup in what will continue to be an inspired career as a genre director. Part of me wonders if some of the fault goes to Netflix, a company that likes to throw money at big stars and name directors but then often doesn’t focus on the quality of the storytelling. I’m thinking of films like The Grey Man and Your Place or Mine, which with tighter scripts could’ve been solid entertainments but instead drone on and on with no end in sight. We Have a Ghost is sadly another entry in that group. Skip this tired, overlong misfire, and give the excellent Freaky a watch instead. Now that’s a Christopher Landon movie worth your time. 

GRADE: D

 

Movie Review: ‘Black Country, New Road: Live at Bush Hall’ Explores the Next Stage of Modern Musical Talents


Director: Greg Barnes

Stars: Tyler Hyde, May Kershaw, Lewis Evans

Synopsis: In place of a third studio album, the band  shares the music they’ve been playing live for the past year.


Black Country, New Road: Live at Bush Hall alluringly explores the next stage of one of the best modern bands out there. Their latest material contains their usual personal and expressionistic lyrics, despair, and bliss being ever-present, yet with a sharper melancholic undertone that goes back to the departure of their former frontman, Isaac Wood. 

What else can be said of the English rock band from Cambridgeshire, Black Country, New Road? For starters, I think they are one of the best groups working today, even though they have only released two records – ‘For the First Time’ in 2021 and ‘Ants from Up There’ in 2022. Every music publication has written about them and their young masterful artistry, raving about their newly-forged discography, multi-instrumental variations, and genre-crossing records. It’s a thing of beauty; at a time when the majority of mainstream music (and art, in general) is filled with mediocrity and lackluster emotionless dribble, Black Country, New Road is creating some of the most exciting, unique, and outright ravishing pieces of work I have seen in quite some time by a recent act. Their records speak to many listeners, even though the lyrics are written from a deep emotional space inside the minds of their respective writers. The music editor of Now Then Magazine, Sam Gregory, even called their last record “the best album of my adult lifetime” in a loving piece dedicated to sincerity and romanticism in it. 

Four days before the release of their second album, BC,NR’s frontman, Isaac Wood, announced his affable, yet unforeseen, departure from the band due to his struggles with his mental well-being. Everything felt like it was crashing down; everyone started worrying about their future. I thought they would break up entirely and become another group with immense talent that stayed together for less than a handful of years. However, the members (Georgia Ellery, Tyler Hyde, Charlie Wayne, Luke Mark, May Kershaw, and Lewis Evans) voiced their support for Wood’s decision to leave. Because of that, they abandoned their plans to tour with material from that record. Instead, they started from scratch with their new six-piece composition, sharing vocal roles and implementing new techniques to appear like that band we all love, albeit in a new direction and perspective. Whatever they do next would be a bold choice, as they had to see where their sound would be after their lead’s withdrawal. 

They thought out their next steps, thinking and curating carefully, and concluded with a post-Isaac Wood “reintroduction” tour showcasing new tracks. During that tour, Black Country, New Road did three shows in December at London’s classic venue, Bush Hall. The group decided to record the performances there instead of doing another studio album with that new material, hence creating the concert film (and documentary, narrowly) Black Country, New Road: Live at Bush Hall, directed by Greg Barnes and mixed by the legendary John Parish. Each of those shows has a different visual theme inspired by high-school theatrical productions – When the Whistle Thins (pastoral settings), The Taming of the School (80s-themed prom night), and I Ain’t Alfredo No Ghost (which is an eye-rolling, yet funny title) – that the band members wrote minor lore off. As a result, each stage looks purposefully corny, and the bandmates know it (as they dress for the part); the audience is also in on the gag. 

The group invites them to join the special event in style, and indeed they do, going all out, particularly from the prom-night-inspired show. These preparations and costume-filled festivities encapsulate Black Country, New Road’s ingenuity and dedication to reinvention. The first few seconds of the film focus on why people care about the band and what their music means to them. But, this is cut off immediately because the introductory song for the shows at Bush Hall, titled ‘Up Song’, captures those feelings from the perspective of the band and their appreciation toward Isaac Wood, singing: “Look at what we did together, BC,NR friends forever”. For this song, cinematographer Jack Maddison gives us glimpses of the audience welcoming the lyrics – dancing and singing along – all with an emotional tie to their love for them. There are also audience members who are recording the show with classic VHS cameras, whose footage is added onto the concert film so the viewer (us watching at home) can feel immersed in the show and make the fans feel special.

The editing team, consisting of director Greg Barnes and Kev Corry, is savvy in seamlessly intercutting the different performances. They consider the lyrics when playing with the footage shot at Bush Hall, making sure that the lighting also ties to them as well. However, one brilliant element manages to jump right off the screen. Throughout the short fifty-two-minute runtime of Live at Bush Hall, Greg Barnes concocts not only a unique experience that showcases the following stages of modern musical talents but an intimate one. It feels like a reunion of close-knit friends, all joining hands, embracing the expressive and stirring wonders of young masterful artistry. The quick glances of the audience’s faces mirror ours, watching at home. And after each song ends, the rupture of cheers from them brings a smile to the band member’s faces. 

Black Country, New Road’s new material featured at the Bush Hall concerts is just astonishing and spell-binding, to the point where you can’t just stick it into one specific genre. Pop punk, art rock, post-rock, and jazz influences are all scattered from track to track, often implementing most (if not all) of them in the same track. Black Country, New Road just delivers one beautiful song after the other, all covered in melancholy and bliss, adjoined by ‘A Moon Shaped Pool’-like instrumental breakdowns that add to those emotions in their tracks. However, a specific song would make any fan shed a tear due to the intimate and personal notes adjoined by May Kershaw’s smooth voice: ‘Turbines’. May repeatedly sings, “Don’t waste your pearls on me; I’m only a pig”, rewording the English phrase “pearls before swine”, meaning offering something valuable to someone who does not comprehend its worth. 

Although May’s interpretation of the lyrics remains unexplained, we might attach it to many things that have caused emotional wounds. Since the release of this concert film, I have been listening to their new material repeatedly. And each time, I get something new from it – a different feeling, a different emotion. There are layers in their personal and deft writing, as well as in May and Tyler’s haunting vocalizations backed by somber piano notes. If Live at Bush Hall is the next stage, or a glimpse of what’s to come, for one of the best bands in the world right now, then we are in for a magical and awe-inspiring journey. It may not be technically the best concert film out there. But, Live at Bush Hall definitely leaves a big emotional impression on every person who watches, whether you are a fan of BC,NR or not. 

Grade: A+

Criterion Collection: March 2023

March only has four films for release this month; one is a classic from the film noir era, along with three new entries. Two of them, coincidently, came out the same year; one is a starting point for a Hong Kong directing legend, the other an almost-forgotten Hollywood rom-com. The last film comes from the legend that is David Lynch with his most unconventional production that the diehard fans of his ate up from the beginning.  

 

Mildred Pierce (1945)

The only re-issue from the collection, Michael Curtiz’s soap opera noir features Joan Crawford in an Oscar-winning performance playing the titular character, a single mother struggling to make life better for her children. However, bad luck intervenes every time and creates a shocking revelation after a man is shot dead in her home. Melodrama hits its high note in James Cain’s novel, portraying the hard-working woman in a world lacking gentlemen (this was set during WWII) and making Joan Crawford the ultimate solo woman fighting for her slice of the American dream. 

 

Chilly Scenes of Winter (1979)

One of five women to direct a feature for Hollywood in the 1970s, Joan Micklin Silver dives into a comedy about the difficulties of finding and keeping love for one man. A civil servant falls for a woman who then leaves him to go back to her husband, only to learn later she’s single again. Desperate, he tries to get her back. John Heard, Mary Beth Hurt, Peter Riegert, and Gloria Grahame star in an underrated romantic comedy about the obsessive, love-smitten loner who just wants to find happiness.

 

Last Hurrah For Chivalry (1979)

Legendary Hong Kong director John Woo made a hit with one of his first features, a martial arts story about two swordsmen who help a man seek revenge. However, the journey turns into one about deception and the truth about who is really honorable. It finished up a decade of highly successful wuxia films that flourished in Hong Kong at this time with similar themes and Woo paid tribute to his mentor Chang Cheh, one of the biggest innovators of the martial arts theme at the time.

 

Inland Empire (2006)

David Lynch’s last full-length feature to date is one of the strangest he’s ever done, yet one of the best. Shot by himself with his then-wife and editor, Mary Sweeney, this was done with a digital camera, low resolution, and made on-the-fly with a day’s script being written on the spot. This was a very experimental project, but the Lynchian qualities are unmistakably present. Laura Dern, “a woman in trouble,” as the tagline states, is an actress who finds her role in a movie cursed due to past events around a previous production of the story. In true Lynchian form, you have to just sit back and take in a whole new experience. 

 

Follow me on Twitter: @brian_cine (Cine-A-Man)

Chasing The Gold: Let the Blockbuster Win

Streaming has killed television. Even before streaming, basic cable’s revolution in scripted series killed television. Even before that, premium cable channels outstripped anything on the big four networks. Television, as it once was, is dead and yet the largest, most revered film award show is desperate for people to watch its telecast on network television, in prime time.

Every year there are at least half a dozen articles before the Academy Awards that criticize and praise the ideas the newest batch of producers have to make the event a must watch broadcast. Every year, after the telecast, we all realize that the show wasn’t any shorter, the awfulness of the host wasn’t any less predictable, the montages were still ham-fisted, and actors should absolutely have a cutoff to their speeches.

We like the pageantry, the drama, the scale, the overwrought reverence for movies, and we tolerate the predictability that most of awards season has become. It’s so rare that we get to the final event of the film awards season and we don’t know with strong mathematical evidence which way each major category will go. It’s sort of boring when you really get to the nuts and bolts of it. The only people who are surprised are the people who have seen maybe one or two of the Best Picture nominees.

There’s nothing that depresses me more than a colleague, a stranger, or even a close friend bemoaning that nothing they’ve seen this year is up for anything major. They laugh out that, “What even are these movies? Did anyone even see them?” They complain that the Academy is elitist, snobby, and beholden to independent cinema. These same people skip anything that’s not familiar at the box office. The reason they didn’t see these films is because they chose not to, in many cases. In other cases, it’s because theater chains won’t take too much of a risk on one of their precious screens. Screens that are covered in the studio’s latest IP acquisition or reboot/remake/legacy sequel.

So toss it all out. Toss out the idea of an Oscar movie and focus on getting the viewers the Academy needs to keep their sponsors happy. The viewing public who, every week, is either destroying or saving movie theaters want their interests represented. The Academy wants those viewers and their respect.

Forget Everything Everywhere All At Once. Forget The Banshees of Inisherin, Tár, Triangle of Sadness, or even The Fabelmans. Give the people what they want. Award Top Gun: Maverick Best Picture.

The film is a proven winner as a box office powerhouse, an audience pleaser, and a surprising critical darling. Of the other blockbusters nominated, it’s got all the alchemy and charm where Elvis or Avatar: The Way of Water are missing one thing or the other. Top Gun: Maverick is a technical marvel and in a sea of legacy sequels. It’s a charmer, hitting notes that only a grizzled, more assured sequel story could. It’s not an impossible, improbable, or enraging thing to happen.

This is what the Academy needs to ensure their continued existence and to get the most people possible watching their telecast. They don’t need us. You and I, who seek out new movies by interesting filmmakers, who week after week find new original stories that are unnecessary to the governing body of the Academy Awards. You and I who see more than five movies in a movie theater, who go to film festivals, who support independent theaters, and buy physical media; we aren’t the majority. Our eyes only get the Academy so far and they don’t do what we need them to do anyway. We need them to pick the “right” movie and it so rarely happens that it may be time to let them slip off the door into the frozen waters of the North Atlantic. It may be time to let the Academy watch from the hallway as we close the door on them to plan the future of our family business. It may be time to say, screw your sad movie about a capitalist mogul, we want social change to come to our small, Welsh mining town!

So give Best Picture to Top Gun: Maverick. It is the correct, objective choice in the grand scheme of things. It will guarantee future viewers if they know that the era of the foreign film, that is a film that goes against the grain and tastes of broad audiences, is over. They’ll watch their stars again if they know that nothing unpleasant, challenging, or atypical has a chance of soiling the telecast. The five movies they saw in a theater that year will be well represented. The rest of us will continue to debate the true best picture with reverence, love, vitriol, and bile. Cinema has changed and what is old is always new again.

Podcast: Favorite Movies That Are Absolute Trash – Episode 523

This week’s episode is brought to you by Koffee Kult. Buy today and get 15% OFF with the code: ISF

This week on the InSession Film Podcast, inspired by Cocaine Bear, we discussed our favorite movies that are delicious dumpster whoppers! When we say “trash” we mean that with deep reverence. They may not be great, but we love them deeply. We also have a brief Q&A talking about the Oscars.

On that note, check out this week’s show and let us know what you think in the comment section. Thanks for listening and for supporting the InSession Film Podcast!

– Favorite Movies That Are Absolute Trash (1:35)

This is a fascinating topic because much of it will come down to how you define “trashy” movies and where on the spectrum it succeeds at being great garbage. There’s surprisingly a few nuances at play here, and we had a great time philosophizing on what a “trashy” movie is and why we love them. Again, to reiterate, we go into this conversation with nothing but love for these films.

[divider]

RELATED: Listen to Episode 516 of the InSession Film Podcast where we discussed our Top 10 Movies of 2022!

[divider]

– Oscar Talk (1:27:16)

With the 2023 Oscars looming, we have a brief discussion about some winners that surprised us, and we do our best to project how this year’s crop of nominees will hold up down the road.

Show Sponsor: First Time Watchers Podcast

– Music

Arrival to Earth – Steve Jablonsky
This is Your Land – Woody Guthrie
The Return of the Eagle – Atli Örvarsson

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
InSession Film Podcast – Episode 523

[divider]

Next week on the show:

Boxing / Sports Movies

[divider]

Help Support The InSession Film Podcast

If you want to help support us, there are several ways you can help us and we’d absolutely appreciate it. Every penny goes directly back into supporting the show and we are truly honored and grateful. Thanks for your support and for listening to the InSession Film Podcast!

VISIT OUR DONATE PAGE HERE

Movie Review (Berlinale 2023): ‘Tótem’ is a Touching Exploration of the Dualities of Life and Death 


Director: Lila Avilés

Writer: Lila Avilés

Stars: Naíma Sentíes, Montserrat Maranon, Marisol Gase

Synopsis: Seven-year-old Sol spends the day at her grandfather’s home, helping with the preparations for a surprise party for her father. Throughout the day, chaos slowly takes over, fracturing the family’s foundations. Sol will embrace the essence of letting go as a release for existence.


Lila Avilés’ sophomore feature, Tótem, has the actress-turned-filmmaker delivering a personal and warm family drama about the intricacy of human relationships and their experiences with mortality. The Mexican filmmaker’s latest intertwines deep-seeded sadness with tenderness and levity to keep the film from indulging in overly-sentimental and histrionic mechanisms. 

Lila Avilés is a talented force to be reckoned with. Although she has less than a handful of features in her young filmography, her filmmaking has a firm grip on powerful dramatic sensibilities that feel equally personal, passionate, and emotional. From the moment I finished her directorial debut, The Chambermaid (2018), I knew that Avilés told her stories from the heart – curating rich stories that her country, and cinephiles across the world, would be proud of and enjoy. She seemed to have struck a chord quickly with her cinematic prowess. Five years have passed since the release of The Chambermaid, and since then, we have been waiting anxiously to see what story she delivers next. But now, the time has finally arrived. Her sophomore feature, Tótem, premiered at this year’s Berlin Film Festival in its competition selection, and it was oh-so worth it. In comparison to her directorial debut and shorts, Avilés’ directorial touch is more delicate and intimate here as she reflects on the complexity of human relationships and the different ways in which people view mortality. 

Lila Avilés’ Tótem takes place over the course of one fierce and draining day, which, for many, will serve as an introduction to the sadness that shapes life as we know it and, for others, an exploration to keep what’s left of your kin and relatives together. Avilés puts aside the crammed hotel rooms of The Chambermaid’s setting for a large house, where some festivities are about to take place. It begins with a contradiction between celebration and farewell, wishfulness and sorrow, as a seven-year-old girl, Sol (Naíma Sentíes), wishes that her father won’t die while the car is filled with balloons. This creates a weird sensation for the person watching, as some elements develop a notion of festivities, but that line foreruns that there’s suffering lingering within its attendants. A dual ritual is going to take place in her grandfather’s (Alberto Amador) house: the surprise birthday party of a young father and painter, Tona (Mateo García Elizondo), and a farewell ceremony to him as well – his latest one might be his last, due to his late-stage cancer. 

For some part of the story, Sol helps her aunts, Nuri (Montserrat Maranon) and Alejandra (Marisol Gase), along with their children of different ages, prepare the house for the reception. However, the only thing Sol wants to do is see her father. She wants to spend time with him before everything is too late. And her reaction is expected, as at a young age, you don’t expect her to have a worldly comprehension of the ups and downs in life. This might sound like an over-sentimental feast, but Avilés knows well enough not to put this story into those treacherous waters. Instead, she injects vigor and wit into the melancholic haze of its subject matter, occasionally reminding me of the works of Edward Yang (Yi Yi) and Carlos Saura (Cría cuervos…). It reminds me of these ravishing and masterful films because of the innocence behind the tragedy and the aspect of holding onto our most profound bonds with all we’ve got, notably family. 

Familiar tension arises from the frustration behind something you can’t control. To combat those sequences, Avilés juxtaposes them with calm moments to breathe and contemplate loss and the alacrity and delicacy of human relationships. I love films about death and how different people perceive it because it helps us come to terms with it ourselves in some form or fashion. Films like Lila Avilés’ Tótem allow people to open up about their fears about mortality and expiration on a more personal level. It may not be the highest degree imaginable due to it being the most significant mystery (and fear) that life is forged around. But these types of films help us reflect on our different perspectives on death as we age. However, at the same time, there’s a constant sign of life, even when the narrative mostly dwells on loss. Tótem is a celebration of life and the tragic beauty that comes with the longest goodbye. 

Plenty of shots focus on animals (including a cat named Monsi, a couple of dogs, a parrot, and a goldfish), plants, and the yearning for everything to be alright in the end. Slowly but surely, Sol welcomes the essence of letting go. Her process might take more than a day to comprehend, and her journey showered by loss isn’t over. Yet, Avilés’ film captures that feeling with a personal and tender note that one can’t help but be mesmerized by it – reminding you of the various farewells and eternal goodbyes during your childhood when you could not grasp everything that it meant. It isn’t all about the innocent getting their first glimpses of death and grief; the film also captures how even as an adult, it impacts you in every way imaginable. Avilés handles this roundabout of generational grief with a sense of warmth and consolation. 

The adults might comfort the children, but it also happens the other way around; the kids’ innocence helps the older members of the family come to a realization of unity, bringing another layer of spirited potency to this already delightful and careful feature. Tótem is a poignant and beautiful picture that shines a light on the most heartbreaking topics with a warm grasp on the cinematic language of dualities.

Grade: A-

Women InSession: Contemporary Romantic Comedies – Episode 27

This week on Women InSession, we continue the spirit of Valentines Day as we talk about our favorite contemporary romantic comedies!

Panel: Kirstin Battestella, Zita Short, Erica Richards

On that note, check out this week’s show and let us know what you think in the comment section. Thanks for listening and for supporting the InSession Film Podcast!

– Music

The Return of the Eagle – Atli Örvarsson

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
Women InSession – Classic Romantic Comedies

[divider]

To hear this Extra Film episode and everything else we do, download our apps on the Amazon Market for Android and the Podcast Source app on IOS devices. The mobile app covers all of our main shows, bonus podcasts and everything else relating to the InSession Film Podcast. Thanks for your wonderful support and for listening to our show. It means the world to us.

Movie Review (Berlinale 2023): ‘Living Bad’ is a Poignant Complimentary Piece of João Canijo’s Bad Living


Director: João Canijo

Writer: João Canijo

Stars: Nuno Lopes, Filipa Areosa, Leonor Silveira

Synopsis: The film portrays story of a family of several women from different generations, whose relationships with each other have grown poisoned by bitterness.


The second film in João Canijo’s Berlinale-bound dual-project, Living Bad (Viver Mal), plays like a melancholic and melodramatic version of The White Lotus. The hotel guests’ lust, lies, and angst intertwine to forge an enticing complimentary piece to Bad Living (Mal Viver) that completes the puzzle of the hotel’s mysteries.

Because of the pandemic’s containment and isolation, João Canijo finally got the chance to create his ambitious dual-perspective project and premiere both films at this year’s Berlin Film Festival in different sections: Bad Living (Mal Viver) and Living Bad (Viver Mal). These two films are set in a decaying Portuguese hotel that’s slowly nearing its untimely end due to financial reasons and ruptures in the relationship of its staff, which are coincidentally related to one another. Bad Living, the first (and foremost) half of this narrative, focuses on the women working in the hotel and explores the various dynamics of their up-and-down lives – melancholy slowly drenching their essences. It was a mesmerizing experience, as Canijo used elements from masters at the craft (Bergman and Rivette) to curate the film’s procedure. These women’s troubled past and broken present can’t be mended by staying in the hotel. But, since their entire lives and reason to live are tied to that place, they might as well go down with the ship. That vacation location, meant to represent a place for bliss and enjoyment, turns into pessimistic hell. 

Throughout the entirety of Bad Living, we get glimpses of the guests staying at the hotel, and we also hear some of their conversations through echoes (as if we are trespassing). Yet, we don’t actually interact with or know anything about them. That’s where Living Bad (Viver Mal) comes into play. The missing pieces of the puzzle are now placed together to create a beautifully tragic exploration of desire, lies, betrayal, and the reluctance of acceptance. The film is set during a weekend, where three groups of guests arrive to eat some fancy food, drink expensive wine, enjoy some time by the pool, and be together in unison. However, as Bad Living demonstrated, things will not go according to plan. The hotel again reprises its role as this “haunted house” where your mental state will not be the same once you have arrived. The past haunts these guests, and they must face how it shapes their present lives whether they like it or not. 

Living Bad is a film about mothers and the space they take in relationships, told in three chapters. There’s a man torn between being there for his wife (and her successes) and the space that his mother consumes between them. A mother is urging her daughter to marry a man so that she can continue her own love affair with him. Another mother is preventing her daughter from making her own decisions by scolding her girlfriend and their fervent devotion. These are three stories of unwillingness to accept people for who they are, intertwined by their individual lusts, little white lies, obsessions, and angst. All of them had problems before getting to the hotel, but upon arriving, their issues worsened. Everything goes downhill as they spend more time there. And once they leave, their respective problems have reached a state of no return; the guests have spent a weekend in purgatory. 

João Canijo describes Living Bad as “the reverse shot of Bad Living, ” which mirrors the aforementioned film. The family working in the hotel are now fragments in the backside of this film, like spirits walking across the halls. Meanwhile, the guests are now at the forefront. Since we already know everything that has happened with the family (you need to see Bad Living first before indulging in the second perspective), there’s an interesting element of trying to connect one situation with the other – a nuisance that the family has with one of the guests’ dilemmas. Living Bad (Viver Mal) often plays like a melodramatic and melancholic version of the HBO Max-critically acclaimed series, The White Lotus, in which a group of uber-rich people unleashes their worst, most privileged impulses and with each passing day, a darker complexity emerges in the picture-perfect idyllic locale. However, it doesn’t have the comedic tone the series has; instead, it doubles down on the intertwining between desire and betrayal. 

These three groups of guests don’t have interconnected storylines, but they are going through the same highs and lows upon arrival. They provide exciting dynamics onto the table, most of which are grounded. At the same time, the rest dwell within the melodramatic sensibility Canijo wants to embrace to give the film a somewhat ghostly tone. Some of the storylines aren’t as gripping as the ones previously in Bad Living. And I wish some of them had been explored more, as you can see the potential of a feature-length film with – at least two of them, particularly the last chapter, where Carolina Amaral and Leonor Vasconcelos deliver fascinating performances and have great chemistry together. Nevertheless, Living Bad (Viver Mal) gives us that necessary glimpse to complete the full dreamscape-like vision that João Canijo has wanted to deliver since Blood of My Blood. Having watched both films now, I do think that the way to have tackled this type of story was through a dual-perspective two-piece project because if it were all crammed up into one feature, most facets would lose their gloomy and haunting sensation. 

When divided into two features, Canijo explores, with ease, the complex dynamics each person involved in this narrative has with one another. And it is fascinating to see such ambitious work end up in the filmmaker’s favor. I hope this film shines a light on Canijo’s filmography and that more people get into his work. 

Grade: A-

Movie Review: ‘Creed III’ Unleashes Massive Directing Talent


Director: Michael B. Jordan

Writer: Keenan Coogler and Zach Baylin

Stars: Michael B. Jordan, Jonathan Majors, Tessa Thompson

Synopsis: Adonis has been thriving in both his career and family life, but when a childhood friend and former boxing prodigy resurfaces, the face-off is more than just a fight.


The original Rocky film will always be what this franchise, and any boxing movie truthfully, will spend its time chasing. Not only a commercial success but a multi-Oscar winning tale about a fighter doing the one thing he knows more about than anything. When Creed was initially announced, the story of Rocky had regressed astronomically and was only partly saved by the sixth installment of the series, Rocky Balboa. Creed was already fighting an uphill battle and managed to not only provide a compelling “Rocky” movie, but it instantly became one of the best of the franchise. For the first time since the original in 1976, a film in the saga was able to evoke the same emotions and feelings that made Rocky such a classic. Followed up by Creed II, which was another stellar outing, this spin-off series proved it had staying power and was even in a position to overtake the champ.

Now in the third installment, Creed III starts with a young Adonis (Thaddeus J. Mixson) sneaking out and going to watch his best friend Damian Anderson (Spence Moore II) box in an underground ring. After winning the fight, and the bet Damian placed on himself, the two head to a liquor store which leads to Adonis and Damian getting into an altercation that would alter their relationship forever. Flash forward 15 years, and current Adonis (Michael B. Jordan) is finally getting his rematch against “Pretty” Ricky Conlan (Tony Bellew). This isn’t a normal fight, however, as this is the last fight of Adonis’s career after announcing his plans to retire following the fight, no matter the outcome. Luckily for him, he manages to keep his title belt and leave boxing as a champion.

His life after boxing consists of raising his daughter Amara (Mila Davis-Kent) as well as running the Delphi Gym and promoting the newest champion Felix Chavez (Jose Benavidez). That is until Damian is released from prison and he, as well as the past that Adonis has been running from, resurface. He lets Damian train at the gym and spar with Chavez to get his feet back on the ground, but when Chavez’s upcoming opponent Viktor Drago (Florian Munteanu) can’t fight, Damian gets the chance to finally become the world champ he thought he would be from a young age. This fight puts Damian on the map as he begins to antagonize Adonis for living the life he felt he always deserved. After three years of retirement, Adonis decides that he can’t keep running from his past and needs to meet it head-on in a fight between who he was and who he became.

Shockingly, the story itself was one of the weakest parts of the entire film. Screenwriters Keenan Coogler (the brother of Ryan Coogler) and recent Oscar nominee Zach Baylin (King Richard) manage to evoke some emotional moments throughout whether it be Adonis’s aging mother or the relationship he shares with his daughter, but the underdeveloped script gives off a feeling of a behind-the-scenes look rather than a narrative feature. There definitely was some reclamation that had to be done as this was the first film to not feature Sylvester Stallone’s Rocky; while some of the charm was lost, it did allow Adonis to stand on his own feet as the focal point of this story.

In this film standing opposite Jonathan Majors was never going to be an easy task. Majors delivers an antagonist whose brutality and tenacity, mixed with his determination and tragedy, provides a good medium for the audience as someone they can root for and against at the same time. The Rocky series in particular always had an issue when it came to the antagonists being one-note villains whose only goal is to inflict pain on the protagonist. That is Majors’s goal with Dame, but it comes from a place of pain and resentment not for what Adonis did when they were younger, but for forgetting about him at his lowest. He also conveys Dame with empathy, and in what is easily the most physically demanding role of his career, he still displays the quiet nature that not only helped him breakout in 2019’s The Last Black Man in San Francisco but proves himself as one of the most captivating and compelling actors in Hollywood.

Where Creed III shines brightest of all is in the directorial debut of Michael B. Jordan. Jordan taking over as director isn’t surprising given that Sylvester Stallone directed quite a bit of this franchise with Rocky II, Rocky III, Rocky IV, and Rocky Balboa, but while Stallone was better on paper than he was behind the camera, in just one film, Jordan has proven himself to be an audacious visual storyteller. How he manages to tell the story through the camera can make up for the lack of story in the script itself, and the fight scenes are truly where he shines. Early on, Jordan talked about how he wanted to incorporate anime fight scenes in a live-action way, and while these sorts of fights could have been gimmicky, he and cinematographer Kramer Morgenthau are able to work the scene beautifully crafting some of the most intense and visually appealing fight scenes in quite some time.

His ambition didn’t stop there, however, as he magnificently used the final fight to tell the real story of the film. Fighting in the Rocky/Creed franchise has never been about being the best, there has always been a bigger picture to the battles being shown and how Jordan frames and tells the story of the final fight through the visuals and the choreography, stripping away all of the noise and displaying two people who are fighting for much more than a title. It was a truly risky but worthwhile move that reminds you what these movies have always been about, picking yourself up even after you’ve been knocked down.

While Creed III might be the lowest of the trilogy due to a thin story, it is a dazzling directorial debut from Michael B. Jordan and another prominent turn from Jonathan Majors that makes this film an entertaining addition to the Creed saga. The original Rocky is and always will be the gold standard for films of this franchise, but now three films in, it is clear that the reins have been passed and this franchise belongs to Adonis Creed.

Grade: B