Thursday, May 15, 2025
Home Blog Page 17

Movie Review: ‘Sonic The Hedgehog 3’ Races To Success


Director: Josh Fowler
Writers: Pat Casey, Josh Miller, John Whittington
Stars: Jim Carrey, Ben Schwartz, Keanu Reeves

Synopsis: Sonic, Knuckles, and Tails reunite against a powerful new adversary, Shadow, a mysterious villain with powers unlike anything they have faced before. With their abilities outmatched, Team Sonic must seek out an unlikely alliance.


It’s been the norm that every movie franchise is also a movie universe. It’s refreshing to have one that’s just building just a single world with each subsequent film. It’s true that earlier this year Paramount+ had “Knuckles,” a limited series following the titular echidna warrior on his own adventure, but, for the most part, the universe of Sonic the Hedgehog has remained small and cinematic. Each installment builds on the last to create a satisfying experience just as the ideas seem to be wearing a little thin.

Sonic the Hedgehog 3' Review: Keanu Reeves in Video Game Sequel

Sonic the Hedgehog 3 is a lot like Sonic the Hedgehog 2. Sonic (Ben Schwartz) is tasked with tackling a new furry foe being aided by evil genius Dr. Robotnik (Jim Carrey). Sonic learns about teamwork, family, believing in himself, and that with great power… yada, yada, yada. It would be tiresome, but the formula works for a reason. Sonic the Hedgehog 3 has enough backstory and exposition that a casual moviegoer could walk in and catch up with the story quickly. The film is the way it is so that Sonic isn’t driven by a need to destroy his antagonists, but to change their hearts. It’s a good message and one that strikes at the hearts of those of us who understand the power of a chosen family.

It also helps that the special effects just keep getting more glorious. The fuzz on each of the creatures looks so authentically soft that it makes you want to reach out and run your fingers through it. The running sequences continue to impress, but Shadow’s (Keanu Reeves) teleportation is an awesome sight to behold. The fights are grand in scale and for a film that has world ending weapons in play, manages to reduce the human collateral damage of the biggest showdowns.

It is easy to forget the human characters in the midst of the adorable and fearsome animated characters at the heart of the story, but they pop themselves in in surprising ways. James Marsden has always had comedic chops, but he pulls off being the heart of the story as a great paternal figure for his otherworldly charges. Sometimes sidelined in the other two films of the franchise, Tikka Sumpter gets more into the action this time around and it’s wonderful. The two of them look like they’re having a blast and have great chemistry together. Though, neither can hold a single candle to the double performance of Jim Carrey.

Jim Carrey has carried this franchise on his back since the first film. It’s not a detriment either. The fact that he is what you should be watching is exactly how the character of Robotnik should be played. He steals every scene and chews scenery like gum, blowing it into a glorious bubble and popping to create something grander than you ever thought possible. In Sonic the Hedgehog 3, Carrey does a feat we always hoped he could. He pulls off a double performance acting opposite himself as Gerald Robotnik, his character’s grandfather. With modern technology, the parallel scenes are seamless. So seamless that the best scene in the film is between Carrey and Carrey.

The two Robotniks stand at a laser field in protective suits that reflect the lasers to make them harmless. In celebration of their genius, the two mad scientists decide to dance to their final destination. When you read dance, you should know that this isn’t just a couple of guys doing the running man down a laser filled hallway, it’s a full on, choreographed spectacular. The moves are synchronized and stylized perfectly. Director Jeff Fowler, editor Al LeVine, and the entire visual effects crew have made something utterly enthralling and even as it’s so far out there, it is a perfect fit to the world that’s been created in spite of its complete arbitrariness to the plot.

It’s easy to praise Sonic the Hedgehog 3 for its visual innovations and style even if its story and some of the humor leave much to be desired. The film is a four quadrant movie so it can’t be too complex, but it would have been nice if the writers had stretched themselves a little farther. Here’s hoping Sonic the Hedgehog 4, because there will be a 4, will attempt to race through some new ground because this franchise is one of the more enjoyable out there in spite of its flaws.

Grade: B

Classic Review: ‘Goldfinger’ Succeeds Despite Problematic Moments


Director: Guy Hamilton
Writers: Richard Maibaum, Paul Dehn
Stars: Sean Connery, Gert Fröbe, Honor Blackman

Synopsis: While investigating a gold magnate’s smuggling, James Bond uncovers a plot to contaminate the Fort Knox gold reserve.


Gooooldfingah! If you read that word correctly, you just heard Dame Shirley Bassey’s iconic voice in your head. You hear that incredible score by John Barry. You see the face of Sean Connery smirking at a one liner he’s made after a fight. Goldfinger has become the quintessential entry in the James Bond franchise. It built the formula better than the two films that came before (Dr. No and From Russia with Love) and it firmly entrenched the character into the popular mindset. 

Goldfinger | James Bond Spy Thriller [1964] | Britannica

When it comes to Bond films, the director always takes a back seat. Director Guy Hamilton deserves credit for his influence on the look and feel of the film. Hamilton’s acumen for action is uncanny. He and editor Peter Hunt create some excellent car chase sequences. The scenes of the street race James Bond (Sean Connery) and Tilly Masterson (Tania Mallet) engage in through the Swiss countryside are quick and energetic. The driving gun battle 007 and Goldfinger’s henchmen engage in also expertly shows off Hamilton’s abilities to cut so that the progression of events is clear and easy to follow. It also gives a chance to show off each and every gadget in Bond’s arsenal.

It’s the gadgets that often make the movie in the world of James Bond. From the practical to the outlandish, each and every gadget shown is a way to move the plot forward and also give a bit of foreshadowing for how 007 may improvise on his mission. It’s the best part of any Bond film when Q (Desmond Llewelyn) and his underlings are shown in their element. In Goldfinger, they introduce one of the most iconic and enduring symbols of Bond’s appeal, an Aston Martin DB5. It also serves as a reminder that even though James Bond is charming and can think on his feet, he isn’t even close to the smartest guy in the room. It’s a blast to see Q take Bond down a peg and treat him like an inferior.

However, it’s never a blast to be reminded of how much these films, Goldfinger especially, are rampant with a deeply uncomfortable sexism. It’s one thing to name a strong, capable, entrepreneurial woman pilot Pussy Galore (Honor Blackman). It’s another to watch as James Bond forces himself on her. It’s played as seduction, but Pussy’s body language denotes and the force James is exuding shows clearly that this physical touch is unwanted. 

The scene starts well with James and Pussy on equal footing. They show off their Judo skills tossing each other around a stable and into hay. Then James turns their play ugly. He grabs onto Pussy’s hands as she struggles underneath him. He presses against her pinning her to the ground before pushing his lips onto hers. What’s even more disgusting is when her muffled cries slowly shift into moans of pleasure as her hands stop trying to get him off of her and pull him close instead. It’s incredibly uncomfortable to watch and, mixed in with all the other scenes of Bond’s interactions with women, it’s the rotting icing on a moldy cake. Our villain’s behavior is suddenly more reasonable than this.

Bond films live or die on the backs of their antagonists and Auric Goldfinger (Gert Fröbe) is an all-timer. He’s not a man who wants to take over the world. He just wants his money to be more valuable than everyone else’s. He is cowardly and cunning in equal measure. His most famous line, delivered with relish and expert inflection by Fröbe, is a perfect encapsulation of his absolute misanthropy. Bond asks, as a laser comes ever toward severing him from his favorite body part, “Do you expect me to talk?” With a laugh Goldfinger retorts, “No, Mr. Bond, I expect you to die!” The laser is so much more elaborate than a bullet to the head, but it shows Goldfinger’s brain is always working. Given the time it takes for the laser to reach its target the option to increase his windfall grows because it allows Bond to panic and to want to make a deal.


Goldfinger remains a top tier James Bond adventure because it has confidence in itself. There isn’t any worry that people won’t be on board or that they won’t be impressed because the film pulls out the stops and amps up the intrigue. There’s a comfortableness in this film because its filmmakers have a formula that is familiar, but allows room for much improvisation and playfulness. In spite of its ugly and demeaning sexism, Goldfinger is an enthralling spy story that has become a blueprint not only for the Bond films, but for the entire spy genre.

Grade: B

Podcast Review: Mufasa: The Lion King

On this episode, JD and Brendan review Barry Jenkins’ latest film Mufasa: The Lion King! A movie to the major studios like this is a bit of a surprise for Jenkins, but as we talk about in the conversation, if it leads to his next Moonlight, then we’ll be perfectly content with how this ended up. Especially because it’s not *that* bad.

Review: Mufasa: The Lion King (4:00)
Director: Barry Jenkins
Writers: Jeff Nathanson
Stars: Aaron Pierre, Kelvin Harrison Jr., Tiffany Boone

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
InSession Film Podcast – Mufasa: The Lion King

Chasing the Gold: InSession Film Awards Nominations (2024)

This week on Chasing the Gold, Shadan and Erica reveal the 2024 InSession Film Awards Nominations as voted on by the entire InSession Film staff! It’s been an incredible year for film and we are deeply excited to announce the nominees that resonated the most with us as we celebrate the year in cinema.

Please note: These nominations are voted on by the entire staff and operate separately from the InSession Film Podcast, in which JD and Brendan will be revealing their awards on Episode 619.

On that note, check out this week’s show and let us know what you think in the comment section. Thanks for listening and for supporting the InSession Film Podcast!

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
Chasing the Gold – InSession Film Awards Nominations (2024)

Women InSession: Female Writers Onscreen

This week on Women InSession, we discuss/rant about the portrayal of female writers on screen in film over the years and misguided approach many of them have taken! There have been many iconic female writers and poets over the decades, many of whom we love deeply, but for whatever reason the medium of cinema hasn’t done many of them justice. We needed to get cathartic as to why that has been the case.

Panel: Kristin Battestella, Jaylan Salah, Zita Short

On that note, check out this week’s show and let us know what you think in the comment section. Thanks for listening and for supporting the InSession Film Podcast!

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
Women InSession – Episode 114

Episode 615: Critics Choice Nominations / Spider-Man Spin-Offs

This week’s episode is brought to you by Koffee Kult. Get 15% OFF with the code: ISF24

This week on the InSession Film Podcast, we discuss all of the good and the bad with this year’s Critics Choice nominations! We also talk about the Sony Spider-Man spin-off universe and what direction they should take next.

– Box Office / Bad Marketing (2:36)
We open the show this week by talking about last weekend’s box office, and you won’t believe which two films topped the charts once again. Also, it’s not as if Kraven was ever going to do well, but still, those opening numbers are dreadful. Adjacent to the box office, we talked about Hollywood’s dubious marketing and how that’s led to some films becoming big disappointments. 

– Sony’s Spider-Man Spin-Offs (28:35)
Recently it was announced that Sony was ending its Spider-Man spin-offs universe, putting them into some sort of limbo state for the moment. We talk about what they could do next and the opportunity to make a gazillion dollars if they just follow our blueprint. Given where things are at the moment, audiences are receptive to multiple narratives happening simultaneously. 


RELATED: Listen to Episode 516 of the InSession Film Podcast where we discussed our Top 10 Movies of 2023!


– Critics Choice Nominations (58:14)
The Critics Choice nominations dropped last week, and we wanted to give our thoughts on what this year’s crop looks like as the awards race continues to build. The reputation of Critics Choice is that of an Oscars predictor, which is a bit odd given how similar a lot of the nominees are to other groups and guilds. There are some great nominees this year. But as usual, there are others that are very questionable. Either way, plenty to discuss here. 

– Music
Spider-Man – Danny Elfman
Kiss the Sky- Maren Morris

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
InSession Film Podcast – Episode 614

Next week on the show:

Mufasa: The Lion King

Help Support The InSession Film Podcast

If you want to help support us, there are several ways you can help us and we’d absolutely appreciate it. Every penny goes directly back into supporting the show and we are truly honored and grateful. Thanks for your support and for listening to the InSession Film Podcast!

VISIT OUR DONATE PAGE HERE

Movie Review: ‘Rita’ is Magical and Horrific


Director:  Jayro Bustamante
Writer: Jayro Bustamante
Stars: Giuliana Santa Cruz, Ángela Quevedo, Alejandra Vásquez

Synopsis: Rita, a 13-year-old girl, runs away from her abusive father to the big city. She finds solace until she’s placed in a safe house run by the State. Rita and her cellmates plot an escape that ends in a shocking act of violence.


“The more one knows fairy tales the less fantastical they appear; they can be vehicles of the grimmest realism, expressing hope against all the odds with gritted teeth.” 

― Marina Warner

Rita" brings a fairy-tale lens to real-world horror story

Guatemalan director Jayro Bustamante has used elements of the fantastic to excavate the history of oppression of indigenous people in the country. His haunting La Llorona uses the legend of the weeping woman as a punishment for brutal dictators and their regime enablers. In Rita, Bustamante moves into the contemporary by referencing a shocking true case of neglect and abuse inside the ‘reform’ school system for unwanted girls. Part orphanage, part detention center, part state-sanctioned sweatshop and underage sex-trafficking ring. The facility where thirteen-year-old Rita (Giuliana Santa Cruz) finds herself is an inverted fairytale and folkloric world where girls run in wolfpacks, dress as fairies, princesses, angels, but also as stars, bunnies, and rainbows. There are witches, ogres, dungeons, and fairy godmothers. It’s ostensibly 2017, but Bustamante pulls aspects from years of Guatemalan history from cars that would be driven in the 1980s through to antiquated technology. Rita exists in the ‘Once upon a time’ world and the contemporary world.

“When I was seven years old, I stopped believing in fairy tales. I realized the stories that were told did not always end with a happily ever after. The world is not like that. I only began to understand them again later. Without fairy tales, I would have had no hope at all. I would have not been able to face what was coming to me. I was thirteen I ran away from home, but they captured me and sent me to a fortress on a hill just like in a fairy tale… My story begins here. Like all fairy tales, it did not happen exactly like this. But it is what I remember and the only way I dare tell it,” Rita narrates as she sits in the back of the police car ferrying her to the facility. Out the window, she observes young women running wild through the grounds, growling and snarling. Armed guards open the gates. 

Rita’s ‘sin’ was to escape her sexually abusive father and try to save her younger sister from suffering as she did. Transferred from a hospital after she almost bled out from a pregnancy termination (her second), she is led through an impossible network of cages and tunnels. Ash creatures sparkling with Christmas lights appear to her. “You saw nothing,” says the Monitor (Sabrina De La Hoz) as she escorts her to the Quarters of the Angels. Storm clouds gather inside and outside the darkened room as she is violently hazed by winged creatures. Why the girls enacted the violence upon Rita will be explained later in the film. In the morning, she is given her ‘uniform’ – a white crop top and short skirt. She is also given her wings. “If you want to stay in this room, you put them on,” says Terca (André Sebastián Aldana) the leader – a black-winged angel. 

'Rita' Trailer: Jayro Bustamante Is Back To Shatter Your Heart

“I don’t need anyone to protect me,” Rita tells one of the wolfpack as she makes her way through the facility. She will soon find that everyone needs protection, justice, retribution, and freedom. Rita becomes known as ‘Angel 56’ and her ‘class’ is factory sewing. She refuses to put the wings on until she is attacked by the ‘stars’ who claim she must be sacrificed. 

Rita is guided by the wise and foul-mouthed Bebé (Alejandra Vásquez), and Sulmy (Ángela Quevedo), who explain the horrors, both real and possibly imagined. What isn’t imagined is that Ernestina (Margarita Kenéfic), the social worker who is fashioned as a witch, is not going to help her build her case to leave the facility. She asks why Rita didn’t report her father earlier and suggests that she is jealous of the sexual attention he pays to her six-year-old sister. Nor is it imagined that the guard William (Ernesto Molina Samperio) attempts to rape her. 

“The girls who think they’re mystical beings, they’re the craziest of all,” says one of the Stars from their hidden camp in the forest. It was the Stars and Terca’s wife, Majo, who began the first revolution at the facility. Majo hanged herself with Christmas lights so the visitors had to see her. Other stars began to disappear. Bebé says she’s afraid of them as she doesn’t know which are ghosts and which are alive. 

Bustamante and cinematographer Inti Briones construct an elaborate but gritty fantasy. The bruised bodies of children, the swollen bellies of raped girls, the heat of a workshop, and the defeat written on the faces of those who have been taken to ‘clients’ mix with misty forests, glitter, stained glass angels, and girls in flight. The fear Celia (María Telón), Rita’s ‘fairy godmother,’ has for her safety is genuine, just as Rita’s rage and confusion are. The symbolism of stones as souls, burned dolls, and hand-woven sanctuaries with the skeletons of infants enshrined as holy flow into armed police hunting girls as they try to escape their confines. 

Jayro Bustamante seeks to imagine as a child would imagine. Rita’s story is told the only way she dares. For how can a child who has faced systemic horrors explain the world of nightmares and give grace to the fantastical children who suffer, and still suffer, under Guatemalan law?

Rita Review: Jayro Bustamante Remarkably Blends Magical Realism & Horror In  Fantastical Take On A Tragic True Story

Rita is a rich tapestry of truth and fable. The real case it is based on remains ‘unsolved’ – and Bustamante doesn’t shy away from the purpose of Rita which is to highlight hypocrisy and harm; a legacy in his mind that is built into Guatemala and inescapable. Haunting and fiercely political, Rita is searing work by Jayro Bustamante.

Grade: A

Podcast Review: Nickel Boys

On this episode, Sophia Ciminello from the Oscar Wild Podcast joins JD and Brendan to discuss one of the very best films of the year in RaMell Ross’ Nickel Boys! Ross stepped onto the scene in a big way back in 2018 with his documentary Hale County This Morning, This Evening, and that alone got us excited for Nickel Boys. But then the reviews dropped, including Sophia’s great analysis, that jumpstarted our hype even further. And boy, the film did not disappoint at all.

Review: Nickel Boys (4:00)
Director: RaMell Ross
Writers: RaMell Ross, Joslyn Barnes
Stars: Ethan Herisse, Brandon Wilson, Daveed Diggs, Aunjanue Ellis-Taylor

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
InSession Film Podcast – Nickel Boys

Movie Review: ‘Lord of the Rings: The War of the Rohirrim’ is a Pretty Rehash


Director:  Kenji Kamiyama
Writers: Jeffrey Addiss, Will Matthews, Phoebe Gittins, Arty Papageorgiou
Stars: Brian Cox, Gaia Wise, Luke Pasqualino

Synopsis: A sudden attack by Wulf, a clever and traitorous lord of Rohan seeking vengeance for the death of his father, forces Helm Hammerhand, the King of Rohan, and his people to make a daring last stand in the ancient stronghold of the Hornburg.


There are books that we think should never be made into movies. Lord of The Rings and The Hobbit were definitely on that list for quite a long time.  But then, of course, Peter Jackson, Phillipa Bowens, and Fran Walsh proved that very wrong with their stellar, original trilogy (Your mileage may definitely vary on the second trilogy). And it is tempting to fill in the gaps of J.R.R. Tolkien’s world. After all, we not only have a prequel television series via Amazon, but also now a new animated film that takes place in between the TV show and the movies. The world is so vast and, in some places, lacking in detail, that there are numerous opportunities for exploration and epic tales. Sadly, Lord of the Rings: The War of the Rohirrim is too focused on making you remember the original films to tell its own story in a satisfactory way.

The film opens with recycled musical score from the original movies and features the voice of its female warrior, Eowyn (Miranda Otto), telling the story of its previous female warrior, Héra (voiced by Gaia Wise). Héra is filled with boundless energy, rides a horse, fights with a sword, basically everything you might expect from the initial descriptors. Her father, Helm Hammerhand (voiced by Brian Cox) is the King of Rohan and, yes, if you watched the original movies, that should sound familiar to you. Helm is proud of his daughter (and his two sons), but holds her back. The film really begins when the leader of a neighboring tribe, Freca (voiced by Shaun Dooley) demands his son Wulf (voiced by Luke Pasqualino) be married to Héra. Helm takes offense, challenges him to a fight, and kills him with one punch.  His name is Hammerhand, after all. Unsurprisingly, after this moment, much of the plot consists of Wulf attempting to exact vengeance on the Hammerhand family.

The animation is wonderful, minus a few moments in which it does not look at if horses’ hooves interact with the ground, but that is quite minor. Watching Héra and others in battle is truly a sight to behold and if you are, like me, a loving fan of the connected source material, you will not be able to stop yourself from getting just a little swept up with the emotion. As the familiar music swells, and recognizable characters and moments arise, well, we are only human.

But here’s the problem. It is simply too connected. The War of the Rohirrim loves a name drop. I won’t list them, both due to spoilers and because there are simply too many. But worse than that, many of the actions of these characters follow such similar beats to the trilogy, that you will find yourself wondering why you aren’t watching that instead. As the people of Rohan travel to a certain structure, the wait for the name begins and when it finally happens, it is so underwhelming, one can only sigh and throw up their hands. 

Additionally, despite attempting to explore and possibly expand the deep lore, the film completely depends on the audience to point at the screen in recognition, and sadly, forgets to create memorable characters. Every single one is stock, one that we have seen thousands of times before. War King, young woman held back, older woman mentor, sensitive warrior, avenging son. Now, there are ways to create memorable moments within stereotypical characters. But, despite an over two hour runtime, screenwriters Jeffrey Addiss, Will Matthews, Phoebe Gittins seem wholly disinterested in depth and opt for scenes that would be better represented in the cutscene of a video game.

The predictable nature of the story, the constant need for connection to previous material, and the lack of characterization saddle The War of the Rohirrim with a disappointing experience. Luckily, there are several battle sequences that make the film engaging and give you something to hold onto. There is absolutely room for more stories from Middle Earth, but we should hope for one that tells a new story, instead of riding on the coattails of the original Ride of the Rohirrim.

Grade: C

Chasing the Gold: Best Actress is Poised for Another Historic Nomination

Every crop of new Oscar nominees comes with a fresh batch of statistics and records. Many are firsts. Last year Lily Gladstone became the first Native American performer to be nominated for Best Actress for her performance in Killers of the Flower Moon. The year before Michelle Yeoh became the first woman of Southeast Asian descent to be nominated and win Best Actress for her performance in Everything Everywhere All At Once. This year is poised to have another historic nomination.

Karla Sofía Gascón is poised to be nominated in Best Actress for her performance in Emilia Pérez and if she is she will become the first openly transgender performer to be Oscar-nominated. “Openly” is an important distinction as Elliot Page was not out as a trans person at the time of his Best Actress nomination for Juno in 2008. It’s an incredible leap forward for inclusion.

Though, as with last year’s historic nomination of Lily Gladstone, the media push, the articles, the think pieces, and the bevy of precursor award wins that she nabbed didn’t amount to much when Emma Stone’s name was read on Oscar night. It all comes down to who The Academy’s broad voting body throws their support behind. Post Oscar nomination Gladstone’s career has taken off and has given more visibility to more culturally astute Native American stories. The same could be said for Gascón if she is nominated. With the nomination alone she could be on the cusp of a more impactful career as a trans actress and advocate for more nuanced and even portrayals of the trans experience.

It may be that category fraud played into last year’s decision, as well as, past year’s decisions. Category fraud is a broad way of describing when a studio or performer thinks their chances at a win for any award are better in one category over another. This happens in egregious ways like David Niven (Separate Tables, 1958) and Anthony Hopkins (The Silence of the Lambs, 1991) winning Best Actor for 15 and 16 minutes of screen time, respectively. More often it happens when a strong performance that is typically a co-lead gets shifted to a Supporting category. A recent example would be Viola Davis’ work in Fences (2017) being nominated for, and winning, Best Supporting Actress, which was undoubtedly a lead performance.

In this way, last year’s favorite, Lily Gladstone was elevated to Best Actress even though her performance in the film is very clearly a supporting role. The potential history-making nomination for Karla Sofía Gascón is, like Viola Davis’ turn, a co-lead. Her role could even be considered a more supporting role than co-star Zoe Saldaña’s. Saldaña’s character drives a lot more of the plot of the first act. This is minor category fraud at best and isn’t enough to get people to vote against her, but what really could sink Gascón’s chances of a win is if more people vote for someone else, namely, if they vote for an ingénue instead.

The ingénue is a powerful concept in Hollywood and the Academy likes awarding young up-and-comers as much as they like to reward a performer’s body of work. The power of the ingénue is why Viola Davis’ team chose to campaign for her in Best  Supporting Actress rather than Best Actress because it seemed nothing could stop, and nothing did stop Emma Stone from claiming Best Actress for La La Land. This year, critics, pundits, and prognosticators have fawned over Mikey Madison for her powerhouse of a performance in Anora. She owns our attention from her first scene to her last and while the first awards bodies of the season are a mixed bag of winners, it’s very likely Madison will be raking in her share of the hardware and very likely the coveted Oscar.

So, while a historic nomination may be in the air for Karla Sofía Gascón, it’s likely that her nomination will not lead to a win. The way this field has been left wide open it could be the ingénue (Mikey Madison), the comeback (Angelina Jolie), the double threat (Cynthia Erivo), or the legacies (Demi Moore, Marianne Jean-Baptiste) that take home the Oscar.

Podcast Review: Queer

On this episode, Erik Anderson from AwardsWatch joins us to discuss Luca Guadagnino’s new film Queer! It’s been quite the year for Guadagnino with the release of Challengers earlier in the year, and now with what could be his Magnum Opus with Queer. Given the nature of the story, it’s been slightly more polarizing, but we had a great time talking about its daring qualities and incredible craftsmanship.

Review: Queer (4:00)
Director: Luca Guadagnino
Writers: Justin Kuritzkes
Stars: Daniel Craig, Drew Starkey, Jason Schwartzman

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
InSession Film Podcast – Queer

Chasing The Gold Interview: ‘The Substance’ Special Makeup Effects Designer Pierre Olivier Persin

Please note the following Q&A contains plot spoilers for The Substance. Watch the film first, you won’t regret it!

Demi Moore’s transformation in The Substance has taken the movie world, and pop culture at large, by storm. Acclaim and awards buzz have rightfully followed. With a small 15-person crew, and a mere 17.5 million dollar budget, special makeup effects supervisor Pierre Olivier Persin took writer/director Coralie Fargeat’s ambitious, wildly original vision and together they created the ultimate magic trick.

Here, in an interview with Olivier Persin, I attempt to understand the secrets behind The Substance‘s many cinematic illusions.

Shadan Larki: So, I say this with so much love and respect. But The Substance is one of the most disgusting and disturbing movies I have ever seen. [Laughs]. How did you do it? I know. there were many different inspirations, with David Cronenberg being one of them.

When you get a script like this, how do you even start to visualize what these scenes could look like? How did you all pull this off? I need to know!

Pierre Olivier Persin: [Laughs]. Well, when I read a script like that, I’m happy. Disgusting is a compliment in my job. And Coralie wasn’t afraid of anything. She was pushing us with the prosthetics and the special effects team with the blood to go crazy, ‘Don’t be afraid of anything, more, more veins, more bumps, more goo, more blood…’

That said, I never thought at any moment, ‘Oh, let’s do something gross.’ Let’s try to gross out people and make them feel uneasy or anything. We were trying to pull off the best illusion possible. And to create characters that were cool and fun. And realistic and well done with lots of details. We put all our love into this. So, it was more a matter of love, a matter of art, than trying to disgust people. Even though I am with you, the results are pretty gross.

Shadan Larki: I read an interview that you did with IndieWire where you mentioned something similar. You talk about the idea of the ‘decay’ of the woman’s body. I’m paraphrasing here, but you said, ‘I don’t see it as decay. I see it as a thing of beauty.’ I thought your word choice there was really interesting. Can you tell me more about finding beauty in the storytelling and the visuals we saw on screen?

Pierre Olivier Persin: Yeah, very true. I never thought, and with all my crew at the workshop, we were never laughing at reference pictures; we never thought of it [in a derogatory way]. We were like, ‘Wow, cool!’ Cool forms and how we could shape them and paint them.

It was always fun. The idea was to create a really looking form, every wrinkle, the translucency of the skin, the movements… let’s have hollow breasts and a hollow bum, so when she walks, it jiggles and all that. And it was all these successive ideas, the forms, and then the technical side of it and then the artistic side, the painting and everything and translucency and all that, and trying to get the best movement possible to avoid wrinkles in the bodysuit.


And even when we were working on Monstro and designing Monstro, again, the idea was to have that creature with all the boobs, bumps, and everything, but with ballerina feet like a dancer, tiptoeing and dancing very lightly with that crazy body. That was the idea. So, there was always an element of grace. We came from a place of love for our characters.


Shadan Larki: I do have to mention, and I want people to know that you were working with a $17.5 million budget and creating something that films with $200 million budgets cannot do. And I’m not saying that as any empty compliment. Truly, the sheer amount of prosthetics and the level of detail is incredible. How were you able to pull that off, given that your resources were finite? $17 million is not a lot of money for any project, let alone such an ambitious one. Again, I have to ask: How did you do it?

Pierre Olivier Persin: And I had a small crew. At the maximum, a 15-person crew.
We were not 50 people working at the workshop on that. We put lots of love and passion into it and lots of weekends and late nights. And I really worked pretty much 11 months without much of a break; I had a Christmas break for a week. And I had COVID for a week. So, even my wife told me, ‘I’m happy that you’re sick and you have COVID because you wouldn’t have stopped otherwise.’

Shadan Larki: Oh my gosh!

Pierre Olivier Persin: So, at least with COVID, I was stuck at home, and I couldn’t go to work. So, I guess I had two weeks off for those 11 months working on The Substance.
When you don’t have lots of money, you have passion. And all of my crew was the same. They were all really talented. I had a very talented crew. And they all worked really, really, really hard.

Shadan Larki: There are so many scenes that I feel like have now become iconic. For me, the one that stands out is when Sue (Margaret Qualley) is sewing Elizabeth (Demi Moore) back together after she’s born. What I loved about that scene, in particular, and what sort of got to me, was the fact that the skin felt gelatinous in some way. I was just fascinated by the way that it looked, almost like I could see the way that her skin would feel. Like, if I were to reach through the screen, I could touch it and feel it.

Pierre Olivier Persin: Yeah, thank you for saying that because when you build prosthetics, they are really, really soft. They are a silicone gel. So, they are really, really stretchy and soft, but because I knew it’s going to be shot in tight close-up, I didn’t want, when the stitch goes through, to see some kind of plastic, too stretchy looking skin, like with the needle going through and you see very stretchy skin, and it would reveal the trick. So, it was a very soft appliance, a silicon appliance. But on the lip of the wound, we put a special silicon inside the lip, if I may say, the edges of the wound where the needle goes through for all of the stitches.

So, it was a mix of a very soft appliance and special silicone for the edges. So, we had that flesh-like quality and nice movements, but we also had something a little bit different where the needle goes through. And it’s difficult to explain, but, yeah, in close-up, you can really tell the difference. Those small details, I think, were important.


Shadan Larki: You mentioned the word ‘Illusion,’ which is what I was thinking of the whole time that I was watching The Substance. In terms of scope, what do you think is the biggest or most difficult illusion that you had to create in terms of the prosthetics?

Pierre Olivier Persin: There are very technical characters in the movie: Monstro, Golem… However, there is one illusion, which is a small illusion, and it is when Demi’s character is sitting in her chair in her living room, watching TV. And one of her legs is old and shrunken and horrible, and the kneecap is stuck. And she tries to get unstuck. I don’t know if you remember the scene; she tries to unstick the leg, and it’s all stuck, but then suddenly, she’s able to. In that scene, Demi was kneeling inside the chair. It was a special sofa chair. And both legs, the normal one and the old creepy one, were fake silicone legs with mechanisms and everything. And It’s a little something, and I like that. It’s like a very old-school magician trick from the 19th century. You know, hiding someone in a box, and you saw the box in half. It’s an old trick, but I like it, and it is a proper illusion, I think.

Shadan Larki: Well, speaking of having somebody in a box, Monstro, at the end, Margaret said she was in the actual costume.

Pierre Olivier Persin: Correct. We had Margaret for the close-up, and we had the stunt double for all the wide shots and the blood and all that. And it was a suit. Everything in the movie is mostly prosthetics. So, there are really silicone appliances, even Golem, that are glued onto the body.

For Monstro, only the face was glued on. The prosthetics of the face were glued for movements, but the rest was really a suit that you could put on. So, the upper half, the bottom, gloves, feet, and a hood. And the face was glued on. So, getting inside Monstro’s body was fast; applying the face took quite a bit longer.


But even if you have the most comfortable suit in the world, if you are inside the suit, it’s very tough for the performer. We had a cooling vest. Margaret was also wearing a cooling vest to cool herself. We were able to plug in the cooling vest in between takes to cool her off. But it’s very tough. There was a heat wave in Paris at that time, and people were passing out literally on set, some because of the heat. So, we had to take a break and stop the shooting while people were recovering. It was quite tough.


Shadan Larki: What’s interesting is that the character of Monstro is designed to look like both women, right? But it also, as you mentioned, has elements that are entirely her own. So how do you even, again, think of… I’m sorry, but all my questions are based on my fascination with how your brain works, basically. [Laughs].


Pierre Olivier Persin: [Laughs]. I wish I knew how my brain works!


Shadan Larki: Yes, getting into Pierre’s mind, that’s what we are doing here!


Pierre Olivier Persin: Okay, so what was in the script from the very beginning was Demi’s face in the back with that scream kind of face, something like that. I don’t know. It was like, for instance, with all the boobs and everything, we also have a spine in the middle, between the boobs. Spines are really important in the movie.


I was like, ‘Okay, we have lots of boobs, but also we can add a spine just in the middle as if another spine has grown.’ Coralie was like, “Maybe, I want some teeth biting one of the boobs.” So I did that, and we moved on like that. Coralie, from the very beginning, was thinking of the Elephant Man or the ‘Elephant Woman’ in a way. We did many designs for the heads, but the one Coralie picked is very close to Elephant Man. We had other designs that were much more different. She really wanted them not to be horrible monsters and wanted the audience to feel sympathy and be moved by what was happening to the character rather than just have an ugly monster eating everyone.


So, yeah, Coralie wanted to keep that because The Elephant Man is universally known, and everybody is moved by the movie. We have never tried to rip off any movie, but you do not create it in a vacuum, either.

Shadan Larki: Are there any other details you’d like to mention? You mentioned painting veins and other small details. The more you watch The Substance, the more you notice the artistry at work. What were some of those details?

Pierre Olivier Persin: I really wanted to use different layers, not just prosthetics. Sometimes, you apply a prosthetic and paint over it to bring out the fleshiness, but we also painted the skin first with strong details before gluing the prosthetics on top. This allowed us to have things coming out from under the skin. For veins and other details, we added different colors and differences, layering them under the silicone prosthetics.

It was important for me to create depth and complexity, not just in the details but in the overall shape, too. From a distance, the character needs to be believable but close up; it should remain interesting. We had to be careful because Coralie was using tight close-ups and harsh lighting, which made the prosthetics more challenging. But it was very interesting.

Shadan Larki: My last question: It’s amazing to see how The Substance has already become iconic. Elisabeth’s spine has become a symbol. I saw so many Elizabeths in yellow coats on Halloween! How does it feel to see these images you’ve created become so beloved?

Pierre Olivier Persin: It’s crazy. Coralie keeps texting me photos of Halloween costumes and stuff, and I’m amazed. Some days during shooting, I thought, “This is the end of my career,” but now to see the response… it’s incredible.

Women InSession: Val Kilmer

This week on Women InSession, we dive into the fascinating career of the great Val Kilmer! From Top Gun to Tombstone to Batman Forever to Kiss Kiss Bang Bang, and everything in-between, Kilmer has had a really interesting career. And we had a really great time breaking it down and talking about our favorite Kilmer films.

Panel: Kristin Battestella, Jaylan Salah

On that note, check out this week’s show and let us know what you think in the comment section. Thanks for listening and for supporting the InSession Film Podcast!

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
Women InSession – Episode 114

Interview: Chasing The Gold: Jason Reitman On the Chaos and Creativity of Putting On a Show in ‘Saturday Night’

Jason Reitman probably knows better than most what it’s like to be around comedians. As the son of Ivan Reitman, the director of such works as Stripes, Ghostbusters, Meatballs and the producer of National Lampoon’s Animal House, Jason was hanging around as a child with many of the primary cast members of what would become Saturday Night Live. He has also directed Bill Murray and Dan Ackroyd. As a child he was an extra in Ghostbusters II, Dave, Kindergarten Cop and many more. He is known for his collaborations with Diablo Cody. 

Film Review: Saturday Night - SLUG Magazine

Saturday Night chronicles the chaos of the first episode in 1975 of what would later become the defining comedy sketch show Saturday Night Live

Nadine Whitney asked him about his process, his favorite people, and what he loves about making impossible things happen. 

Jason Reitman: This is Jason. Hi!

Nadine Whitney: Jason, hi! Or should I say “Hey, bud”, because you’re Canadian and you’re filming the legacy of another great Canadian, Lorne Michaels (played by Gabriel LaBelle). Obviously, a lot of people are going to ask you this – through your dad and other folks you grew up around many of the talents from Saturday Night Live. Is it difficult separating your personal feelings for them and putting them on camera as characters who are completely unprepared for what’s about to happen? 

Jason Reitman: It’s a really interesting question, and it’s funny, in particular with Dan Aykroyd, who, as you know, I’ve been making these Ghostbusters movies with. I feel like I have such a strong relationship with Dan who is now 70 years old, so it’s really tricky sometimes to wind back the clock and think of him as a 23-year-old who did not know what was ahead of him. 

I remember I asked Dan. I said, “What were you thinking the opening night?” Dan is the rare person. He can tell you exactly what he was thinking. Dan said, “You know, I thought, I’ve got a snowplow waiting for me in Toronto, so I’ve still got a job.” 

I think that’s what it was like for a lot of them. I think they were aware of how talented and how gifted they were, and what kind of chemistry they had and how special that was, but they had no sense of whether or not it would catch and whether audiences would receive it. So, I think they were all taken by surprise. I think what they felt, and what it feels like when you’re actually in 8H, when you’re in that room, the rest of the world disappears. 

If you ask people on the show all the time, what they’ll say is they feel like they’re doing a show for an audience that’s inside the stage. They’re not thinking about the American public. They’re not going to see people watching on television and that feels true to that environment. 

It feels there’s something special that Lorne created. It’s this safe, immersive world where you figure it out; you forget about time, you forget about everything else you don’t know whether it’s day or night. You just create. They were doing it on the fly.

Movie Review: "Saturday Night" Has Its Moments But Doesn't Quite Live Up To  The Legacy That Inspired It - The Independent | News Events Opinion More

Nadine Whitney: There are aspects, of course, in Saturday Night that are, by necessity, fictional. Certain things didn’t happen in the timeline you’ve presented in the film, and certain sketches weren’t shown on the first night. But the way that you’ve put it together, with the incredible chaos of like: “Okay, this is out, this is in, this is out, this is in. We need this writer now. Hey! there’s Paul Schaffer from David Letterman.” 

I didn’t realize how many people were milling in the background who would later be hugely popular. This was what was going on at the time the first musical guests were people like Janis Ian, and George Carlin (Matthew Rhys) was locked away in his dressing room taking drugs.

Jason Reitman: I’ll tell you, it’s interesting that it’s so funny, because I know you brought up that I grew up around Dan Aykroyd and Chevy Chase, but that’s not what I think of when I think of my childhood. When I think of my childhood, what I think of is I grew up on the trucks. I grew up on set. I grew up around the camera people and the sound people and the makeup and hair people and the special effects people. What I grew up around was a crew who every morning would wake up at the crack of dawn and try to pull off something that no one had ever done before. 

They would try to tell some unusual piece of storytelling. I watched on a daily basis people struggle with creativity, because that’s what it is. Every day you try something, it doesn’t work, and then you find a way to come together. 

I remember the first time I heard about Saturday Night Live and I watched an episode, I asked my father, Ivan, “How often do they do this?” Because I thought this was once a year, like Christmas or the Super Bowl. He told me, “They do this every week” That’s when I fell in love with it. When I realized that there was a group of people that every Tuesday started with nothing, and by Saturday, they had a show. 

So, what I wanted to create was something where the audience feels like they were part of the crew. I wanted to create an immersive experience. In which the audience felt like they were part of the cast and the crew of the opening night of Saturday Night Live. There wasn’t the traditional introduction to each character. The movie was not going to ease you into what was happening. You were going to get thrown in. It’s the night of, and you’re meeting thirty people. You don’t know who they are yet. You’re gonna have to figure it out as you go. The music’s pounding, the camera’s moving, and everything’s on the fly, and it feels hyper immersive and hyper real, and by the end of it, you’re gonna feel like one of the people throwing down the bricks. 

That was the challenge of writing the script. That was the challenge of making the movie, and the joy of it has been watching people get caught up in a film where they know what’s gonna happen, like Titanic goes down and we know the show goes on the air. But somehow, they still get caught up in the energy of what it feels like when you are moments away from going live. That was the great storytelling challenge, and then the joy of pulling it off.

Saturday Night' Review - by Sonny Bunch - The Bulwark

Nadine Whitney: They all pulled it off so imperfectly perfectly. I was stressed. I was thinking how are they going to make this happen? I was also thinking, “Why is everyone being so mean to Jim Henson?”

Jason Reitman: It’s really funny, Jim Henson really stood out. They didn’t get along with him. I think that’s part of what I found so interesting about it, is that Jim Henson is arguably the biggest genius on that show that night and will have the biggest cultural impact of any person on that show. And yet, sometimes it’s not a right fit. One of the interesting things about making this film is watching what will become a dozen household names challenge each other, push and pull each other to create something great. And sadly, Jim Henson just takes the bullets, the poor thing. 

Nadine Whitney: You’ve got Nicholas Braun playing Jim Henson and playing Andy Kaufman. That’s a great doubling of roles. He is so good, and believably so, as both people.

Jason Reitman: I’m so proud of him. We threw that at him at the last second, because Benny Safdie was originally going to play Andy Kaufman. 

Nadine Whitney: That would have been a great fit.

Jason Reitman: I know, but Benny’s film got a green light. He had to go direct. And it just hit us. It was like, well, you can play more than one character on Saturday Night Live. Wouldn’t it be interesting if you know, there was all these little subtle ways that we’re doubling SNL in that were emulating the show itself. Not only in the way that we created this, but structurally. The fact that there’s a musical performance one third in, and two thirds the way in, and there’s a weekend update in the middle, like we’re doing little things that are making nods to SNL. We thought, oh, one actor playing two characters is kind of an interesting nod to how they did that.

Nadine Whitney:Who is your favorite Saturday Night Live person?

Jason Reitman: The funny thing is I can give you the easy answers, which are like, “Oh, I mean, I love Will Ferrell and, you know, and I love Adam Sandler, and I love Steve Martin or…” But it’s the crew. It’s the people who put on the show. Because what they do is extraordinary. On Wednesday night they’re given sketches and overnight, Wednesday night, they’re building the sets. They’re making the costumes. The camera work and lighting rigs start. They’re rehearsing, beginning on Thursday and Friday. They’re building the show live. I grew up wanting to be someone on the trucks. I wanted to be one of the people who makes things. 

Nadine Whitney: And you do! You’re a director, you’re a writer, you’re a genius on your own level. Young Adult, The Front Runner, Tully, Juno, Up in the Air, Thank You for Smoking. I could go on, but I think you know the films you’ve made. I don’t need to tell you (laughing).

Jason Reitman: With Saturday Night for the first time, I wanted to make a comedy, but I also wanted to make a thriller. I think when people think comedy, sadly, they usually are never thinking about the filmmaking and the structure. When they talk about drama, they talk about craft, when they talk about comedy, they talk about the laughs. I wanted to make a comedy that was a thriller, a comedy was craft, a comedy where every person on the crew had to kind of level up their game to pull off this feat. I’m just so proud of my crew and cast.

Saturday Night Director Jason Reitman Reveals Which SNL Star Was  'Trickiest' to Cast

Nadine Whitney: I think you should be. I think, too, Ivan would be absolutely thrilled by the film. 

Just a final note. Matt Wood, where has he been all our lives?

Jason Reitman: I know! There’s an actor who knew from day one. People asked, “When are you gonna play John Belushi?” Like, this is just like destiny.

Saturday Night is a 2024 biographical comedy drama film directed by Jason Reitman about the night of the 1975 premiere of NBC’s Saturday Night, later known as Saturday Night Live. The film stars an ensemble cast portraying the various Saturday Night cast and crew, led by Gabriel LaBelle as the show’s creator and producer, Lorne Michaels. Rachel Sennott as Rosie Shuster. Cory Michael Smith as Chevy Chase. Ella Hunt as Gilda Radner. Dylan O’Brien as Dan Ackroyd. Matt Wood as John Belushi. Cooper Hoffman as Dick Ebersol.  Nicholas Braun as Jim Henson and Andy Kaufman. J.K. Simmons as Milton Berle. Nicholas Podany as Billy Crystal. Tommy Dewey as Michael O’Donoghue. Emily Fairn as Laraine Newman. Jon Baptiste as Billy Preston. Kim Matula as Jane Curtain. Willem Dafoe as David Tebet. Lamorne Morris as Garrett Morris. Abraham Hsu as Leo Yoshimura Andrew Bath Feldman as Neil Levy. Tracy Letts as Herb Sargent. Taylor Grey, Kaia Gerber, Paul Rust, Matthew Rhys, Finn Wolfhard and many more also feature.

Movie Review: ‘Carry-On’ is a Welcome Return To Form From Collet-Serra


Director: Jaume Collet-Serra
Writer: T.J. Fixman
Stars: Taron Egerton, Jason Bateman, Danielle Deadwyler

Synopsis: A mysterious traveler blackmails a young TSA agent into letting a dangerous package slip through security and onto a Christmas Day flight.


After failing to make his mark on blockbuster cinema with the sauceless Jungle Cruise and Black Adam, which genuinely changed the hierarchy of power in the DC universe, but not in the way its lead star envisioned, Jaume Collet-Serra finally returns to mid-budget entertainment with Carry-On. Sadly, such a thrilling picture has been relegated straight to Netflix with little to no fanfare by the streamer in giving it the theatrical release it deserves. After all, Collet-Serra’s string of theatrical action films with Liam Neeson ranks high as some of the best mid-budget fare of the last decade, so it’s only natural that it should be out in as many cinemas as possible. 

Taron Egerton Faces Deadly Airport Threat in 'Carry-On' Trailer

However, since Netflix doesn’t care about the perennity of this artform (as evidently illustrated in being hesitant on giving Greta Gerwig’s The Chronicles of Narnia a wide IMAX release), one has to contend with watching this great movie primed for the big screen on a television. It is truly a marvelous piece of filmmaking that would go gangbusters in the 1990s, especially in how it constantly harkens back to Steven Spielberg’s aesthetic and pace (think of The Terminal as a main point of reference). And what would you know? Amblin Partners produced this film, which is part of a first-look deal with Spielberg’s company and Netflix, to produce and release at least one movie per year. Bradley Cooper’s Maestro was the first, Carry-On is the second, and Chris Columbus’ The Thursday Murder Club will be the third in 2025. 

Carry-On doesn’t reinvent the wheel, nor does it have to. Collet-Serra is such a stylistically astute filmmaker that he efficiently pulls us into the busiest day of the year in one of (if not) the busiest airports in the United States: LAX on Christmas Eve. Before that, however, he attempts to develop a compelling relationship between its protagonists, Ethan Kopek (Taron Egerton) and Nora Parisi (Sofia Carson). However, it doesn’t really work. The performances are perfunctory, the chemistry is non-existent, and every single ounce of dialogues seemed to have been written by someone who has just learned what a “dialogue exchange” is. 

In fact, the first twenty minutes or so of Carry-On are pretty rough. How Collet-Serra and writer T.J. Fixman represent Ethan’s introductory arc is pitifully clichéd, especially when the (justifiably) personal stakes are set up in a rather haphazard way: Ethan’s girlfriend is pregnant, and he desperately wants to get a promotion to care for his baby, to which his boss (wonderfully played by Dean Norris) refuses but is willing to give him a shot to screen luggage at the airport, which he has not done before. 

Once this predictable and rather dull introductory section is out of the way (including a cold open that belongs in a completely different film and gives Carry-On a surprising direct-to-video sheen), the real movie begins. Ethan wasn’t supposed to work in luggage today. It’s only because his superior wanted to see what he’s made of that he replaced his friend, Jason (Sinqua Walls), who was initially going to be the target of a mysterious, nameless traveler (played by Jason Bateman). Now, it’s Ethan who is at the front and center of a call with this traveler, tells him to do nothing when a carry-on luggage containing a nerve agent known as Novichok is screened, or else Nora will die. 

Ethan, the hero he is poised to be, cannot “do nothing” and frequently attempts to trick the traveler, but doesn’t know a nameless watcher (played by Theo Rossi) observes his every move. Parallel to this story, LAPD detective Elena Cole (Danielle Deadwyler) investigates a corrupted audio recording that may expose what is currently happening at the airport, under the TSA’s nose. Like his 2014 film Non-Stop, Collet-Serra illustrates Carry-On in the classical sense of the term, with most of its emotional beats telegraphed from the start. We know Ethan will ultimately triumph over evil, no matter how intricate the traveler’s setup is, which is poised to cause shocking setbacks. 

Carry-On Trailer: Taron Egerton Stars in Netflix Action Thriller

What compels us to watch this movie until the very end is how Collet-Serra refines his visual language to the fullest extent, creating larger-than-life setpieces to heighten the stakes and tension. Such a simple story could’ve been clinically aestheticized, which would’ve been another cog in the Netflix algorithm. But Collet-Serra is not that kind of director, as he illustrated in Orphan and his numerous Liam Neeson collaborations, not so much in his large-scale blockbusters, which seem directed by committee than with the singular sense of style that few directors who tasked to helm mid-budget actioners will do. 

That’s what makes something like Carry-On special. A confrontation inside a moving car between Cole and Agent Alcott (Logan Marshall-Green) could’ve been hacked to bits. However, Collet-Serra and cinematographer Lyle Vincent stimulate our senses by moving the camera 360 degrees, in and out of the car, while Wham!’s Last Christmas blares on the speakers. 

It’s pure kinetics, which Collet-Serra manages effortlessly in a scene like this. It involves audience participation and puts us in the edge of our seats, especially when the camera always thinks about how the audience will perceive a specific action set piece. He’s also well in his element when capturing Taron Egerton running like Tom Cruise inside the airport, from one place to the next, or on the tarmac as he attempts to board the plane during the movie’s thrilling climax. There’s a real sense of excitement whenever Egerton runs fast, or the camera begins to move slightly when a new development arises, furthering our sense of immersion inside the airport on this very busy, and extremely chaotic day. 

It’s also when Egerton shines the most, as a paranoia-riddled TSA agent whose incessant stress leads him to make unforgivable decisions he cannot explain to his co-workers or superiors. Everyone is in danger if he doesn’t listen to the traveler, who doesn’t have any tangible motivations for wanting to poison a plane, until Cole uncovers a geopolitical plot when they realize who will be on that plane. The traveler is tasked to do something through a mysterious organization that doesn’t get as fully developed as it should, but that is completely secondary to the fact that he doesn’t ask questions as long as he gets paid. 

What’s most compelling is how he manipulates Ethan (and eventually someone else) into doing his bidding with zero remorse whatsoever. At first, Collet-Serra smartly doesn’t reveal the antagonist’s face (although his voice very much primes us that it’s indeed Jason Bateman) until one of Ethan’s closest colleagues gets killed, which profoundly shifts their exchanges via an earpiece. At that moment, the traveler reveals himself to Ethan, forever changing the dynamic between protagonist/antagonist. He has little reason to do what he’s about to do beyond getting paid, which makes him a rather ruthless villain. After all, he has nothing to lose as long as Ethan does nothing and the Novichok is on the plane. He can kill anyone and will never feel remorse for what he did. The ultimate objective it’s what’s most important for him. 

Perhaps we could’ve gotten a deeper exploration of who he was hired by, but Collet-Serra is explicit that it doesn’t matter. What matters is how Ethan foils this plot and overcomes each hurdle he faces. That’s what attracts us to watch the movie, which becomes more exciting by the minute once the parallel storylines between the TSA plot and police investigation coalesce. It also helps that Deadwyler is having tons of fun playing a detective who will stop at nothing before her theories are proven correct, even if she is facing her own set of challenges. 

Collet-Serra taps into a side of Deadwyler we haven’t seen on screen before, interestingly contrasting with the emotionally vulnerable and nuanced turn she gave as Berniece in Malcolm Washington’s The Piano Lesson. In a movie like this, her interior emotions needed to be at the front and center of her performance. In Carry-On, it’s all about the adrenaline rush she gets in solving such an indecipherable case like this one. Both Egerton and Deadwyler have terrific chemistry together once they are eventually paired on screen, but the same can’t be said for how boring Ethan’s relationship with Nina is. 

Carry-On movie: Netflix just gave this Christmas its Die Hard.

It’s the sole narrative thread that dampens Carry-On. A movie like this absolutely needs personal stakes, which is why Ethan first listens to the traveler and does nothing, until he finds out what he is letting in at the airport. But these stakes don’t feel as crucial as when Collet-Serra and Vincent focus their camera solely on Ethan, who progressively descends into torment until he decides to take action, come hell or high water. No one will tell him to sit back and do nothing, especially when he knows what will happen to the passengers if this suitcase goes on the plane. His resolve is far stronger than the traveler thinks. 

The antagonist has a rather narrow-minded viewpoint of Ethan, which is part of the reason why he eventually underestimates him. What happens next is Collet-Serra riffing on Non-Stop, positioning their final confrontation inside a plane. It may not reach the same thrills as that movie’s finale, but it’s undoubtedly his biggest morceau de bravoure since then. With flawlessly executed cinematography and minute editing work from Fred Raskin, Elliot Greenberg, and Krisztian Majdik, Carry-On’s climax overcomes some of its screenwriting inconsistencies and finally gives Ethan his time to shine until its last shot could open the doors for something much bigger than LAX. 

The movie may not ultimately become a new, Die Hard-esque holiday classic (which is likely why Netflix is releasing it at this time, as counter-programming for Kraven the Hunter and The Lord of the Rings: The War of the Rohirrim). However, it has allowed Jaume Collet-Serra to get his groove back as an efficient mid-budget filmmaker with enough verve to make a name for himself, in the wake of his weakest efforts in Jungle Cruise and Black Adam. Now that his subsequent films, The Woman in the Yard and a Lily James-led reboot of Renny Harlin’s Cliffhanger, are right up his alley, we’re likely to get more great stuff from a director everyone should know and love in a day and age where an authorial imprint in blockbuster cinema isn’t found as much as it did many years ago. 

Grade: A-

Chasing the Gold Interview: ‘Anora’ Hair Department Head Justine Sierakowski

Mikey Madison is simply electrifying in Anora

With tinsel-laden hair, thick eyeliner, and a killer wardrobe, Madison bursts onto the screen, making for one of the most memorable “A Star is Born” performances I’d seen in some time. 

Yet, when Madison joined director Sean Baker for a post-screening Q&A at TIFF, I quickly realized that the seemingly reserved and mild-mannered actress on stage was a world away from the firecracker Ani I had just seen on screen. I had just witnessed a complete transformation. One that I had taken for granted. The hair and makeup work in Anora serves as armor for Madison and her on-screen alter-ego, Ani.

In being given the opportunity to interview Anora‘s Hair Department Head, Justine Sierakowski, (and her makeup counterpart Annie Johnson), I set out to discover all about the inspirations behind Madison’s looks in the film. The answers may surprise you.

Watch our full interview with Anora’s Justine Sierakowski below:

Interview: Pat Boonnitipat, Director of ‘How To Make Millions Before Grandma Dies’

How to Make Millions Before Grandma Dies (Lahn Mah) by Pat Boonnitipat has become a sleeper hit across the world. The Thai dramatic-comedy about a young slacker and his no-nonsense grandmother who live together when she becomes ill is arch, warm, exasperating and tender – just like M. and his Umah.

Starring Putthipong ‘Billkin’ Assaratanakul as M. and first-time actor Usha Seamkhum as Umah, the chemistry between the two leads is adorable. 

Nadine Whitney speaks to Pat about making a film that becomes “first in your heart.”

Nadine Whitney: Hello Pat. The first question I need to ask you involves changing mediums. You’ve worked a lot in television, but this is your debut feature. How is it going across into feature filmmaking?

Pat Boonnitipat: Working in television is such a really long process and I got to experiment with so many things in production. So, when it comes to feature film, which is shorter, as a filmmaker, you want to try this and that. You want to show you were inspired by so many great filmmakers, and you want to do it like them. But I actually did much of that while making the TV series. So, when I made the feature film, it wasn’t as much about trying to be like someone else, but just trying to really get to the story and tell it in the way that it enhanced your story.

Nadine Whitney: You have a very famous Thai pop star in the film with Billkin. I didn’t realize quite how popular he was until I put my review of the movie up on some social media. Putthipong ‘Billkin’ Assaratanakul is a terrific actor. Can you tell me about getting him to channel the comedic energy, the slacker energy, and the heartfelt energy of M. into the the role.

Pat Boonnitipat: Billkin is a very lovely guy himself. He’s a very lovely person. He always likes to just tease people exactly like M. does in the movie. It came out pretty naturally for him to perform that way. The comedy scenes and with all the jokes, I think it just happened seamlessly, because he and Usha Seamkhum were really close during workshopping. When we were on set together, he was a joker. During the shoot, he teased Usaha. Behind the camera and on the camera is the same energy.

Nadine Whitney: I cannot believe that How to Make Millions Before Grandma Dies is Usha Seamkhum’s first role. She is astonishing. I laughed with her, I cried with her, I felt angry for her, I felt everything!

I ran through this mix of emotions through the entire process. At one stage, I was giggling uncontrollably. At other times I was sobbing. At other times I was furious. That is a sign of accomplished filmmaking

Can you tell me about directing Usha Seamkhum, as this is her screen debut.

Pat Boonnitipat: Usha Seamkhum is really talented. She’s gifted in the way that she didn’t have any pre-concept of acting but she somehow could just understand the character. 

Grandma’s character in the movie is quite the opposite of her own personality. She’s very kind, she’s very lovely, and she loves to hug everybody. She always says, “Oh, I love you. You’re so cute and you’re so lovely. Thank you so much!” But the grandmother in the movie is quite the opposite. She keeps things inside herself. When Usha understood Amah, she could just be her. 

What is truly gifted about her is that she’s very open and she and she could believe that Billikin, the main actor, is actually her own grandkid. In that way, she really loved him, and that’s how she could perform so well.

Nadine Whitney: Can you tell me a bit about building the roles of the siblings, Umah’s children.

Pat Boonnitipat: I grew up in a house that also had a lot of the middle generation. It would be my mother, my uncles, my aunts, and that generation. But the one who cooked for us and took care of us children was the grandmother. The middle generation would go to work, and then they would come back and take us on holidays and things like that. The majority of the decisions made in the house were done by the middle generation. 

The genesis of the story is about the grandson and the grandmother. But I think that from my experience, the middle generation plays a very important role in the dynamic between what’s going to happen next for the people who live in the house.

Nadine Whitney: M’s mother Sew is one of the few characters who just wants to hang out with her own mother because she loves her. I think that is one of the more beautiful aspects of the film. I don’t think that Sew wants anything material at all. 

M., from his time with Amah, learns that he has a mother to hang out with and he should spend time with her. There is another generation coming, too. Rainbow the daughter of Amah’s eldest son who M. can teach too. A lovely passing on of tradition of caring.

Pat Boonnitipat: Well, thank you. That’s beautiful.

Nadine Whitney: Can you tell me what it is like to know audiences across the world are seeing your film?

Pat Boonnitipat: I didn’t expect it. Me and the scriptwriter Thodsapon Thiptinnakorn were just trying our best to tell the story. It’s very difficult for Thai film to travel internationally. We were just more than happy if it did well in our own countries. 

What I experienced from the reaction that I got from audiences around the world is surprising. It’s quite common that they are touched by the characters, and many scenes.

Nadine Whitney: You have touched an array of people with the work. There is a universality in the work, because many of us understand generational differences and how our parents and grandparents were each put into situations that we didn’t necessarily understand.

Pat Boonnitipat: Thank you so much for telling me this. Thank you so much.

Nadine Whitney: I can only think of one other Thai drama and comedy film that has had the kind of international breakthrough that How to Make Millions Before Grandma Dies, and that’s Bad Genius. You worked on the television series of Bad Genius, and it’s recently just been remade as an American film. Have you seen that?

Pat Boonnitipat: I haven’t seen the American version yet. 

The movie is very, very popular, like it got remade in America and in China it is very popular in as the box office wise. But the TV series, it’s quite popular in Thailand, and also in a few Southeast Asian countries for example, Indonesia, and a little bit in Malaysia, but in China, not so much.

How did you build the dynamics between the characters?

Pat Boonnitipat: The chemistry is like my chemistry between me and my grandmother. Thodsapon Thiptinnakorn wrote the character of Amah first. She is based on Thodsapon Thiptinnakorn’s grandmother because she sold congee like Amah does in the movie. 

When it came to directing, because his grandmother already passed away, and I didn’t have a chance to meet her, I tried to construct the character based on my own grandmother because she’s the one I know best. 

I love the way that my grandmother is always so chill about things that I’m so frustrated about, but at the same time, she could be so specific, very specific with things I’m so careless about. Her humor is exceptional, and her way of seeing the world. 

Nadine Whitney: The film is “number one in my heart”. Amah and M. get to be number one in my heart. Sew gets to be number one in my heart. I think you’ve done a beautiful, beautiful job. Is there anything you’d like to say before we go?

Pat Boonnitipat: You made my day. Thank you so much. Thank you for your kind words. I’m so lucky to be able to talk to you. Thank you.

Nadine Whitney: You’re very welcome. Anything you would like to say to the wider audience out in the world?

Pat Boonnitipat: I just wish they have a good time. I mean, they don’t have to watch the film. I would just wish they have a good time in their life.

Nadine Whitney: That’s a beautiful thing to say. You are a wonderful person, Pat.

Pat Boonnitipat: Thank you so much. You’re so kind. Thank you so much.

How To Make Millions Before Grandman Dies is a 2024 Thai comedy-drama film directed by Pat Boonnitipat, co-written by Pat and Thodsapon Thiptinnakorn, and starring Putthipong “Billkin” Assaratanakul and Usha “Taew” Seamkhum in their debut feature film roles. In the film, a university dropout low on money volunteers to take care of his terminally ill grandmother in the hope of pocketing an inheritance. It is available to rent on VOD

Chasing the Gold Interview: ‘The Seed of the Sacred Fig’ Director Mohammad Rasoulof

Iranian auteur Mohammad Rasoulof joins InSession Film’s Awards Editor Shadan Larki, for a wide-ranging interview for his latest film, The Seed of the Sacred Fig

Written and directed by Rasoulof, ‘Sacred Fig’ is part insightful familial drama, part sharp political thriller, and in part a human rights documentary featuring real-life footage taken from Iran’s “Woman, Life, Freedom” protests in the summer of 2022. Under the helm of a lesser filmmaker, the results could have been perhaps messy or convoluted. But, in Rasoulof’s expert hands, ‘Sacred Fig’ is woven together beautifully, culminating with a final act that is breathless and utterly profound. 

Pressure makes diamonds, and the immense political and social pressure Mr. Rasoulof and his crew faced in making The Seed of the Sacred Fig, risking imprisonment, cannot be understated. But, in persevering, Rasoulof has created a gem of a film—a living document that ruthlessly examines that very pressure and what it does to the human condition.

The problem, as you’ll see in our interview, is that Mr. Rasoulof is far too humble a man to place himself amongst the greats of Iranian and, indeed, world cinema. With The Seed of the Sacred Fig, he has proven that’s where he belongs.

Watch our full interview with The Seed of the Sacred Fig writer/director Mohammad Rasoulof below:

Interview: Chasing The Gold:The Fabulous Nickel Boys: Ethan Herisse and Brandon Wilson On Beauty and Darkness in ‘Nickel Boys’

Nickel Boys directed by RaMell Ross, based on Colson Whitehead’s award-winning novel has been garnering laurels already with Ross being awarded best director at The Gotham Awards and Brandon Wilson being awarded best breakthrough talent there, also.

Nickel Boys is based on a real reformatory school which began operating during the Jim Crow segregation years where young Black men were horrifically abused and murdered. Ethan Herisse stars as Elwood Curtis, a young man from Tallahassee who, on the eve of going to college, is arrested and sent to The Nickel Academy in Florida where he meets Jack Turner from Houston, played by Brandon Wilson. It is a film that spans decades and the ongoing systemic violence committed on the minds, bodies, and cultural consciousness of Black Americans. 

Nadine Whitney had the immense honor of speaking to Ethan and Brandon about their work and the importance and impact of the film.

Nadine Whitney: Hello, hello, you beautiful, beautiful men. I was profoundly moved by Nickel Boys. Many people are discovering RaMell Ross’ singular vision and his unique way to deliver narrative cinema. 

I first wanted to ask you about learning about the notion of shared identity, which is something that begins to merge between the two characters, Elwood and Turner.

How much of that was brought through the different points of view RaMell Ross made you experience through the filming of the piece. From their meeting at The Nickel Academy both characters teach each other different things. Turner teaches about class and economics. Elwood opens Turner’s eyes to the literature, the beautiful, civil rights, and hope. They have a different sense of what it is like being a young Black man in America at the time, but a sense that informs each other. 

Ethan Herisse: Oh, there’s so many layers to that emotionally. RaMell had talked to us about Colson Whitehead’s book and Colson’s perspective of seeing himself as both Turner and Elwood. RaMell, in a similar way, when he was writing the film with Joslyn Barnes said that he was viewing himself as both of these characters speaking through different perspectives. Getting to play those and experience Turner’s and Elwood’s relationship. From the moment they meet their worlds depend on one another. 

And as you’re saying, the way they challenge each other, their differing ideas because they’re clashing and trying to fix the other person or teach the other person. And when they let go of that and they, I mean more so Elwood with for Turner because he kind of can crack his shell a little bit and show him at the world can be so much bigger. 

From that point on Turner can’t live without Elwood, which is why he, I mean, there’s not really a choice, is motivated and why he comes and stays with him in the sweat box because I don’t think Turner could survive anymore without Elwood in his life. 

Brandon Wilson: Elwood won’t be surviving without Turner in that moment anymore, either.

Ethan Herisse: There’s so much the idea of the shared. Even the way film was shot. It invites you into the experience through these boys’ eyes after they share the identity of both of them and gets you immersed in this world so much more directly and intimately. Aunjanue had some way of describing it, but I’ve forgotten how she put it.

Nadine Whitney: Speaking of Aunjanue Ellis-Taylor, her performance as Hattie (Elwood’s grandmother) is extraordinary. You can feel when Turner is held by her, it’s like the first time he’s been held by anyone for most of his life. What was it like acting with her?

Ethan Herisse: Yeah, yeah. She’s mind-blowing. Oh, this is my second time working with her. [The first was Ava DuVernay’s mini-series When They See Us]. I was so fortunate to have experienced that.  

Then this time around with me being Elwood I was always with camera as it’s the point of view when we were working together. I was able to watch her act while also, you know, being present with her. And it’s really incredible how she is able to bring the best out of who she is performing with because of her presence. You there is no way that you can be in a moment and in a scene with her and you would not be pulled in and not be engaged and be affected by what’s happening. 

I was not stunned by how amazing she was, but I was stunned how that even in those moments, in every moment where I was, you know, off camera it felt like nothing else mattered. There wasn’t ever anything around us, in that it felt as though she was speaking directly to me and pouring all of those words and emotions into me. 

It takes a really talented and special individual to do something like that and to effect people in that way and that’s speaking as a person who was there on set with her. But for her to also be to be able to captivate everyone. I started watching her on screen in the movie and because she’s looking directly the camera, anyone sitting in the audience knows exactly what I’m saying. You experience everything. You are fully pulled into the moments because of her. 

You are feeling that love that she is pouring into Elwood and into Turner. and into that hug because it’s being played right to you as an audience member. So, it’s an incredible feat and she’s fantastic. 

Nadine Whitney: Brandon, how did you feel working with her? 

Brandon Wilson: Equally blown away, this is my first time working with her and I remember there was a moment where I felt I hadn’t met Aunjanue until a few months ago. Because what she was asked to do in the film, I think it’s different than what me and Ethan were asked to do in the film. 

She was I think very much alone in a lot of her exploration. I can’t speak for her process, but it felt like she was very much in her own zone in when we were filming, so yeah, I never felt like I actually met her until recently.

But to get to still witness her was… yeah (breathes out in appreciation). I remember talking to Ethan in some of the first days when I first came in, and I think because of this kind of an aloneness that she had to live in, I felt so separate from her.

The first scenes that we had that I talked to Ethan, and I was like, “I don’t I feel like I’m here. Do I have any scenes with her? It doesn’t even matter if I’m there.”

I was just talking so flippantly and just with disregard, but I’m fortunate to have that safe space. To say silly things and the to regret them because very quickly I got so much. I saw who she was actually and just how powerful she was and getting to watch her more and I would just get pulled in more and more. I remember then I came back to Ethan later, I was like my bad. I said something stupid. (Both laughing)

Nadine Whitney: I’d like to talk to about working with the director of photography Jomo Fray. He has a radical and distinctive eye, and you get to actually wear that eye. What was it like wearing this point of view, this empathetic humanistic point of view as an actor.

Brandon Wilson: We got really close to Jomo. I mean, sometimes we were physically wearing this point of view. Sometimes Ethan would wear the camera on his chest or sometimes I would have the thing that Daveed Diggs was in and the cameras behind the head. 

Ethan Herisse: But a lot of times it would be Jomo still controlling the camera and we would just be very, very close to his back. Because of that and also because of the way he shot it and the way RaMell shot it – he talks about like having to find what our eyes actually do and like what it actually is to live in our bodies. Because when we trade places and Turner becomes our eyes, but we remain present with Elwood. It gave us the opportunity to become so much closer that with the cinematographer and the camera operators than maybe would have ever had if there was filming some just more traditional way. 

Nadine Whitney: Jomo is a visual poet. I know this is ridiculous. I’m talking to you, the stars, and I’m rattling on about the cinematography.

Ethan Herisse: We share your excitement about Jomo. He just won an award for the film from the New York Film Critics Circle. So, go Jomo!

Nadine Whitney: What would you like to say about the film? What would you like audiences to take away from it? 

Ethan Herisse: I say something about the film, and I will make you (points to Brandon) talk about the audience. 

Brandon Wilson: It’s the same pressure! (laughing).

Ethan Herisse: What I have to say about the film is that it’s really special to have had an experience like we did on set when we were making it. Where it was filled with a lot of love and joy and we really got to dive into this new experience. Into the beauty of collaboration. Then to be able to see it and see that all of what we experienced on the set everything that I described reflected in the movie.  So, you’re able to feel that and experience that.

Furthermore, to be on this journey where we are able to talk about it and it is being acknowledged and we get to celebrate it. It’s a true privilege to be a part of something that was as special as a movie like Nickel Boys

I can’t say you dream about something like this, because I honestly, I feel like you don’t see something like this coming. But I feel like you know when something is good, and that was the feeling throughout the whole process of making the film that we were doing something good.

I just want to continue to share Nickel Boys with as many people as possible because I think it’s an experience that everyone should dive into. 

Brandon Wilson: We have talked about RaMell and how RaMell is very much very still on this idea of wanting to give the Nickel Boys more life and the story of the boys the Dozier School more life. When stories like these come to light rather than the boys remaining statistics or just being remembered for their deaths. I think something Aunjanue was talking about was the way the film was shot. She would discuss when people tell her that the film is hard. 

I would also like to add that this film is so beautiful. It does in that way as well show you that these boys, even though they’re going through something so dark, that there is life. When Elwood looks up at a tree or is looking at a leaf in his hand, there’s still so much awe and wonder that is universal to all humans. That awe still exists in a person who’s going through a terrible situation. I hope people recognize that as well. 

Nadine Whitney: It is profoundly beautiful, and that’s part of the pain, I think, too, is to see how both Turner and Elwood see each other. Life and its possibilities; the small and the large and the eternal and to know that for some their lights were ended.

So, thank you very much for your time. I really haven’t seen a film like it and it’s extraordinary and you are both extraordinary people. 

Ethan Herisse: Thank you so much. It’s been a pleasure talking to you.

Chasing the Gold Interview: ‘Anora’ Head Makeup Designer Annie Johnson

Anora‘s head makeup designer, Annie Johnson, sits down with InSession Film Awards Editor Shadan Larki to discuss her work on Sean Baker’s acclaimed new drama. Watch blow as Johnson discusses how her new designs helped star Mikey Madison get into character, her inspirations for her makeup work, and designing looks for a sprawling supporting cast.