Home Blog Page 138

Movie Review (Cannes Film Festival 2023): ‘Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny’ Checks All the Boxes of a Good Adventure Flick


Director: James Mangold

Writer: Jez Butterworth, John-Henry Butterworth, David Koepp, James Mangold

Stars: Harrison Ford, Phoebe Waller-Bridge, Mads Mikkelsen

Synopsis: Archaeologist Indiana Jones races against time to retrieve a legendary artifact that can change the course of history.


A nostalgic send off of a beloved character, a fitting addition to a treasured franchise, or perhaps a mixture of the two, Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny could easily fit into both categories. Mangold takes the reins on this fifth and final installment to do his very best at achieving an action-packed film teeming with quirky jokes, nostalgic callbacks and enough charm and wit to do the infamous โ€œIndyโ€ justice. The film is by no means perfect, though long-time fans should have fun with this โ€˜last hurrahโ€™ for the legendary adventurer. 

Harrison Ford is back as Indy and up to his old hijinks in the brand new installment out of Cannes. With the magic of visual effects, the film opens with a startlingly young looking explorer in the middle of his usual old antics, tussling with nemesis Jรผrgen Voller (Mads Mikkelsen), a former WWII Nazi Scientist. Itโ€™s an exciting opening scene with fights atop a moving train and plenty of charm, but we donโ€™t stay here for long. Soon, we jump from the past to present and are introduced to a handful of new characters such as Helena Shaw (Phoebe Waller-Bridge), the now-grown daughter of Indyโ€™s old sidekick Basil Shaw, played by Toby Jones. Trailing alongside Helena is Teddy (Ethann Isidore), a teenage pickpocket and sidekick whose loyalty and allegiance lies with her, aiding Helena in her escapades. With this new cast of characters introduced, pandemonium begins and the adventure is afoot.

Though the adventure afoot unfortunately isnโ€™t quite what it used to be. With lackluster jokes, a number of classically predictable chase scenes and some underdeveloped new characters, the ventures are entertaining for sure, but overwhelmingly average. Thereโ€™s nothing terribly wrong or disastrous with any aspect of the film, but thereโ€™s an old spark that used to exist in the franchise that just isnโ€™t present with this one. A slew of characters embarking on a global chase to locate the โ€˜Dial of Destinyโ€™  is fun and intriguing enough, but could be more-so. A few risks in the writing of the plot or characters by the film’s four writers couldโ€™ve gone a long way in adding something a bit more unique and memorable to this final Indy film, but it commits to what it is well enough.

On a technical note the film has much to boast about. From appealing cinematography by Phedon Papamichael and score by the infamous John Williams, it surely appeases the senses. Nostalgia is the absolute powerhouse that drives this film from the sentimental music to how itโ€™s captured on screen, and is one of its saving graces through and through. A new generation of movie-goers will be able to experience an โ€œIndiana Jonesโ€ title on the big screen for the first time, and long time fans should be eager to catch another final theatrical glimpse of their favorite whip-cracking swashbuckler set to the all-too-familiar theme song once more.

The performances are good enough, believable and entertaining, though the standout is assuredly Phoebe Waller-Bridgeโ€™s Helena. With her witty quips and well timed humor, she may tap into a bit of her go-to โ€˜Fleabagโ€™ here and there, but sheโ€™s the one that earned most laughs from the audience and seems to fit into the Indy universe with ease. Ford is steady and seasoned, giving a solid final performance and going out on an undeniably emotional though honorable note. Mikkelson as Voller is an intriguing villain and fun addition to the film, but isnโ€™t given much to work with and lacks in screen time and material, which is a shame due to the fact his performance and character held a lot of campy โ€˜bad guy’ potential. 

Though itโ€™s fun to see the seasoned and beloved fedora-adorned explorer back in action, itโ€™s a bit of an unnecessary addition to an already complete franchise. Perhaps overwhelmingly average, Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny isnโ€™t an outright disaster by any means, it checks all the boxes of a good adventure flick, though it certainly lacks the tangible charm of the Spielberg installments. Maybe the franchise shouldโ€™ve been left as is, but seeing as it wasnโ€™t, this final swan song of a film is fine enough and is sure to strum at least a string of heartwarming nostalgia into even the most cynical or doubtful viewer.

Grade: C+

Podcast: Ranking Disney’s Renaissance Age – Episode 536

This weekโ€™s episode is brought to you by Koffee Kult. Get 15% off with the code: ISF

This week on the InSession Film Podcast, inspired by Disney’s latest live-action remake in The Little Mermaid, we thought it would be fun to rank (collectively) all 10 films from Disney’s iconic Renaissance Age! We all grew up with these films, and certainly nostalgia is a factor, but they are generally heralded as some of Disney’s best films for a reason. So, our final ranking wasn’t quite as divisive as last time, but there was plenty of fun to go around.

On that note, check out this week’s show and let us know what you think in the comment section. Thanks for listening and for supporting the InSession Film Podcast!

– Renaissance Age Part 1 (4:27)
Like last time, we talked about these movies in chronological order. During this segment, we talk about and power rank The Little Mermaid, The Rescuers Down Under, Beauty and the Beast, Aladdin, and The Lion King!


RELATED: Listen to Episode 516 of the InSession Film Podcast where we discussed our Top 10 Movies of 2022!


– Renaissance Age Part 2 (1:33:46)
In the back half of the episode, we continue our power ranking as we talk about Pocahontas, The Hunchback of Notre Dame, Hercules, Mulan, and Tarzan

Show Sponsor: First Time Watchers Podcast

– Music
A Tale as Old as Time – Angela Lansbury
I’ll Make a Man Out of You – Donny Osmond

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
InSession Film Podcast – Episode 536

Next week on the show:

Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse

Help Support The InSession Film Podcast

If you want to help support us, there are several ways you can help us and we’d absolutely appreciate it. Every penny goes directly back into supporting the show and we are truly honored and grateful. Thanks for your support and for listening to the InSession Film Podcast!

VISIT OUR DONATE PAGE HERE

Podcast Review: Master Gardener

On this episode, JD and Jay break down Paul Schrader’s new film Master Gardener, starring Joel Edgerton! It hasn’t received the same praise as First Reformed, and for the reasons we mention, it may go down as the film we’re most against the grain on in 2023.

Review: Master Gardener (3:00)
Director: Paul Schrader
Writers: Paul Schrader
Stars: Joel Edgerton, Sigourney Weaver, Quintessa Swindell

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
InSession Film Podcast – Master Gardener

Women InSession: 90s Teen Comedies

This week on Women InSession, we get giddy as we talk about our favorite 90s teen comedies! We talk everything from Clueless to The Faculty to Don’t Tell Mom the Babysitter’s Dead and everything in between!

Panel: Kristin Battestella, Zita Short, Amy Thomasson

On that note, check out this week’s show and let us know what you think in the comment section. Thanks for listening and for supporting the InSession Film Podcast!

– Music
The Return of the Eagle – Atli รƒโ€“rvarsson

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
Women InSession – Episode 40

To hear this Extra Film episode and everything else we do, download our apps on the Amazon Market for Android and the Podcast Source app on IOS devices. The mobile app covers all of our main shows, bonus podcasts and everything else relating to the InSession Film Podcast. Thanks for your wonderful support and for listening to our show. It means the world to us.

Podcast Review: How to Blow Up a Pipeline

On this episode, JD and Brendan discuss the Daniel Goldhaber film How to Blow Up a Pipeline! This is a film that garnered some hype at this year’s Sundance Film Festival, but it turns out much of that was genuinely warranted.

Review: How to Blow Up a Pipeline (3:00)
Director: Daniel Goldhaber
Writers: Ariela Barer, Jordan Sjol, Daniel Goldhaber
Stars: Ariela Barer, Kristine Froseth, Lukas Gage, Forrest Goodluck, Sasha Lane

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
InSession Film Podcast – How to Blow Up a Pipeline

Movie Review (Cannes Film Festival 2023): ‘A Song Sung Blue’ is Beautiful and Unoriginal


Director: Zihan Geng

Writer: Liu Yining

Stars: Huang Ziqi, Zhou Meijun, Liang Long, Liang Jing

Synopsis: Fifteen year-old Xian goes to live with her father while her mother, a doctor, takes a job in Africa. Soon, she becomes fascinated by her father’s stepdaughter, a swaggering, liberated and slightly melancholic young woman.


The story being told by Zihan Geng and screenwriter Liu Yining in A Song Sung Blue has been seen plenty of times, particularly in the film festival circuit these past few years. And although the array of tropes and cliches might be bothersome for some viewers seeking a different type of journey, the elegance and naturalistic beauty of the central performances by Huang Ziqi and Liang Jing help the film be pretty engaging on an emotional level.ย 

Youth is a fragile state that serves as a learning pattern for lifeโ€™s multiple (and concurrent) ups and downs. Everyone takes it for granted before they realize later that those were some of the most important and wistful days of their life; those are the days that shape our lives. In random moments, we get glimpses of our past experience and feel a splash of youth flowing through oursoul. The directorial debut from young filmmaker in Zihan Geng, A Song Sung Blue (premiering at the Cannes Film Festival in the Directorโ€™s Fortnight sidebar) captures this essence beautifully through a story about two girls struggling to find their place in the world. Unfortunately, her film can be placed onto the sorting hat of wispy coming-of-age dramas โ€“ where a summer (and a special person) paves the way for the enlightenment of a teenager โ€“ that make the festival rounds all year round.ย 

Set in the early 2010s, A Song Sung Blue follows a shy fifteen-year-old girl named Xian (Zhou Meijun) who lives in the northeast area of Harbin with her divorced mother (Liang Jing). Xian loves being with her mother, although her teenage angst sometimes gets the better of her. However, things will change, at least for the summer, as her mother has accepted a two-month position in Africa so that it can give her better opportunities in the future. Because of this, she is sent to live with her father (Liang Long), who runs a struggling photography studio, for a while. She hasnโ€™t seen him since her parentsโ€™ divorce a few years ago. Xian isnโ€™t excited to see him after all this time, asking her mother not to go to Africa so she doesnโ€™t spend the Summer alone. From the moment he appears onscreen, you get the feeling that Xianโ€™s chemistry with him isnโ€™t the same as her motherโ€™s.ย 

Thereโ€™s a lot of distance and resentment from Xian, as her father wants to connect with her by all means, even introducing her to his Korean-Chinese partner/assistant and pet monkey. The first two days are a bit rough, as the lonesome Xian is forced to have some of her classmates over at the photo studio, her father taking advantage of the situation and charging them for group pictures. She isnโ€™t being noticed by them or by her father. So, Xian heads to the backroom to take a breather. And thatโ€™s when she meets the person that will change her life forever: her fatherโ€™s stepdaughter, the eighteen-year-old Jin Mingmei (Huang Ziqi). Mingmei will be the guiding light to illuminate Xianโ€™s road of self-discovery and desire โ€“ she treats her older step-sibling like an idol, a poster of a celebrity on the wall.ย 

It is not only Mingmeiโ€™s aspirations of opening a shop and ditching the flight attendant courses sheโ€™s taking that make Xian want to win her affection. But also the radiance she transmits through her daily life brightens Xianโ€™s previously lonely life; a gray-hued room pops with color the moment she arrives. Zihan Geng delves into the coming-of-age tropes and cliches through these sisters’ newly-formed relationship, serving some scenes that remind of other (and better) films. We have seen this type of dynamic hundreds of times which is a magnet to these movies because people relate to them. I think the film relies so much on the relatability factor that it fails to expand its story into something of greater narrative weight.ย 

A Song Sung Blue may have a style that reminds of Wong Kar-wai and a blue-hued filter that covers the screen in a hazy lens, shot by a cinematographer (HJY) who seeks out the more grounded side in each frame. But that constant pressure to make audiences feel like they have gone through these same or similar situations holds it back. However, at the same time, this same relationship that is mostly forged by tropes comes through with nuance and beauty, primarily through Huang Ziqi and Liang Jingโ€™s touching performances. An easily identifiable contrast between the two characters โ€“ the introverted Mingmei and the extroverted Xian, teenage angst versus the bliss of youth โ€“makes some of the narrative beats quite emotionally engrossing. Mistaking emotions is a crucial aspect of growing up, and Zihan Geng directs these actresses to the point where they reflect this sensation effortlessly.ย 

The rest of the cast doesnโ€™t leave much of an impression since the story revolves around the two leads for the most part. But, there are a few scenes between Xian and her mother that are quite moving, although recognizable. Zihanโ€™s filmmaking skills are admirable, often demonstrating that the issues with her directorial debut are primarily contained in its screenplay and narrative development. While A Song Sung Blue has its fair share of beautiful scenes, the lingering sensation of been-there-done-that haunts the film during its wistful ninety-two-minute runtime. 

Grade: C+

Podcast: Wong Kar-wai Movie Series

Wong Kar-wai is one of the best filmmakers in the modern era with some of the most beautiful looking movies ever made. He’s a pivotal figure of Hong Kong cinema whose influence is unmatched and unrivaled. While we didn’t get to all of the films (due to unforeseen circumstances), we have a great time delving into what makes his films exquisitely cinematic and provocative.

As Tears Go By, 1988

Listen or watch our podcast review here.

Days of Being Wild, 1990

Listen or watch our podcast review here.

Chungking Express, 1994

Listen or watch our podcast review here.

Ashes of Time, 1994

Listen or watch our podcast review here.

Fallen Angels, 1995

Listen or watch our podcast review here.

Happy Together, 1997

Listen or watch our podcast review here.

In the Mood for Love, 2000

Listen or watch our podcast review here.

We hope you enjoyed the series as much as we did! If you have any thoughts on these films, please reach out to us on social media or you can email us [email protected].

Movie Review: ‘The Little Mermaid’ Offers Freshness to a Timeless Story


Director: Rob Marshall

Writers: David Magee and John Musker

Stars: Halle Bailey, Jonah Hauer-King, Melissa McCarthy

Synopsis: A young mermaid makes a deal with a sea witch to trade her beautiful voice for human legs so she can discover the world above water and impress a prince.


While the ongoing debate surrounding Disney’s decision to adapt its older animated movies into live-action films continues, it is undeniable that these adaptations persist due to their financial success. The latest addition to this lineup, The Little Mermaid, not only aims to be profitable but also endeavors to capture the essence of the original animated classic while offering a fresh perspective. This recent rendition of the beloved Disney Renaissance tale manages to achieve this goal, although it is not without flaws. The film succeeds in bringing the enchanting story to the big screen, evoking a strong sense of nostalgia for Disney movies of the past. The Little Mermaid stands as one of the finest live-action adaptations released to date, if not the very best.

However, engaging with the film proves challenging from the start. While the breathtaking cinematography captures the mesmerizing and perilous nature of ocean waves, the story loses its momentum thereafter. The absence of an opening musical sequence, omitting both the sailor’s song and the introduction of the sisters, immediately raises concerns about the pacing, which persist throughout. It takes around 15 to 20 minutes before “Part of Your World” finally emerges as the film’s first musical sequence. This peculiar pacing sets the tone for the movie, struggling to strike a balance between providing an enjoyable and entertaining experience while grappling with scenes that feel necessary but uncomfortably protracted.

As one dives into the underwater realm, the captivating visual effects draw viewers into the story. While the film’s promotional campaign may have hinted at a more subdued color palette, the underwater world is surprisingly vibrant and colorful. However, there remains a pseudo-realistic quality that prevents complete immersion. In comparison to James Cameron’s Avatar: The Way of Water, which achieves near photorealism, The Little Mermaid retains a distinct animated quality. At times, it feels as though I am watching CGI recreations of the actors rather than the actors themselves, contributing to occasional clunkiness. The characters’ hair never quite appears natural, and their attempts to simulate swimming seem off, revealing that they are clearly not in water but rather creating the effect in a studio. Nevertheless, the design compensates for these shortcomings. The visually stunning mermaids’ fins appear realistically adapted, as if mermaids truly existed. The extension of scales onto their bodies creates an appearance akin to clothing, offering a unique and distinct look that sets them apart from the shell-bras of the 80s animated film.

A notable addition to the story is the introduction of mermaids possessing a unique and individual “Siren’s Song,” seamlessly integrating with the film’s narrative and aligning with the lore surrounding mermaids. Ariel’s (Halle Bailey) song serves a dual purpose, proving her voice to Ursula (Melissa McCarthy), the sea witch, while encompassing “Part of Your World” with similar melodies. This subtle addition adds significant context to why Ariel ultimately loses her voice. In addition to surrendering other aspects of her mermaid identity, Ariel must also relinquish her captivating Siren allure, including her voice. This added dimension grants her more autonomy, even in the absence of her voice. It is a much-desired inclusion that, coupled with other expanded character traits, grants Ariel greater depth, enhancing the captivation of her story.

Prince Eric (Jonah Hauer-King) also receives substantial additions that greatly enhance his character, transforming him from a somewhat bland yet visually appealing animated counterpart into a more well-rounded persona. While some of these traits effectively contribute to his emotional growth and his relationship with Ariel, others feel lacking and fail to provide meaningful progression for his character or the overall story. Instead, they seem clumsily inserted into the narrative to attempt a more three-dimensional portrayal. Unfortunately, this expansion comes at the cost of other characters such as Flounder and Scuttle, who are reduced to near accessories. Their inclusion becomes almost superfluous, reaching a point where their presence seems unnecessary from the outset.

Among the core characters, Halle Bailey as Ariel and Melissa McCarthy as Ursula truly stand out. Bailey flawlessly embodies the titular character, showcasing her remarkable voice and effortlessly capturing the naivete of the young mermaid who yearns to explore a world she does not perceive as the evil her father warns her about. McCarthy initially struggles to find her rhythm in the early scenes, but once she delves into “Poor Unfortunate Souls,” she completely embraces her performance, becoming the iconic sea witch in a truly captivating manner.

Undoubtedly, the songs are the standout moments of the film, elevating it into a truly enjoyable and entertaining experience. Alongside the heavily marketed “Part of Your World,” the film includes several songs from the original, along with a few additional songs for Ariel, Eric, and Scuttle. “Under the Sea” evokes vibrant visuals reminiscent of the animated musical numbers found in another Disney hit from 1994, “I Just Can’t Wait to Be King” from The Lion King. These songs pay homage to the grand musical style prevalent in Disney films of that era. Ariel’s new song seamlessly blends in with the rest of the soundtrack, fitting as if it were part of the original film. Eric’s song, while pleasing to the ears and visually appealing, feels slightly too modern in style, without necessarily adding a distinct positive or negative impact to the overall film. However, the same cannot be said for Scuttle’s song addition, a rap number clearly penned by Lin-Manuel Miranda, included primarily to showcase the rap skills of Awkwafina as Scuttle and Daveed Diggs as Sebastian. While both actors demonstrate impressive abilities, the song itself becomes grating and easily stands as the weakest aspect of the film, perhaps better off left on the editing floor.

Another minor point of discussion has been the decision to alter some lyrics in “Kiss the Girl.” Personally, I found the alteration to be so slight that I hardly noticed the difference. The change promotes a healthier environment by encouraging the two main characters to kiss, even though one of them cannot verbally express consent. However, it’s worth noting that the original version contains other problematic lyrics that remain unchanged in this adaptation, creating a sense of cognitive dissonance regarding the film’s intended message.

Despite the unevenness resulting from these additions and adaptations, watching The Little Mermaid was still an enjoyable experience. Halle Bailey undeniably shines in the leading role, and her future in the film industry is undoubtedly promising. The songs and story beats evoke a powerful sense of nostalgia, and although I may not actively seek to revisit the film in the near future, I can envision myself casually putting it on in the background for some lighthearted fun. The Little Mermaid successfully brings the beloved Disney classic to life, showcasing captivating visuals, enhanced character development, and memorable performances. While it may not be without its flaws, it stands as one of the finest live-action adaptations released to date, preserving the essence of the original while offering a fresh take on a timeless tale.

ย 

Grade: B

‘Milk’ 15 Years Later: An Interview with Dan Jinks

I found myself nervous and reaching for my water bottle so much before and during this interview, why exactly Iโ€™m not sure because I can tell you that Dan Jinks is so damn chill and a lot of fun to talk to. What I find even more comical for myself is I truly had no reason to be nervous as weโ€™ve spoken before and have mutual friends so to find myself nervous was silly, but in the end worth it. I sat down with the Oscar winning producer (American Beauty, Best Picture, 1999) to discuss Milk on its 15th Anniversary and to look back and discuss everything about his involvement to the awards race of 2008.

Joey Gentile: Dan, thank you so much for joining me today, welcome to InSessionFilm.

Dan Jinks: Thank you so much for having me, it’s been awhile since I had the chance to talk about Milk so thank you for this opportunity.

JG: Of course. So, one of the things I like to do is break the ice with the people I interview with a really fun question, with that said- Dan, if you had the opportunity to go back and revisit any piece of material in film, television, or theater that youโ€™ve produced and create a sequel to see where those characters are at now, what would it be?

DJ: (Laughing) Ya know, thatโ€™s a great question. I did a TV series called Pushing Daisies and I always felt that it had more life in it and I never thought we got our full due. Thereโ€™s been talk of a reboot throughout the years. Ironically, this interview today is being done during the current WGA strike and PD was a show that was affected during the last writers strike. We were off the air for many, many months and when we came back our show just never picked up the momentum or the same audience we had pre-strike. Iโ€™m sure Bryan Fuller (creator/writer of Pushing Daisies) would want to take us back into stories unfinished there.

JG: Uh, about Bryan Fuller- cannot wait for Crystal Lake the Friday the 13th series heโ€™s working on, as a huge horror fan here I am so pumped.

DJ: Oh my God, me too. Itโ€™ll be great.

JG: So, itโ€™s been 15 years since Milk and as someone who is now 31, I was a sophomore in high school when the movie released and it came out around the time where I came out publicly as bisexual before I fully embraced and accepted myself as a gay man, so this movie has special meaning to me and my acceptance looking back. For you as a producer taking on such an important figure in American gay history who means so much to so many and for certain reasons, how did this project come across your desk?

DJ: It came to me in such an odd route and Iโ€™ll tell you that story. So I had known Dustin Lance Black, the writer, since 2000 at an OutFest party that my producing partner Bruce Cohen and I hosted. So Lance and I remained friends and I had heard somewhere that Lance was working somewhere on a script about Harvey Milk and he had attached Gus van Sant to direct. So I call him up to congratulate him and say โ€œhey, Iโ€™m so happy for you, amazing newsโ€ just assuming there is a producer, because when a director on par of Gus van Sant is attached there’s a producer and Lance said โ€œthereโ€™s no producer yet, do you want to read it?โ€ I said โ€œ what are you kidding me?โ€ So I read it that night, called Lance the next morning and then found myself sitting in a room with Lance and Gus. Ironically, I had been such a fan of Gus and had been for years trying to set a meeting for years with him but his agents kept saying โ€œI donโ€™t knowโ€ and building a wall between anybody and then I sat down with him and heโ€™s the nicest guy in the world and we got along great and it was a wonderful experience making the movie. It truly was just as simple as hearing a friend had a script and director, calling to congratulate and then I became attached.

JG: You know, something you just said caught my attention just now, and that is you saying his agents were essentially blocking a meeting with him and you. My guy, youโ€™re an Oscar winning producer and you are being denied a meeting? How does that make sense in โ€œHollywoodโ€?

DJ: Itโ€™s a good question and ya know I asked at the time, especially in the wake of American Beauty, this is a town where people get excited when there’s heat on you and there was certainly heat on us as producers and we are also openly gay producers at a time where there weren’t as many openly gay producers and Gus is openly gay so it just made all the sense in the world to meet. I just think it was odd for his agents to truly not be pushing that. I donโ€™t think it was specifically against us, but I think in a general way they were very protective of Gus. In the end, youโ€™d have to ask them because I was indeed surprised (Dan says this with a big grin on his face) we could not get a meeting with him but in the end we became good friends and made the movie.

JG: That is actually the perfect segueway, there was you, Bruce Cohen, Gus, Lance Black, and Elliot Graham (Editor) working on this film, and Iโ€™m sure more openly and not openly gay people working on it. It gets going and you have all these gay creatives on this project about a gay icon and you cast Sean Penn in the role of Harvey Milk. Now, I would like to note I myself, Joey Gentile am not one who believes you have to be gay to play gay. I think it actually does more harm because then youโ€™re boxing gay actors into a gay only box. I think you need to cast the right person in the role but see everyone for the role, whether it be gay, straight, trans, any color, unknowns, knowns, get them all in the room and cast from the melting pot. However, we are now in a climate where the idea of gay in gay roles only is pushed heavily so looking back do you regret the casting and how did it happen?

DJ: Hereโ€™s the thing, even though it was only 15 years ago it was a VERY different time. The truth is though, we needed a star to get the financing to get that movie made. If we were trying to get that movie made today, (I donโ€™t think we could get a gay actor attached to the lead) the sad thing is I donโ€™t think it could actually be made, I donโ€™t know who that gay actor is who could get us the financing. I want to be very clear that it’s not that I donโ€™t think there aren’t gay actors who could play it but that the movie cost at the time somewhere around $23 million. Even Sean Penn was not enough to get the movie green lit, we had to get that ensemble of Emile Hirsch, Josh Brolin, Diego Luna, James Franco. We needed all of them to get it green lit, it was a hard movie to get financed. It was a movie about a gay politician that even at the time we did it a lot of people living in San Francisco didnโ€™t even know who Harvey Milk was, he was not a well known figure. 

There were people who would walk through Harvey Milk Plaza in San Francisco and not even know who he was at that time. Ya know, I have been asked that question a lot and I can be a little defensive about it because we felt we were so lucky to have gotten Sean Penn. Iโ€™ll be honest I spent hours and hours after reading that script, going through lists of actors and I came up with 3 actors who I felt was right for the role and could get the movie financed and the fact that one of them actually said yes was a miracle. None of them were gay men, but Iโ€™ll tell you something that was really important to me, Gus, Bruce, and Lance is that we cast a number of gay people in the film. We cast them in gay roles and in straight roles, Victor Garber and Denis Oโ€™Hare are two examples. We cast the right person for the role but we did cast a lot of gay people for the movie.

JG: I completely get it, and my opinion on the matter doesnโ€™t line up with Twitter these days on gays needed for gay roles, so I was definitely curious to see how that process went for a film like this. A lot of what is said on Twitter needs to be taken with a shot of penicillin because in the end it’s still a business and business decisions are made that the public isn’t aware of, critics, etc. So as someone like myself who knows the ins and outs like you do, it’s always an interesting conversation to be had.

DJ: Iโ€™ll add something to it too. There are movies that I think are important movies that aren’t even getting made right now as a result of โ€œhow dare you cast a straight actor in a gay roleโ€ that as a result, a lot of straight actors donโ€™t want to play gay roles anymore but also because we donโ€™t have enough stars there are stories not being told, movies not being made that would probably like Milk have a lot of gay actors in them outside of a lead and giving them the opportunity to be seen but we donโ€™t have the stars where you need a star in order to get made, and the truth is at times you need a star. 

If youโ€™re doing a TV series like Love, Victor where you donโ€™t need a star then absolutely try harder to cast a gay actor in that part, thatโ€™s not asking much. But if youโ€™re doing a movie that needs a star there are certain realities that are taken into it. I know of many scripts right now that arenโ€™t being made because we donโ€™t have gay stars, and those few gay stars we do have, you send something to such and such actor and they go โ€œI played this already, I donโ€™t want to do this againโ€. Then you have people going โ€œwell why didnโ€™t you get such and such actorโ€ well the truth is they donโ€™t want to do it or they arenโ€™t a star and there we are back at the beginning of sometimes in this business in order to get made you are required to have a star.

JG: No I get it, trust me I understand. So taking yourself back to the making of the film, is there anything you took from making Milk that maybe you didnโ€™t know at the time?

DJ: The thing about politicians (especially local politicians) is that they use a staff of young people a lot. The kids in their 20โ€™s working for Harvey were now in their 50โ€™s when we were making the film and they are characters in the movie, so weโ€™re telling their story too. They would come by the set every single day, the best known was probably Cleve Jones (played byEmile Hirsch) he was someone who Lance Black relied on a lot while he was writing the script for research and access. In the end it was such an important thing to all of them as well because it was such a big part of their life and that was amazing to learn.

JG: 15 years later, what do you hope people get from the film now?

DJ: One of the things that was so important with Harvey Milk was visibility, โ€œif they know us they are less likely to hate us.โ€ I feel like what is happening now with Trans issues, I have a trans niece that I love very much. I care about her health and safety and happiness and it just kills me that the Republican party, theyโ€™re looking for issues that can be headlines and rile up the base as if trans people are in any way hurting or affecting their lives and I think ya know again, it goes back to the more people you know, the more visibility in trans characters in film and television it will make it more normal to the viewer and I think that was something, the visibility of it all was hugely important to Harvey Milk and really important today.

JG: Well said. So moving onto- the movie comes out, the response is very good, critics love it, audiences respond, come Oscar time you get a whopping 8 nominations and end up winning two big ones. As someone who came off of American Beauty where you guys swept that season and won everything under the sun, is it more chill the second time around? Or are you just as nervous going into Oscar night?

DJ: Great question, listen, to go through the AB journey with awards was just an out of body experience. It was something that wasnโ€™t expected and as a lot of people growing up I was the nerdy kid who just wasnโ€™t going to win an Oscar. I mean that just seemed completely out of the realm of possibility and when it happened it was a thrilling, overwhelming, and exciting experience. If it ends up being the only time in my life where I win an Oscar then what a lucky person I am. So to be nominated again, as a producer nominated for the film you are the representative because it’s really the movie thatโ€™s nominated, itโ€™s just a thrill. 

There was a movie that year called Slumdog Millionaire that did very well, it was having that race to the Oscars that AB had, I called a friend of mine, one of the great Oscar prognosticators Dave Karger and asked him, I said โ€œ does Milk have a chance to win Best Picture?โ€ He very kindly said โ€œ I wouldnโ€™t say it doesnโ€™t have a chance but it would be considered the biggest upset in the history of the Oscarsโ€ and I laughed and said โ€œokay, that’s all I needed to know, we donโ€™t really have a chanceโ€. So I went into the evening having fun and feeling so lucky to even be there. I had a great time and didnโ€™t feel the pressure of having to give a speech because I knew that I didnโ€™t have a shot to win. I was thrilled that Lance Black won, and that Sean Penn won and listen, we got 8 nominations for ya know a movie that had a very independent movie feel to it. It happened at a time where that was less likely to happen too because there were only 5 Best Picture nominees too.

JG: Yup, I was gonna say 5, absolutely. Well that was the year that changed everything too. It was the year that caused the rift too because of The Dark Knight and even Wall-E being snubbed for a movie like The Reader. So due to that year is the reason the Academy expanded from 5 to 10 nominees. So after that you saw things like The Kids Are Alright, Winterโ€™s Bone, Her, Philomena getting into Best Picture that wouldnโ€™t have โ€œhappenedโ€ had it still been only 5.

DJ: Absolutely correct.

JG: I gotta know, where do you keep your Oscar?

DJ: (Smiling and pointing off camera) Itโ€™s a little cubby hole in the entry area of my house.

JG: Amazing, love that. All in all, looking back with what you did 15 years ago, are you proud of the film and how itโ€™s aged?

DJ: Oh, Iโ€™m very happy with that movie. It was hard in a lot of ways but thrilling in a lot of ways too. I was really happy with many things that could have gone wrong. I remember seeing some miniseries that took place in the 70s beforehand and everything looked so fake from the mustaches on the guys to the tight jeans, it just looked like such a cliche. From our costume designer, a guy named Danny Glicker, to our production designer, a guy named Bill Groom, these people didn’t just research, they researched and researched and researched so to have the accuracy of the most minor details was so damn thrilling.

JG: Itโ€™s truly great to see you so cheerful and smiling and talking about your work like youโ€™re a kid in a candy shop. That attitude is so weirdly hard to find now as most people I have talked to look back at their work with ways to change what the final product was, so to see you light up and glee about it, tip my hat to you sir.

DJ: (Laughing) Thank you. I love making movies, I feel so lucky to do what I do and I am happy that Iโ€™ve made a few things that Iโ€™m hoping have stood the test of time.

JG: You have, truly. Okay, a fun one for you- anyone who I talk to who is an Academy member I love asking this question. As an Academy member, what does it take for a film to get your number one spot on your ballot? And let’s say in the last decade, how often are you getting it โ€œrightโ€?

DJ: See I donโ€™t EVER vote to get it โ€œright,โ€ my vote isnโ€™t ever for what I think is going to win, my vote goes to what I consider the Best Picture, always! In terms of getting it โ€œrightโ€ my ballot is always the right one. Ya know, sometimes Iโ€™m voting for the winner but often Iโ€™m voting for the one that moved me somehow more than the eventual winner did.

JG: Thatโ€™s amazing to hear and honestly I get it, ya know I look back at this last year for an example and Triangle of Sadness was my favorite movie of the year and I ranked it at 1, until I saw All Quiet on the Western Front and was like wait a minute, nope, thatโ€™s it, thatโ€™s the best one in the lineup. So even though I rank ToS as my favorite it’s clear for me that AQOTWF was easily the Best Picture but I would vote the same way, itโ€™s not about what is projected to win, it’s about what you think is the best in the lineups.

DJ: Oh, without a doubt. Remember if youโ€™re a voter itโ€™s what you have to do. Itโ€™s a different thing if youโ€™re going to someone’s Oscar party and youโ€™re filling out a ballot, then youโ€™re voting on what you actually think is going to win, but for your own ballot you have to vote for what you think is the best.

JG: Nailed it. So Dan, whatโ€™s next up for you? Whatโ€™s on the horizon?

DJ: Well weโ€™re in strike mode in Hollywood, but outside of that itโ€™s all unclear right now. Iโ€™ve got a few things set up at studios, a few things Iโ€™m trying to package, and a couple of TV things Iโ€™m working on. Itโ€™s just an odd time due to the strike so there is a lot that cannot be done and as someone who is very much in support of the writers and the WGA I want them to get a fair deal and be resolved as quickly as possible to their benefit. Right now there’s just a huge amount of uncertainty in the business and um, sort of everything Iโ€™ve been working on is on pause for the moment.

JG: Oh for sure, pay the writers! Ya know I will be kicking myself in the ass here if I donโ€™t close with this. Fiddler on the Roof, for your consideration- Carol Kane as Yente the Matchmaker, PLEASE make this happen, it has to be done.

DJ: (Laughing) Fiddler on the Roof was a movie I was hoping was going to be made this past year but we got caught in the change of ownership from MGM to Amazon and all that, itโ€™s right now on a slower track. We have a TERRIFIC script from Steve Levinson, Tommy Kail is literally one of the great living directors. Itโ€™s just not gonna happen as quickly as I would like it to happen, I am sad to say. But I appreciate your casting thought and will keep her in mind when we get there.

JG: Amazing, amazing, amazing. Dan, thank you so much for taking the time to talk with me today.

DJ: No, thank you!

Movie Review: ‘About My Father’ is an Imperfect, Infectious Comedy


Director: Laura Terruso

Writers: Austen Earl and Sebastian Maniscalco

Stars: Robert DeNiro, Leslie Bibb, Kim Cattrall

Synopsis: When Sebastian tells his old-school Italian immigrant father Salvo that he is going to propose to his all-American girlfriend, Salvo insists on crashing a weekend with her tony parents.


Even if you are a serious cinephile who considers film an art form, you have to be a fan of genre movies. From the drenched digital effects of an action-adventure picture to the ominous murder-mystery thriller, movies are meant to entertain the masses. The same goes for the semi-autobiographical comedy that makes you laugh from your gut, despite its faults. That’s what you have with About My Father, coming from the mind of one of the hottest comedians in the world, Sebastian Maniscalco. This is a comedy in the vein of Meet the Parents and Wedding Crashers that plays into standard family dynamic tropes but happens to be very funny,

Directed by Laura Terruso, About My Father was written by Maniscalco and veteran CBS sitcom writer Austen Earl. The story follows Sebastian, a Hilton hotel manager who is dating Ellie, a delightful artist played by Leslie Bibb. Ellie has a down-to-earth personality and a sparkling smile that lights up the room. They are your classic “opposites attract” type of couple, with Ellie bringing a smile to Sebastian that he didn’t know he had. Quite literally, Ellie has to teach him how to practice and strengthen his facial muscles to smile more consistently.

The couple comes from extraordinarily different backgrounds. Ellie’s family can trace their roots back to the actual Mayflower. Her mother, Tigger (Kim Cattrall), and her father, Bill (David Rasche), are your typical blue-blood yuppies who lament that his father only gave him one hotel to start after he graduated from Harvard. Not to mention her brothers: Lucky (Anders Holms), a champagne socialist, and Doug (Brett Dier), a hippie trained in the art of Tibetan singing bowls, round out an eccentric group.

On the other hand, Sebastian comes from a blue-collar family led by his father, Salvo (Robert De Niro), a stylist who has been building women’s confidence and hair volume for decades. Knowing the value of a dollar, Salvo would always keep his son from ordering appetizers or desserts off the menu. When Christmas came, he would make homemade toys for Sebastian, such as a skateboard (and comments next year, he will make him “one of those Nintendos”). Sebastian needs his grandmother’s ring from Salvo, which he plans to give Ellie as he asks her to marry him. However, his father will only allow it once he meets Ellie’s family at their summer home on the Fourth of July.

The comedy is inspired by Maniscalco’s father, an immigrant from Sicily and an Army veteran who supported his family by being a hairstylist in a working-class neighborhood in Chicago. As a fan of Maniscalco for years, going way back to the days of the 2008 documentary comedy tour Vince Vaughn’s Wild West Comedy Show: 30 Days and 30 Nights โ€“ Hollywood to the Heartland, not much has changed since then. The finely groomed and cologne-doused Italian American comedian, with a penchant for class, style, and dry cleaning every piece of clothing down to his boxer shorts, has the same cartoonish delivery that makes for a welcomed juxtaposition on stage, as it does in this film.

About My Father excels when Maniscalco waxes poetically about his life and nostalgically looks back at his upbringing. You’ll also enjoy how the comedian openly disagrees with his father but recognizes the differences in lifestyles with these blue bloods that cannot be ignored. It’s no coincidence that those scenes, particularly when Sebastian and De Niro’s Salvo begin to make jokes at his future in-laws’ expense in private, work because they are straight from the theme of Maniscalco’s “Can you believe this?” stand-up act.

The cast has a nice chemistry together, including the humorous rapport between De Niro and Maniscalco. This is their second film together since The Irishman, where, if you remember, the latter received a bullet to the head from the legendary actor. De Niro has always been comedically gifted in culture clash comedies, but he never plays against type for a reason. While most characters outside the leads are cardboard cutouts from genre comedies, Cattrall stands out the most here as a fire-breathing conservative politician. While some scenes are typically outlandish (such as Sebastian losing his shorts on a Flyboard) and others may elicit eye-rolls (like Salvo using a family mascot for dinner), the scenes are still funny, albeit a bit too long and overplayed at times. The scenes where Sebastian is overtly rude to his father are purely manipulative to play into themes of the comedian coming to his own realization of what family means to him.

Still, you don’t go into About My Father expecting a reinvention of the genre with its lightning-quick running time. It’s a culture clash farce that works because of Maniscalco’s style of comedy and De Niro playing to his long-established comic strengths as a cynical curmudgeon set in his ways. This highly enjoyable movie has an infectious sense of humor and delivers a handful of belly laughs that will put a smile on your face, even as you come to terms with its imperfections.

Grade: B+

Movie Series Review: In the Mood for Love

On this episode, Ryan and Jay continue our Wong Kar-wai Movie Series with one of the best films of the 2000s in In the Mood for Love! This is generally regarded as Kar-wai’s best film, and even one of the the best of all-time. So, there was certainly much to discuss here and we did our best to articulate why its reputation is so well deserved.

Review: In the Mood for Love (3:00)
Director: Wong Kar-wai
Writers: Wong Kar-wai
Stars: Maggie Cheung, Tony Leung

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
InSession Film Podcast – In the Mood for Love


JD and Brendan also discussed In the Mood for Love on Episode 396:

Movie Review (Cannes Film Festival 2023): ‘She Is Conann’ May Be A New Cult Classic


Director: Bertrand Mandico

Writer: Bertrand Mandico

Stars: Elina Lรถwensohn, Christa Thรฉret, Julia Riedler

Synopsis: Conan’s life at different stages is shown with a different aesthetic and rhythm from the Sumerian era to the near future.


With his latest picture, She is Conann, French filmmaker Bertrand Mandico gender -flips Robert E. Howardโ€™s creation, Conan the Barbarian, to create a gory and innovative take on the mythic tale. While it may be an endurance test for some, due to the iconoclastโ€™s inclination toward provocation, the brutal film will be a delicious cinematic treat for those willing to embrace its chaotic nature. โ€œIโ€™ll show you barbarism. Let the show commence!โ€

French filmmaker Bertrand Mandico has such a distinct vision that his films often feel like they are not from this planet. โ€œI capture the onirism and the magical realismโ€, he has quoted before. His projectsโ€™ dreamlike haze and campy nature have such a singular vision that the viewer is left in awe (and quite stunned) of what they have witnessed. As a result, every single frame gets a different reaction from you โ€“ confused, baffled, excited, intrigued, grossed out, and (primarily) staggered. Not even Gaspar Noรฉโ€™s filmography gathers this range of reactions and emotions from the audience. And he tries more than Mandico to provide shock factor. Mandico mixes genres left and right, never sticking to a specific one. His breakout hit, The Wild Boys, is a coming-of-age adventure fantasy that uses surrealism to express its ideas about gender and sexuality. After Blue (Dirty Paradise) is a Dark Crystal-like sci-fi western. 

What else is he going to come up with for his next feature? Nobody can guess what route he is taking. For his next piece of work, Mandico takes inspiration from the mythic tale of Conan the Barbarian but with his usual flair and intrigue in telling queer (and eroticized) stories. If you thought we would see an Arnold Schwarzenegger or Jason Momoa-type figure โ€“ an extremely buff man with a hairy chest waving his sword around like a beast โ€“ as seen in multi-million-dollar Hollywood films, you better think again. This interpretation, titled She is Conann, follows the journey of six female reincarnations of the titular character and her fight against the evil Sanja (Julia Riedler). If you donโ€™t know anything about this French filmmaker, I think you will have difficulty getting into this movie filled with torture, sex, lust, cannibalism, and gore.

A hellhound photographer named Rainer (to be more specific, a dog/human hybrid played by the directorโ€™s muse, Elina Lรถwensohn) guides the audience through narration onto this journey of time and the human soul, seeing the different stages of the warriorโ€™s life. Born at a dark time when people used to believe in demons and wonders, She is Conann begins with a flashback in a Hell-like setting. We see an old lady pondering about her past in the presence of Queen Conann (Franรงoise Brion playing the elder version of the character) and the aforementioned Rainer. The hellhound has always been by Conannโ€™s side. She confirmed her prophecy of becoming the most โ€œbarbaric of barbariansโ€ as a teenager. During that time, Conann (in this segment, played by Claire Duburcq) was enslaved by Sanja and her group of bloodthirsty goons that murdered her family. 

After finally escaping the torturous hands of the evil mistress, Conannโ€™s journey beginsโ€ฆ and endsโ€ฆ and begins once again because sheโ€™s killed by her older self time and time again. Her reincarnations have different paths, ranging from a stunt woman in 90s Brooklyn to falling in love with her enemy. However, all of them contain some amount of brutality, especially when damnation touches her on the shoulder and begins a non-stop massacre of everyone who crosses her path. This episodic structure divides the film into eclectic and visually tantalizing segments that serve little to no purpose in expanding its themes. However, each one truly demonstrates Mandicoโ€™s talents as both a provocateur, which deserves some form of props, and as a filmmaker. One aspect that the director has failed to capture since The Wild Boys is trying to blend the imagery with its themes and how one lifts the other. 

His last feature, After Blue, had some incredible cinematography and production. But what we saw on screen didnโ€™t develop what he wanted to say. And, to this day, I still donโ€™t know. In She is Conann, that same thing happens. However, since the film is so bonkers and wildly entertaining (on top of that, severely campy), you can forgive many of those problems. Even though there isnโ€™t much to hold onto with the gender roles theme, the macabre romanticism presented is deliciously unique, and its provocation stirring, ending as an endurance for some and a cinematic pleasure for others. Another positive note on Mandicoโ€™s films is that they are very vivid and captivating, pulling the viewer into his world of misfit constructions. It feels as if you can reach onto the big screen and touch (and even smell) everything onscreen โ€“ feeling the sharpness of Conannโ€™s sword, the fumes of the stunt womanโ€™s car, the blood on everyoneโ€™s hands, severed body parts laying on the floor, amongst other things that pop into the film. 
This wistful underworld, viewed via Nicolas Eveilleauโ€™s lens (often in black and white), is shot in a way that its dreamy haze casts a spell on the viewer. Whether or not you want to be a part of this story, upon entering, thereโ€™s no turning back. Mandicoโ€™s shock-filled gaze hypnotizes you, and its images will remain in your mind for a long time due to its imaginative madness. The unapologetic strangeness of everything happening will clearly ruffle many feathers, but you canโ€™t take your eyes off it. This sort of effect is rarely found in todayโ€™s cinema; less than a handful of filmmakers cause this type of reaction in their audience. Thatโ€™s a testament to Bertrand Mandico and his pursuit of constantly anomalous MacGuffins. All of his creations have a tactile and eerie feel to them. Some of them leave you in awe because of the beauty behind the madness; most of the time, Mandico gets this reaction when depicting the flora and fauna of his worlds. However, there are others that gross you out in the best way possible. In the case of She is Conann, the gore and sex.  Admiring his ambitions, determination for the bizarre, and curation of some of the most disturbing cinematic moments you will see this year (and probably in this decade), She is Conann has all the ingredients to become an arthouse cult classic; I hope this man continues to make films for an extended period of time.

Grade: B+

Movie Review (Cannes Film Festival 2023): ‘How To Have Sex’ Delves Deeper Than Expected


Director: Molly Manning Walker

Writer: Molly Manning Walker

Stars: Laura Ambler, Samuel Bottomley, Daisy Jelley

Synopsis: Three British teenage girls go on a rites-of-passage holiday – drinking, clubbing and hooking up, in what should be the best summer of their lives.


The Cannes Film Festival has just found its first surprise hit in Un Certain Regard selection How to Have Sex, which is much more than an exceptional directorial debut from London-based cinematographer-turned-filmmaker Molly Manning Walker and a showcase of Mia McKenna-Bruceโ€™s acting talents. This is predominantly an evocative conversation starter. It is occasionally difficult to watch due to the unsentimental glimpse at the female experience, but it is so rewarding once it reaches its closing moments. 

Most private schools have a post-graduation/exam group holiday that serves as a rite of passage for thousands of teenagers worldwide. In Puerto Rico, numerous teenagers who have recently graduated from high school make a trip to the Dominican Republic (Punta Cana) or Mexico (Cancun) to celebrate their โ€œyears of hard workโ€ (or slacking off) โ€“ serving as a communal last hurrah, as everybody is heading their separate ways after the summer โ€“ by staying at a slightly fancy hotel with a pool, binge-drinking cheap liquor to create a numbing effect, and listening to some reggaeton at the nearby bars. The songs of Ozuna, Anuel AA, Bryant Myers, Almighty, and Bad Bunny (before his rise to being a megastar) were blasting out of the speakers at all moments, creating a sense of camaraderie as everyone was singing them in harmony like a choir. However, there are more than a handful of negative aspects.

These holidays can be seen as contentious, and I agree. After attending the aforementioned trip myself a few years ago and reevaluating it later, you notice these groups’ lack of respect and lousy behavior when traveling to foreign places with a beer in one hand and a rum coke in the other. Sure, some good moments may arise from this six-day expedition, as you get to have fun with your classmates (potentially) one last time before heading to college โ€“ playing soccer while tipsy, the late-night pool session where we talk about our respective futures, meeting new people from other nearby schools, etc. But, thereโ€™s the potential for peopleโ€™s worst tendencies to pop up; brutish actions caused by drunken and addled teens cause the vacation to feel extremely exhausting and less enjoyable the more time you stay. It is an endurance test that we need to experience to see how truly awful those trips actually are. 

In the U.K., thereโ€™s a similar holiday; every summer, in the wake of GCSEs (General Certificate of Secondary Education), sun-seeking teens go to Malia, a town in Crete, Greece, for a couple of days in pursuit of booze-addled ventures to let go of the stress induced by assignments, tests, essays, and the drama that awaits them back home. And London-based cinematographer-turned-filmmaker Molly Manning Walker brilliantly turns that summer holiday into an endurance test for three sixteen-year-old friends while they await their academic qualification results in How to Have Sex, which is playing in the Un Certain Regard section of this yearโ€™s Cannes Film Festival. Donโ€™t come into this film wanting something similar to Harmony Korineโ€™s lousy neon-hued party of a movie, Spring Breakers, because Manning Walker has much more to offer. She delivers a coming-of-age story without the cliches and the usual safety net of schmaltzy sentimentality attached to it, opting for a more realistic view of the female experience during those types of situations. 

How to Have Sex begins with the central trio of Tara (Mia McKenna-Bruce), Skye (Lara Peake), and Em (Enva Lewis) preparing to have a thrilling and adventurous four days in the hot and hectic town of Malia. The nightclubs over there offer captivating promotions of cheap booze to make you walk through their doors. They are ready to hit the dance floor, take a dip in the pool, and hopefully conquer some boys and lose their virginity. These initial moments have Molly Manning-Walker showing the girls in very high spirits to embrace the party life โ€“ singing, dancing, drunkenly shouting (Best Holiday Ever!) โ€“ with occasional moments having them falling down (and puking) just to rise up again and hit some moves. Tara, Skye, and Em have formed a closely-knit pact to enjoy this party paradise before they go their separate ways. Well, at least for Em, thatโ€™s the case; Tara and Skye say their future is less certain than that of their friend. 

This is the last hurrah, a trip that might close out their chapter together. Their room overlooking a resort hotelโ€™s pool, where day and nightlife feel like two very different beasts, paves the way for an array of pulsing misadventures, where the intricacies of teenage friendships are in full realistic display. The wear-and-tear of the cityโ€™s vodka-smelling haze affects everyone onscreen, making them think about their actions once the starlit skies turn blue. All of this is demonstrated through the facial expressions and chemistry of the leading trio, but mainly Mia KcKenna-Bruce is the one who stands out, transmitting her swindling emotions of excitement and loneliness through a multifaceted glance that breaks your heart. The story later develops when the girls see a group of hungover men in the flat next door: the friendly and brash but shy Badger (Shaun Thomas) and the insensitive Paddy (Samuel Bottomley). 

The former gets a sense of Taraโ€™s swindling emotions, noticing the loneliness and desperation; meanwhile, the latter is inconsiderate and discourteous. The manipulative and constantly-negging Paddy is the one who manages to escort her away from the neon-lit club onto the beach, where the terms of the events that transpire there are concerningly ambiguous โ€“ Manning-Walker detailing some of the realistic horrors of what can occur during those group holidays. The film relies on Mia McKenna-Bruceโ€™s acting chops, as her reactions to what she endured are quite complex, and Manning-Walkerโ€™s authentic grasp on the subject matter and story during the latter half of How to Have Sex. Tara is still a teenager who wants to have fun. However, McKenna-Bruce adds some underlying pain to her character; her portrayal of the character has a double-sided feature where each look has equal amounts of elation and restraint. 

As Taraโ€™s situation with Paddy grows, you notice how the filmโ€™s title has multiple meanings; the inner negotiation of post-sex ponderings causes her to think if she wants to forget it all or go along with her day. But, in the grand scheme of things, these characters, even though these last four days were brutal in multiple senses, they emerge stronger than they were before. We have seen the story Manning-Walker wants to tell before a couple of times throughout the years. Yet, not with such a keen eye for details in its gender and sexual politics, as well as its characters. How to Have Sex has a strong identity and sense of importance that might cause audiences from various age groups to gather around and start a conversation about similar events, whether you have gone on a similar holiday or not. This is definitely one of the most surprising and best films I have seen at the Cannes Film Festival so far. 

Grade: B+

Movie Review (Cannes Film Festival 2023): ‘Un Prince’ is Overnarrated and Leaden


Director: Pierre Creton

Writers: Vincent Barre, Pierre Creton, and Mathilde Girard

Stars: Mathieu Amalric, Pierre Barray, Vincent Barre

Synopsis: Pierre-Joseph is 16 years old when he joins a training center to become a gardener. There he meets Franรงoise Brown, the director, Alberto, his botany teacher, and Adrien, his employer, all of whom are decisive in his apprenticeship and the discovery of his sexuality. 40 years later, Kutta, Franรงoise Brownโ€™s adopted child, whom he has always heard about, arrives. But Kutta, who has become the owner of the strange castle of Antiville, seems to be looking for something more than a simple gardener.


Pierre Creton makes some questionable directorial and narrative decisions, such as over-reliance on narration, slow pacing, and over-eroticized storylines, that test the audienceโ€™s patience in his latest work, A Prince (Un Prince) โ€“ a beautifully shot, albeit leaden and poetic-to-a-fault, picture about the vaporous passionate embraces of a botanistโ€™s sexual awakening. 

The Cannes Film Festival sidebar Directors’ Fortnight (or Quinzaine des rรฉalisateurs) contains some of the most interesting, stylistically engrossing pictures in the whole festival. Sure, most of the big names are competing to win the holy grail that is the Palme dโ€™Or. But, there are awe-inspiring talents in said selection, Pierre Creton being one of them. While simultaneously working as a farmer in Caux for over the past twenty years (serving as a beekeeper, cow herder, and even milk quality controller), the French filmmaker has been inspired by his plentiful positions in the agricultural world to curate his fascination for cinema. As a result, Creton forges a relationship with the grounds he resides in to craft his work and expand on the bond between humanity and nature, relating them to desires, passions, and death. It is fascinating how Creaton has integrated agriculture with filmmaking; I havenโ€™t seen someone do it in that fashion before. 

His latest post is that of a gardener, requiring patience, keen-eyed observations of the landscapes, and hope. And as Creton has done in the past, his latest passion is forged into his next feature-length film uniquely โ€“ titled A Prince (Un Prince). Most recently, we saw Paul Schrader using the trade of gardening in the third installment of his โ€œMan in a Roomโ€ (First Reformed, The Card Counter) series, Master Gardener. However, Schrader uses the perseverance and silence of the characterโ€™s precision in his craft to cover the dark past that keeps haunting him. Creatonโ€™s film isnโ€™t near to being like Schraderโ€™s. Instead, he wants to focus on how the beauty of nature paves the way for a young botanistโ€™s sexual awakening. While all of this sounds quite intriguing and serves potential for a poetic endeavor of passion and desire, it ends up as a slog and a half. 

A handful of beautiful static shots introduce A Prince, as the echoes of the flowing wind sway the viewer into the directorโ€™s story of fiery embrace. One of the many narrators (this time, Franรงoise Lebrun) in the film begins to tell the story of a man named Kuttar. And by how heโ€™s being described, Kuttar seems to be of great importance. The first detail we are given about Kuttar is that he was a delicate and beautiful child โ€“ citing that he never complained, albeit while admitting that she never listened to him. Next, the narrator switches topics and begins to talk about her personal life, confusing the audience, not knowing how to contextualize what sheโ€™s saying with what we are being shown onscreen. A few minutes later, another narrator arrives. Similar to what we heard before, he also deems Kuttar as a significant figure in his life. But, things begin to take a weird turn when the story we see onscreen doesnโ€™t match the one we hear through the various narratorsโ€™ voices. 

The tale depicted via image centers around Pierre-Joseph (Antoine Pirotte), a sixteen-year-old who has entered a training center to become a gardener. In this center, he meets a variety of people that will become a pivotal part of not only his apprenticeship but also his sexual awakening โ€“ the centerโ€™s director Franรงoise Brown (Manon Schaap), his botany teacher Alberto (Vincent Barrรฉ), and his employer Adrien (Pierre Barray). All of this is seen through highly confusing scenarios with some sketchy progress in the main characterโ€™s exploration of passion and affinity. You never know what exactly is going on. And you donโ€™t really care to understand it all because nothing in the film is interesting. This eighty-two-minute picture begins to frustrate the viewer due to its unnecessarily poetic nature and over-reliance on a voice guiding you at all times. Its well-choreographed static shots, combined with the soothing background noises of nature, begin to induce a sleep-inducing effect onto the viewer. 
You notice the care and thought put into A Prince by the director, alongside his team of screenwriters. It definitely feels far more personal than his previous features, Va, Toto! (2017) and A Beautiful Summer (2019). The cinematography by Antoine Pirotte, which is easily the best facet here, is also full of life, breathing some fresh air onto the green landscapes of this erotic fairy tale โ€“ even adding some surrealistic imagery to the movieโ€™s latter half. Nevertheless, it never reaches a stable point where one has an interest outside of what beautiful landscape we will see next. It often feels more like an art installation than a full-length feature. From one beautiful moving image to the next, the viewer never knows its context. Pierre Creton has shown us before that he is a very skillful director by using the healing factors of nature to fuel the fire of his cinematic prowess. It just seems that whatever he was trying to concoct in A Prince wasnโ€™t polished enough to see the light of day.

Grade: D

Movie Review: ‘The Cow Who Sang A Song Into The Future’ is a Surreal Voyage Into the Past and the Future


Director: Francisca Alegrรญa

Writers: Francisca Alegrรญa, Manuela Infante, and Fernanda Urrejola

Stars: Leonor Varela, Mรญa Maestro, Alfredo Castro, Marcial Tagle

Synopsis: It begins at a river in the south of Chile where fish are dying due to pollution from a nearby factory. Amid their floating bodies, long-deceased Magdalena bubbles up to the surface gasping for air, bringing with her old wounds and a wave of family secrets.


One woman emerges from a river and wanders around a Chilean town. She has a strange aura and everything around her starts malfunctioning, but she is too enamored with what she sees to register that she should not be there. When her elderly husband sees her from across the room โ€“ as the way she was when she died years ago โ€“ havoc ensues and the drama at the center of The Cow Who Sang a Song into the Future starts.

The film, the debut of Chilean filmmaker Francisca Alegrรญa, is hard to define, mixing a family drama marked by unsaid secrets, resentments, and fears, with an environmental message, flavored by singing cows (giving honor to its inventive title) and passionate dances that convey things that cannot be said. While it is difficult to label the film, it is easy to admire its singularity and abstraction.

The Cow Who Sang a Song into the Future starts with the return of Magdalena (Mia Maestro) from the dead, resurfacing years after her passing from a contaminated lake that has killed hundreds of fish. Her appearance brings a crisis in her now dysfunctional family. After this surreal event, and more concerned about her fatherโ€™s health than her motherโ€™s return, Cecilia (Leonor Varela), a successful doctor, comes back home accompanied by her two children, including her trans daughter, with whom she has a complicated relationship.

The reunion in the family home means an encounter with past resentments and unknown truths that only become more unbearable as Magdalena goes back to her familiar environment, more with curiosity and innocence than any sense of duty to her family. She is too engrossed in her own rediscovery of life to pay too much attention to the emotional turmoil she is creating on those closer to her that continued living with anger years ago.

Alegrรญa, putting together multiple themes inside her surreal story, is not too interested in offering explanations or clear answers to her storylines. Instead, the movie advances within an aura of mystery, unresolved feelings, and uncertainty. No one really knows what is going on, but they still carry on trying to make sense of the present, let go of the past and find peace for the future. In this regard, the film unmasks the complexity of family secrets, long-gone memories that time has made blurry, and conflicted feelings that judge harshly those who are absent and mercifully those who โ€œstayed.โ€ In this weird and ethereal fable, the Latin American reality of marital issues and family ambiguity are painfully exposed, allowing for an emotional climax that is illustrated with hard-earned understanding and new opportunities with the young generations. Nevertheless, to get here the journey is complex, illustrated aptly by a script that is patient and caring with its flawed characters. The story is filled with emotional baggage, but it is ethereal in its offering of conclusions.

The film is a mix of contrasts: it is about the environment and its protection, but it is also about family trauma and its intimacy. It focuses on one family, but it shows a survival issue as universal as possible. It is about the past, but it focuses on the future. Its approach on family and conflict is traditional, but the struggles it addresses โ€“ environmentalism, identity and trans liberation โ€“ define our modern society. It has too many things going on, but even with its surrealism, it conveys the massive burden that shapes the existence of any person in todayโ€™s world with their multiple identities, struggles and tribulations.

At the center of the story, both Mia Maestro and Leonor Varela give heart-breaking and contrasting performances. The first, ghostly and out worldly, conveys everything with her eyes, mouth, and body, never using her voice, but acting as a saving figure who arrives when it is crucial. The second, taciturn and cold, goes through a whole transformation presented humbly in Varelaโ€™s eyes and demeanor.

The Cow Who Sang a Song into the Future relies on abstraction and undefined ideas to convey its message. While a family drama lives at its heart, newcomer filmmaker Francisca Alegrรญa is skilled enough to go beyond this intimacy and offer a message of environmentalism, acceptance, and curiosity for the wonders of this planet.

Grade: B

Movie Review: โ€˜Fast Xโ€™ Is All About Family and Cars Going Brrrr


Director: Louis Leterrier

Writers: Dan Mazeau and Justin Lin

Stars: Vin Diesel, Jason Momoa, Michelle Rodriguez, John Cena

Synopsis: Dom Toretto and his family are targeted by the vengeful son of drug kingpin Hernan Reyes.


The end is here, with Fast X, the first part of an allegedly three-installment finale that will finally see The Fast Family reachโ€ฆthe end of the road. Aside from The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift, Fast & Furious, and The Fate of the Furious, each installment of The Fast Saga has been amazingly entertaining and furiously (no pun intended) over the top. The franchise is at its best when it doesnโ€™t take itself seriously and fully knows that you will be dead instantly if you ever attempt the minimum of what Dom Toretto (Vin Diesel) and his crew do in this film.ย 

This film opens with a nearly twenty-minute-long car chase in the streets of Rome, where Tej Parker (Ludacris), Roman Pearce (Tyrese Gibson), Ramsey (Nathalie Emmanuel), Han Lue (Sung Kang), Letty Ortiz (Michelle Rodriguez), Little Nobody (Scott Eastwood) and Dom try to intercept a huge bomb rolling down the street before it explodes near the Vatican. The pair were set up by Dante Reyes (Jason Momoa), son of drug lord Hernan Reyes (Joaquim de Almeida), who was the main target of Fast Five and died during the events of that film. Of course, in true Fast fashion, we have never seen Dante in Fast Five, nor know that he even existed, just like Domโ€™s brother Jakob (John Cena), who never existed before the ninth film. 

But who cares? The bomb literally catches fire (!!!) while Dom and Letty try to intercept it. And by some God-like miracle (I wonโ€™t spoil how they pull it off because itโ€™s truly a glorious feat that must be seen to be believed), the bomb goes into the river before it blows up. However, the gang has been blamed for the attack and are branded as terrorists. They are now forced to split up and meet up with Dom at a rendezvous point in Portugal. Letty gets arrested by The Agency and is sent to a black site prison with Cipher (Charlize Theron). Meanwhile, The Agencyโ€™s new leader, Aimes (Alan Ritchson), attempts to track down Jakob, Mia (Jordana Brewster), and Brian (Leo Abelo Perry) as a means to get to Dom. 

A lot happens in this first part, which is very much a part one, meaning that most of the film is exposition and breadcrumb-setting for the next two installments. Some characters, such as Deckard Shaw (Jason Statham), Queenie Shaw (Helen Mirren), Mia, and a few more surprises, show up for merely extended cameos to tease their roles in the future films for the โ€œgrand finale.โ€ New characters are also introduced, including Isabel Neves (Daniela Melchior), sister of Elena Neves (Elsa Pataky), and Tess (Brie Larson), daughter of Mr. Nobody (Kurt Russell), who donโ€™t do much aside from hinting that their roles will be bigger and chapter eleven and twelve (and Russell is likely going to show up in one or both of those films). 

Itโ€™s essentially a 141-minute-long commercial for the sequel that goes, โ€œYou liked this? Are you enjoying the ride? Well, Iโ€™ve got news for you! Weโ€™re making two more of these! Come back for the next one!โ€ Usually, you would see me write a large review that vehemently tells studios to stop making part ones because they are mostly unnecessary cash grabs and donโ€™t do anything aside from being a clunky mess filled with endless expository dialogue. Of course, Fast Xโ€™s non-action scenes are fairly clunky and even clunkier when youโ€™ve got Vin Diesel mumbling through every slurred line of dialogue like Marlon Brando in Apocalypse Now. Itโ€™s incredible how he gets worse with each installment, phoning in every aspect of his portrayal of Dom and sleepwalking through any ounce of chemistry he has with his son. 

On the other hand, youโ€™ve got Jason Momoa, who seems to base his villainous portrayal of Dante as a hybrid of Christian Baleโ€™s Patrick Bateman, Jesse Eisenbergโ€™s Lex Luthor, Jared Letoโ€™s Joker, Matt Smithโ€™s Milo from Morbius andโ€ฆAquaman. As ridiculous as it is, and you can tell how much fun Momoa has, it simply doesnโ€™t work. His performance is so at odds with the movie’s tone, which seems serious even if the action sequences arenโ€™t. The stakes are bigger than ever because Dante is going after everyone who helped the Fast Family. However, Dante seems too goofy to be taken seriously as a legitimate threat, as calculating and psychotic as he is. 

All these elements could technically produce a bad film, but are you watching the tenth (!!!) installment of The Fast and the Furious for the plot? Who cares about the plot! I  just want to see cars go brrrrrrr while our God Dominic Toretto survives the improbable yet again. If the action is well-crafted and executed, thatโ€™s the only thing keeping me going. I couldnโ€™t care less about the half-baked espionage intrigue, poorly-written and performed villain, and endless exposition dumps. Maybe this one is more โ€œgroundedโ€ since theyโ€™re not sending cars to space (that was a very dumb idea), but itโ€™s perhaps one of the most technically proficient Fast and Furious films to date. 

Justin Lin did a great job directing tight and vivid action in F9. However, replacement Louis Leterrier takes it to another level in Fast X. Leterrier is a big fan of drones and essentially laid out his aesthetic footprints in his last movie, The Takedown. He and cinematographer Stephen F. Windon craft action that is not only clear to follow but superbly choreographed and paced. The Rome chase is the perfect example of this, but the action only grows more elaborate from there: thereโ€™s a terrific bridge gunfight in Rio de Janeiro, an actual race with some legitimate stakes between Dante and Dom, some cool one-on-one fights, including the highly marketed brawl between Letty and Cipher. 

Every action scene has an insane amount of weight and planning to them and are an absolute visual feast to watch on an IMAX screen. The climax is a specific highlight, with a dam blowing up, causing Dom to do a quasi-Demon Slayer breathing to glide the car onto a safe location. Again, theyโ€™re Gods. Theyโ€™re not real people. Fast & Furious does not take place in an alternate Earth. Once you suspend your disbelief, the ride is much easier that way. The Fast & Furious franchise seems more in line with anime than anything else: dead characters frequently come back in painfully elaborate ways, previously unheard relatives show up and become the new โ€œvillainโ€ our team of car Gods has to defeat through the power of Family. This is essentially every anime ever but with cars.ย 

Yes, Fast X has many inconsistencies. It has plenty of mediocre performances and egregious attempts at fan service, too. But it doesnโ€™t matter. No one who pays money to see the TENTH installment in The Fast and the Furious watches the film for these reasons. Itโ€™s all about how the filmmakers do cool things with cars. If they nail that, simultaneously having each character utter the word โ€œfamilyโ€ in every sentence, you have a great movie on your hands. And Fast X is a banger. Cars go brrrrrr and fly in nearly-indestructible fashion, it puts the F in Family, and Leterrier shows the world how skillful of a filmmaker he is behind the camera (and with drones!). What more could you ask for?

Grade: A-

Podcast: Catching Up on 2023 – Episode 535

 

This weekโ€™s episode is brought to you by Koffee Kult. Get 15% off with the code: ISF

This week on the InSession Film Podcast, Brendan and Jay do a little catch-up on 2023 and discuss the films we’ve seen, but haven’t had a chance to talk about on the show quite yet! It’s been an interesting year to this point, and while we’ve seen a lot of films, we haven’t had the opportunity to get to all of them. So this was a nice way to finally get our thoughts on there on a few others.

On that note, check out this week’s show and let us know what you think in the comment section. Thanks for listening and for supporting the InSession Film Podcast!

– 2023 Catch-Up Part 1 (3:16)
In this segment, we focus primarily on the films that both Jay and Brendan have seen. This includes The Super Mario Bros. Movie, Evil Dead Rise and Tetris as a few films we were able to discuss.


RELATED: Listen to Episode 516 of the InSession Film Podcast where we discussed our Top 10 Movies of 2022!


– 2023 Catch-Up Part 1 (1:07:23)
In this segment, we talk about the movies that just one of us have seen, but felt compelled to talk about.

Show Sponsor: First Time Watchers Podcast

– Music
Peaches – Jack Black
Falling Blocks – Lorne Balfe

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
InSession Film Podcast – Episode 535

Next week on the show:

Disney Renaissance Era Power Ranking

Help Support The InSession Film Podcast

If you want to help support us, there are several ways you can help us and we’d absolutely appreciate it. Every penny goes directly back into supporting the show and we are truly honored and grateful. Thanks for your support and for listening to the InSession Film Podcast!

VISIT OUR DONATE PAGE HERE

Movie Review: ‘Showing Up’ Heals Your Soul


Director: Kelly Reichardt

Writers: Jonathan Raymond and Kelly Reichardt

Stars: Michelle Williams, Hong Chau, Andre 3000

Synopsis: A sculptor preparing to open a new show tries to work amidst the daily dramas of family and friends.


Watching a Kelly Reichardt film is a refreshing experience purely based on her minimalist style. While her last film, the “udderly” entertaining First Cow, focused on working-class characters, dreary skies, and a rusting setting, her latest film focuses on blue-collar academics and artists working to find their voice and make their mark on the world. Many will find her style a slow churn, but watching a Reichardt film is like leaving the city for the country on a quick holiday. In a world filled with bombastic movie franchises coming out this month, like Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 and Fast Ten, her film Showing Up’s relaxed pace is a big breath of fresh air that’s good for the soul.

Reichardt co-wrote the script, along with long-time collaborator Jonathan Raymond, and it is filled with neurotic characters but avoids clichรฉs by stripping down the neurosis and internalizing anxiety and depression instead of having every character wear them on their sleeves. Those characters include Lizzy (Michelle Williams), a sculptor embarking on a career-defining exhibition of her work but can’t take a hot shower because her landlord Jo (Hong Chau), isnโ€™t able to afford to fix the water heater. Her manic-depressive brother Sean (Joe Magaro) goes months without talking to his family. Her divorced parents (Maryann Plunkett and Judd Hirsch) bicker whenever they are in the same room together.

The performances are lovely and filled with Reichardt disciples. This is Michelle Williams’ fourth film with the director, after working on Meek’s Cutoff, Wendy and Lucy, and Certain Women. The great actress takes over a character’s persona so well that they hide in plain sight. That’s what Williams does here; she is so unrecognizable even though she’s on the screen before you because she fully and thoroughly inhabits a quietly suffering character. There are very few actors in the world who can immerse themselves that inhabit a role like Williams. I’d bet the average film fan wouldn’t be able to recognize her.

The same goes for Hong Chau, who has had quite a year with an Oscar nomination for The Whale and being cast in the uber-popular Netflix series, The Night Agent. No matter the material, There’s no role she doesn’t immerse herself in. Here, you notice her character’s relaxed and carefree demeanor, which serves as an antonym to Lizzy and gets under your skin. Mind you, not because of any intense dislike, but because she can live her life without regret, something that Lizzy cannot. The always terrific Magaro, the star of First Cow, is relegated to a glorified cameo but is compelling here as the family outcast. Magaro is an outstanding performer who stands out in any role, regardless of its size. The handful of scenes shows how short the distance can be between true creative genius and major mental health disorders.

You may be surprised that this film is labeled as a comedy because it lacks laughs, and the movie will be more challenging than most for audiences to digest. However, Showing Up is an understated drama about healing. Most artists have tortured souls for one reason or another, and you’ll find glimpses of that in the characters. A subplot of Lizzy and Jo tending to a pigeon’s health serves as a metaphor for what is happening around the main character. Reichardt aims to examine how solemn or eccentric artists self-soothe through their work and the world around them. By caring for someone or something else, Lizzy learns to treat herself with love and compassion in order to heal.

As we said, Showing Up is good for the soul.

ย 

Grade: B

Movie Review: ‘Guy Ritchie’s The Covenant’ Gives Everything Away


Director: Guy Ritchie

Writers: Guy Ritchie, Ivan Atkinson, and Marn Davies

Stars: Jake Gyllenhaal, Dar Salim, Sean Sagar

Synopsis: During the war in Afghanistan, a local interpreter risks his own life to carry an injured sergeant across miles of grueling terrain.


The United States left over seven billion dollars in military equipment when they withdrew from Afghanistan, but the price of leaving seventy-eight thousand Afghan allies is incalculable. Most of these were interpreters and were promised visas for themselves and their families after completing their mission. Guy Ritchie’s The Covenant is given a proper big studio treatment but once again tells the story through the lens of a white savior character instead of the most interesting subject of the tale.

Guy Ritchie’s The Covenant tells the story of Master Sgt. John Kinley (Jake Gyllenhaal) who leads an elite unit looking for Afghan insurgents. Kinley is an officer who has to put their trust not only in their local interpreter’s translation but also in the knowledge of the communities in the surrounding areas. Their newest interpreter goes by the name of Ahmed (Dar Salim), who used to be a mechanic before the war. He proves his worth to Kinley by sniffing out an ambush early on. Ahmed has reason to so wary of spies from the Taliban โ€“ his son was murdered by the predominantly Pashtun, Islamic fundamentalist group.

After watching the film, you will realize the trailer gives away most of the movie, so there are no real surprises. Guy Ritchie co-wrote the film with Wrath of Man and Operation Fortune: Ruse de Guerre scribes Ivan Atkinson and Marn Davies. The second act primarily deals with what you already know โ€” Ahmed carried Kinley safely through rough terrain littered with the Taliban. The film is not based on a true story but is inspired by the broad idea of the sacrifices the brave local interpreters made. 

Guy Ritchie’s film may be his most mainstream to date, and I’ll admit the first two acts are very suspenseful and even exciting. That includes the film’s first big gun battle, where Kinley and company stumble upon an insurgent base filled with ammunition and even an area to torture hostages while taping them. Another scene shows how reliant the U.S. Army is on these men, in which one of their translators intentionally misleads them. These set pieces are extraordinarily well-done, brutal, and eye-opening to the everyday dangers of patrolling during Operation Enduring Freedom.

Youโ€™ll enjoy the performances from Gyllenhaal and especially the gravitas Dar Salim brings to the role here. Thereโ€™s a genuine visceral feeling when Salim’s Ahmed carries Gyllenhaal’s Kinley to safety. There is a tension-filled grip that holds the viewer’s attention and will hardly let go. However, the film stumbles in its third act when you get the white survivor’s guilt, which seems a bit pie-in-the-sky. Kinley goes in alone to bring back the man who saved his life, who has been waiting for approval while hiding from the Taliban, who have Ahmed on their most wanted list. The final scenes, which involve The Boys’ Antony Starr being paid to help with the rescue, bring one too many overwrought action scenes that feel repetitive rather than building any additional exhilarating action.

And that’s a significant issue with Guy Ritchie’s The Covenant. The final act would have made the film work so much better if it dealt with Ahmed’s struggle to survive rather than Kinley’s guilt and depression of leaving one man behind. Besides playing into the white savior trope, the film plays it too safe by being too conventional, which is commonplace in most action-adventure films. Sure, it’s inspired by current events where wounds are still exposed, but that rescue effort hinders Ritchie’s film from being great.

For a better film, please check out the far superior and the haunting nature of Matthew Heinemanโ€™s documentary Retrograde, a powerful film in scope and examines themes from a lens from the men who lived it.

 

Grade: C+

Podcast Review: Fast X

On this episode, Ryan and JD discuss the latest film in theFast & Furious franchise; Fast X (Your Seat Belts)! Jason Momoa is an absolute star and gives the franchise a whole new gear. Also, is Brian coming back?

Review: Fast X (3:00)
Director: Louis Leterrier
Writers: Dan Mazeau, Justin Lin
Stars: Vin Diesel, Michelle Rodriguez, Tyrese Gibson, Ludacris, Brie Larson

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
InSession Film Podcast – Fast X