Sunday, July 6, 2025
Home Blog Page 75

Movie Review: ‘Bottoms’ Embraces The Weird


Director: Emma Seligman
Writers: Emma Seligman and Rachel Sennott
Stars: Rachel Sennott, Ayo Edibiri, Ruby Cruz

Synopsis: Two unpopular queer high school students start a fight club to have sex before graduation.


Yes, Bottoms slaps, punches, claws, cuts, and maims in ways that will leave bite marks with sharp teeth. This Emma Seligman comedy refuses to place itself in a box, going beyond its standard satirical tropes within its premise. It’s a teen comedy that blends Horatian and Juvenalian satire, transforming into something unexpected and invigorating. Notably, it’s a wicked commentary on victimization and socialization.

The story follows two unpopular best friends, PJ (Rachell Sennott) and Josie (Ayo Edebiri), who have been cruelly shunned by their classmates, and even school officials, for not being as popular as other students. They have been best friends since their moms split the bill for babysitters, relying on each other through thick and thin.

Both PJ and Josie are gay, and their high school crushes, Isabel (Havana Rose Liu) and Brittany (Kaia Gerber), hardly interact with them, to the point where they might not even know they exist. That is until Isabel walks away from her star quarterback boyfriend, Jeff (Nicholas Galitzine), who constantly has a wandering eye and cheats on her with a refined group of older women.

Jeff becomes an obstacle when they give Isabel a ride, and the car barely grazes his knee, but he claims a serious physical injury just before the big rivalry game. Principal Meyers (Wayne Pere) is ready to expel them, conveniently ignoring that they were offering Isabel a safe ride. He claims they are starting a school club that teaches other teenage girls self-defense. Meyers tells them to “beat the shit out of each other while reading the Vagina Monologues” and sends them on their way.

Bottoms was written by Seligman and one of the film’s stars, Rachel Sennott, the director’s frequent writing partner, and all-around muse. The talented and versatile actress excels at embracing unlikable roles and winning over audiences with authentic portrayals of the exaggerated misbehaviors of teenage or young adult females. Sennott was born to play the star of an independent cringe-comedy.

From her portrayal of a young Jewish female caught between her sugar daddy and girlfriend at a funeral in Shiva Baby to her almost methodical techniques as the maddeningly annoying Gen-Z teenager in Bodies Bodies Bodies, Sennott embraces assertive behavioral imperfections. Her role in Bottoms brims with temerity, and her attitude is so full of piss and vinegar that you might fear she’d spin uncontrollably off her axis. Sennott has a mean streak in virtually all of her performances that is inherently magnetic.

The Bear’s Ayo Edebiri’s character serves as the film’s conscience, consistently thinking that starting a female fight club to meet girls is a wrong, if not hilarious, idea. Edebiri expertly delivers timeless deadpan deliveries, showcased in full display in Bottoms. She captures the sympathetic sweet spot for the gay, sexually oppressed female teenager who feels trapped as an outcast. If anything, Josie is the most submissive of the group.

Bottoms offers a fresh take on teen comedy, similar to how Assassination Nation shook up the teen horror genre. While some might playfully call it “Gay Fight Club” or “Not Another Gay Teen Movie,” Seligman and Sennett’s film both embraces and satirizes those film tropes, creating something wonderfully invigorating for a modern-day teen comedy, culminating in its shockingly brash and brutally dark comedic finale.

And this is what makes Bottoms such original comedic content. Furthermore, Marshawn Lynch’s classroom, where he credits feminism, was invented by a man, and his students stand in a cell tucked away in a corner. The way Nicholas Galitzine presents himself as a chaser of the Gen X tale or Miles Fowler’s Tim embodies the coming-of-age teen villain. They accept these women only after contributing to the overall toxicity problem that the film turns its critical eye toward.

Bottoms is perfectly encapsulated by a line near the film’s beginning in which the announcement over the loudspeaker states, “Could the ugly, untalented gays, please report to the principal’s office?” The line isn’t just a microcosm of the deliberately wild and zany takes on victimization; it also reflects how harshly judges often lack the maturity to be true to themselves. A case in point is that some choose labels, or in this case, uniforms, to fit the idea of what society wants them to be, which explains why the male villains never take off their high school football uniforms.

Bottoms embraces that awkward, authentic freakiness of high school self, venturing into the wild side even for the most fervently absurd—a hilarious and distinctive comedy with facetious humor for the modern, audacious teenage female.

No matter the orientation.

Grade: A-

Movie Review: ‘Golda’ Squeezes Out Every Ounce of Drama


Director: Guy Nattiv
Writer: Nicholas Martin
Stars: Helen Mirren, Zed Josef, Claudette Williams

Synopsis: Focuses on the intensely dramatic and high-stakes responsibilities and decisions that Golda Meir, also known as the ‘Iron Lady of Israel’ faced during the Yom Kippur War..


Golda is an exceptional historical drama that unfolds like a tightly wound political thriller and showcases a virtuoso performance by Helen Mirren in the titular role. Of course, I’m not telling you anything you don’t already know. However, the film leads to a stunning scene between Golda Meir and Henry Kissinger (the outstanding Liev Schreiber), which might be one of the year’s best.

Around the 72-minute mark, after ignoring the mighty United States’ pleas for a cease-fire, primarily related to oil price increases, Mirren unloads a demand on Schreiber’s Kissinger that sends shivers down the spine and raises the hairs on your arms. “You must decide, Henry, side with me, or I will create an army of orphans and widows, and I will slaughter them all. Whose side are you on? You must choose.”

For a fan of the genre or a historical junkie, it’s as riveting a scene as you may see all year. Never before has the red handset being slammed back into its base reverberated more with anticipation of dire consequences. Even for the Soviet Union and the United States, who were squeezing the first and only female Prime Minister of Israel into a ceasefire, these two superpowers were no match for a weathered and chain-smoking old Jewish bitty in sturdy orthopedic shoes.

Directed by Academy Award winner Guy Nattiv, Golda follows the controversial political figure over a 21-day period in 1973, which involved Meir’s Israel and the Arab states led by Egypt and Syria. (Yes, the war lasted 19 days, but the film covers a few days after the conflict “officially” ended.) Meir had the impossible task of preventing her country’s all but certain annihilation.

That’s because she and her citizens were stuck between several rocks and hard places from different angles. For one, Israel and Meir were just not fighting the war with the heavily armed Arab nations. For one, the threat of Soviet involvement was always lingering. In a political chess match, Meir continually attempts to involve the United States, despite Kissinger’s objections because the United States must remain neutral because of its dependence on foreign oil.

Golda was written by Florence Foster Jenkins’ scribe Nicholas Martin, and his script is brilliantly paced while juggling multiple storylines about how the war affects people abroad and at home. Most of the film is told on numerous fronts. For instance, when in Meir’s house, she shows a vulnerable side with her assistant as she suffers from chronic and debilitating physical ailments. Another,  which is the film’s central narrative, goes back and forth to her tribunal, deciding if her decisions were indeed lawful.

Another from the political offices and makeshift war room went over political strategies, displaying the strength and creativity most political figures could only dream of possessing. Finally, involving what is possibly the film’s most visually stunning scene, a military operation bunker, where Meir has to make choices that even Sophie would find herself running away from.

And this is where the marriage of page to screen between Nattiv, Martin, Mirren, and the director of photography Jasper Wolf’s gorgeously claustrophobic and intimate cinematography becomes harmonious cinema. You can practically feel the cloud of smoke Meir blows in the camera’s face as she listens in real-time to the demise of the Israeli soldiers she deploys into all but certain ominous outcomes.

The way Martin’s script layers themes of anxiety at home, where Meir is constantly aware from the stenographer’s mood as she has a loved one involved in the fight, circles back to a devastatingly effective scene—Mirren’s delivery of astute and enlightening political observations like “Knowing when you lost is easy; knowing when you won is hard,” and “Just remember all political careers end in failure.”

Many claim that Golda can be putting it politely, dry, or even dull. While that’s understandable, this is a film with a limited budget. The team here squeezes every ounce they can with the funding and story available to them. And while the criticisms of casting Mirren as a Jewish hero and icon are legitimate, it’s hard to argue how Mirren inhabits the real-life figure’s weathered mind, body, and soul.

Grade: B+

Movie Review: ‘Jules’ Feels Incomplete


Director: Marc Turtletaub
Writer: Gavin Steckler
Stars: Ben Kingsley, Harriet Sansom Harris, Jane Curtin

Synopsis: Milton lives a quiet life of routine in a small western Pennsylvania town, but finds his day upended when a UFO and its extra-terrestrial passenger crash land in his backyard.


The “Baby Boomers” are the most significant labor force cohort in the United States, so movies tailored for the age range of 57 to 75 will never go away any time soon. The AARP genre of films has become popular of late. From the Book Club franchise, Going in Style, and Poms, these movies are designed to take the family’s matriarch to a show on Mother’s Day Sunday matinee.

While most of these films offer a pleasant way to spend a lazy afternoon, if that’s your thing, the best ones have some underlying thematic value regarding a generation’s worth, not only appreciated but the need that our elders have to offer.

Unfortunately, Jules offers very little in that department, which is a shame considering the talent involved, including a legendary lead, two respected comedic character actors, and a director whose feature film debut, Puzzle, was an unexpected gem. Sadly, this science-fiction comedy lacks imagination beyond its one-note joke.

Directed by Marc Turtletaub, Jules tells the story of Milton (Ben Kingsley), an older adult, quietly living out his life watching endless episodes of CSI reruns on basic cable in a small Western Pennsylvania town. He’s estranged from his son, and his daughter is worried about him since he leaves newspapers in the freezer and a can of vegetables in the bathroom medicine cabinet. 

Milton’s significant daily activity is going down to the community center to propose changing the town’s slogan to the political leaders into something grammatically correct, and he’s not the only one. That includes Sandy (Harriet Harris), who wants to propose community outreach so she can connect with the younger generation. 

We also have the neighborhood busybody, Joyce (Jane Curtin), who’s worried about how her fellow older adults present themselves but fails to understand that her abrasiveness pushes people away. However, that is all about to change when an alien spaceship crashes into the back of Milton’s rural property, and they meet an extraterrestrial who goes by Jules.

Jules was written by Gavin Steckler, whose most significant contribution to film and television was the USA Network series Playing House. And that sums up my experience with the film—it feels like a pilot for the easy-going and breezy network that was never produced. Steckler’s script offers a buddy concept and some mildly odd escapism that’s light-hearted and approachable. Yet, while the script does generate some empathy and relatability, the interaction never reinforces the film’s themes to produce deeper, more profound outcomes and develop the characters in significant ways that are desperately needed.

Yes, Jules has some lovely moments, such as how Kingsley portrays Milton’s warm nature. I am also thrilled that Harris has a significant role here. The veteran character actress, best known for being the hilarious, no-morals agent Bebe Glazer on Frasier and the doomed wife of Sammy in Memento, is the film’s emotional center.

Harris is involved in the picture’s best scene. However, to justify my issue with the film’s uneven mix, it combines an odd, out-of-place solo rendition of “Free Bird” with Curtin’s Joyce. Finally, when the film builds to the script’s payoff, the finale must be more varied, and the final 15 minutes feel needlessly lengthy. Not only are the connections between the three main subjects never established, none are made outside their bubble. The emotional void between the trio is as vast as space itself.

Jules has its heart in the right place for all intents and purposes, but very little is accomplished with a film that is less than 90 minutes long. Along with the film’s lack of a complete third act, this comedy does little to no favors in terms of exploring what makes life worth living.

Grade: C-

Podcast: “How It’s About” Movies – Episode 548

This week’s episode is brought to you by Koffee Kult. Get 15% OFF with the code: ISF

This week on the InSession Film Podcast, we discuss the best movies that exemplify Roger Ebert’s profound quote of “it’s not what a movie is about, it’s how it’s about it,” and why we live by that ethos! We also discuss a little Blue Beetle box office and rant out a possible Thor 5.

On that note, check out this week’s show and let us know what you think in the comment section. Thanks for listening and for supporting the InSession Film Podcast!

Blue Beetle Box Office (2:16)
In the first segment, with the disappointment of Blue Beetle‘s box office, we wanted to talk about its impact and how we hope it has an Elemental type run long term.


RELATED: Listen to Episode 516 of the InSession Film Podcast where we discussed our Top 10 Movies of 2022!


– How It’s About Movies (21:40)
Roger Ebert will always be the GOAT for many reasons, but among them for us, is his legendary quote about a movies’ execution. It’s easy to judge any movie on what it’s about, but that doesn’t necessarily mean anything. So many movies are great, not because of what’s on the page or what it is as an idea, but because of its execution. A movie’s direction, performances, score and overall sincerity will always carry its quality. And here we talk about some movies that best exemplify that specifically.

– Thor 5 Rant (1:31:22)
It was reported last week that Taika Waititi is working on Thor 5, and we had some thoughts on this given our love of the Thor character over the years. We’re ready to move on from the Waititi Thor movies.

– Music
About Today – The National
Shallow – Bradley Cooper, Lady Gaga

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
InSession Film Podcast – Episode 548

Next week on the show:

Gran Turismo / Racing Movies

Help Support The InSession Film Podcast

If you want to help support us, there are several ways you can help us and we’d absolutely appreciate it. Every penny goes directly back into supporting the show and we are truly honored and grateful. Thanks for your support and for listening to the InSession Film Podcast!

VISIT OUR DONATE PAGE HERE

Movie Review: ‘Blue Beetle’ is Full of Heart and Standard Comic Book Fare


Director: Angel Manuel Soto
Writer: Gareth Dunnet-Alcocer
Stars: Xolo Ramirez, Susan Sarandon, Adriana Barraza

Synopsis: An alien scarab chooses college graduate Jaime Reyes to be its symbiotic host, bestowing the teenager with a suit of armor that’s capable of extraordinary and unpredictable powers, forever changing his destiny as he becomes the superhero known as Blue Beetle.


Blue Beetle is another frustrating superhero outing for Detective Comics, which finds enough heart in the community of characters folding into a comic book movie that follows the genre playbook step by step. A one-note villain, check. A magnetic lead in love with a drop-dead gorgeous love interest caught up in a plot that has worldwide consequences, check. A few supporting characters who are as well-rounded and three-dimensional as a couple of Flatheads, check. But hell, at least they are a lot of fun. And that’s what makes the fresh premise of a Mexican-American superhero finally gracing the silver screen such a frustratingly mixed bag of potential and uninspired storytelling.

The story follows Jaime Reyes (Xolo Ramirez), a recent pre-law graduate who is the first in his family to earn a college degree. Returning home to a hero’s welcome, his family celebrates his return. That’s until his sister Milagro (Belissa Escobedo) breaks some bad news to him: They are losing the house, and the family business went bankrupt because his father, Alberto (Damián Alcázar), suffered a heart attack. Jaime’s mother, Rocio (Elpidia Carrillo), and his beloved Nana (Adriana Barraza) felt strongly that it would have been a distraction to his education if they broke the terrible news.

Jaime vows to lift his family out of this predicament. He lands an interview with Kord Industries, a multinational research and development corporation specializing in military defense, after a chivalrous happenstance with Jenny (Bruna Marquezine), a beautiful young twenty-something and Kord’s CEO. Jenny’s father left her the company and disappeared mysteriously, to the ire of her Aunt Victoria (Susan Sarandon), who saw Kord as her life’s work. That’s when Jenny discovers Victoria has begun redeveloping defense weapons again, something the principles of her father were dead set against.

While investigating, Jenny finds Victoria possessing the Scarab, an ancient relic of alien technology. While trying to escape with the artifact, she hands it off to Jaime, who is waiting for his interview. Jaime violates the one instruction she gave him by not opening the box. The Scarab doesn’t attack when he does but instead becomes a part of him. Jaime transforms into the Blue Beetle against his will. But, as we know, if you live by the code of Community’s Jeff Winger, you don’t choose to be a hero. It’s thrust upon you.

I was excited when I read Angel Manuel Soto would helm Blue Beetle. Indeed, the director of the hidden gem Charm City Kings would find the subculture and that particular “thing” that makes this comic book hero ring true. And for the most part, he does this by offering a warm, big-hearted, Latinx “familismo” lens to view the iconic DC hero. This is portrayed with love and affection between the characters, particularly the father-son relationship that gives the dynamic its heart. Mirroring that sentiment is Marquezine’s Jenny, who never had a warm embrace growing up. Jaime also proposes using his superpowers to protect his family, but never by lethal force, freeing the film from stereotypes.

Written by Gareth Dunnet-Alcocer, Blue Beetle, at times, has horror film elements that are reminiscent of Venom. For instance, when the Scarab takes over Ramirez’s Jaime, this can be viewed as a form of reincarnation. The scene is graphic (and the reactions of the family members vary to the point where they seem out of place) and even terrifying. This mix, particularly at the film’s end, gives the Blue Beetle an uneven experience. Even if these scenes have an infusion of retro 80s movie-era homage, that works. 

The script also has thinly veiled characters, particularly the villains, with Sarandon being a one-note cliché. While the villainous muscle, Carapax (Raoul Max Trujillo), earns a backstory, the payoff is rushed and more than predictable. Also, the script never delves deep enough into the backstories of Jaime’s family. For instance, George Lopez serves as the film’s comic relief; he’s hilarious here, but we never learn enough about why and how he’s such an IT expert and the Lucius Fox of the film. The same goes for Academy Award nominee Adriana Barraza. Her character is a kick-ass grandma fighting Victoria’s super soldiers alongside Jaime, indicating her former participation as a revolutionary out of nowhere. Too many characters feel incomplete for over a two-hour movie, and the story would have benefited dramatically from greater care and context.

And those aren’t strikes against the film’s narrative of a hero born of love instead of overwhelming trauma, but against a standard comic book formula that doesn’t take enough chances. This is strange, with this being James Gunn’s first significant decision in his new role as the DCEU’s managing puppet master. Why would a man who took enormous risks that revitalized Marvel with the Guardians franchise double down on formulaic superhero cliches? While the Blue Beetle has plenty of heart and a fresh perspective, the villains and the heroes are a forgettable blend of standard comic book fare that’s never as interesting as the movie’s relaxed, warm, and loving scenes where this DC film lives.

Grade: C

Women InSession: Favorite 2000s Movies

This week on Women InSession, we take a dive in the movies of the 2000s and talk about our favorites of that era. It’s not necessarily our favorite decade for movies, but there are (obviously) some fantastic films to come our during that period that we absolutely adore.

Panel: Kristin Battestella, Zita Short

On that note, check out this week’s show and let us know what you think in the comment section. Thanks for listening and for supporting the InSession Film Podcast!

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
Women InSession – Episode 50

To hear this Extra Film episode and everything else we do, download our apps on the Amazon Market for Android and the Podcast Source app on IOS devices. The mobile app covers all of our main shows, bonus podcasts and everything else relating to the InSession Film Podcast. Thanks for your wonderful support and for listening to our show. It means the world to us.

Podcast Review: Blue Beetle

On this episode, JD is joined by Rosa Parra of the Latinx Lens Podcast to review the new DCU film from Angel Manuel Soto in Blue Beetle! This isn’t just the so-called reboot of the DCU, but it’s the first superhero film to feature a mostly Hispanic cast in a very prominent way, including its hero in Jaime Reyes. Regardless of its box office, this is going to be a film that resonates with people and we had a great time talking about that.

Review: Blue Beetle (3:00)
Director: Ángel Manuel Soto
Writers: Gareth Dunnet-Alcocer
Stars: Xolo Maridueña, Adriana Barraza, George Lopez, Bruna Marquezine

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
InSession Film Podcast – Blue Beetle

Movie Review: ‘Strays’ is Super Sweet and Sour


Director: Josh Greenbaum
Writer: Don Perrault
Stars: Will Ferrell, Jamie Foxx, Isla Fisher

Synopsis: An abandoned dog teams up with other strays to get revenge on his former owner.


Are we in the new golden age of the hard-R-rated summer comedy? From Jennifer Lawrence’s uproarious and raunchy No Hard Feelings to Adele Lim’s racy and hilarious Joy Ride, there has been a newfound wave of foul-mouthed comedies to enjoy. Some of these films’ best scenes would make Porky’s Bob Clark blush. This August, we have Strays, a hilarious comedy featuring some of the most adorable little dogs you’ll ever see and showcasing some of the dirtiest deeds in cinema history—all with an underlying theme that surprisingly hits home with that old cliché of a lot of heart. These super sweet yet seriously sour antics of these Strays are filled with filthy, gut-busting, leg-humping hilarity.

The story follows Reggie (Will Ferrell), a “woof”-fully optimistic mixed breed unaware of his toxic pet-owner relationship with Doug (Will Forte). Doug is the kind of lowlife who blames his substance abuse, laziness, and lousy situation on his dog. He repeatedly attempts to abandon Reggie in the middle of nowhere by throwing his tennis ball out of the truck and driving off while Reggie gives chase. However, Reggie interprets it as a game of “Fetch & F*ck” and always manages to bring the toy back to Doug’s feet, where he says the titular latter word.

Finally, Doug has had enough and takes Reggie into the ominous city, where he becomes acquainted with the freaks and geeks of the bustling city streets. Among them is a Boston Terrier with a gift of the gab named Bug (Jamie Foxx), who teaches Reggie how to survive on his own. Bug introduces Reggie to more stray dogs like Maggie (Isla Fisher), an Australian Shepherd, and Hunter (Randall Park), an enormous Great Dane with a small dick energy despite the obvious heat he’s packing. The sexual tension between Maggie and Hunter is undeniable. Finally realizing Doug doesn’t care about him, the group embarks on a road trip to visit Doug so Reggie can, in his own words, “Bite his dick off.” Yes, like I said, a foul-mouthed comedy.

Written by Dan Perrault and directed by Josh Greenbaum, Strays has a big, ferocious bite that most comedies can only dream of. The film features dirty yet heartfelt and outrageously funny debauchery from some of the most adorable pooches you will ever see. Strays can be seen as a loquacious take on Homeward Bound: The Incredible Journey, but with abundant sex, copious amounts of drugs, and free-flowing alcohol. Given Hollywood’s penchant for transforming simple stories into unnecessarily sentimental narratives — a phenomenon that might soon be dubbed “The Tuohy Effect” — it’s almost as if Strays presents what the 1993 family film was truly like before the greedy little money-grubbing mouse got his hands on the script.

Part of the fun of what makes Strays so funny is watching the juxtaposition of these hellhounds, equipped with heart-swelling puppy love expressions, doing bad things—very bad things. Almost every joke works famously, from a jaw-dropping camp-side “pillow” fight to a priceless and well-timed Miley Cyrus needle drop and a wicked take on Marley & Me. And the ones that don’t land are so audacious and bold that you forgive Greenbaum and Perrault solely because of their effort.

Much of the credit should go to Ferrell and Fox, whose styles seemingly shouldn’t blend but create a joyous combination of sweet and sour. Ferrell dives back into that Elf persona with a humorous, deadpan, and naïve delivery. This allows Fox’s garrulous and spunky Boston Terrier to steal nearly every scene he’s in. Delivering humor while also conveying the film’s sharp wit and an insightful take on male toxicity, Bug’s spin-off isn’t just a request but a matter of time. You’ll also appreciate the humor generated from Park’s Hunter and Fisher’s Maggie for their numerous risqué and suggestive double entendres.

Frankly, Strays reminds me of the type of comedy The Farrelly Brothers used to make in the 90s. Similar to those movies, they had an underlying human (work with me here) element. Here, Perrault finds something sobering regarding victimization in a surprisingly profound scene when Reggie convinces himself that Doug loves him. Yes, it involves a mutt with a tennis ball, but that moment reveals more about the catch-22 in domestic violence, and is more insightful than most films.

Ultimately, Reggie carrying Doug’s blame-shifting leads to Greenbaum’s canine opus—a relatable sense of community, family, and finding your place in life—which still supports the film’s hard comedic edge. Sure, it may not make sense why Hunter has a medical cone if he’s a stray or that Doug is such an over-the-top deadbeat that no woman in her right mind would have him, let alone for one night. However, Strays is damn funny and pushes the envelope farther than I thought possible.

Strays is a loquacious Homeward Bound and the super sweet yet seriously sour antics of these pooches are filled with filthy, gut-busting, leg-humping hilarity.

Grade: A-

Movie Review: ‘The Monkey King’ is Beautiful and Empty


Director: Anthony Stacchi
Writers: Steve Bencich, Ron J. Friedman, and Rita Hsiao
Stars: Jimmy O. Yang, Bowen Yang, BD Wong

Synopsis: Inspired by an epic Chinese tale, translated into an action-packed comedy, a Monkey and his magical fighting Stick battle demons, dragons, gods and the greatest adversary of all – Monkey’s ego.


*This piece was written during the 2023 WGA and SAG-AFTRA strikes. Without the labor of the writers and actors currently on strike, the movie being covered here wouldn’t exist.*

Though quite unsuccessfully, Netflix has been trying to get into the animation game for a long time. It’s only when they’ve plucked films from other studios (The Mitchells vs. The Machines & Nimona) or when they team up with an actual auteur behind the camera (Guillermo del Toro’s Pinocchio) that they can succeed in the game. But they’ve never delivered something tangible when delving into studio-driven animated offerings. However, since they wanted to dominate all spheres of filmmaking, it was only a matter of time before they would take a crack at making another mainstream animated film in The Monkey King

Based on “Journey to the West,” the movie will hit the streaming service on August 18th. I had a chance to check out The Monkey King in theaters, and this is where it deserves to be experienced. Rarely have I seen such mastery in its visual form, it would feel shameful not to bask in its vivid kineticism on the largest screen possible. The animation style is consistently malleable, going from bright, colorful 3D worlds, morphing into hand-drawn animation as the titular Monkey King (Jimmy O. Yang) defeats 99 demons in a terrific montage, and goes back to 3D with notable changes in its form as it transports audiences from one world to the next. 

There’s even a setpiece that feels directly plucked out of CAPCOM’s Ōkami, set in Hell, where different brush techniques are used to unleash a superpower to subdue The Monkey King. It’s one of the most inspired action scenes I’ve seen in an animated film all year and consistently moves in exciting and fresh ways. The final fight between The Monkey King and The Dragon King (Bowen Yang) is incredible. Director Anthony Stacchi continuously finds new ways to enthrall viewers, especially children who will lose their minds when they witness what this film has in store for them. The children at my screening were entertained, and one of them even got up from their seat when The Monkey King got some of his powers. 

But the story raises more questions than answers and hampers the film. The Monkey King has never taken no for an answer and is now on a quest to become immortal. He starts this by killing over 100 demons, crossing his name off a scroll in Hell, which only makes him half-immortal. However, becoming fully immortal proves difficult for the King, as he teams up with Lin (Jolie Haong-Rapaport) to attain immortality by traveling to Heaven and defeating the immortals who control it. However, Lin has been working for The Dragon King, who promised her rainfall in her village, whose crops have been devastated by the scorching heat. But The Monkey King is a total jerk – he only does a quest that benefits his personal gain, and not anyone’s. He even tries to outsmart Buddha (BD Wong)…and it doesn’t work. 

As a movie destined for families, The Monkey King challenges younger viewers in asking to sympathize with a protagonist who is completely unlikeable in every sense of the word. Yes, the film is based on several texts (Cheang Pou-soi’s The Monkey King painted the titular character in a more thoughtful and vibrant light than this film), but does he have to be this unlikeable? As good as O. Yang is, the character is unfortunately written in a way that feels irritating instead of making audiences understand exactly why he wants to attain immortality and defeat the Gods on top of the hierarchy. It’s all egotistical, and it, unfortunately, doesn’t imbue any positive values on children, who usually are taken to animated films by their parents to make them learn about something. 

The Monkey King doesn’t have any positive message to pass on or even a lesson to come out of this ordeal. Instead, we get to observe The Monkey King irritating every other character and only thinking about himself for 92 minutes. How fun. No, really, that’s it. And the villain is also egotistical — he wants to steal The Monkey King’s stick to submerge the planet in water and take over Earth. So we have a self-centered monkey fighting a self-centered dragon for their nefarious gains. And no one, not even Lin, learns anything meaningful in the process. I might’ve excused its mostly annoying characters were it not for a core message, but none of that is found here. 

Thankfully, the visuals and action sequences are all terrific, and the main reason why the movie is, against all odds, watchable. The voice cast is also quite good, with Bowen Yang being the biggest highlight as The Dragon King and Wong impressing in a minor role as Buddha. But it’s not enough to save The Monkey King with a haphazard story and problematic character arcs. Kids will certainly enjoy its breakneck pace and staggering action sequences, but will they learn anything meaningful beyond the pretty visuals? I highly doubt it…

Grade: C+

Top Ten Michael Fassbender Essentials

Before big ticket failures like Assassin’s Creed or panned thrillers like The Snowman and more time spent on being a race car driver than making movies, Michael Fassbender was an indie darling knocking on Hollywood’s door. Here’s a rundown of Fassbender’s heavy dramas, quirky pieces, and award worthy performances from back when Jonah Hex was his only outlier.


10. Angel

Precocious Romola Garai (The Crimson Petal and the White) dreams of becoming a famous writer and erasing her humble past in director François Ozon’s (Swimming Pool) 2007 sweeping, lovely, fanciful, and tongue in cheek yarn. Our titular turn of the century romantic is smitten with Lothario painter Michael Fassbender, but the intentionally bemusing Victorian over the top and silly, sentimental old time montages give way to crisscrossing love triangles and Great War bitterness. The dreamlike, storybook style humor and pre-War fiction becoming fact decadence accent Angel’s revisionist tawdry. The hedonistic characters don’t take themselves too seriously even as heavier subject matter looms, but the classy ensemble uses each other to keep their secrets as Angel’s tantrums and fantastical lifestyle escalates. Garai is delightfully distasteful as Angel is swept up in her own mystique and unceremoniously pays the price for getting what she wants. Her out of touch Victorian opulence and juicy books lose their luster as changing Edwardian fates find her in true Dickensian fashion. Fassbender captures Angel’s breathtakingly idealized Esme as each looks the other way at their lies. Fassbender’s eyes carry Esme’s unsaid Great War torment and deceptions. His continued emasculation at Angel’s hands goes from perceived paradise to a shattering reality. Some period romance fans may be put off by the mocking tone and the play on genres between period versus fantasy is uneven at times. Fortunately, there is enough grandiose wit and flights of fancy for fans of the cast as this blissful tale turns wonderfully tragic.


9. A Dangerous Method

Director David Cronenberg (A History of Violence) re-teams with Viggo Mortensen (Eastern Promises) as Sigmund Freud to Michael Fassbender’s Carl Jung in this 2011 psychoanalysis opus. The dialogue-based storytelling may be old-fashioned or slow for some audiences while the in-camera cuts perhaps move too fast with years of treatment and correspondence passing from scene to scene in a stream of consciousness in media res. Thankfully, the frank conversations and bantering debates amplify the religion, medicine, and id discourse. Attention to period detail and intimate filming with up close photography showing both doctor and patient during the “Talking Cure” reflect the inward out examinations. Unfortunately, disturbed patient Keira Knightley(Atonement) is a distracting, unsympathetic contortionist as the jealous Sabina conflating doctor/patient affairs, blackmail letters, and psychoanalysis dissertations. Knightley never throws herself into the character with complete abandon, leaving the battle of the sexes ideologies feeling watered down, tame, and lightweight. Sara Gadon (Cosmopolis), however, is pleasantly surprising as the quiet in white lace Emma Jung trapped in a stoic, one-sided marriage. Her one scene with the unstable and intrusive Sabina is awkward perfection, but their maternal submissive meets masculine dominance give and take sadly goes unexplored. Vincent Cassel (Black Swan) also deserved more time as the devil on Jung’s shoulder to Mortenson’s father figure Freud. Their professional resentments and larger psychoanalytical philosophies should have been the film’s focus instead of the pseudo love triangle. Jung’s buttoned up strictness, finite mannerisms, and tight mustache contrast his pleasant psychologist’s demeanor and the passions he must explore. Fassbender embodies both the charming ideas and the conflict upon Jung’s mind over his behind closed doors taboo Edwardian experiences. The glasses come off as Jung makes mistakes, denies, admits, lives. Despite some uneven pacing and performances, Cronenberg’s cerebral panache makes for an intriguing film conversation here.

8. Slow West

Loner Fassbender helps young Kodi Smit-McPhee (The Power of the Dog) find his sweetheart in 1870 Colorado for writer and director John Maclean’s (Pitch Black Heist) visually stunning 2015 full length directorial debut with crisp skylines, impressive camerawork, and a surreal patina. The opening narration establishes the harsh frontier and suspicious, unforgiving mood, but additional, head hopping voiceovers are obvious and unnecessary. Intercut flashbacks and seemingly happy recollections interfere with the present quest and should have come in one early sequence to bookend the superb shootout finale. Likewise, we shouldn’t see the unreliable Rose herself until required, for dream sequences and foreshadowing fears better encapsulate the sardonic tone wrapped in the traditional western motifs. Everything that will happen is alluded to somewhere in the film, layering the character realizations, bounty hunter codes, and cowboy rivalry. Though short at under ninety minutes, the well paced reflection and quiet conversations progress with the forward moving journey and siege action. Smit-McPhee’s young Scottish noble is in over his head with idyllic hopes and a trusting nature that gets the better of him. He thinks this is all one big adventure despite increasing consequences and the need to kill quickly. Some plot holes, however, hamper his improving ingenuity, creating questions on who knows the who what when where and whys. How many people have to end up dead because clueless Jay is in the wrong place at the wrong time causing exactly what he was trying to prevent? Fassbender’s Silas, in contrast, is commanding on horseback – a cigar chomping, ruthless, rugged drifter who abides by no law and demands cash. He sleeps upright, robs when necessary, and counters Jay’s romantic stories with cynical humor. For all his lawless posturing, mercenary motivations, stoic action, and belittling delivery, however; traveling with Jay changes Silas from whiskey killer to fond father figure. Despite a few narrative hiccups, viewers should watch this ironic tale at least twice for the layered winks and genre metaphors.


7. Frank

Struggling songwriter Domhnall Gleeson (Ex Machina) joins the unusual, unpronounceable band Soronprfbs and its eponymous, eccentric singer Michael Fassbender – who wears a giant papier-mâché head. “Chinchilla!” safe words, goofy one-liners, and social media commentary anchor the witty, natural script as our newcomer chronicles the recording of the band’s next album on social media with “#livingthedream” unreliability. Jon asks the questions on our mind: Does Frank have a beard? How does he brush his teeth? Is he disfigured? He’s from Kansas? The askew, self-aware comedic circumstances make it okay to laugh at tender moments, but the band’s internet notoriety leads to insensitive media and jokes about the head. Theremin player Maggie Gyllenhaal (Secretary) pretends she doesn’t care – a tough, bizarrely nurturing figure who knows Soronprfbs doesn’t need to be famous but they do need music to heal. Making music is a religious revival to Frank, but once we see he still wears his “has a certificate” head offstage, we’re hooked by his artistic fragility. We don’t blame Frank for wearing his head because we hide within our own facades, illusions, and phony hashtags to control how we’re perceived. This mask helps Frank express himself and see through other people’s issues even though he doesn’t realize his own brokenness. Fassbender embodies the top heavy physicality and offbeat genius with a different unknown voice from inside the head, and life just might be easier if we too clarified our internal facial expressions as Frank does. This is an excellent character study from director Lenny Abrahamson (Room) exploring the quirky whilst being no less poignant – no matter how you pronounce Soronprfbs.

6. Prometheus

Noomi Rapace (The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo) petitions the Weyland Company to fund an archaeological expedition to the distant planet LV-223, but only Michael Fassbender’s android David is awake for the journey to discover these “Engineers” and the alien origins of humanity in director Ridley Scott’s 2012 return to the Alien universe. The bright science fiction palette and imaginative special effects look simply smashing as the foreboding body horrors escalate with planetary storms and trapped personnel encountering creepy creatures and ancient artifacts. Unfortunately, the creature connections, origin aspirations, and spiritual character motivations that should have been explained by writer Damon Lindelof (Lost) go unrealized thanks to the rushed, disjointed script leaving deleted scenes and supplemental material to fill in the plot holes and inconsistencies saved for the inevitable sequel. Although Rapace is up to snuff as the Oedipal object of David’s intentions, any scary speculative science fiction food for thought descends into obvious contrivances. Conflicts between faith, science, and the reexamination of humanity fall prey to nonsensical actions. Charlize Theron (Monster) is ice queen company representative good fun, but she deserved more, and the quality supporting cast including captain Idris Elba (Luther) and Guy Pearce (L.A. Confidential) as Peter Weyland are squandered. Fortunately, Fassbender’s hyperactive, prepubescent, synthetic sociopath David subtly exceeds his programming in uniquely devoid yet malevolent orchestrations. He continually disobeys any instruction and uses his superior intellect to gain control, outgrowing his human inventors and using Engineer technology to his advantage. Botched Alien connections, fly by night scripting, and behind the scenes flaws aside; Prometheus is nonetheless entertaining for science fiction lovers thanks to the capable cast.


5. X-Men: First Class


Nazi scientist Kevin Bacon (Mystic River) tortures Michael Fassbender’s metal manipulating Erik Lehnsherr while privileged James McAvoy (Split) as Charles Xavier becomes a mutant professor aiding the CIA to avoid nuclear war during the Cuban Missile Crisis in director Matthew Vaughn’s (Layer Cake) vibrant, swinging, Bond-esque 2011 gem. Fedoras, frocks, gadgets, newsreels, and split screens accent the character focused friendships and fractures amid intelligent mutant debates and quiet rage. Compared to today’s comic book movies, the slower pace allows time for attention to detail, tension, and surprises building up to the Professor X and Magneto divide we know is to come. Certainly, the women are underutilized in this misogynistic sixties. The superfluous mutant henchmen and lightweight X-Kids make for an unnecessarily crowded ensemble that should have been recruited for a direct follow up film. Thankfully, McAvoy embodies the zest, compassion, and hope of our prequel Charles. Initially arrogant, Charles’ awakening of Erik’s full power in hopes of mutants living together peacefully with homo sapiens instead comes at a very high price. Frankenstein parallels, Jekyll and Hyde metaphors, and Neanderthal comparisons add layers to the diverging mutant ideologies, and Fassbender excels with an abandon for languages, revenge, standoffs, and tears. He’s the soon to be bad guy justified in everything that he does. His deadly magnetism and ruthlessness combine for a 007 Dalton meets Craig edge, but we know better than to believe Erik will work for the common good with Charles. With stylish mid century elan and on the precipice performances, this is a serious superhero film and one of X-Men‘s finest.


4. Jane Eyre

This 2011 adaptation of Charlotte Bronte’s 1847 tale featuring the titular Mia Wasikowska (Crimson Peak) to Michael Fassbender’s Rochester has divine costumes, emotional scoring, excellent locales, foggy scenery, and flickering period lighting. Candles and firelight invoke an old-fashioned ambiance as well as shadows and gothic mood. Natural camerawork and flashback storytelling build realistic suspense and mystery as our governess trades literary barbs with the brooding master of the manor. Wasikowska’s poise reiterates Jane’s intelligence and self-respect as she grows from pale to radiant and confident in her unusual relationship with Rochester. The Bronte banter opens these kindred souls up beyond their societal barriers, but Jane sticks to her convictions despite Rochester’s intimidating attraction. Fassbender’s Master of Thornfield Hall appears almost as an apparition – striking an alluring balance between lonely menace and unobtainable flirtation. He’s demanding, pesky, and trusts no one but Jane, whose spitfire matches his own tongue in cheek intellect. Unfortunately, the Victorian conventions and secrets in the attic threaten to undo their would be bliss. Despite the reduced time and structural changes, Bronte fans and period piece aficionados will be swept up upon the moors thanks to these atmospheric performances.


3. Shame

The perfect façade of Michael Fassbender’s Brandon Sullivan hides a depraved sex addiction and a visit from his sister Carey Mulligan (Promising Young Woman) upends the out of control internet porn and call girls in director Steve McQueen’s visceral 2011 NC-17 drama. Unusual mixes of conversational dialogue, long silences, or musical interludes accent the alternating intercuts, unbalanced editing, and tight photography reflecting Brandon’s inner spiral. The distorted timeline builds both a conventional plot and nontraditional storytelling yet the script is not that explicit or shocking. This is a quiet film with actions and expressions letting the characters cry out in different ways. Needy Mulligan is full of heart wrenching issues all her own, but Brandon cannot give the help she wants. Brother and sister – scarred and unashamed to be naked in front of each other – come to violent, pseudo-sexual blows because they should be able to heal their brokenness together yet it’s not their fault if they can’t. We feel for Brandon as our off kilter avatar thanks to his sad lifestyle and fear of intimacy. Cartoons and juvenile behavior suggest a previous trauma; Brandon’s apartment is bare and his gray pants/blue shirt/scarf uniform is as devoid as his stare. He never eats, only drinks, drugs, or caffeinates to keep his bottomless sex drive going. He can’t behave normally as the constant craving for an unattainable climax leads to nothingness. Fassbender’s tears encapsulate the man versus man, man versus nature, and man versus himself tragedy. This is a depressing, raw, uncompromising piece addressing our frailty, loathing, and pain.

2. Fish Tank

Writer and director Andrea Arnold (Red Road) wastes no frame as the natural, over the shoulder camera captures the bleak documentary feeling of the Essex council housing where delinquent teen Mia meets her mother’s latest boyfriend Michael Fassbender. Diegetic sound and the square, full screen ratio mirror the dated, boxed in, congested atmosphere as the Peeping Tom audience may not like what we observe. In her debut, Katie Jarvis captures Mia’s youthful rage and underlying softness with raw emotion and realism. Though her moves are outdated and not very good, dancing is Mia’s chosen self expression. The abandoned apartment where she practices is free from the shouting and violence at home. Mia lashes out with overused hollow curse words and plays dress up with her mother’s things – drinking, finding birth control, and mixing youth with adulthood in ways she doesn’t fully understand. When Connor comes along, he gets Mia out of her angry shell, becoming the stable force this family needs. Unfortunately, Mia’s infatuation with Connor blinds us to the budding inappropriateness she fails to comprehend and we’d rather not see. He seems friendly, caring, and sexy because we are in her point of view with increasingly askew slow motion and lucid, dream-like distortions as the line between father figure and intimacy blurs. Such ugly, taking advantage, loss of innocence indiscretions like this happen in the real world all the time, but the clouded juvenile view of Fassbender’s charisma leads to the blinders coming off in escalating surprises and crimes. Some parts of this coming of age tale are very difficult to watch. It’s meant to be uncomfortable, and the voyeuristic viewer comes away with no easy answers.


1. Hunger

After fellow Irish prisoners endure brutal abuses and inhumane treatments at the Maze Prison, Fassbender’s IRA Officer Bobby Sands ends their 1981 blanket and no-wash strike efforts in favor of a hunger strike. Father Liam Cunningham (Game of Thrones) attempts to convince Sands this will be equally unsuccessful, but Sands refuses food and medical treatment for 66 days as his body slowly wastes away in director Steve McQueen’s 2008 debut. Simmering, silent shots establish the bleakness as character backgrounds and stoic guards caught in a difficult position don’t make it easy to discern who is right or wrong. This is not a political movie but rather a story about one person suffering naked humiliations, excrement, orifices, and worse. The realistically dirty, unpleasant look of the film itself is emaciated, pared down and on strike against the glitzy, overdone Hollywood system. There’s precious little dialogue until Cunningham asks Sands why in an excellent, 17 minute unbroken two-shot. It’s natural, serious, sad, and even witty as viewers must pay attention to the smoking, subtle movements, hidden ticks, and vocal inflections to understand what’s really being said. What are Sands’ real motivations for the strike? Fassbender is without dialogue most of his time, letting his sad eyes and onscreen transformation capture the mundane starvation monotony and quiet bodily torment of waiting to die. The haunting imagery and worst of what humanity does to each other herein is not easy to watch yet this is a film you can’t forget. 

Interview with Composer John Powell

Composer John Powell is well known for his work in the realm of animation with How to Train Your Dragon, Kung Fu Panda, Happy Feet and others. His score for Solo: A Star Wars Story was noteworthy. And now he’s Emmy-nominated with his score for the documentary Still: A Michael J. Fox Movie. JD sits down with John to talk about the challenges he faced with Still and why it was a great experience for him.

Preview of the 80th Biennale Di Venezia

As summer turns to autumn, a major batch of films is coming out, and Oscar season is starting to shift gears. The next of the big world film festivals, however, is overshadowed by the current SAG-AFTRA/WGA strike that won’t permit A-listers from attending the event. New films from Richard Linklater, Woody Allen (I know), Luc Besson (again, I know), William Friedkin (R.I.P.), Sofia Coppola, Bradley Cooper, and David Fincher are among the highly anticipated films coming out with a jury led by director Damien Chazelle and joined by Jane Campion, Martin McDonough, and Mia Hanson-Love. Here’s a short list of those films to look out for. 

El Conde (Chile)

Pablo Larrain (Jackie, Spencer) is back home with his dark comedy that will touch a raw nerve in Chile. His new feature portrays the notorious military dictator Augusto Pinochet as a vampire who has lived for 250 years and now wants to die as things get worse for him. With a Netflix release, it can be viewed anywhere, and the reaction to this movie could be interesting. Pinochet’s legacy remains a stain on Chile, but a significant percentage of the population sees him as Chile’s modern liberator. It is Larrain’s second film on the Pinochet era after 2012’s, No. 

Ferrari (USA)

An all-Italian story dramatized by Hollywood. Sounds familiar? After Adam Driver played a Gucci two years ago, he now plays Enzo Ferrari in Michael Mann’s long-awaited biopic. Set in the 1950s, the story follows a particular time in his life: the death of his son plus the financial struggles of his company as Ferrari aims to win the highly sought Mille Miglia, a 1,000-mile race across the country. With Penelope Cruz, Shailene Woodley, Gabriel Leone, and Patrick Dempsey, it will make quite an impression – or be hostile – to Italian audiences about one of their being made by Hollywood. 

The Palace (ITA/SUI/FRA)

I’m going to get a lot of slack for mentioning this movie because of the director, but since I already said Woody Allen and Luc Besson, to me, I might as well pick out their films. Polanski, who is 90 years old and what could be his final film, has his dark comedy to show. Set in a Swiss luxury hotel on New Year’s Eve, 1999, guests from all over the continent merge and have a ball of a night that becomes a sudden wreck. The international ensemble includes Fanny Ardent, Oliver Masucci, John Cleese, Joaquim de Almeida, and Mickey Rourke. 

Poor Things (UK/USA)

Five years after his universally acclaimed The Favorite, director Yorgos Lanthimos is back and reunites with star Emma Stone and screenwriter Tony McNamara. This time around, this dark comedy follows a dead woman who is brought back to life and then looking to insert herself back into the world. Mark Ruffalo, Willem Dafoe, Ramy Youssef, Jerrod Carmichael, and Margaret Qualley also star in this surrealistic Victorian-era piece, a seeming mockery about an era of “values” that Lanthimos is fit to chop up.

Society Of The Snow (URU/SPA)

J.A. Bayona goes to another real-life disaster story after The Impossible. It is one Hollywood has produced before, the 1993 film Alive! It is the harrowing tale of survival from a group of Uruguyans who crash high in the Andes mountains in 1972 and survive for weeks despite the cold and hunger. With Netflix’s support, Bayona shot the film around the actual location of the crash site and used unknowns to play the group. Society is also the festival’s closing film and will play out of competition. 

Follow me on Twitter: @brian_cine (Cine-A-Man)

Podcast Review: Talk to Me

On this episode, Brendan and JD discuss the latest A24 horror film Talk to Me from directors Danny and Michael Philippou! We’re getting to this a few week’s late, but it didn’t stop us from having an intriguing conversation over the film’s mechanics, ideas on grief, and how those things are somewhat at odds with each other.

Review: Talk to Me (3:00)
Director: Michael Philippou, Danny Philippou
Writers: Bill Hinzman, Danny Philippou
Stars: , Sophie Wilde, Alexandra Jensen, Miranda Otto

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
InSession Film Podcast – Talk to Me

Podcast Review: Theater Camp

On this episode, JD is joined by David Rosen of the Piecing It Together Podcast to review the wonderful mockumentary Theater Camp!

Review: Theater Camp (3:00)
Director: Molly Gordon, Nick Lieberman
Writers: Noah Galvin, Molly Gordon, Nick Lieberman, Ben Platt
Stars: Noah Galvin, Molly Gordon, Ben Platt, Jimmy Tatro

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
InSession Film Podcast – Theater Camp

Podcast: Remembering William Friedkin – Episode 547

This week’s episode is brought to you by Koffee Kult. Get 15% OFF with the code: ISF

This week on the InSession Film Podcast, we remember the late-great William Friedkin as we discuss his very best films and why he was such a legendary filmmaker! He’s made some iconic movies with The Exorcist and The French Connection, but others such as Sorcerer and To Live and Die in L.A. are equally noteworthy. There’s no denying his impact on Hollywood and we wanted to celebrate the man and his remarkable work.

On that note, check out this week’s show and let us know what you think in the comment section. Thanks for listening and for supporting the InSession Film Podcast!

– William Friedkin Part 1 (5:58)
In the first segment, we begin by talking about Friedkin’s overall impact on Hollywood and get into The Exorcist, The French Connection, Killer Joe and Sorcerer.


RELATED: Listen to Episode 516 of the InSession Film Podcast where we discussed our Top 10 Movies of 2022!


– William Friedkin Part 2 (1:09:25)
For the back half of the show, we finish our Friedkin conversation by reflecting on The Hunted Bug and offering up our top 5 movies within his filmography.

– Music
The Exorcist Theme – Robert Miles
To Live and Die in L.A. – Wang Chung

Subscribe to our Podcasts RSS
Subscribe to our Podcasts on iTunes
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Stitcher
InSession Film Podcast – Episode 547

Next week on the show:

Blue Beetle / New DCU

Help Support The InSession Film Podcast

If you want to help support us, there are several ways you can help us and we’d absolutely appreciate it. Every penny goes directly back into supporting the show and we are truly honored and grateful. Thanks for your support and for listening to the InSession Film Podcast!

VISIT OUR DONATE PAGE HERE

Movie Review: ‘The Last Voyage of the Demeter’ is a Dull Retread


Director: André Øvredal
Writers: Bragi Schut Jr & Zak Olkewicz
Stars: Corey Hawkins, Liam Cunningham, Javier Botet

Synopsis: A crew sailing from Carpathia to England find that they are carrying very dangerous cargo.


*This piece was written during the 2023 WGA and SAG-AFTRA strikes. Without the labor of the writers and actors currently on strike, the movie being covered here wouldn’t exist.*

“It’s Dracula on a boat.” “It’s like Alien, but with Dracula.” You don’t need to say anything else. I’m here. No matter how terrible the title is. I will see that in a heartbeat. What an incredible concept based on The Ship’s Log from Bram Stoker’s Dracula. Why didn’t anyone think of this before? Especially after the maligned Renfield, it certainly sounds like it could reignite interest in Dracula after Universal failed to readapt the tale in 2014 with Dracula Untold. Not only that, but it stars Corey Hawkins as the lead, one of the best up-and-coming actors working today, and the music is composed by Bear McCreary, fresh from his incredible work in The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power? Shut up and take my money!

I was ready to watch The Last Voyage of the Demeter. Yes, it’s a bad title. Possibly the worst of the year. But if the film is good, I can easily forgive a flimsy title. And while it’s welcomed in the realm of horror to have a lean and mean premise and a good lead performance from Corey Hawkins, the film itself is one of the dullest horror movies I’ve seen in a very long time and one of the most disappointing outings from a studio I’ve seen all year. It’s even worse when the film starts quite decent, beautifully shot, and immediately hits the audience with the eeriest possible atmosphere as we see the remains of the Demeter before it flashes back to four weeks before this scene. Then it grinds to a halt and never picks up. 

The movie follows the Demeter’s titular last voyage, as the shipmates discover that a cargo they’ve been carrying has been killing off crew members one by one. First, it killed all of the animals on board. Then it starts picking up some of the B-crew members until the middle section arrives, and one major character has to die for the stakes to be elevated before its climax. All of this has been hampered to death in so many horror movies time and again. Still, I will applaud director André Øvredal for doing something that no one else would’ve ever done with one of the most shocking midpoint swings I’ve seen since the death of Maria Hill in Secret Invasion. Of course, that’s apples and oranges, but it did catch me off guard and, quite frankly, shocked the living hell out of me. 

But that’s the only exciting scene The Last Voyage of the Demeter offers. Instead of creating an atmosphere of pure dread as they progressively discover that this boat is harboring the blood-sucking Dracula (Javier Botet), the movie would rather craft endless murky sequences filled with jumpscares and gotcha! moments. One character looks at the sea with his monocular, panning slowly until BOO! Dracula appears before him and…disappears as he takes his eye off. Next, he talks to Clemens (Hawkins), lightning strikes, and, of course, Dracula is right behind him. All of it, from how Øvredal frames these sequences, have been plucked straight out of other horror films, and there’s no eye for the original or the exciting here. 

It would rather play it safe with the “Dracula on a boat” concept than elevate it and produce the next horror cult classic. And even the scenes where Dracula kills people are poorly constructed. It doesn’t help that none of the night sequences (where most of the movie takes place) are poorly lit and have barely any energy to sustain most of the runtime. It’s either poorly lit and haphazardly shot, or with lighting hitting the frames in a strobe-light effect, audiences become overwhelmed by its power. Botet’s practical performance of Dracula, which is genuinely terrifying, gets hampered by what looks like unfinished CGI. 

It doesn’t look scary or finished when Dracula flies for the first time. The CGI completely bogs down Botet’s portrayal of the character. It must have been fun playing an on-screen iteration of the character we hadn’t seen since F.W. Murnau’s Nosferatu (until Robert Eggers releases his version of Murnau’s film next year). Yet, his performance can’t be seen amidst the sea of computer-generated effects he is masked with. Botet has brought to life some of the scariest creatures in modern-day horror cinema. Yet, his talents are completely wasted here, especially in its final act, in which Dracula arrives at the full extent of his on-screen powers without much excitement generated from its aesthetics and acting. We can always count on Bear McCreary to accompany the film with a wonderful score, but most of the acting here is surprisingly forgettable. 

Hawkins is the best part of the movie as its moral center, always trying to justify what’s going on with reason and scientific rigor. Still, everyone else is a distinct cliché: Liam Cunningham as the washed-up captain who refuses to believe a supernatural entity is here, Aisling Franciosi has a personal vendetta against Dracula and is the only one who knows how to defeat it, and David Dastmalchian teeters the line between rationality and irrationality. And then you’ve got the kid, played here by Cobweb’s Woody Norman (his horror streak is not very good!). Of course, the kid will get into serious trouble, and Hawkins’ character will act as its father figure, protecting him at all costs when his grandfather (the captain) can’t. All of these character arcs, even Hawkins, don’t add anything new to the table and bloat what could’ve otherwise been a lean 85-90-minute affair to two hours, spending way too much time building storylines with very little payoff near the end, instead of hammering its gothic aesthetic with modern-day gore sensibilities, which is what an “Alien but Dracula” movie should’ve been in the first place. 

As a result, The Last Voyage of the Demeter fails to deliver on its core premise. Yes, Dracula is on a boat…but did it have to be this boring? After the incredible success of RackaRacka’s Talk To Me, Hollywood studios need to realize that most moviegoers are turning down mainstream horror and are instead supporting auteur-driven (and independent) horror films that will not only scare the living hell out of you but consistently take risks in its plot structure and aesthetics. The Last Voyage of the Demeter is not only extremely dull to look at, but its story re-treads so many beats that have already been done far too many times in studio-driven horror. It’s time for the genre to reinvent itself before it grows even more stale than current studio offerings. 

Grade: D

Op-Ed: Andersonian Grief: Denial

CHAS

He also stole bonds out of my safety deposit box when I was fourteen

[Royal looks at Chas, then back at the judge. He chuckles uncomfortably]

There’s a collective denial we all face as humans. We bear certain unbearable truths of the world only in the back of our minds in order to not collapse in a permanent puddle of despair. Our human grief is in constant denial with itself. It’s how we survive and it’s how many of Wes Anderson’s films are set up. There are near perfect worlds built to deny certain outside influences. They’re artificial constructs for the people and anthropomorphized characters to pretend that their version of society is the only one. In small ways, the facades are dropped, as when Max Fischer (Jason Schwartzman, Rushmore) is kicked out of Rushmore and sent to public school and when fascist factions invade the bucolic Grand Budapest Hotel. Yet, even then, the characters build back up their fantasy walls within these new systems. Their denial then builds on top of their underlying drive. With Max Fischer his denial hides his intense anger, with Royal Tenenbaum (Gene Hackman, The Royal Tenenbaums) and Foxy Fox (George Clooney, Fantastic Mr. Fox), their denials bely perverse and selfish bargaining, and for Francis Whitman (Owen Wilson, The Darjeeling Limited), his denial underplays his deep depression. It’s only us as the voyeur who, denying the outside world for 90 minutes, can, from our perspective, see the false front these characters are putting up.

One of Wes Anderson’s early and most charismatic collaborators, Owen Wilson has taken on the burden of this character trait in several films. He plays the above-mentioned Francis Whitman, eldest brother of the Whitman clan attempting to repair his fractured family. He pops in splendidly as envious, addict writer,  Eli Cash (The Royal Tenenbaums). He plays an ocean enthusiast and potential son of Steve Zissou (Bill Murray), Ned Plimpton (The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou). Lately he’s shown up as a writer about town Herbsaint Sazerac (The French Dispatch). Yet, there’s no more indelible and emblematic character of denial than Dignan (Bottle Rocket).

Dignan makes plans. He has tremendously big dreams for himself and his best friend Anthony (Luke Wilson). Most of the plans involve the two of them becoming career criminals, constantly on the run with only each other to rely on. It’s obvious how much Dignan has missed Anthony while he’s been voluntarily institutionalized. It also becomes obvious that Anthony is only humoring Dignan, a fact Dignan does everything in his power to ignore. Dignan doesn’t want to admit he’s in mourning for the loss of the one person who never tried to be a force against him.

It’s obvious that Dignan isn’t for everyone. He’s got a short fuse, a lot of energy, and he has a need to be in charge of the situation. Anthony accepts him for who he is, he believes in Dignan’s lack of cynicism, and his drive to accomplish something. Yet, for all of that, Anthony has changed. He’s gotten a new perspective on himself and it’s forcing Dignan to confront aspects of his personality he’s simply not ready to confront. Dignan longs for the relationship he had with Anthony before Anthony went away. He longs for it so much that he denies that any time has lapsed. He shoves himself, dragging Anthony along with him, into his grand scheme, which culminates in the finalization of his 75 year plan. Until the big heist falls apart around them, Dignan believes wholly in his resolve that this is the only way to keep Anthony by his side, he is fully committed to his state of denial.

On the opposite end of Dignan is Lucinda Krementz (Frances McDormand, The French Dispatch). She is in denial of her denial. An argument could be made that she’s depressed. Most writers are. Yet, Krementz’ grief comes not from a loss of self or a loss of a loved one, but the loss of independence. People in her life seem to think she lacks. They think that her pursuit of truth and exploration of the human condition means she has a void to fill. It’s plain that when necessary and wanted, Krementz will find a way to fill her void as per her dalliance with young revolutionary Zeffirelli (Timothée Chalamet). What she’s in denial of is that she does need to be seen and seen as a person.

Krementz is perfectly comfortable telling the truth. She tells Zefirelli she never lies. Though, in telling the truth she puts up barriers, pushing people away because they’re uninterested in her perspective. In one of Anderson’s many beautiful scenes of characters looking deeply into mirrors, Krementz dabs at the run of mascara beneath her eye. She played the tear off as a symptom of the tear gas seeping in through the window. She denies her friends the opportunity to pity her. Krementz doesn’t want them to know she has needs outside of her work because that would admit that she has something outside of her work. 

It’s evidenced again as she noticeably cringes Juliette and Zefirelli’s heated argument about her. Against her better judgment and because she can’t admit she just wants Zefirelli to want her, she sends the two of them off to break the palpable tension between them. In so doing she denies herself a companion who satisfied her intellectual itch. It’s fitting that the final scene of her story is in her minimalist office, her typing, editor Arthur Howitzer, Jr. (Bill Murray) comes in for her copy, and rather than say anything, she points. She has pushed up her walls again in grief over loss because if she denies the sympathy of Howitzer, Zefirelli will be immortalized by her words. Zefirelli, not a grand love, but a companion and thrilling subject can still exist as she continues to write.

If Krementz seethes in quiet denial, Monsieur Gustave H. (Ralph Fiennes, The Grand Budapest Hotel) basks in the pompous brightness of his denial. He is grieving for a world that he has only ever been a tourist to. Like men with his modicum of power over other people, but still in a lowly and servile role, Gustave believes he holds a high place in society, that he’s respected by those with wealth and influence. They certainly need him in the moment, but if it weren’t him, they would have someone else. He is replaceable with little loss to the quality of life. It’s represented by the fascist Zig Zags placing the hilariously named Monsieur Chuck (Owen Wilson) effectively and efficiently in the role. The world is moving on from men like Gustave.

It’s when Gustave finally reaches the station he’s always dreamed of that his denial becomes absolute and leads to his downfall. If he could have learned from his experience, if he could have looked forward, left it all behind, he could have survived. He wants to live the life he’s only watched, though. He wants to be able to throw his weight around. It quite literally hits him in the face. His insistence on this world, this microcosm, of cultured elite blinds him to every truth in front of his face. He’s astute about many things, aware of many others, but this massive cataract of denial about the larger world is his fatal flaw.

Those Andersonian figures that live in denial are sometimes his happiest characters. In the case of Krementz, content is a more applicable word. They have raised their walls, put their blinders on, and speed ever more toward their own goals and aspirations. In some ways they’ll never reach the other stages of grief. In others, they live them all simultaneously, shifting the other pieces of their psyche to the back of their minds in order to see the world as it makes sense to them. Denial is a fable, it’s a world where things will always be put into place. There is a symmetry to it all. All of Anderson’s films fit well as fables as they’re all heightened versions of our reality, letting us ignore the imperfections of the world outside for a glimpse at something that’s so beautifully constructed as all his characters wish their lives could really be.

Movie Review (Locarno 2023): ‘Anatomy of a Fall’ Toys with Legal Tropes


Director: Justine Triet
Writers: Arthur Harari and Justine Triet
Stars: Sandra Hüller, Swann Arlaud, Milo Machado Graner

Synopsis: A woman is suspected of her husband’s murder, and their blind son faces a moral dilemma as the sole witness.


With her fourth feature film, the Palme d’Or-winning Anatomy of a Fall (Anatomie d’une chute), French filmmaker Justine Triet delivers an intelligent and engrossing courtroom drama that uses the tropes contained within these types of films to dissect the fragility in our bonds and the effects (and vulnerability) of manipulation. And it is all hoisted on the back of Triet’s piercing, yet delicate, pen and Sandra Hüller’s remarkable performance.

Throughout the last couple of years in her young (and blooming) career, French Filmmaker Justine Triet has made a name for herself, with each feature showing a new array of skills and delicate playfulness in her directorial approach. She has presented to us a breezy romcom with In Bed With Victoria – her most straightforward work) – as well as Sibyl, an understated dramedy that contains erotic-thriller trappings via a love triangle, both of which coincidentally stars the international “it girl” Virginie Efira. If you look at her filmography, you quickly see the changes she has made to her craft, each time taking more risks. However, none of us were prepared to see her most significant transformation to date with her fourth picture, Anatomy of a Fall – a courtroom drama lifted by its smart screenplay and even savvier lead performance.

The international title of this film refers back to one of the most recognized courtroom dramas in the history of cinema, Anatomy of a Murder, as well as the aftermath of the central narrative kickstarter of a deadly fall. But its references toward the aforementioned film end there; it adjusts the tropes that come with these types of films to deliver a dissection of not only the death that leads to the trial but also how fragility and manipulation get a hold over a person in this situation, in which loss blinds and people try to mend the truth for their convenience. This leads to Triet delivering her best (by a mile wide) and most emotionally gripping work. Of course, courtroom dramas are often forged to be gripping. But Triet doesn’t construct Anatomy of a Fall in the manner we anticipate, without the crowd-pleasing moments and the back-and-forth of people who want to reveal the most secrets. 

She does so with a sense of delicateness in her pen and humanism in her lens; it’s carefully thought out and more controlled than most recent examples of these movies. Anatomy of a Fall opens with an interview between a writer, Sandra (Hüller),  and a student (Camille Rutherford) asking questions for her thesis. This interaction, set in Sandra’s remote Alpine home in the “middle of nowhere” (which is also being fixed as an Airbnb) has plenty of flirtatious undertones. And Sandra doesn’t mind, even with the double-entendres. She likes the lighthearted attention the pupil is giving her, hence her overzealous question: “What Do You Want to Know?”. Sandra is flattered by it all. What this inconsequential and short scene does is provide a quick glimpse into who Sandra is and how Hüller plays her with such believable raw emotions. This can also be accredited to Triet’s talent as a screenwriter. 

One of her many gifts is revealing her characters’ personalities in an unhurried and airy fashion so that we can be drawn to them. This was present in Triet’s previous features, as well. Still, her latest work is even better executed, more evident, and precise, making every story beat – and dialogue sequence that comes in between – get the most out of the human characteristics. Sandra lives with her husband Samuel (Samuel Theis) and their son Daniel (Milo Machado Graneral), who’s almost completely blind because of an accident at his father’s company. Sandra and Samuel’s dynamic is quite tricky; while the former is prosperous in her writing, the latter is a struggling (and depressed) teacher who blames his wife for botching his own writing success. She’s entirely put off by her husband’s self-loathing, the two often fighting about the shameless emotional antics that Samuel goes through. There’s also a bit of resentment coming from Samuel, as he states that Sandra has plagiarized some of his ideas for her own books.

Of course, there’s an understanding between the two regarding emotional stability. But Sandra is still bothered by his doubts. After this series of introductory events that gives us our first look at this family’s dynamics, Samuel’s dead body is discovered in the snow with a pile of blood beneath his head. And nobody knows what exactly happened, whether he was pushed or jumped from the roof onto his untimely death. This is where the film’s interview-like procedure begins. Over the next two-and-a-half hours, Justine Triet pulls us into the schematics of a trial. She doesn’t put the entirety of her focus on the facts in the case itself. Instead, Triet wants to pick apart the main suspect, Sandra, and demonstrate what lies beneath her fractured relationship with her now-passed husband and the possibilities of what could have happened to him. 

You fill in the many gaps in Sandra and her relationship with her son and husband. The lawyer’s questioning explores the good and bad terms of their respective relationships. A question leads to an answer told in the form of a flashback or a recent memory of hers that’s being fiddled with because of the conservatory manipulation. That’s why when Triet withholds information, it isn’t just for the sake of being ambiguous; she holds on to it so that later on, those crucial details garner a more piercing impact on the viewer, often making you think about the characters’ moralities and what’s going through their head as it unravels. One thing that stands out from this specific courtroom drama is that you are so engaged in the dynamics between these characters, particularly the development (and deterioration) of Sandra and Samuel’s marriage, that one doesn’t really care about whether or not she is guilty – the regret and shame come from what happened in the past rather than the trial itself. 

The brilliance behind this time-meddling structure between the past (glimpses of her marriage) and present (the trial) delivers a heavy exposure to the effects of manipulation, primarily to an unknowledgeable court – who’s being influenced by newly shaped words that create new (and false) truths. All of this may seem like it is quite simplistic surface-wise – on paper, feeling like one of the many. However, as the trial goes on, Triet pulls out a fascinating array of web-like deconstructions of family and interpersonal dynamics. It doesn’t contain itself within the confines of what we know of courtroom dramas; Triet chooses to expand her vision by crossing genres – intertwining heartbreak and comedy occasionally – and emotions, in addition to the surprises that arise as Anatomy of a Fall runs its course, albeit not in the sense of traditional dramatic reversals commonly seen in these types of pictures. 

Apart from Justine Triet’s ever-evolving talents as a filmmaker, the film equally relies on Sandra Hüller and her reserved, direct, yet calm performance. The movie grows alongside her acting abilities, consistently presenting a solid force of dramatic sustainability. Her work here doesn’t serve as an anchor that holds the film steady. But it is pretty difficult seeing how Anatomy of a Fall would have worked with another actor, as the role demands plenty. And Hüller makes the best of it without the regular over-emotional and way too whipsmart antics, relying on a more grounded tenor for her portrayal. When you see Triet’s past work, you could have never guessed she had this in her, developing a more mature directorial vision for her genre-crossing pen. Indeed, we will have to wait and see if she continues on this path of directing methodical pictures that play with the tropes of a fairly-used subgenre in narrative cinema.

Grade: B+

Movie Review: ‘Shortcomings’ is a Flawed and Understated Step in the Right Direction


Director: Randall Park
Writer: Adrian Tomine
Stars: Justin H. Min, Sherry Cola, Ally Maki

Synopsis: Follows a trio of young, Bay Area urbanites–Ben Tanaka, Miko Hayashi and Alice Kim–as they navigate a range of interpersonal relationships while traversing the country in search of the ideal connection.


With heavy hitters such as Barbie and Oppenheimer dominating the box office this summer, independent film releases worthy of attention can go unnoticed. That’s where the must-see rom-com Shortcomings comes into the mix, and though it’s not the most gripping film of the year, it’s undoubtedly one of the most authentic.

Based on the 2007 graphic novel of the same name by Adrian Tomine and with a directorial debut from Randall Park, Shortcomings explores love, identity, and growth. At the film’s beginning, we are introduced to Ben (Justin H. Min), an outspoken, self-centered film-loving jerk who manages a local movie theater and spends his free time watching Criterion Collection classics.

In fact, when it comes to his adoration for film, he’s a bit of a snob. After he and his long-term girlfriend, Miko (Ally Maki), attend a film festival, the pair have opposing views on the Crazy Rich Asians parody film that premiers at the event. As the couple is Asian American, Mika feels liberated by the on-screen representation and believes it’s a step in the right direction for future Asian American filmmakers.

On the other hand, Ben argues that the rom-com is uninspiring and generic, proclaiming that he would feel more represented if future filmmakers created something unique. The couple also seems to disagree a lot regarding their views, not to mention Ben’s attraction to white women and his desire to pursue a romantic connection with one whenever the opportunity arises.

There’s no getting away from the fact that Ben isn’t a very likable guy. He’s selfish, hypocritical, and insulting. Still, his comedic one-liners, ignorance, and lack of self-awareness provide copious amounts of entertainment, especially regarding his awkward dating experiences. Min transitions through Ben’s undesirable character traits flawlessly, and effortlessly flips the script, and executes humor and charisma when the moments call for it, reflecting his range as an actor.

Ben is at his most animated when spending time with his lesbian best friend Alice (Sherry Cola), who challenges his ideals and isn’t afraid to give him a piece of her mind. The dynamic works as the pair are outspoken, brutally honest with one another, and have an unspoken understanding. Alice represents that one friend we all need in life. We might feel a bit put out when they disagree with our life choices; but at the same time, they provide logical and valid advice that we need to hear.

Cola is having quite the year since starring in the risqué comedy Joy Ride, and her performance in Shortcomings doesn’t disappoint. Her moments on-screen are as charming as they are endearing, and I look forward to her future work. She and Min do a fantastic job of depicting two close friends with a genuine connection, and their back-and-forth banter gives audiences some of the feature’s most authentic moments. Ben is by no means pleasant, but we see glimpses of his softer side when he temporarily adopts the fictional title of Alice’s boyfriend, as she’s yet to disclose her sexual orientation to her family and fears how they will react to the news.

Miko’s relationship with Ben is relatable and something we are all likely to have experienced at some point in our lives. She delays an inevitable breakup, hoping the pair can overcome their challenges, as she hopes for change, yet it never arrives. On the other hand, Ben likes having his cake and eating it too. He stays in the relationship while being open to other romantic partners he views as preferable.

Min and Maki perfectly portray a relationship past its sell-by date that both parties hold onto due to comfort and fear of change, and their scenes alongside one another adequately capture the complexities of love. It would have been nice to see more of Maki’s personality throughout the film, as most of her scenes are disputes with Ben. Still, given that he’s the main character study of the story, most of which centers around their breakup, it’s understandable why she may have taken a back seat.

What I really admire about Shortcomings is its realness and simplistic “life happens” approach to storytelling. Though the film has little emotional depth and veers on the more lighthearted side, it addresses challenges people face in their everyday lives and plays out as a coming-of-age story for adults that you want to stick around until the end for.

The characters are flawed, but their journeys are a learning curve and help them become better people. Ben may not have the most groundbreaking conclusion, but, by the end, his experiences encourage him to look within and embrace growth. The story’s moral is that the grass isn’t always greener, and you should appreciate what you have because sometimes, once it’s gone, you can never get it back again.

Grade: C+

Chasing the Gold: Barbenheimer

Two of the year’s biggest hits, Barbie and Oppenheimer, were finally released on July 21, and both films have received significant Oscar buzz in the days since. They are likely to do well at next year’s Academy Awards ceremony, including in the top eight categories. Barbie has a good shot at getting into Best Adapted Screenplay for Greta Gerwig and Noah Baumbach, along with Best Picture. Oppenheimer will probably perform even better, with nominations predicted for Best Adapted Screenplay and Best Director for Christopher Nolan as well as Best Picture.

But what about the acting categories? Does anyone in the Barbie cast have a chance at hearing their names called on Oscar nominations morning? And despite Heath Ledger being the only actor in a Christopher Nolan movie to ever manage an Oscar nomination (and win) for The Dark Knight, might some of the talent from Oppenheimer receive acting Oscar nods? Here are the five actors from the two movies who can do it…

1. Robert Downey Jr., Best Supporting Actor for Oppenheimer

The most surefire contender from the two films is Robert Downey, Jr., who gives one of the best performances of his career as Lewis Strauss, the government official who did not see eye-to-eye with Robert Oppenheimer. His character goes through a fascinating arc, cool and confident in his earlier scenes, and losing his patience to dramatic effect in the third act. A moment near the end when his character goes berserk in an angry rant is particularly memorable. The character allowed Downey Jr. to flex his acting chops in a way he hasn’t done in years, and with two Oscar nominations behind him—for Chaplin in 1993 and Tropic Thunder in 2009—look for Downey, Jr. to enter the Best Supporting Actor Oscar race as the presumed frontrunner in early 2024. 

2. Ryan Gosling, Best Supporting Actor for Barbie 

It is extremely difficult to make it into the acting categories at the Academy Awards for a comedic performance, but Gosling’s hilarious, high-spirited turn as Ken in Greta Gerwig’s film is too much of a delight to pass up. If his character was only allowed to act silly and idiotic, he wouldn’t necessarily be a contender, but Gerwig takes Ken into unexpected directions, including giving him a long segment of the movie to sing his heart out and build more complexity into the character. Gosling already having two Oscar nominations behind him doesn’t hurt either—for Half Nelson in 2007 and La La Land in 2017. With Barbie’s massive popularity, the Academy is going to want to reward at least one of the cast members with a nomination, and the same way Melissa McCarthy was deemed worthy of an Oscar nod for Bridesmaids in 2012, Gosling will make the final cut next year for Best Supporting Actor.  

3. Cillian Murphy, Best Actor for Oppenheimer

Murphy not making it in for his impressive lead performance in Oppenheimer would be one of the craziest snubs in recent years. Nolan’s epic rests on his shoulders, Murphy in almost every scene of the three-hour running time. He has never been nominated before, which could put doubt in people’s minds, but he’s never had a juicy role like Robert Oppenheimer to sink his teeth into and show what he’s made of as an actor. It’s not a colorful performance the way Ken is in Barbie, and Murphy isn’t given a ton of showy moments the way Robert Downey, Jr. is in Oppenheimer’s third act. However, Murphy is essentially the entire movie, and given Oppenheimer’s behemoth box office and massive critical acclaim, you can bet on a Best Actor nod for Cillian Murphy. 

4. Margot Robbie, Best Actress for Barbie

If Greta Gerwig’s warmly embraced film can get into Best Supporting Actor, Best Adapted Screenplay, and Best Picture, is it possible the star of the film gets left off the Best Actress list? Unlike Cillian Murphy, who is almost guaranteed a Best Actor nod for Oppenheimer, Robbie’s best shot at getting into Best Actress for Barbie comes down to how competitive the category will be next year. It’s difficult for comedic performances to get into the supporting acting categories, and it’s nearly impossible for them to make it into Lead Actor or Lead Actress. Her character goes to some moving and dramatic places in the second half, which should help Robbie’s chances, as will her two previous Oscar nominations for I, Tonya in 2018 and Bombshell in 2020. Whatever happens, Robbie is likely to get at least one Academy Award nod for Barbie—even if she doesn’t make it into Best Actress, a producing nod is likely for Best Picture.  

5. Emily Blunt, Best Supporting Actress for Oppenheimer

The immensely talented Emily Blunt has done great work in films like The Devil Wears Prada, Sicario, and A Quiet Place, and yet she still has never received an Oscar nomination. Will 2024 finally be the year Blunt receives some much overdue recognition from the Academy? Although she doesn’t have a big role in Oppenheimer as Robert’s wife Kitty, many of her scenes in the film’s first half being brief and with little dramatic power, she’s given a few excellent moments in the second half. Her back-and-forth with Murphy show frustration and longing, and her riveting interrogation room scene near the film’s conclusion might be enough for Blunt to find herself with her first Academy Award nomination.

The only other person I could see being a potential spoiler in the acting Oscar categories is America Ferrera in Barbie for Best Supporting Actress. Her one beautifully delivered monologue she delivers about the frustrations of being a woman could be her ticket to a surprise Oscar nomination if the category isn’t super competitive. Overall, look for both Barbie and Oppenheimer to show up on Oscar nominations morning in the acting categories. The race in Best Supporting Actor between Robert Downey Jr. and Ryan Gosling is especially going to be a fun one!