Director: Gareth Edwards
Writers: Max Borenstein (screenplay), Dave Callaham (story)
Stars: Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Elizabeth Olsen, Bryan Cranston, Ken Watanabe

Synopsis: The world’s most famous monster is pitted against malevolent creatures who, bolstered by humanity’s scientific arrogance, threaten our very existence.

[/info]

DIRECTION
Coming of the heels of Monsters in 2010, Gareth Edwards looked to show that his small sci-fi film wasn’t a fluke, and boy, did he deliver with Godzilla. The opening credits sequence immediately sets the tone, helped by Alexandre Desplat’s brooding score, and throws us into a wonderfully crafted exposition that never slows down. Edwards’ camera work was impeccable, fluid and moving with intense purpose. The pacing was solid, especially when it came to showing us the monsters (no pun intended) of the film. Every time we see Godzilla, it’s incredibly purposeful and perfectly timed, which ultimately just makes you lust to see more of him. Much like Pacific Rim, all of the action sequences take place at night and either in the rain or clouded in smoke and debris, however that only adds to intensity of the film (much how I felt about Pac Rim too). The fight sequences at the end between Godzilla and the monster creatures are amazing, a ton of fun, and riveting the entire time. The execution was flawless. Everything from the dangerous aesthetic, to the riveting creature design, to the robust score, Edwards showcases his skills on a high level and that he’s a director to look out for.

Grade: A+

[divider]

SCRIPT
The films starts with an amazing opening credits sequence, showcasing 1940’s/50’s footage of nuclear explosions and a newly discovered water creature that forces the creation of new government organizations to help keep this under wraps. Fast forward to 1999, Dr. Ichiro Serizawa (Ken Watanabe), who is the head of a secret group who is tasked with studying these creature’s, has found a preserved skeleton of a creature similar to the one they found in 1954. However, they find a few things that make you go “uh oh” and now things are really setting in motion. We are then introduced to Joe Brody (Bryan Cranston), a seismologist who is working in Japan at a nuclear facility and notices a pattern that doesn’t seem to say earthquake, yet nobody seems to really know what it is. After a series of events, we fast forward another 15 years (to present time), where Brody’s son Ford (Taylor-Johnson) is on leave from the Navy and heads home to see his wife (Olsen) and son. After a short time at home, Ford is forced to go to Japan to help his father, who has calculated a conspiracy theory regarding the nuclear facility. While we see a strain in their relationship, the two of them find themselves trying to find the truth when they are arrested by Serizawa’s group. From there, chaos ensues. A monster escapes, people are killed and panic seems to be consensus. The U.S. government and NATO are now taking control over efforts to contain the situation. From here, it’s a cat and mouse game of trying to take down these creatures, while Godzilla seems to have a similar notion when he faces up against them. The insertion of these creatures, who feed off of nuclear radiation, felt natural and real, while many of the human characters felt lost and confused. Outside of the Cranston arch, much of the human story isn’t that compelling but it doesn’t matter, when Godzilla shows up, it’s amazing.

Grade: A-
[divider]

RELATED: Locke Movie Review

[divider]

PERFORMANCES
Bryan Cranston is amazing and is easily the strongest one here. His character has a lot of passion, is heartbroken and feels compelled to find the truth no matter the cost and Cranston showcases that well. In the end, I just wanted more of him. Aaron Taylor-Johnson is an actor I like, but he’s incredibly flat in this role and didn’t seem very inspired. He seemed lost and not quite sure where to take his character. As a side effect, the relationship between him and Elizabeth Olsen suffers. It’s hard to invest in their relationship, as well as the father-son relationship between Taylor Johnson and Cranston’s characters. As the main lead in the second and third acts, Taylor-Johnson is mundane and average at best, which is disappointing coming from him. Olsen is okay but is mostly wasted as we only see her in a few scenes here and there. Ken Watanabe is another great actor, but he’s in unintentionally humorous with his confused look throughout the film. It’s as if his whole time investigating these creatures, he couldn’t believe they were real, which came off kind of funny. As much criticism as Pacific Rim received for it’s acting, outside of Cranston, the acting here isn’t any better. The best performance of this film, far and away, are the two monster creatures and Godzilla. Every time they are on screen, you are on the edge of your seat.

Grade: B+

[divider]

SCORE
This feels like a strange film for Alexandre Desplat to score, but his music here was fantastic. It’s harrowing at times, intense and is more than serviceable. Desplat uses a nice layer from the original Godzilla in his main theme, which was a nice touch as well as nostalgic. Most of the music isn’t very catchy and it’s not a score you’ll listen to much outside of the film, but for the movies’ sake, it’s great.

Grade: A-

[divider]

FINAL THOUGHTS
One of my major concerns going in to this film, was going to be the crystallization of it. Planes, tanks and guns were not going to do it after watching Pacific Rim last year. And honestly, three-fourths of the way through, I started to think to myself “to defeat the monsters, we had to create monsters of our own.” However, the turn Edwards and his team makes and the fight that ensues at the end more than makes up for the absence of Gypsy Danger. It was incredible. Godzilla isn’t a perfect film by any means, but it takes aspects of what we know about Godzilla and pieced it together in a way that felt real, intense and big. Go see this film.

Overall Grade: A-

Director: Steven Knight
Writers: Steven Knight (screenplay)
Stars: Tom Hardy, Olivia Colman, Ruth Wilson, Andrew Scott

Synopsis: Ivan Locke, a dedicated family man and successful construction manager, receives a phone call on the eve of the biggest challenge of his career that sets in motion a series of events that threaten his careful cultivated existence.

[/info]

INTRO
Steven Knight’s Locke is an intriguing film, but more importantly, it carries a weight that hopefully people don’t just pass over.

DIRECTION
Knight has some solid camera work that is fluid and always moving, much like the pace and the film’s vehicle. As the entire film takes place in one location, the SUV that Ivan Locke is driving, Knight uses some creative techniques that keeps the film fresh and compelling. Knight beautifully drifts through the English night utilizing the highway’s natural lights and sounds, that is genuine to the location and makes you believe you’re in the car with Ivan. The pacing is executed well with perfectly timed comedic bits that don’t come out often, but when they do, it’s right on the money. In a film like this, there is potential for the film to become stale, but there’s not much redundancy and every action has purpose behind it.

Grade: A

[divider]

SCRIPT
How many times have we seen films like The Wolf of Wall Street that glorify bad people doing bad things? Probably too many to count. The importance of the film cannot be stated enough. Instead of witnessing another Dom Hemingway, we instead are thrown into the world of Ivan Locke, a concrete foreman, who is driving to London for a reason he wish he didn’t have to. Ivan is a good man. He’s married with two kids and has a job where he is highly respected and everyone loves him. However, we find out through many phone calls that Ivan, like all people, makes mistakes. And unfortunately for him, this mistake is leading to the birth of a child from a woman he hardly knows. What separates Ivan from most characters we see in film, and a lot of people in real life too, is the fact that he is aware of his circumstances and risks everything to do the right thing. He isn’t going to run away from his hardship, but rather man up and face the consequences of his action, even if that means losing everything. Meaning, he is the polar opposite of Jordan Belfort. There are several soliloquies throughout the film where Ivan deals with his past hurts, which are not going to define him. Those moments hit hard, especially right after where his sons call him to discuss the drama, where he is undone. The drama that unfolds is gripping, heartbreaking and ultimately something that will stay with me all year long. It’s about time we see a character who has character and is the example we should all strive for, especially when dealing with our own inner turmoil.

Grade: A+
[divider]

RELATED: Neighbors Movie Review

[divider]

PERFORMANCES
Tom Hardy is incredible in what is easily one of his best performances. He sells the nice guy really well and as things crumble around him, we see him fight that turmoil that feels authentic and potent. Every interaction he has is via the phone and Hardy’s awareness of the situation was impeccable. He’s absolutely compelling from beginning to end. Olivia Colman and Ruth Wilson are serviceable as voices for the wife and pregnant woman, but it’s Andrew Scott who steals the show at times with is amazingly well-time comedic bits. All in all, fantastic work here.

Grade: A

[divider]

SCORE
Dickon Hinchliffe has been remarkably consistent while being mostly under the radar. His score here is subtle but fluid and has the perfect tone of the film. You won’t notice it much but when it’s gone, you feel it. It fills the space so nicely and added the right amount of drama that lifted Hardy and the elements happening around him.

Grade: B+

[divider]

FINAL THOUGHTS
There are not enough Ivan Locke’s in the world. Sure the guy made a terrible mistake, but we all do. The difference is that a lot of us aren’t willing to deal with the consequences and it says a lot about a man, that is willing to risk it all to do the right thing. A lot of the time, when we see these kinds of themes, it’s in our superheroes. This, however, is grounded in reality and feels very real. Women may view things a bit differently, as they are mostly hurt victims here (and who can blame them?), but the themes of struggle and how to fight through them is incredible. By year’s end, this will still be one of the more important films we see all year.

Overall Grade: A